Smithereens (1982)

Smithereens (1982)

“Everyone’s a little weird these days; it’s normal.”

Synopsis:
A self-serving, would-be singer (Susan Berman) in New York City pursues a punk musician (Richard Hell) while managing and manipulating interest from a van-owning artist (Brad Rinn).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Aspiring Stars
  • Homeless
  • New York City
  • Punk Rock

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary notes that in this “impressive low-budget independent film directed by Susan Seidelman” — who leapt to fame a couple of years later with Desperately Seeking Susan (1985) — the director more accurately portrays Greenwich Village as “realistically, an ugly, hellish, unfriendly place where offbeat characters are too stoned, crazy, and selfish to help out their kind.” He describes Susan Berman’s “young refugee from New Jersey” as a drifter/grifter with “no money, no apartment, and no friends who will help her out” given that “most everyone has had enough of her grating personality, her lies (usually about needing no one), and her shameless taking advantage of anyone she thinks may help her.”

She’s “forced to live in a van with a nice guy (Brad Rinn) from Montana but she keeps disappointing him with her disloyalty”:

— and while “he wants her to go away with him… she’s planning on going to LA with a young singer (Richard Hell of the punk band, the Voidoids) — not seeing the signs that Hell (who is broke) is using her as she uses everyone else.” Touché.

Peary writes that while “we keep expecting Berman to wise up so she can enjoy a little happiness — we could use a little relief as well” — “Seidelman won’t let her” since “she wants to draw an accurate portrait of the typical Village loser.”

Peary points out “technically, the film is fairly polished — Seidelman composes her shots well, creating striking tableaux by situating her strangely dressed and coiffured characters in the frame with colorful props (Rinn’s van, for instance) and bizarrely designed or graffiti-colored walls.”

However, while I appreciate the effort Seidelman put into her debut indie film — made on a shoestring, with plenty of support from local artists and ample shooting delays and challenges — I’m hard-pressed to see it as anything but an unbearable downer featuring an utterly unlikable protagonist. It may be realistic (it sure reads that way), but I struggled to make it through to the end.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Good use of location shooting

Must See?
No, unless you’re curious to see Seidelman’s debut.

Links:

Lone Wolf McQuade (1983)

Lone Wolf McQuade (1983)

“Forget it, kid; I work alone.”

Synopsis:
With help from his eager new partner (Robert Beltran), Texas ranger J.J. “Lone Wolf” McQuade (Chuck Norris) enters into a vicious battle against a psychopathic drug runner (David Carradine) whose girlfriend (Barbara Carrera) falls for Norris.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Chuck Norris Films
  • David Carradine Films
  • Drug Dealers
  • Sheriffs and Marshals
  • Westerns

Review:
Chuck Norris does what he does best — stereotypically embody traditional notions of masculinity — in this neo-western which was purportedly inspired by Sergio Leone’s spaghetti westerns. While there’s apparently a popular drinking game in which rounds are consumed upon hearing the term “Ranger” being spoken, I found it more fascinating to focus on how relentlessly one hyper-masculine image or trope after another — guns, explosives, beer, drugs, horses, tanks, turbo-charged cars, helicopters, planes, smoking, seduction — manage to be crammed into this film, ranging from Norris’s initial take-down of a horse thief and his banditos:

… to his single-move slamming of a bully in a bar up onto a pool table:

… to a strategically placed image of bullfighting (I guess they couldn’t justify an actual scene of that!) behind Norris in a later sequence:

… to his chemistry with Carradine’s mistress (Carrera), who has requisite sultriness and allure but was more amusingly memorable as a Bond villainess in the same year’s Never Say Never Again (1983).

Sweater-clad Carradine, meanwhile, seems to be having a ton of fun playing a sadistic baddie who’s equally comfortable blowing people away and showing off his martial arts chops.

In his third film after Zoot Suit (1981) and Eating Raoul (1982), Beltran is well-cast but given too little to do (perhaps inevitably) as Norris’s sidekick; he’s primarily meant to represent a nervous new ranger who learns to overcome his fears and act like a “real” man by heading out guns blazing.

In the image above he’s shown alongside character actor L.Q. Jones, who has some memorable early moments as “Dakota Brown.” Also adding extra quirkiness to the cast is Daniel Frishman as a megalomaniac little person in a wheelchair:

… and William Sanderson — “Sebastian” in Blade Runner (1982) — as a buffoonish drug dealer named Snow, with coke bottle glasses.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Good use of location shooting in El Paso
  • Norris and Carradine’s final battle

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look as an archetypal Norris film, especially given his duels with Carradine.

Links:

Good Guys Wear Black (1978)

Good Guys Wear Black (1978)

“I’m saying we’ve been set up.”

Synopsis:
A former elite CIA assassin (Chuck Norris) collaborates with a fellow vet (Lloyd Haynes) in uncovering a plot by a corrupt politician (James Franciscus) to have all survivors of a certain raid in Vietnam assassinated.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Assassination
  • Chuck Norris Films
  • Political Conspiracy
  • Veterans
  • Vietnam War

Review:
Chuck Norris’s first notable role was in this post-Watergate political conspiracy thriller, starting with an action-packed raid in Vietnam which goes terribly wrong.

Flashing forward, we see that Norris is now a graduate student in political science at UCLA, who enjoys racing cars on the side:

… and has no trouble being pursued by numerous beautiful women — including a mysterious reporter (Anne Archer) who he quickly becomes involved with.

Meanwhile, we see Haynes getting increasingly suspicious about a spate of strategic murders taking place across the nation — all involving men who were part of their elite team.

The film takes us across various scenic locales, including a ski resort at Lake Tahoe:

… with bloody sniper kills interspersed at regular intervals. What role does aging alcoholic politician Edgar Harolds (Dana Andrews) play in all of this?

That’s not revealed until much later on; but one thing is guaranteed: we will get to see Norris fighting at least once.

Note: Watch for Jim Backus in a cameo role as a doorman.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Dana Andrews as Edgar Harolds
  • Creative sets

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see for Norris fans. Listed as a Cult Movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Force of One, A (1979)

Force of One, A (1979)

“The headlines are screaming there’s a karate killer loose in this city!”

Synopsis:
While trying to crack a case of mysterious cop-murders carried out by a masked karate killer, a police detective (Jennifer O’Neill) enlists the help of a martial arts expert (Chuck Norris) whose adopted son (Eric Laneuville) is eventually put in harm’s way.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Chuck Norris Films
  • Drug Dealers
  • Martial Arts
  • Police

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary points out that this “pretty good Chuck Norris vehicle is much like a typical television police series, only it has some well-done karate fights to heighten the action.”

He adds that “there’s a strong supporting cast, Paul Aaron’s direction is impressive (particularly during fight sequences), and Norris’s karate exhibitions make up for the fact that he can’t act a lick in this film.”

Of most interest, marginally, is top-billed Jennifer O’Neill, who is effective playing a strong female cop.

Otherwise, there’s really nothing to recommend this one unless you happen to be a fan of such fare — and/or of Norris.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Decent directing

Must See?
No; you can skip this one unless you’re a Norris fan.

Links:

Cockfighter / Born to Kill (1974)

Cockfighter / Born to Kill (1974)

“I’m gonna keep my mouth shut until I’ve won that medal.”

Synopsis:
A down-on-his-luck cockfighter (Warren Oates) takes a vow of silence until he’s able to win back his fame, fortune, and girlfriend (Patricia Pearcy).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Ed Begley Jr. Films
  • Gambling
  • Harry Dean Stanton Films
  • Millie Perkins Films
  • Monte Hellman Films
  • Troy Donahue Films
  • Warren Oates Films

Review:
Notable as the only film which lost money for producer Roger Corman, this Monte Hellman-directed movie — based on a novel by screenwriter Charles Willeford — was re-released under various other names (including Born to Kill) but ultimately remains what its title implies: an 83-minute film about cockfighting, a sport which is now illegal across all 50 of the United States (though not in Puerto Rico, where it remains a thriving industry). Your appreciation of this offering will depend on a few factors: 1) how much you enjoy watching Oates turn in an impressive performance despite being limited to just a few lines of speech (in a flashback); 2) how curious you are to see this bloody sport in action (though you could alternatively just watch a short documentary about it on YouTube):

… and/or 3) how much of a Monte Hellman completist you are. Watch for numerous big-name actors in small roles, including Harry Dean Stanton as fellow cockfighter Jack Burke:

… Troy Donahue as Oates’ brother Randy:

… Millie Perkins as Randy’s curler-clad wife:

… and Ed Begley Jr. as a lanky local fighter.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Warren Oates as Frank Mansfield
  • Nestor Almendros’ cinematography

Must See?
No, unless you’re curious or a Hellman fan. Listed as a Cult Movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Bang the Drum Slowly (1973)

Bang the Drum Slowly (1973)

“How can he be so sick, and play so well?”

Synopsis:
A terminally ill baseball player (Robert De Niro) is supported in staying on his team by his unwaveringly loyal friend, Henry (Michael Moriarty).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Baseball
  • Friendship
  • Illness
  • Michael Moriarty Films
  • Robert De Niro Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
When discussing what he refers to as his “favorite baseball film,” Peary notes that screenwriter Mark Harris’s story (based on his 1956 novel) is “sensitively directed by John Hancock” and centers on “how people come through for those in trouble (the same theme as Terms of Endearment).” He writes that the “picture makes you feel good about people but, at the same time, sad that we so rarely show our altruistic side.” He argues “it has wit, creates nostalgia for a more innocent baseball era,” and “also tugs at your emotions [and] breaks your heart.” He concludes by noting that “the two leads, then relatively unknown, give exciting performances” — though “at the time [he] thought Moriarty would be the one to go on to superstardom” rather than De Niro.

Unfortunately, I can’t agree with Peary’s praise of this film; I’m more in alignment with Andrew Sarris, who in his review for The Village Voice noted that it’s highly effective at bringing on emotions (the closing baseball game is a tear-jerker) but otherwise too simplistic in its presentation. I’m guessing this one may mean a lot more to those who enjoyed the novel. Nominated as one of the Best Pictures of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Michael Moriarty as Henry
  • The lump-inducing final baseball sequence

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended for one-time viewing if you’re curious.

Links:

Winter Kills (1979)

Winter Kills (1979)

“Listen, kid: we find the killers of your brother, you’ll be a hero — a fucking legend.”

Synopsis:
With support from his father (John Huston) and girlfriend (Belinda Bauer), the brother (Jeff Bridges) of an assassinated president tries to follow an increasingly bizarre maze of clues leading to identifying the killer.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Anthony Perkins Films
  • Black Comedy
  • Dorothy Malone Films
  • Eli Wallach Films
  • Elizabeth Taylor Films
  • Father and Child
  • Jeff Bridges Films
  • John Huston Films
  • Murder Mystery
  • Political Conspiracy
  • Ralph Meeker Films
  • Richard Boone Films
  • Sterling Hayden Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, “Comic fantasist William Richert wrote and directed this cult film adapted from a novel by Richard Condon” (who had written The Manchurian Candidate 15 years earlier). He points out that the “picture has off-the-wall humor, bizarre characters, innumerable plot twists, [and] strange moments” — including “girlfriend Belinda Bauer talking to Bridges while sitting on the toilet:”

… “Huston walking around in red bikini shorts:”

… “Bridges riding out of Dad’s earshot to yell back, ‘You stink!'”:

… “loco spy-network wizard Anthony Perkins carrying on a calm conversation with Bridges although Bridges has just broken his arms:”

… and “a doorman in a temper tantrum,” among others.

However, he points out that “there are too many loose ends and overly eccentric characters” (no kidding!), noting in particular that “we could do without Sterling Hayden’s war-games fanatic.”

He adds that “it seems as if none of the star actors read the whole script,” given that “scenes have little connection to one another.” Perhaps worst — though this is meant to be a darkly comedic paranoia thriller — is that “the tongue-in-cheek approach makes what could have been a provocative vision of the corrupt American power elite into something quite trivial.”

I agree. This seems like a film that may have once felt more relevant given its proximity to JFK’s assassination, but now merely seems too purposefully disjointed and quirky for its own good. With that said, among the many cameos or supporting performances to watch out for are Richard Boone:

… unbilled Elizabeth Taylor:

… Eli Wallach:

… Ralph Meeker:

… and Dorothy Malone.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Jeff Bridges as Nick Kegan
  • Vilmos Zsigmond’s cinematography

Must See?
No; while this film clearly has its fans, I’m not among them.

Links:

Young Törless (1966)

Young Törless (1966)

“You agree to everything. You are a coward!”

Synopsis:
At an early 20th century boarding school in Austria, new arrival Thomas Törless (Mathieu Carrière) is distressed to find two classmates — Reiting (Fred Dietz) and Beineberg (Bernd Tischer) — bullying a fellow student named Basini (Marian Seidowsky), who has been caught stealing.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Barbara Steele Films
  • Boarding School
  • Bullies
  • Coming of Age
  • German Films
  • Teenagers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary notes that this “compelling adaptation of Robert Musil’s 1906 novel, written and directed by [27-year-old] Volker Schlöndorff,” “presents military academies as breeding grounds for fascists, and draws parallels between what happens in the school and the rise of Nazism in Germany in the early 1930s, [including] victimization of Jews.” He adds that even “more interestingly, it’s about how similar people can, through circumstances, go in opposite directions,” with one becoming “an oppressor and the other an outcast victim.”

Ironically, while Carrière’s Thomas detests the way Beineberg and Reiting “intellectualize that what they’re doing to Basini is an experiment in human nature (to see how much he will take),” Thomas himself could be seen as the ultimate passive intellectualizer, given his lack of willingness to step in and help Basini; which is worse?

Meanwhile, Thomas’s frustration with Basini’s “masochistic [sic] acceptance of his degradation and victimization” also seems off-base, since Basini is simply and pragmatically trying to survive. Shedding additional light on this topic, film scholar Timothy Corrigan — in an essay for Criterion on the film’s historical relevance — writes:

“Although critics of the film sometimes misread Törless’s passive and intellectual response to brutality as the message of the film, there is too much dark historical irony in this drama to be denied. Seen from Schlöndorff’s perspective in postwar Germany, this prewar tale of the Austrian upper class becomes a chilling anticipation of a culture stifled by authoritarian regimes and attitudes and secreted in the violent obsessions and weaknesses of individuals supporting those regimes.”

He continues:

“Like other films with similar boarding-school plots, such as Jean Vigo’s Zéro de Conduite (1933) and Lindsay Anderson’s If…. (1968), Young Törless investigates the social rituals that shape and repress adolescents in a rite-of-passage drama. But unlike those other two films, there is no rebellion against the institution in this German drama but instead a frighteningly stoic withdrawal.”

Striking Bernd Tischer (this is his only listed film role on IMDb) makes quite an impression as the school’s dominant bully; and in a surprising bit of casting, Barbara Steele plays a prostitute who piques Törless’s curiosity more than his lust.

On a side note, I was particularly interested in revisiting this film after learning more about Carrière through his daughter Alice’s recently released memoir, Everything Nothing Someone (2023), in which she very openly discusses the impact of his eccentric, philosophy-driven parenting style on her own fragile sense of self; one can see traces of the father she describes in this much earlier role for Carrière (his breakthrough film).

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Mathieu Carrière as Törless
  • Bernd Tischer as Beineberg
  • Franz Rath’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful early entry in New German cinema.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem

Links:

Color Purple, The (1985)

Color Purple, The (1985)

“I don’t know how to fight; all I know how to do is stay alive.”

Synopsis:
After being sexually abused by her father (Leonard Jackson) and giving birth to two kids who are adopted away from her, a young Black woman (Desreta Jackson) growing up with her beloved sister Nettie (Akosua Busia) in early 20th century Georgia becomes the wife (Whoopi Goldberg) of an abusive widower (Danny Glover) whose singer-lover, Shug (Margaret Avery), turns out to be an unexpected light in her life.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • African-Americans
  • Child Abuse
  • Deep South
  • Domestic Abuse
  • Feminism and Women’s Issues
  • Steven Spielberg Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that “Steven Spielberg’s adaptation of Alice Walker’s probably unfilmable Pulitzer Prize-winning [1982] novel” — which is nonetheless about to be released in a new rendition — “is a shrewdly directed, impressively acted movie,” but “it intentionally alters Walker in objectionable ways.” He asserts that “Spielberg and [white male] writer Menno Meyjes trade in Walker’s hellish, male-controlled, black world where Celie grows from an unappreciated, exploited, sexually abused, unloved daughter (Desreta Jackson)”:

… “to unappreciated, exploited, sexually and physically abused wife (Whoopi Goldberg).”

He argues that Spielberg and Meyjes “substitute [in] a fairytale world that is shot through rose-colored lenses, where Celie’s problems with [her] husband… are no worse and no more realistic than Cinderella’s when living with wicked stepsisters” while also choosing “to downplay such controversial themes as rape, incest, racism, and most significantly, lesbianism.”

He writes that “the book’s feminist theme — [that] Celie’s personal growth, self-respect, and rare moments of happiness are the result of being with strong women like Shug and her foolish stepson’s battling wife, Sofia ([Oscar-nominated] Oprah Winfrey) and reading the letters from her sister in Africa — is almost completely diluted.”

Peary points out that while the “picture has many big scenes from the book,” “they’ve been taken out of context so that we can’t see their thematic relevance.” For instance, “we don’t see that Sofia is gotten out of jail by her former romantic rival, Squeak (Rae Dawn Chong), so we are deprived of the significant black-female-bond theme that makes the whole sequence involving Sofia important.”

It’s been so long since I read The Color Purple that I can’t recall details of all these subplots — meaning I must judge the film on its own merits. To that end, I agree with DVD Savant’s assertion that:

The film has no appreciation of what destitute misery can be — even Harpo’s broken-down shacks look like something wonderful from Tom Sawyer’s Island. There’s never a day in Georgia that isn’t drop-dead gorgeous, even when it’s raining or a storm is brewing; everybody looks well fed, if not downright prosperous. The movie is designed within an inch of its life, and cinematographer Allen Daviau drowns the screen with pretty pictures that warp the world of poverty the film aims to depict.

Indeed, this is an overly pretty, glowing film about some of life’s most challenging topics — but to its credit, it ultimately shows that women can (and will) prevail even in the face of seemingly unbearable insults. Goldberg’s fine breakthrough performance makes this film worth a look, though I ultimately don’t consider it must-see viewing — and I’m not particularly looking forward to the remake, either; I’d rather re-read the book one day.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Whoopi Goldberg as Celie
  • Allen Daviau’s cinematography

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a one-time look for Goldberg’s performance, and for its historical significance as an Oscar nominee.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Zulu (1964)

Zulu (1964)

“The sentries report Zulus to the southwest — thousands of them.”

Synopsis:
In 1879, Lieutenant John Chard (Stanley Baker) — with support from Lieutenant Bromhead (Michael Caine) — assumes command of a missionary station at Rorke’s Drift in Natal, South Africa, where they prepare for advancement of 4,000 Zulu warriors.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Africa
  • Historical Drama
  • Jack Hawkins Films
  • Michael Caine Films
  • Military

Review:
Stanley Baker produced — and formerly blacklisted director Cy Endfield helmed — this colorful historical epic, based on a real-life battle and featuring a cast of 700+ Zulu extras (most of whom were descendants of the warriors). Although the subject matter is inherently problematic — we are asked to watch and sympathize with White settlers defending land they recently stole — the film itself does a masterful job showing events in a reasonably respectful way; while the Zulu warriors are primarily an indistinguishable mass (we never get to know any of them as humanistic individuals), they are at least portrayed as worthy, skilled, reasonable, and insanely brave combatants.

With that enormous caveat aside, the movie is exciting and almost impossibly tension-filled, as we wonder how in the world a tiny group of men will manage to hold off forces 26 times their size, circling in from all directions.

The script — by Endfield and John Prebble, whose original story the screenplay is based on — does a nice job setting us up to understand the complexity of the colonists’ situation. As the film opens, we see missionary Otto Witt (Jack Hawkins) and his daughter (Ulla Jacobsson) observing a mass Zulu marriage ceremony.

From there, after hearing about the crushing defeat of British soldiers at Isandlwana, they are taken to the hospital at their mission station, where we’re quickly introduced to a group of men who are either hurt, malingering, doctoring (Patrick Magee), or keeping camp — and none of whom have any idea what they’re about to be in for.

Hawkins (secretly alcoholic) and Jacobsson are firmly against asking the hospital’s inhabitants to stay and fight — and eventually they’re taken away to safely; but violence for those staying is inevitable, and the majority of the film shows how the entire company (well and sick) manages to hold out (though of course not without plenty of death on both sides).

Note:Jacobsson is the only listed female in the cast of this film, which most definitely does not pass the Bechdel Test.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Michael Caine (in his breakthrough role) as Lt. Bromhead
  • Fine supporting performances


  • Truly impressive battle sequences
  • Stephen Dade’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, once, but with caution (as noted above).

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links: