Barrier (1966)

Barrier (1966)

“Where does it say everyone has to make good?”

Synopsis:
A Polish medical student (Jan Nowicki) whimsically makes his way through life while dating a tram driver (Joanna Szczerbi).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Eastern European Films
  • Jerzy Skolimowski Films

Review:
It is truly difficult to know what to make of this early experimental film by Polish writer-director Jerzy Skolimowski, given that there really is no… plot. I had to rely on reading reviews and overviews just to get a basic sense of what I was seeing. Apparently we are watching the travails of an unnamed young medical student (Nowicki) who becomes fed up with his studies (it’s hard to blame him):

… and leaves with simply his suitcase and a piggie bank to visit his dad in a retirement home:

… where he’s given a letter by his father and sent on a wild-goose-chase involving a World War I saber and an older woman (Malgorzata Lorentowicz).

He climbs up a wall with chickens on it (?!):

… meets and dates a pretty tram operator:

… and sits in a mostly-empty restaurant with too many waiters milling around:

… where eventually, newspapers are made into jaunty party hats.

Nowicki also attacks a plastic-wrapped car with his saber at one point.

Given how little any of this makes sense, it’s challenging to follow or care very much — if at all — about what happens next. Knowing that Skolimowski later helmed Deep End (1970), The Shout (1978), and Moonlighting (1982) (among other titles) makes this early outing more of a curiosity for those interested in how he’s evolved as a director — but it’s not must-see viewing on its own.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Occasional snippets of creative imagery

Must See?
Nope; skip this one.

Links:

Reflections on Must-See Films From 1965

Reflections on Must-See Films From 1965

I’m back for another reflection on a particular year in cinema! As a recap, I’ve already shared my thoughts on must-see titles from 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, and 1964 — and I’m now ready to discuss my take-down on titles from 1965.

Interestingly, this year holds my lowest percentage of must-see titles so far. Out of 72 movies, I’m only voting 19 (or 26%) must-see. Below are just a few highlights from this year in cinema, which offered up plenty of darkness (literally — most are in b&w) on screen; however, I’ll begin my overview with a notable exception to that tendency.

  • I’m a huge fan of Robert Wise’s Oscar-winning musical The Sound of Music, which is not to everyone’s tastes but has delighted me for years. Julie Andrews’ performance remains preternaturally compelling, and as I noted in my review: “The use of authentic Austrian/German locales — including the iconic opening shots on verdant hillsides — helps to open up the [original Broadway] play enormously,” turning “the entire affair into a wonderfully picturesque adventure.”
  • Of the 19 must-see titles from 1965, seven are in a language other than English, with two (discussed below) in Italian, two in French (see here and here), and three in Czech. From the latter (which also includes Milos Forman’s Loves of a Blonde and Zbynek Brynych’s The Fifth Horseman is Fear), the Oscar-winning flick The Shop on Main Street — a film “about the absurdity of war, politics, and discrimination” in which “we are clearly able to see the insanity of the social upheaval creeping across Europe” — stands out above them all.
  • Another powerful foreign title is Marco Bellochio’s debut feature Fists in His Pocket, about a young man who “decides to relieve his older brother… of their dysfunctional family by gradually killing everyone — including himself — off.” (!) In my review, I note that watching this movie — which comes across as “part black comedy, part character study, part horror film” — is like viewing “a train wreck in slow motion”: we remain “fascinated yet unable to look away,” particularly given Lou Castel’s “powerhouse performance” as a man suffering from “depression, grandiosity, and mental instability.”
  • Speaking of memorable performances, it’s impossible to forget Rod Steiger’s leading role in Sidney Lumet’s bleak holocaust-survivor film The Pawnbroker. As I note in my review, “Viewers must prepare themselves for relentless agony as we watch a deeply broken man perpetuate his own horrors onto others through grim apathy and misanthropy.” This film is well worth a one-time watch — but be forewarned.
  • Equally (though differently) disturbing is Roman Polanski’s Repulsion, starring Catherine Deneuve as a young French woman in London who experiences a frightening mental decline. Her performance — as well as Polanski’s ability to work atmospheric wonders within a tight budget — make this a tense psychological thriller with plenty of unexpected twists and turns.
  • Peter Watkins’ fictionalized docudrama The War Game — which was “deemed too controversial for airing on BBC television, but was given a theatrical release, and received an Oscar for best ‘documentary’ in 1967” — offers up a “hypothetical vision of a post-apocalyptic nightmare — including lack of sufficient food or medicine, military rule, and hideous physical symptoms.” As I note in my review, it “remains just as powerful today as it must have been [decades] ago, when the threat of nuclear war was even more [?] imminent.”
  • There are several cult classics from 1965, with perhaps my personal favorite being Elio Petri’s “cleverly conceived, visually stylish” (it’s in color!), “smartly scored,” Italian-language sci-fi flick The 10th Victim — about “a futuristic society which allows individuals to join a human hunting game.” Ursula Andress (the huntress) and Marcello Mastroianni (her prey) are perfectly cast as the cat-and-mouse leads, with Andress a particular revelation as she “delivers a nuanced, smart, humorous, even heartfelt performance, all while looking as incredibly gorgeous as always.”
  • Another noteworthy cult flick is Russ Meyers’ inimitable Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! — which is the only Meyers film (out of all twelve listed in GFTFF) I tend to remember with much interest thanks to “its utterly unique stars…, its unforgettable title, and its striking imagery.” My review synopsis gives you a sense of how bizarre this flick is, if you somehow haven’t yet seen it (or would like a refresher):

    “When three go-go dancers — Varla (Tura Satana), Rosie (Haji), and Billie (Lori Williams) — go drag racing in the desert, Varla ends up killing the boyfriend (Ray Barlow) of a bikini-clad girl (Susan Bernard) who the group then kidnaps. They end up at the home of a reclusive, secretly wealthy sociopath in a wheelchair (Stuart Lancaster) who is cared for by his two sons: a mentally slow hunk nicknamed ‘The Vegetable’ (Dennis Busch) and his brainier brother (Paul Trinka). Sex-obsessed Billie pursues Busch, while Varla attempts to bed Trinka in order to learn where Lancaster’s money is hidden, and Bernard tries to escape.”

    Whew — get ready for some wild, violent, female-fueled escapades!

  • Speaking of larger-than-life characters, Orson Welles’ self-professed final directorial masterpiece was Chimes at Midnight, in which he plays the recurring Shakespearean role of Falstaff — a portly knight who experiences tremendous heartbreak and betrayal at the hands of his lifelong friend Prince Hal. It’s a beautifully crafted — albeit typically “Shakespeare-ingly” dense — cinematic outing.
  • Another notable film about betrayal from 1965 was Martin Ritt’s The Spy Who Came In From the Cold, which hews faithfully to John Le Carre’s source novel and offers a powerfully sobering antidote to more escapist spy fare of the Cold War era. As I note in my review: “To its credit, the film retains all the suspense of the book while both simplifying key plot points and visually opening up certain scenes. Oswald Morris’s atmospheric cinematography is top-rate, and the performances are fine across the board.”
  • Finally, I want to highlight Brian Forbes’ King Rat — a haunting adaptation (of James Clavell’s novel) which is “unrelenting in its graphic depiction of the heat, starvation, despair, craziness, lethargy, boredom, and overall sense of hopelessness pervasive in [POW] camps.”

There are quite a few dark themes emerging across these recommendations from 1965: hopelessness, despair, violence, guilt, discrimination, betrayal, kidnapping, theft, duplicity, mental instability, starvation… These all seems particularly apt for the year in which Malcolm X was assassinated; Bloody Sunday occurred in Selma; American troops first arrived in Vietnam; the Watts Uprising took place in Los Angeles; and Quaker Norman Morrison set himself on fire in protest (to name just a few noteworthy events). There was a lot going on, both in America and abroad.

Thank goodness for movies, and for the opportunity to remember a few of our favorite things…

Juliet of the Spirits (1965)

Juliet of the Spirits (1965)

“True love requires total knowledge of each other.”

Synopsis:
When a well-to-do housewife (Giulietta Masina) begins to suspect her husband (Mario Pisu) is having an affair, she consults help from both psychics and private eyes in learning what’s going on, and leans on her friend (Valentina Cortese) and sex-positive neighbor (Sandra Milo) to explore new potential paths for herself.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fantasy
  • Federico Fellini Films
  • Housewives
  • Infidelity
  • Italian Films
  • Marital Problems

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, this “difficult Federico Fellini film” tells the story of “a meek, passive woman… who suspects her husband… is having an affair with a young model” and thus “consults a medium, hires a detective to spy on her husband, and slips in and out of a fantasy world full of spirits from her past.”

He notes that the “picture has advanced, pre-women’s-movement themes” — such as that “women shouldn’t equate themselves with their problems; women withstand humiliation out of fear of being alone; women secretly wish they had freedom that could come only if their husbands leave them” — and he argues that “Masina’s feeling that she is unworthy and deserving of persecution and punishment can be tracked back to her childhood, when her character in a religious school play was raised to the rafters while being symbolically burned to death” (though the exact meaning of this connection isn’t clear).

Peary points out the “picture has such interesting themes that after a while you wish Fellini had forgone his confusing trips into the surreal world of Massina’s unconscious and just told his story.” He concludes his review by noting that “the casting of Fellini’s wife in the lead seems ill-advised,” given that “Masina looks like a Plain Jane in a world of flamboyant grotesqueness” (I agree, but figured there was a point to this somehow).

Like Peary, I’m not really a fan of this film — which, as many have pointed out, seems in some ways like a feminist “version” of Fellini’s 8 1/2 (1963). Gianni Di Venanzo’s cinematography (this was Fellini’s first film in color) is beautiful, and much care was obviously put into all aspects of the creative set and costume design:

… but the storyline is ultimately unsatisfying. While Fellini fans will naturally want to check it out, it’s not must-see for all film fanatics.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Colorful cinematography and sets
  • Nino Rota’s score

Must See?
No, though of course Fellini fans will certainly want to see it.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Shameless Old Lady, The (1965)

Shameless Old Lady, The (1965)

“It’s only been six months since the old man died. Now she’s going to the cinema — going to the movies, watching movies, strolling about the city, living it up!”

Synopsis:
Shortly after the death of her husband, an elderly woman (Sylvie) shocks her two grown sons (Etienne Bierry and Francois Maistre) and grandson (Victor Lanoux) by befriending a prostitute (Malka Ribovska) and a shoe store owner (Jean Bouise), and living a much more expansive life.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Character Arc
  • Elderly People
  • French Films
  • Grown Children
  • Inheritance
  • Strong Females
  • Widows and Widowers

Review:
Based on a short story by Bertolt Brecht and helmed by writer-director René Allio, this character study of a widow gaining a new lease on existence offers an intriguing glimpse into the possibilities of living life on one’s own terms. Although the screenplay takes a while to start rolling, once we see the directions things are headed in, we can’t help but cheer on our protagonist. While Sylvie’s children expect her simply to mourn and continue the life of servitude and frugality she’s always led:

… Sylvie most definitely has her own plans. It turns out she has been quietly taking in the world around her, and little by little, begins to reach out to people she’s intrigued by — including (for reasons unknown) Ribovska:

… and Bouise.

We can tell that she’s enjoying shopping:

… eating out (especially a luxurious dessert!):

… gambling (she asks to learn how horse betting works):

… engaging with intellectual conversations:

… purchasing a car for the first time:

… and, perhaps most important of all, not allowing her kids’ desires, needs, or expectations drive her actions. Sylvie’s tale is a simple but empowering story of second chances, and a reminder that it really is never too late to follow your passions.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Sylvie as Madame Berthe Bertini
  • Good use of location shooting in Marseilles

Must See?
Yes, for Bertini’s performance and as an overall unique show.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

War Lord, The (1965)

War Lord, The (1965)

“I’ll not give her up; I can’t.”

Synopsis:
In 11th century Normany, when a knight (Charlton Heston) is sent by his duke to rule over a Flemish village, he soon falls for a beautiful young woman (Rosemar Forsyth) betrothed to the son (James Farentino) of the town leader (Niall MacGinnis), and decides to take advantage of a pagan custom allowing him “first dibs” on her — but will Heston’s jealous brother (Guy Stockwell) stand for this turn of events?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Charlton Heston Films
  • Cross-Cultural Romance
  • Historical Drama
  • Medieval Times
  • Play Adaptation
  • Richard Boone Films

Review:
I’m not quite sure why Peary includes this historical drama — directed by Franklin J. Schaffner, adapting a 1956 play by Leslie Stevens called The Lovers — in his GFTFF. While the production values are fine:

… the storyline tells us far too little about this period of time in European history, other than focusing on the salacious (and contested) practice of droit du seigneur — that is, the “right” by feudal lords to sexual conquest of a virgin on her wedding night.

When Heston (sporting perhaps his worst movie hairstyle ever) first meets Forsyth, we’re meant to applaud him for not automatically violating her:

… and — after he feels a repellent buzz when attempting to touch her — to wonder whether she may have some kind of witchy pagan powers. Indeed, the clash of Christianity with Paganism is the film’s most intriguing potential theme, but it’s underdeveloped and seems to mostly serve as a curiosity factor.


The emergent romance between Heston and Forsyth (whose character is given virtually no personality) doesn’t go anywhere meaningful, and other supporting characters are equally opaque. There is a lot of medieval fighting and castle defending, if you enjoy that sort of thing:

… but otherwise you can feel free to skip this one.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Vibrant sets and costumes
  • Russell Metty’s cinematography

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see for Heston completists.

Links:

Shakespeare Wallah (1965)

Shakespeare Wallah (1965)

“What do these people know about our theater — Shakespeare and all that?”

Synopsis:
A young British actress (Felicity Kendal) traveling across India in a Shakespearean troupe with her father (Geoffrey Kendal) and mother (Laura Liddell) falls for a playboyish man (Shashi Kapoor) with a possessive Bollywood mistress (Madhur Jaffrey).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Cross-Cultural Romance
  • Indian Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Merchant and Ivory Films
  • Shakespeare

Review:
James Ivory and Ismail Merchant’s second feature-length film together after The Householder (1963) [non-GFTFF] was this adaptation of journals (later published as a memoir) by Geoffrey Kendal, who starred alongside his wife, daughters, and son-in-law (Kapoor) as a real-life version of himself. The storyline takes place during an intriguing time in Indian history, when Geoffrey’s troupe was at the tale end of (according to Wikipedia) “perform[ing] Shakespeare before royalty one day, and in rural villages the next,” with “many of their audiences… schoolchildren.”

In the film, we see Geoffrey struggling to secure work for his company:

… given that Indian culture is shifting towards more interest in sports and Bollywood features:

… which in some ways feels entirely appropriate given the necessary trajectory of post-colonialist initiatives.

The emotional crux of the narrative lies in the tentative romance between Felicity and Kapoor — which is hard to take at first given his duplicity.

However, Jaffrey is arrogant and entitled enough herself that we can see Kapoor would be much better off with Felicity — but is romance with Kapoor what’s best for her? The cinematography by Subrata Mitra (Satyajit Ray’s DP) is effectively atmospheric throughout, and Ray’s score — composed in just 10 days — is perfectly suited for the story. While it’s not must-see viewing, this film is well worth a look, and will be of special interest to Merchant-and-Ivory fans.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Felicity Kendal as Lizzie
  • Madhur Jaffrey as Manjula
  • Geoffrey Kendal and Laura Liddell as Tony and Carla Buckingham
  • Subrata Mitra’s cinematography
  • Satyajit Ray’s score

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended for one-time viewing.

Links:

Viva Maria! (1965)

Viva Maria! (1965)

“When I’m dead, swear to me you’ll go on fighting!””

Synopsis:
In early-twentieth-century Central America, the daughter (Brigitte Bardot) of an Irish revolutionary teams up with a circus singer (Jeanne Moreau), and the two Marias accidentally invent the strip tease before becoming revered revolutionaries themselves.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Brigitte Bardot Films
  • Carnivals and Circuses
  • French Films
  • George Hamilton Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Jeanne Moreau Films
  • Louis Malle Films
  • Revolutionaries
  • Showgirls
  • Strong Females

Review:
Louis Malle’s sixth feature film — after Elevator to the Gallows (1958) [not listed in GFTFF but I will review it as a Missing Title], The Lovers (1958), Zazie dans le Metro (1960), A Very Private Affair (1962) [non-GFTFF], and The Fire Within (1962) [non-GFTFF] — was this comedy adventure film loosely inspired by Vera Cruz (1954) but with intentionally female protagonists. Bardot is at the top of her game, bringing sassy energy to her role:

… and Moreau is as solid as ever (though George Hamilton’s role as her revolutionary lover is underdeveloped — something Malle himself acknowledged).

With cinematography in Eastman Color (by Henri Decae) and costumes by Pierre Cardin, it’s a visually heady affair:

… marked by fast-paced action and a few unexpected sight gags.

Interestingly, according to IMDb’s trivia page, “the movie classification board of the city of Dallas, Texas, banned the movie within the city on the grounds that it was too racy,” leading to “one of two U.S. Supreme Court cases that led to the establishment of the MPAA Ratings Code.” That Bardot…

Note: Despite hopeful rumors that they might not get along, Bardot and Moreau make a fine cinematic duo and were friendly in real life, too.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine performances by the lead actresses
  • Pierre Cardin’s costumes
  • Henri Decae’s cinematography

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a one-time look if you’re in the mood — and of course it’s a must for Bardot or Moreau fans.

Links:

Gospel According to St. Matthew, The (1964)

Gospel According to St. Matthew, The (1964)

“Many are called but few are chosen.”

Synopsis:
Years after his virginal young mother (Margerita Caruso) gives birth to him, Jesus of Nazareth (Enrique Irazoqui) travels the countryside working miracles and calling his disciples to him.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biblical Stories
  • Historical Drama
  • Pier Paolo Pasolini Films

Review:
As Peary points out, Pier Paolo Pasolini’s “modern telling of the Christ… story, from birth to resurrection” — which was “given grandiose treatment in King of Kings and The Greatest Story Ever Told” — is “surprisingly straightforward.”

He notes that while “the pacing is very slow and most of the film is played in a subdued manner,” this actually “makes several scenes of callous violence perpetrated by authority figures on the masses particularly jolting” — i.e., “soldiers randomly kill babies who might be Jesus”:

… and “sweet-faced Salome finishes a lovely dance and demands the head of John the Baptist.”

Peary asserts (and I agree) that while “watching Jesus wander the deserts, meeting the poor and delivering defiant speeches (with one famous Christ quote after another), there is a strange feeling of authenticity, as if somehow news cameras were at the scene.”

Peary wonders about Marxist Pasolini’s “feelings about Christ” given how he’s portrayed here: at first he “seems concerned only with getting people to worship him… but in time… shows signs of compassion and a willingness to help, even sacrifice himself, for mankind.” Indeed, “Christ is a revolutionary who unites the masses and becomes a martyr to the cause, defying those in authority in church and state, and forcing these hypocrites, to reveal their true natures.”

Those who grew up hearing the gospel of the Christian New Testament will surely be fascinated to see it coming to life here without alteration. I found myself mesmerized while watching realistic-looking (non)-actors play out the roles I’d learned so much about; this felt much more like the “real deal,” historically speaking, than any other Biblical epic I’ve seen.

With that said, I can see how those not steeped in this particular storyline might be either less compelled by its content, and/or confused. (I’m reminded of taking a European art history class in college and being informed by our professor that having a basic understanding of Christianity would help us — a lot. Indeed, it did.)

Of particular note is the plum central casting of non-actor Enrique Irazoqui as Jesus.

The value of his intense gaze and unwavering commitment to the role are difficult to overstate, given how much of the storyline he (naturally) dominates. As noted on IMDb’s Trivia page:

In keeping with his idea of Jesus Christ as the greatest revolutionary of all time, Pier Paolo Pasolini considered casting Jack Kerouac or Allen Ginsberg in the role. He changed his mind when he met Enrique Irazoqui, a Spanish student of literature, who has written a thesis about Pasolini’s novel “Ragazzi di vita” and was very curious to meet him.

(One also can’t help noticing how many handsome young men were cast as Jesus’s disciples…)

It’s worth pointing out that “musical selections include the Congolese ‘Missa Luba,’ Prokofiev’s ‘Cantata’ from Alexander Nevsky, and Bach’s ‘St. Matthew Passion’,” as well as Odetta singing ‘Sometimes I Feel Like a Motherless Child.’ And I feel compelled to share the weird last sentence of Peary’s review, in which he notes that “this is the only film in which the Virgin Mary (who is pretty!) has a mustache.”

Ummm… Wha?!

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Enrique Irazoqui as Jesus
  • Fine neo-realist cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a uniquely powerful biblical drama by a noted director.

Categories

  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

1941 (1979)

1941 (1979)

“They’re parachuting murderers into these hills!”

Synopsis:
Six days after the attack on Pearl Harbor, a Japanese submarine is spotted off the coast of Los Angeles, setting in motion a host of responses from various military and civilian stakeholders.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Christopher Lee Films
  • Comedy
  • Dan Aykroyd Films
  • Elisha Cook Jr. Films
  • Historical Drama
  • John Belushi Films
  • Nancy Allen Films
  • Ned Beatty Films
  • Robert Stack Films
  • Steven Spielberg Films
  • Treat Williams Films
  • Warren Oates Films
  • World War II

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that while this “pointless mayhem” — about “a lot of panicky and crazy soldiers and civilians rac[ing] around LA in 1941 thinking that the Japanese are launching a full-scale invasion” — “was directed by Steven Spielberg,” it’s “the type of comedy (i.e., Casino Royale) that looks like it was directed by anyone who came along.” He points out that while “at the outset the film has some period flavor” and “introduces some interesting characters”:

… “it becomes increasingly stupid.” Indeed, it’s “alternately smutty, racist, cruel (unless you think watching someone’s house slide off a cliff is funny)” and “it is always wasteful of its large budget.” He notes that given that “screaming, explosions, fights, car and plane crashes, and destruction in general seem to be the order of the day:”

… “one can understand why in the best scene officer Robert Stack would stay away from the chaos in the streets and tearfully watch Dumbo.” (This character and his actions were based on real life.)

The rest of Peary’s short review of this critical failure — though it did fine at the box office — lists the truly astonishing number of big-name actors either co-starring or making a cameo appearance — including John Belushi (as Captain Wild Bill Kelso):

… Treat Williams (playing an effectively cartoonish baddie):

… Dan Aykroyd, John Candy, and Ned Beatty:

… Toshiro Mifune (as Commander Akiro Mitamura):

… Christopher Lee (as Captain Wolfgang von Kleinschmidt):

… Sam Fuller:

… Warren Oates (as Colonel ‘Madman’ Maddox):

… and many, many others. Blink and you’ll miss Patti LuPone (seen here — blinking):

… and, naturally, Dick Miller makes an appearance as well.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • The incredibly filmed dance sequence
  • Fine production design
  • Impressive pre-CGI special effects
  • William Fraker’s cinematography

Must See?
No, though of course it’s worth a one-time look for its infamy.

Links:

Funeral in Berlin (1966)

Funeral in Berlin (1966)

“I like you, English — you’re not as stupid as you look.”

Synopsis:
When British spy Harry Palmer (Michael Caine) is sent to Berlin to help facilitate the journey of a would-be defector (Oscar Homolka), he meets up with the German head of a British intelligence station (Paul Hubschmid), and is seduced by a beautiful Israeli model (Eva Renzi) who he suspects is likely also a spy of some kind.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cold War
  • Michael Caine Films
  • Spies

Review:
Goldfinger (1964)-director Guy Hamilton — who went on to direct several more Bond flicks — helmed this adaptation of Len Deighton’s novel of the same name, once again starring Michael Caine as former-criminal-turned-spy Harry Palmer, as previously seen in The Ipcress File (1965). The storyline is predictably dense and complicated, with countless double agents, hidden agendas, secret alliances, and violent encounters:

… as well as a sexy, overly-convenient dalliance between Caine and Renzi.

The title funeral refers to an elaborate escape plan involving a coffin and shadowy tunnels:

… which is atmospherically shot through the streets of Berlin, as are many other scenes. Don’t worry too much about who is who, since all is revealed by the end — and you can always read a synopsis to catch up on details.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Michael Caine as Harry Palmer
  • Otto Heller’s cinematography
  • Fine location shooting in Berlin

Must See?
Yes, as a finely crafted spy thriller.

Categories

  • Good Show

Links: