Browsed by
Month: May 2025

Danny Peary on Podcasts

Danny Peary on Podcasts

I wanted to mix things up a bit by letting you know that Danny Peary has been interviewed on a couple of podcasts recently — check them out if you’re interested in hearing him discuss films live!

In Part 1 of his talk with Dan Fisher from “Let’s Talk Ten,” Peary and Fisher discuss the first half of each of their top ten childhood favorites, listed here in chronological order; sound bites from the films themselves are liberally smattered throughout, which is fun.

And here are their selections from Part 2, once again in chronological order:

Finally, here is Danny being interviewed on the TV Guidance Counselor podcast very recently, in March 2025. A random cult film he recommends near the end is Deep End (1970). Enjoy!

Red Tent, The (1969)

Red Tent, The (1969)

“When we take up leadership, we forfeit the right to be human — and nobody who’s fit to lead can do that.”

Synopsis:
The guilt-ridden surviving general (Peter Finch) of a dirigible crash near the Arctic in 1928 is visited by ghosts of various people involved in the event — including his pilot (Nikita Mikhalkov), Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen (Sean Connery), the girlfriend (Claudia Cardinale) of a Swedish meteorologist (Eduard Martsevich), rescue aviator Einar Lundborg (Hardy Kruger), and the chief of the Soviet rescue crew (Grigoriy Gay).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Claudia Cardinale Films
  • Explorers
  • Flashback Films
  • Ghosts
  • Guilt
  • Peter Finch Films
  • Sean Connery Films
  • Search
  • Survival

Review:
This joint Soviet/Italian film was directed by Mikhail Kalatozov and based on a novel crafted from the real-life outcome of the airship Italia (which I hadn’t heard of prior to watching this movie). It’s framed as a flashback tale of survivor’s guilt (17 men died), with Finch (General Nobile) literally haunted by the choices he made each step of the way.

However, the bulk of the movie takes place in exciting location-based action. I’ll cite from Wikipedia’s entry on the film, since it nicely provides an overview of what happens:

The expedition is successful at first, but ends in disaster. The Italia is weighed down when ice forms on it. Colliding with the ground, the airship’s gondola is torn away from its keel and the envelope containing the airship’s hydrogen cells; freed of the weight of the gondola, the rest of the ship floats away and out of control, taking some of Nobile’s crew with it. Nobile maintains control of the surviving crew who are now marooned on arctic pack ice with salvaged supplies. They shelter in a tent that they dye red for visibility. They manage to repair the radio, but after receiving no response to their distress calls, three survivors (Zappi, Mariano, and Malmgren) decide to set off across the ice to seek help.

Much more drama ensues from there — and you’re guaranteed to be kept on the seat of your pants despite knowing the ultimate outcome.

As one can imagine, the shooting schedule for this visually impressive film was truly extensive; according to IMDb’s trivia, “Filming went for 62 weeks” and “included location work in Estonia, the Baltic Sea and the Spitzbergen Archipelago in the Arctic Ocean, and [included] studio work in Moscow and Rome.” While not all of the story is equally compelling (i.e., Cardinale is clearly there simply to provide a female touch):

… it’s worth a look for the footage alone.

Note: It was interesting to learn that “the film was shown in the West and in the USSR in different editing versions and with different soundtracks: in the Soviet version, sounds the music of Aleksandr Zatsepin, in the Italian version [which I watched]: Ennio Morricone’s.”

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • A haunting look at death and survival in the harshest conditions
  • Truly impressive cinematography and location shooting

  • Ennio Morricone’s score

Must See?
Yes, as a fine and ambitious internationally-produced adventure film.

Categories

  • Good Show

Links:

Greetings. I’m Back.

Greetings. I’m Back.

It’s been a rough half a year in my country – Peary’s country. I didn’t intend to drop off the face of the classic film blogging universe for so many months, but other issues and considerations have risen to the forefront.

With that said, I’ll never quit classic movies — and I remain grateful for the many ways in which cinema illuminates and explains our world. So many of the films Peary recommends and discusses in Guide for the Film Fanatic — from the origins of cinema through 1987 — have helped me, as a viewer, to experience multiple eras of history through full immersion. Specifically, I’ve been reflecting on the many classic movies I’ve watched over the decades showing political movements, corruption, cynicism, group-think, and outright evil, alongside resistance, criticality, and joy. This current moment, too, will continue to be explored through film — and as dreadful as it is to live through, I know that cinema will help us capture some of the trends and insights we’re just starting to grasp.

I love the steady trend towards democraticization of movies; I always have. Throughout my lengthy exploration of Peary’s book (back when I was 16 and found a copy in the library I worked at), it’s been fascinating learning how more and more directors over the years (no longer all or mostly White men anymore!) were able to get a camera in hand and tell interesting stories. I anticipate that will continue.

Back to this site, I had to rev myself up to post again today — to get back on the horse with my reviews. Really, there are only 563 titles left to review (out of a grand total of 4300) — so, why stop now? I can do it! While it’s not a personal favorite, I’ll imagine Chariots of Fire (1981) as I’m working my way there.

As I’ve said many times before, once this particular project is done I’ll finally be moving on to writing about more recent films, which I anticipate will be its own unique joy. Among the many changes in recent years has been the shift towards long-form series debuting on streaming platforms, which has opened up renewed discussions around the “television or film?” binary (which is nowhere close to simple). Off the top of my head, I can imagine reviewing Adolescence (2025) as a must-see series (film?) from this past year, alongside Mike White’s deliciously perverse The White Lotus Seasons 1, 2, and 3, and plenty of intriguing documentaries (many with multiple episodes).

In terms of more traditional films, from last year in particular I can share that Emilia Perez (2024) was a debacle (wtf?); Anora (2024) caught me up in waves of sadness comparable to the heyday of indie films; September 5 (2024) nicely supplemented Munich (2005); Conclave (2024) was a good old-fashioned drama with a kick of a surprise ending; and A Real Pain (2024) did a better job displaying vulnerable narcissism than any other recent title (thanks to Dr. Ramani for her take on this). I still need to catch up on a bunch of others.

But first — 563 titles from the 1970s and 1980s await me! I’m grateful I’ve taken the time over these past 19 years to make note of my impressions of all the other titles in Peary’s GFTFF, since I’m pretty sure I would otherwise have forgotten much of what I’ve written about. Thankfully, despite a literal onslaught of shows and movies and series available to watch these days, classic movies aren’t going anywhere; check out the many awesome blog sites which are part of the CMBA (Classic Movie Blog Association) for even more takes and approaches other than mine.

I’ll see you online soon.

Godfather, Part II, The (1974)

Godfather, Part II, The (1974)

“Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.”

Synopsis:
After immigrating from Italy as a child (Oreste Baldini), young Vito Corleone (Robert De Niro) rises to a position of power and influence in New York City. Years later, his son Michael (Al Pacino) becomes increasingly alienated from his wife (Diane Keaton) while navigating ongoing tensions in Las Vegas with his brother Fredo (John Cazale), his stepbrother Tom (Robert Duvall), his sister Connie (Talia Shire), and Jewish mob boss Hyman Roth (Lee Strasberg).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Al Pacino Films
  • Betrayal
  • Diane Keaton Films
  • Family Problems
  • Flashback Films
  • Francis Ford Coppola Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Mafia
  • Marital Problems
  • Robert De Niro Films
  • Robert Duvall Films
  • Siblings

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary is not a huge fan of Francis Ford Coppola’s Oscar-winning follow-up — a combined prequel and sequel — to 1972’s The Godfather. He asserts that “Coppola doesn’t have De Niro or Pacino do much acting, limiting them to little snippets of dialogue and many moments when they react (with quiet, calm voices) to the more emotional and demonstrative peripheral characters around them.” (I disagree, but will keep going with Peary’s assessment.)

He argues that “De Niro gets by on presence alone (his charming smile, his quizzical look, his physical grace), but Pacino is a brooding bore” — a character who “does not develop logically from the person he played in the original,” but rather “is a caricature of a crime boss” (again, I disagree). He adds, “All [the] major scenes seem unreal, calculated for audience response,” and “phoniest of all is his breakup scene with wife Diane Keaton, who looks over-rehearsed, like a scene for an acting class.”

Peary continues his take-down by noting that “several of the major scenes in the contemporary section come across as mere duplications of real-life drama we’ve seen on television,” noting specifically that “the scene in which the senator (G.D. Spradin) is found in a brothel with a hooker he brutally killed is similar to numerous sequences in exploitation films of the era and is included for no reason other than sensationalism.”

He asserts that “the only moments that come across as real are when the crime bosses and legitimate businessmen gather in Batista Cuba to decide how to divide up the American pie”:

… and “when a Jewish crime boss (a terrific, subdued debut performance by legendary acting teacher Lee Strasberg) raises rather than lowers the volume on a televised football game while talking over important crime business with Michael.”

In Alternate Oscars — where he names Chinatown (1974) the Best Picture of the Year instead — Peary concedes that The Godfather, Part II “went a step farther” than the original film “by exploring the link between organized crime and politicians — which was certainly a topical theme in light of the Watergate scandal.”

I — along with most other film lovers and critics — disagree with Peary’s take on this justifiably lauded sequel. It’s equally, if differently, compelling throughout, taking the sprawling storyline in fascinating directions (both backwards and forwards) and continuing to evolve our understanding of precisely how a mob family like the Corleones may have evolved. I don’t have any complaints, and find both De Niro and Pacino suitable in their roles; to that end, for another take on the depth of Pacino’s characterization as Michael, check out the video “How Michael Corleone Looks at People”.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Al Pacino as Michael Corleone
  • Robert De Niro as young Vito Corleone
  • Gordon Willis’s cinematography
  • Fine attention to period detail
  • Nino Rota’s score

Must See?
Yes, naturally.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links: