Blindman (1971)
“I didn’t see a thing.”
|
Synopsis: |
|
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Anthony — best known for The Stranger Spaghetti-western-series (which I haven’t seen) — wore intensely painful contact lenses (he wouldn’t do a sequel) to embody a blind man on a last-chance mission to secure a comfortable life through a hefty pay-out. The entire story consists of a cat-and-mouse attempts to transport objectified beauties from one set of aggressive, dirty men to another, with plenty of exploitation scenes thrown in — just, because. As DVD Savant, a fan of this film, puts it:
Personally, I grew tired of explosions and violence long before this film’s (restored) 105 minutes were over — but at least the cinematography and sets are appealing. Notable Performances, Qualities, \and Moments: Must See? Links: |






One thought on “Blindman (1971)”
First viewing (8/27/22). Only for spaghetti western fans.
This is the only one of the 38 films by Bandi that Peary chose to highlight. Inspired by the ‘Zatoichi’ series, it’s by turns confusing, implausible and just plain dumb. This flick is ultimately unsatisfying because it’s consistently frustrating.
According to IMDb, director Alex Cox – who wrote a book on this western genre, ‘10,000 Ways to Die’ – ” rightfully described it as “not a great film, but it has sadistic style and imaginative elements which recall the golden years (of the Spaghetti Western) of 1966 to 1968. It could have been worse, and for that reason alone, as the form stumbled and began to lose its way, enthusiasts still recall it fondly.”
Fans of the film may recall it fondly (esp. if they are weirdly recognizing that “sadistic” is a memorable, um… “style”) but it’s little more than a Sergio Leone-wanna-be (complete with a score that leans toward being a Morricone wanna-be). Those lured to the film by the supporting casting of Ringo Starr may very well be disappointed as well. He’s not very good.