Invisible Man, The (1933)

Invisible Man, The (1933)

“He’s meddled in things men should leave alone.”

Synopsis:
A scientist (Claude Rains) who has discovered the secret to invisibility slowly goes mad from effects of the drug; soon he’s on a wild killing rampage, with dreams of taking over the world.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Black Comedy
  • Claude Rains Films
  • H.G. Wells Films
  • Horror
  • James Whale Films
  • Mad Doctors and Scientists

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “splendid adaptation of H.G. Wells’s novel” — which “begins humorously, [then] becomes scary” — possesses truly impressive special effects by John P. Fulton: the first time Rains unwinds the bandages from his invisible head, even savvy modern audiences will find it hard not to jump. Although he’s not visible until the final 1/2 minute of the film, Rains (who Peary nominates for an Alternate Oscar as best actor of the year) makes a memorable screen debut as the titular anti-hero, who flits around causing havoc and deriving enormous delight from flaunting his newfound powers. The excellent script by R.C. Sheriff and Philip Wylie — part sci-fi, part black comedy, part thriller — keeps us in continual suspense, and makes us cringe at Rains’ psychopathic behavior (he wantonly tips a baby carriage over, and causes a train to derail “just for kicks”). The most surreal moment in the film has to be when Rains — wearing just a stolen pair of pants — skips down a lane, singing “Here we go gathering nuts in May…” — there’s never been another cinematic villain quite like him.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Claude Rains in his screen debut as the Invisible Man
  • Una O’Connor as the hysterical innkeeper who insists that Rains must leave
  • John P. Fulton’s impressive special effects
  • Good use of extreme angles
  • A fine sense of black humor: “We’ll begin with a reign of terror. A few murders here and there. Murders of great men, murders of small men, just to make sure we make no distinction.”

Must See?
Yes. Due primarily to its nifty special effects, this is considered a genuine classic of early horror.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic

Links:

Harvey (1950)

Harvey (1950)

“I’ve wrestled with reality for 35 years, doctor, and I’m happy to state I finally won out over it.”

Synopsis:
Noncomformist Elwood P. Dowd (Jimmy Stewart) spends his days drinking in bars and chatting with his invisible rabbit friend, Harvey. When Elwood’s sister (Josephine Hull) becomes convinced that his quirky behavior is preventing her grown daughter (Victoria Horne) from finding a suitable husband, she takes him to Chumley’s Rest Home, where a well-meaning young doctor (Charles Drake) targets her as the delusional one instead; meanwhile, Elwood befriends the asylum’s founder (Cecil Kellaway), who soon believes that Harvey is real.

Genres:

  • Cecil Kellaway Films
  • Comedy
  • Friendship
  • Jimmy Stewart Films
  • Mental Illness
  • Nonconformists
  • Play Adaptation

Review:
Mary Chase’s Pulitzer Prize-winning play was an enormous hit with post-war audiences, opening in 1944 and running for 5 years before finally closing and re-emerging as a feature film. It’s an unusual, whimsical fable which poses the enduring philosophical question of who’s really crazy in this world — those who live life peacefully while talking to an imaginary 6’3″ rabbit, or those who care more about social status than inner happiness? Because Elwood is ultimately not the only person who “sees” Harvey, it’s difficult to know just what to make of him; he should perhaps be viewed as simply a fantastic reminder that attitude is the essential key to happiness. Elwood, for instance, likes to invite anyone and everyone he meets to “come have a drink” with him, and this open-minded acceptance of all humans — rich (the asylum owner’s wife) or poor (the asylum’s gate-keeper) — is a poignant, important lesson.

With that said, despite its cult status, I don’t find Harvey all that compelling as a film; considering that it’s a comedy, there aren’t nearly enough laugh-out-loud moments or lines. The central dilemma of whether or not Elwood will get committed to Chumley’s is self-evident (how can we not know the outcome ahead of time?); and the unrequited “love affair” between stodgy Dr. Sanderson (Charles Drake) and loopy Nurse Kelly (Peggy Dow) — which supplements the central story — is amusing but ultimately beside the point. It’s the performers rather than the story who make Harvey worth watching: Jimmy Stewart — who lobbied for the role, and reprised it again years later — is perfectly cast as the nonconforming, good-natured Elwood; Josephine Hull, who won an Oscar playing Elwood’s frantic sister, is appropriately ditzy (though I prefer her more subdued performance in Frank Capra’s Arsenic and Old Lace, where she’s the “crazy” one); and the remaining supporting actors — particularly Dow, Kelloway, and Horne — are all fun to watch.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Jimmy Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
  • Josephine Hull as Veta Louise
  • Peggy Dow as pining Nurse Kelly
  • Cecil Kellaway as “Harvey convert” Dr. Chumley
  • An intriguing premise for a comedic fantasy

Must See?
Yes, for its status as an Oscar-nominated crowd pleaser. Listed as a cult movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Unsuspected, The (1947)

Unsuspected, The (1947)

“His day of reckoning must come. He is tormented by fear that someday he will make one false move, one slip that will betray him, and when he does, the lightning of justice will strike… the unsuspected.”

Synopsis:
When the assistant (Barbara Woodell) of suave radio host Victor Grandison (Claude Rains) is murdered, a mysterious man (Michael North) appears on his doorstep, claiming to be the short-lived husband of Grandison’s wealthy young ward (Joan Caulfield); a web of lies, greed, and deceit is soon revealed.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Amateur Sleuths
  • Amnesia
  • Audrey Totter Films
  • Claude Rains Films
  • Constance Bennett Films
  • Hurd Hatfield Films
  • Michael Curtiz Films
  • Murder Mystery

Response to Peary’s Review:
While acknowledging its shortcomings, Peary seems to be an enormous fan of this atmospheric murder mystery, referring to it as a “really exceptional noir melodrama”. Unfortunately, The Unsuspected — based on a novella by Charlotte Armstrong — is prevented from being a true classic due to its highly convoluted plot, which only begins to make sense more than halfway through (as Peary notes, the “plot has clever twists, but there are so many of them that it becomes confusing”). At the same time, it possesses “sharp” dialogue, a “spooky, tense atmosphere” (Michael Curtiz’s direction is memorable), and “interesting characterizations” by everyone except “the miscast North” (and, I think, the beautiful but bland Caulfield). Rains’s performance is particularly noteworthy — despite learning his “secret” early on, we continue to watch his character with fascination, especially as he expertly uses technology to further his goals.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Claude Rains as Victor Grandison
  • Constance Bennett as Grandison’s wisecracking assistant: “You’re as limp as an old girdle.”
  • Audrey Totter as Grandison’s scheming niece
  • The highly atmospheric opening murder
  • Director Michael Curtiz’s innovative camerawork and direction
  • Woody Bredell’s noirish cinematography

Must See?
Yes, simply for Rains’ performance.

Categories

  • Important Director
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Deception (1946)

Deception (1946)

[Note: The following review is of a non-Guide for the Film Fanatic title; click here to read more.]

“Sooner or later you’ll come back to your old teacher. You’ll realize that nothing matters except music; everything passes, except music — and me.”

Synopsis:
Aspiring pianist Christine Radcliffe (Bette Davis) — who believes her fiance Karel (Paul Henreid) has died in the war — is thrilled to find him performing in a cello concert in New York. Soon the two are married, but trouble arises when Davis’s wealthy mentor — composer Alexander Hollenius (Claude Rains) — learns about his protegee’s romantic “betrayal”.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bette Davis Films
  • Claude Rains Films
  • Composers
  • Irving Rapper Films
  • Jealousy
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicians
  • Play Adaptation

Review:
Based on Louis Verneuil’s 1928 play Jealousy, this atmospheric melodrama (directed by Irving Rapper) received negative reviews upon its release, and is generally considered to be merely an “operatic rehash” of its source material — an assessment which doesn’t do this enjoyable film justice. The three leads (who starred together in Rapper’s earlier Now, Voyager) are all wonderful, with Bette Davis perfectly cast as the duplicitous yet well-meaning Christine, and Paul Heinreid appropriately handsome and moody as Karel. Yet it’s third-billed Claude Rains who most impresses: his portrayal of the egomaniacal Hollenius contains intriguing hints of closeted homosexuality, making his obsessive “love” for Christine seem more like a desire for control than a manifestation of lust or romance. Indeed, music itself is the true love interest in this sticky triangle, with murder eventually committed in its name; and while the film’s violent denouement seems to come out of nowhere, it’s fairly easy to forgive this melodramatic plot device considering the clever script that’s come before.

P.S. Interestingly (but perhaps not surprisingly), Christine’s own musical ambitions are dropped as soon as Heinreid appears on the scene; she’s relegated to performing for guests at her own wedding celebration.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Claude Rains as Hollenius
  • Bette Davis as Christine
  • Paul Henreid as Karel
  • John Abbott in a bit role as a cellist
  • Atmospheric settings and backdrops
  • Hollenius taking his sweet time ordering a fancy dinner at a restaurant
  • Clever dialogue: “Extraordinary, isn’t it, that music can exist in the same world as the basest treachery and ingratitude?”
  • Erich Korngold’s score

Must See?
Yes, simply for Rains’s performance.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Great Lie, The (1941)

Great Lie, The (1941)

“If I didn’t think you meant so well, I’d feel like slapping your face.”

Synopsis:
When pilot Pete Van Allen (George Brent) learns that his whirlwind marriage to temperamental pianist Sandra Kovak (Mary Astor) isn’t legal, he visits his former flame Maggie (Bette Davis) and realizes he wants to marry her instead. Pete’s plane is soon lost in the jungles of Brazil, and when Maggie learns that Sandra is pregnant with Pete’s child, she convinces Sandra to let Maggie raise the baby as a memento of her dead husband, in exchange for monetary renumeration. Things become more complicated, however, when it turns out Pete is still alive…

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bette Davis Films
  • Edmund Goulding Films
  • George Brent Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Mary Astor Films
  • Pregnancy
  • Rivalry

Review:
This melodramatic “women’s flick” is primarily notable for the juicy interplay between its two strong female leads — Bette Davis (atypically cast in the more sympathetic role) and Mary Astor (who deservedly won an Oscar for her portrayal as a ruthlessly self-absorbed concert pianist). Davis and Astor rewrote much of the script themselves — improvising whenever possible — and their efforts yield positive results: while the overall narrative of the film still defies belief (see the synopsis above), individual scenes between the women remain enjoyably catty. In order to really appreciate The Great Lie, one must suspend disbelief again and again (would Davis really be that interested in raising her rival’s child as her own? would Astor really take 9 months off from her busy touring schedule in exchange for money she doesn’t seem to need?) — but, if you’re willing, chances are you’ll be waiting anxiously to see how this most unusual love triangle ultimately resolves.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Mary Astor’s Oscar-winning performance as bitchy Sandra Kovak
  • Bette Davis as Maggie
  • Some zingy one-liners: “I’m not one of you anemic creatures who can get nourishment from a lettuce leaf — I’m a musician, I’m an artist!”
  • Max Steiner’s score

Must See?
Yes, simply for the lead female performances.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominees

Links:

Kriemhild’s Revenge / Kriemhild’s Rache / She-Devil, The (1924)

Kriemhild’s Revenge / Kriemhild’s Rache / She-Devil, The (1924)

“Earth, you were once soaked in Siegfried’s blood. One day I shall come and drench you with the blood of Hagen Tronje!”

Synopsis:
Grieving widow Kriemhild (Margarete Schon) agrees to marry Attila the Hun (Rudolf Klein-Rogge) when he promises to defend her name at any cost. After the birth of their son, Kriemhild invites her brother (Theodor Loos) and the murderous Hagen Tronje (Hans Adalbert von Schlettow) for a visit, intending to have Tronje killed; but when Attila refuses to harm his guests, the single-minded Kriemhild enlists the help of local Huns in seeking bloody revenge on the man who killed her husband.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fritz Lang Films
  • Revenge
  • Royalty and Nobility
  • Silent Films
  • Strong Females

Response to Peary’s Review:
This sequel to Fritz Lang’s Siegfried was filmed at the same time, and originally intended to fit the second part of a double-bill. Unfortunately, while it efficiently completes the story told in the early 13th-century epic poem Nibelunglied, it lacks the magical fantasy elements of its precursor, instead presenting a much darker, bloodier story “geared for adults”. With that said, as Peary notes, “the visuals are equally impressive,” and it’s satisfying to watch “the character of Kriemhild, so passive in part one, become one of the most formidable heroines in film history”. Indeed, Kriemhild overpowers even her notoriously autocratic husband Attila the Hun, who is presented here as “a sympathetic figure” — someone who “respects women, plays with babies, cries, and wants his guests to have a good time” (!). It’s too bad we’re not given more scenes between these two newlyweds; instead, Lang pads out the narrative with far too many lengthy — albeit impressively staged — battle scenes. Nonetheless, this classic silent epic remains must-see viewing for all film fanatics.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Margarethe Schon as Kriemhild
  • Rudolf Klein-Rogge as Attila
  • Wonderfully expressive costumes and make-up
  • Lang’s “geometric” framing of characters and buildings
  • Evocative set designs
  • Carl Hoffman and Gunther Rittau’s cinematography
  • The Huns emerging from their insect-like caves

Must See?
Yes. While not as enjoyable as Siegfried, this bloody sequel remains must-see viewing as well.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Siegfried / Siegfried’s Tod (1924)

Siegfried / Siegfried’s Tod (1924)

“Young Siegfried understood the bird’s song: If the dragon slayer would bathe in the dragon’s blood, his body would become invincible, forever safe against word and spear.”

Synopsis:
While traveling to Worms to propose to Kriemhild (Margarete Schon) — the sister of King Gunther (Theodor Loos) — Siegfried (Paul Richter) kills a dragon and becomes invincible in all but one spot by bathing in its blood; he also captures the dwarfish Nibelungen’s hoard of treasure, and acquires a magic helmet which makes him invisible. In payment for Kriemhild’s hand, Gunther asks for Siegfried’s help in winning the mighty Brunhild (Hanna Ralph) as his wife — but when Brunhild discovers that Siegfried has used magic to trick her into marriage, she seeks revenge, enlisting the help of Gunther’s treacherous half-brother, Hagen Tronje (Hans Adalbert von Schlettow), to murder him.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fantasy
  • Fritz Lang Films
  • Revenge
  • Royalty and Nobility
  • Silent Films
  • Strong Females

Response to Peary’s Review:
This first installment of Fritz Lang’s two-part, five-hour saga — based on an early 13th century Norse epic poem — is, as Peary notes, “a marvel, one of the truly great silent films, and one of the most spectacular ventures into fantasy and legend” that has ever graced the silver screen. It’s full of countless memorable moments and images — all stunningly choreographed and framed — with its expressive sets and cinematography evoking “the paintings of Swiss Romanticist Arnold Bocklin” (who also inspired the set of Skull Island in 1933’s King Kong). The story itself is consistently exciting, “subtle enough for adults and magical enough for kids”, and many of the special effects remain impressive. While I’m not a fan of the early dragon fight (it’s hard not to laugh when we see “blood” gushing out of the hole Siegfried pokes in its cardboard side), many other fantasy scenes — including Siegfried’s use of magic to help Gunther fight against Brunhild, and the Nibelungen dwarves turning to stone — are noteworthy.

Although Siegfried is ostensibly about its titular hero, it’s interesting to note that strong females play an important part in both this film and its sequel (Kriemhild’s Revenge). Brunhild is a no-holds-barred warrior woman who surrounds herself with a bevy of female associates; and while Peary notes that she “harbors a secret love for Siegfried” (a fact which is apparently borne out in the original story), it’s not made explicit here. Instead, Brunhild comes across as simply a powerful female who resents being forced to marry and give up her independence; significantly, it’s her actions and motivations which propel the tragic final half of the film. It should also be noted how androgynous the leads appear: Margarete Schon and Hanna Ralph are positively transgendered, while Siegfried — with his wildly poofed-out hair and dramatic make-up — makes for a somewhat “feminine” counterpart. Ultimately, then, Siegfried remains a mythic tale of larger-than-life beings who transcend traditional gender roles, instead embodying core human emotions and values.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Paul Richter as Siegfried
  • Hanna Ralph as Brunhild
  • The wonderfully androgynous Margerete Schon as Kriemhild
  • Marvelous set designs
  • The baroque costumes and headdresses
  • Carl Hoffman and Gunther Rittau’s cinematography
  • Brunhild’s luminous castle
  • The fiery plains surrounding Brunhild’s castle
  • The Nibelungen dwarves turning into stone
  • Siegfried and Kriemhild’s brief but intense romance
  • Siegfried using magic to help Gunther win Brunhild’s hand in marriage
  • A refreshing depiction of a truly strong female (Brunhild)
  • Lang’s “geometric” framing of characters and buildings

Must See?
Yes. This early cinematic masterpiece should be seen by all film fanatics.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Woman in Flames, A (1982)

Woman in Flames, A (1982)

“I wonder just how far I can go… I’m open to anything!”

Synopsis:
A dissatisfied housewife (Gudrun Landgrebe) becomes an upscale call girl, and soon is in demand as a dominatrix. She falls madly in love with a gigolo (Mathieu Carriere), but after they move in together, they quickly grow jealous of each other’s clients.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • German Films
  • Jealousy
  • Prostitutes and Gigolos
  • S&M

Review:
This “satire” on postwar bourgeois values (an enormous box office hit in its native Germany) falls flat on nearly every count. Although Landgrebe is easy on the eyes (and not a horrible actress), we care very little about what happens to her, and her obsessive romance with the boring Carriere never rings true. The dialogue — not helped any by the awful English dubbing on the video release — is inane and cliched, and the titular denouement makes absolutely no sense. Avoid this one if possible.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Beautiful Gudrun Landgrebe as Eva

Must See?
No.

Links:

Sunset Boulevard (1950)

Sunset Boulevard (1950)

“We didn’t need dialogue. We had faces!”

Synopsis:
Desperate for money, aspiring writer Joe Gillis (William Holden) is hired by aging silent movie star Norma Desmond (Gloria Swanson) to help her write her comeback screenplay. Soon the two are lovers — but things become complicated when Holden finds himself falling in love with a young screenwriter (Nancy Olson).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Billy Wilder Films
  • Erich von Stroheim Films
  • Flashback Films
  • Gloria Swanson Films
  • Has-Beens
  • Hollywood
  • Jack Webb Films
  • Love Triangle
  • May-December Romance
  • Nancy Olson Films
  • Prostitutes and Gigolos
  • William Holden Films
  • Writers

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard “remains the harshest indictment of Hollywood on film” — not only “assaulting those who have made [it] a place where talent and integrity have little meaning”, but offering a “funeral elegy to old-style Hollywood films”. Despite its gloomy thematic premise, however, it’s a surprisingly enjoyable movie, full of fabulous set designs, stand-out performances (particularly by Swanson), memorable scenes, and dark humor. The story itself is densely layered: in addition to its sharp critique of Hollywood, Sunset Boulevard is both a suspenseful noir “romance” (with Swanson an atypical femme fatale), and — as noted by both Peary and DVD Savant (see link below) — an unusual “ghost story” with a “morbid, death-obsessed plot”, and countless “horror-movie references and imagery”. Perhaps the strongest indication of Sunset Boulevard‘s brilliance, however, is that our knowledge of Joe’s ultimate fate (his corpse narrates the story) does nothing to mitigate our enjoyment of the film as it unfolds.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Gloria Swanson as Norma Desmond
  • William Holden as Joe
  • Eric von Stroheim as Max the butler
  • Nancy Olson as Betty Schaefer
  • Marvelously baroque set designs
  • Norma pantomiming silent screen characters
  • John Seitz’s noirish cinematography
  • The famous “bridge playing” sequence with former silent stars
  • A macabre sense of humor
  • The classic opening shot
  • The even more famous closing shots
  • Countless memorable lines

    Joe: You’re Norma Desmond. You used to be in pictures — you used to be big.
    Norma: I am big. It’s the pictures that got small.
    Joe: I knew there was something wrong with them…

  • Franz Waxman’s appropriately creepy score

Must See?
Definitely. This is an undisputed classic of American cinema, and merits multiple viewings. Discussed at length in Peary’s Cult Movies (1981).

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Kramer versus Kramer (1979)

Kramer versus Kramer (1979)

“How much courage does it take to walk out on your kid?”

Synopsis:
When his troubled wife (Meryl Streep) walks out on him, a workaholic father (Dustin Hoffman) must learn to care for their 6-year-old son Billy (Justin Henry) on his own. Soon Hoffman discovers the joys of parenthood, but things are complicated when Streep reappears and demands custody of Billy.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Courtroom Drama
  • Divorce
  • Father and Child
  • Meryl Streep Films
  • Raising Kids

Response to Peary’s Review:
While acknowledging that Kramer vs. Kramer (based on Avery Corman’s real-life-inspired novel) is an “excellent, thoughtful, humorous, sensitive film with terrific acting and real characters”, Peary nonetheless expresses some serious reservations in his review, arguing that the film “ridiculously glorifies Hoffman for doing what so many mothers do as a matter of course”. I disagree: because Kramer Versus Kramer is essentially a character study (we see things almost exclusively from Hoffman’s point of view), it makes sense that his transformation from self-absorbed workaholic to loving father is shown as a tremendous accomplishment — for him, it is. With that said, it would certainly be interesting to see the entire story told from Streep’s perspective; but this would be a different film altogether.

To her credit, Streep (who won a Best Supporting Actress Oscar) manages to convince us that her heinous abandonment of Billy was an act of desperation rather than rationality. Even more impressive, however, is Hoffman, who deservedly won an Oscar as best actor of the year — he apparently invested an enormous amount of time and energy into his role, essentially co-writing the script with director Robert Benton, and using improvisation whenever possible. The rapport he develops with Henry (an excellent child actor) is wonderfully natural; I love how there’s never a musical montage depicting their life together as “single males”. Instead — in one of the film’s best sequences — Benton shows us Billy silently setting out plates and doughnuts for breakfast while he and his dad read their respective “papers”.

This type of carefully rendered authenticity permeates the entire narrative, which is often heartbreaking — and occasionally melodramatic — but always, fortunately, real.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Dustin Hoffman as Ted Kramer
  • Justin Henry as Billy
  • Meryl Streep as Joanna
  • Jane Alexander as Ted’s sympathetic neighbor
  • Nestor Almendros’ cinematography — particularly the outdoor New York scenes
  • The infamous “ice cream scene”
  • The hilarious “hallway scene”, when Billy happens upon his dad’s naked lover (JoBeth Williams) heading to the bathroom
  • The hectic “French toast scene” near the beginning of the film — and its subdued counterpoint near the end

Must See?
Yes. This moving, well-acted drama remains the best film ever made about a custody battle.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links: