FilmFanatic.org

Synopsis:
While on vacation in the Himalayas, the younger daughter (Alokananda Roy) of an industrialist (Chhabi Biswas) and his wife (Karuna Banerjee) ponders an offer of marriage from a wealthy suitor (Pahadi Sanyal) while engaging in conversation with a poor but intriguing young man from Calcultta (Arun Mukherjee); meanwhile, her older sister (Anubha Gupta) talks with her husband (Anil Chatterjee) about whether to stay in their marriage on behalf of their young daughter.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Class Relations
• Feminism and Women’s Issues
• Indian Films
• Love Triangle
• Satyajit Ray Films

Review:
Satyajit Ray’s ninth feature film (his first in color) was this contemplative, conversation-filled drama about love and marriage, set in the foothills of the Himalayas (specifically the hill station of Darjeeling). The synopsis above covers the basics of what we see and hear from the three couples (or would-be couples) — aging Biswas and Banerjee:

… unhappily married Gupta and Chatterjee:

… and the undecided future-coupling of either Roy and Sanyal:

… or Roy and Mukherjee.

Not much else is available to read about this film, but according to Wikipedia:

In 1962, Ray directed Kanchenjungha. Based on his first original screenplay, it was also his first colour film. It tells the story of an upper-class family spending an afternoon in Darjeeling, a picturesque hill town in West Bengal. They try to arrange the engagement of their youngest daughter to a highly paid engineer educated in London.

Ray had first conceived shooting the film in a large mansion, but later decided to film it in the famous town. He used many shades of light and mist to reflect the tension in the drama. Ray noted that while his script allowed shooting to be possible under any lighting conditions, a commercial film crew in Darjeeling failed to shoot a single scene, as they only wanted to do so in sunshine.

As Ray’s first venture into original screenwriting rather than adapting someone else’s work, it will certainly be of interest to fans of the director — and it remains a thoughtful treatise on gender norms and marital challenges in mid-century India. But it’s not must-see for all film fanatics.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Good use of locale shooting to highlight interpersonal tensions and possibilities
  

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a one-time look if you’re a fan of Ray’s work.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• FirstPost Article

Synopsis:
In 18th century France, a swashbuckling thief (Jean-Paul Belmondo) travels with his accomplices and his new wife Venus (Claudia Cardinale) to Paris, where they begin robbing from the rich and distributing to the poor — but things get much more complicated when “Cartouche” (Belmondo) falls for a beautiful noblewoman (Odile Versois).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Claudia Cardinale Films
• French Films
• Historical Drama
• Jean-Paul Belmondo Films
• Love Triangle
• Royalty and Nobility
• Thieves and Criminals

Review:
Philippe de Broca — perhaps best known for helming cult favorite King of Hearts (1966) — directed this high-spirited historical adventure flick, described by the New York Times reviewer as offering up “colorful, illustrating legendary footnotes to French history that should keep action fans, romantics and comedy connoisseurs happy even if it confuses the historians.” Indeed, one shouldn’t look for historical accuracy of any kind here — but the production design is appropriately lush, and one feels plopped directly into the era.

A year before starring in Fellini’s 8 1/2 (1963), Cardinale played luscious Venus, a gypsy whose willingness to overlook her partner’s openly roving eye strains credulity yet somehow works anyway; thankfully, her character is given an appropriately satisfying arc.

Belmondo, meanwhile — who seems to have participated in a remarkable number of films during the early 1960s — is able to put his rascally Godardian persona to good use (and did all his own stunts).

While it’s easy to see why he would fall for beautiful Versois:

… it does get complicated keeping our loyalties straight. Regardless, fans of this type of fare will likely not be disappointed (though viewers should be forewarned that there’s a highly distressing, lengthy waterboarding sequence included at one point).

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Jean-Paul Belmondo and Claudia Cardinale as Cartouche and Venus
  
• Lovely cinematography and production design
  
  

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look if you enjoy this kind of drama and/or Belmondo or Cardinale.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review

Synopsis:
Aspiring roller derby players in Ohio dream about the big time.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Documentary
• Sports

Review:
This disappointing documentary about the roller derby scene of the early 1970s offers little hope about the state of humanity. Granted, that shouldn’t necessarily be the prerogative of a sports documentary, which arguably should focus on: 1) what the sport entails, and 2) why people choose it.

In this case, however, while the action is plenty raw — these roller derby athletes play fast, rough, and theatrically — the aspiring athletes interviewed here (along with their wives and girlfriends) are such an uninteresting bunch that it’s hard to care whatsoever about their travails or their outcomes.

The biggest “star” of the show is Roller Derby Hall of Fame inductee Charlie O’Connell, shown here enjoying retirement by his poolside home in California.

Unfortunately, he’s utterly lacking in charisma or meaningful insights. The trailer for a later documentary called This is Roller Derby (2007) — which I haven’t yet seen, but plan to check out — offered me a lot more info in just three minutes.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Occasional snippets of drama on the skating track
  

Must See?
No; skip this one.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• Time Out Capsule Review

Synopsis:
The traumatized wife (Monica Vitti) of a petro-chemical industrialist (Carlo Chionetti) begins an affair with a visiting associate (Richard Harris).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Infidelity
• Italian Films
• Mental Breakdown
• Michelangelo Antonioni Films
• Monica Vitti Films
• Richard Harris Films

Review:
Michelangelo Antonioni’s fourth and final film made with Monica Vitti was his first in color, and in many ways feels like a fourth addition to their original b&w trilogy — L’Avventura (1960), La Notte (1961), and L’Eclisse (1962) — given that once again, Vitti plays a dissatisfied woman who seems to be aimlessly drifting through life. However, in this case she’s simultaneously recovering from and continuing to experience an ongoing mental breakdown much more overtly than what her previous characters went through.

Indeed, Vitti’s Giuliana is visibly disoriented and deeply distressed. At one point she states, “There’s something terrible about reality, and I don’t know what it is. No one will tell me.” Her performance is believable, and especially challenging to watch knowing that she lived so many of her final years suffering from Alzheimer’s. It’s hard not to sympathize with her sense of disorientation given how stupidly and/or mindlessly so many people around her act, as epitomized in the film’s odd party sequence taking place in a crowded riverside shack.

While it’s a little strange seeing red-headed Harris playing a dubbed Italian:

… it works well enough, and his inherent gravitas is welcomed. Story-wise, however, there is as little here to hold onto as in Antonioni’s earlier films. As Andrew Sarris wrote somewhat impatiently in his review for The Village Voice: “Antonioni’s first color film after eight black-and-white features in 15 years… is more a series of paintings unfurled in time than the kind of dramatic spectacle we have been calling a movie for the past half-century.” Indeed, it’s the visuals here — a combination of natural landscapes:

… and harsh mechanical wastelands:

… that most linger in one’s memory, rather than anything about the narrative or characters themselves.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Monica Vitti as Giuliana
  
• Carlo Di Palma’s cinematography
  

Must See?
No, though most film fanatics will likely be curious to see it as part of Antonioni’s quartet of Vitti films. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• Criterion Essay
• Village Voice Review
• Q Network Review
• TCM Article
• TCM DVD Review

Synopsis:
A young woman (Monica Vitti) who has just broken up with her lover (Francisco Rabal) finds new romance with the earnings-focused stock broker (Alain Delon) of her mother (Lilla Brignone).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Alain Delon Films
• Italian Films
• Michelangelo Antonioni Films
• Monica Vitti Films

Review:
This third entry in Antonioni’s informal “trilogy of alienation” — following L’Avventura (1960) and La Notte (1961) — once again features his muse and lover, Monica Vitti, in a central role; and, similar to the two earlier titles, its storyline — this time taking place in the EUR of Rome — isn’t exactly jam-packed. As DVD Savant writes in his synopsis of the film: “The camera simply observes a series of events in a young woman’s life that show her responses — or more accurately, her difficulty in finding responses — to what seems a random and soul-less existence.”

Indeed. Of course, there is a lot more going on thematically for those interested in digging deeper; as Professor Richard Read notes in his analysis of the film:

“It is widely recognized that Michelangelo Antonioni’s film L’Eclisse is a late Italian Neo-Realist critique of the alienating effects of capitalist reification, mass society, mechanization, dysfunctional gender roles and urban living in Cold War Rome.”

Yep. All that, for sure — though as a straightforward movie-watching experience, the film remains less than compelling. However, Vitti and Delon are a beautiful couple to look at:

… and Gianni Di Venanzo’s cinematography is top-notch. Especially noteworthy are the energetic stock trading scenes, filmed with real brokers as extras to add to the verisimilitude.

Note: If you’d like to geek out on the role of architecture in this film, be sure to watch James Macgillvray’s talk.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Fine cinematography
  
  
  

Must See?
No, though most film fanatics will probably be curious to check it out.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• TCM Article
• DVD Savant Review
• Jonathan Rosenbaum’s essay for Criterion

Synopsis:
A novelist (Marcello Mastroianni) and his wife (Jeanne Moreau) spend a challenging evening together, including attending a party where Mastroianni flirts with a beautiful young woman (Monica Vitti) and a playboy (Giorgio Negro) pursues Moreau.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Italian Films
• Jeanne Moreau Films
• Marcello Mastroianni Films
• Marital Problems
• Michelangelo Antonioni Films
• Monica Vitti Films

Review:
The second of Michelangelo Antonioni’s so-called “alienation trilogy” — after L’Avventura (1960) and before L’Eclisse (1962) — was this similarly (slowly) paced film showing us a day and a night in the lives of a well-to-do couple whose relationship has clearly reached a point of impasse. After visiting their dying friend (Bernard Wicki) in the hospital:

… Mastroianni is briefly seduced by a disturbed young woman (Maria Pia Luzi) down the hall:

… while nonchalant Moreau wanders the streets of Milan, observing life and landscapes around her.

That night, the couple head first to a nightclub, where they watch an erotic dance:

… and then to a party, which takes up the entire second half of the film.

Mastroianni is attracted to the daughter (Vitti) of the party host (Vincenzo Corbella):

… while Moreau allows herself to be distracted by a man (Giorgio Negro) who’s shown interest in her.

As with most other Antonioni films of the period, that just about sums up the narrative. While it’s beautifully shot, this one is only must-see for fans of his work.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Gianni Di Venanzo’s cinematography
  

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a one-time look.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• TCM Article
• NY Times Original Review
• DVD Savant Review
• Time Out Capsule Review

Synopsis:
At a baroque European hotel, a tall skinny man (Sacha Pitoëff) challenges inhabitants to the game of Nim while an elegant man (Giorgio Albertazzi) continuously insists to a woman (Delphine Seyrig) — perhaps Pitoëff’s spouse — that they had an affair the prior year.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Alain Resnais Films
• Delphine Seyrig Films
• French Films

Review:
Alain Resnais’s follow-up to Hiroshima Mon Amour (1959) was this collaboration with writer Alain Robbe-Grillet, resulting in one of the most unusual, provocative, and inscrutable entries in the French New Wave. None of the characters have names, and there is no storyline to speak of other than Albertazzi’s repetitive pursuit (gaslighting?) of luminous Seyrig across various spaces in and around the unnamed hotel.

We have no idea — and (SPOILER) never learn — what’s actually going on here. Albertazzi tells Seyrig things like: “You were waiting for me.” “No,” she replies, “why should I be?” His response: “I’ve waited a long time for you.” Later he says: “You’re running away again.” She replies: “What do you mean? I don’t understand a word.” He responds: “If it were a dream, why should you be afraid?” “Tell me,” she says.

And on and on. Later he adds: “You asked me not to see you. But of course we met, the day after or the next, or the day after that. Perhaps it was by accident. I insisted on your leaving with me. You said it was impossible, of course. But now, you know it’s the only thing left for you to do.” And so we hear, relentlessly, why he believes they were once together and should be again.

Does Seyrig want to believe this is true? It’s not clear — and perhaps not relevant, given that this is Albertazzi’s dream (or reality, or intention), and Seyrig simply plays a key role-of-desire, with Pitoëff showing up every now and then as a not-so-menacing third wheel presence.

To that end, there are two repetitive games going on throughout the film: Pitoëff’s matches with various players (he always wins):

… and Albertazzi’s insistent pursuit of Seyrig. Does he get her in the end? I will leave that to you to find out, since it’s the sole narrative hook of the entire venture.

Watch for a subtle image of Hitchcock on the right during an early sequence; I had to go back to look for it once I learned it was there.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Elegant costumes and production design
  
  
• Sacha Vierny’s cinematography
  

Must See?
Yes, for its historical relevance. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

• Historically Relevant

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• TCM Article
• DVD Savant Review
• Q Network Review
• Criterion Essay

Synopsis:
When a model (Vanity) and her partner (Richard Sargent) end up on an island with a gorilla (Don McLeod), an unusual love triangle ensues.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Cross Cultural Romance
• Deserted Island
• Love Triangle
• Primates

Review:
It’s unfortunate that Alfred Sole — director of the horror cult classic Alice, Sweet Alice (1977) — followed up with this nearly unwatchable dreck. Rather than engaging in any attempt at analysis, I’ll simply cite from Graeme Clark’s review for Spinning Image:

This strange item of exoticism was written by its producer Pierre Brousseau and for the male viewers it poses that age old problem. You’re artistic, sensitive but manly, and entirely self-sufficient – so why is your girlfriend interested in a gorilla?

That is the question, indeed. Viewers at the time were likely intrigued and/or excited to see Vanity — best known as lead singer of Nasty 6, which performed Prince’s “Nasty Girl” — in a leading role featuring plenty of nudity:

… and Rick Baker designed the gorilla suit, for what that’s worth.

But the storyline (such as it is — I’ll leave all surprises to you) is sorely lacking.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:
Really, not much.

Must See?
Nope; skip this one.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• Spinning Image Review

Synopsis:
When their teenage daughter (Linnea Heacock) goes missing, Mrs. Tyne (Lynn Carlin) and her husband Larry (Buck Henry) join the Society for Parents of Fugitive Children, where they learn to smoke pot and and mingle with a pair of freewheeling new friends (Audra Lindley and Paul Benedict).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Comedy
• Generation Gap
• Milos Forman Films
• Runaways
• Search

Review:
Milos Forman’s American debut was this time-capsule comedic sketch about generational alienation during the height of the countercultural era. We quickly learn that Mr. and Mrs. Tyne — rather than their missing daughter, who only speaks a few words — are the true protagonists of the film, representing all the well-meaning but utterly clueless parents of teenagers seeking more expressive, less repressive lives for themselves.

The expansiveness of this desire is well encapsulated by the sprawling opening sequence (actually intercut throughout the entire first half of the screenplay) wherein dozens of teenage girls audition for an unknown show.

As in The Fireman’s Ball (1967), Forman seems to take great delight in showing a wide variety of distinctive young female faces.

Meanwhile, Carlin and Henry socialize with their seemingly square friends (Georgia Engel and Tony Harvey):

… and after a series of phone calls, nebbishy Henry (giving off serious Woody Allen vibes) is sent out on the town to comb for his daughter, which leads him to meet a married woman (Audra Lindley) he instantly hits it off with.

Eventually Carlin, Henry, Lindley, and Benedict all end up at a massive banquet for parents just like themselves, looking for their teenage children who have gone astray.

In an extended gag, the banquet-goers engage in an experiential lesson in pot smoking — and after this, we see a hotel-room strip poker game far wilder than anything the parents’ kids are getting into.

The seemingly improvisational narrative (actually co-scripted by Forman, John Guare, and Jean-Claude Carrière) is all crafted to highlight the absurdity and hypocrisy of parents whose concern for their kids might be much better placed examining their own lives and neuroticisms. Watch for numerous recognizable names and faces as peripheral members of the cast, including Kathy (“Bobo”) Bates, Carly Simon, and Jessica Harper auditioning:

… Vincent Schiavelli (playing himself) as the pot-smoking instructor:

… and Ike and Tina Turner performing.

Most startling random sequence: a nude young female cellist performs in a restaurant.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Quirky performances by the leads
  
• Effective use of location shooting in New York City
  
• Several humorous sequences
  
  

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look for its cultural relevance and as Forman’s American debut. Listed as a Cult Movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• Senses of Cinema Review
• Time Out Capsule Review