Lord Jim (1965)

Lord Jim (1965)

“No white man hides himself in the wilderness without a reason.”

Synopsis:
After a young merchant seaman (Peter O’Toole) abandons his ship during a storm, he tries to rectify his shame by drifting around the South Seas, soon befriending the owner (Paul Lukas) of a cargo ship and agreeing to help a local town leader in an uprising against a warlord known as The General (Eli Wallach). Eventually he falls in love with a native girl (Daliah Lavi) and attempts to live a happy life with her — but the arrival of a ruthless pirate (James Mason) forces him to make difficult choices.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Akim Tamaroff Films
  • At Sea
  • Curt Jurgens Films
  • Eli Wallach Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Jack Hawkins Films
  • James Mason Films
  • Paul Lukas Films
  • Peter O’Toole Films
  • Richard Brooks Films

Review:
Richard Brooks wrote and directed this adaptation of Joseph Conrad’s 1900 novel of the same name, based on a real-life incident involving Muslim Indonesians on a seabound pilgrimage to Mecca. It received some negative reviews upon release, and unfortunately, I can see why. Though Freddie Young’s cinematography is as beautiful as always:

… and O’Toole is effectively earnest as a young man wracked with guilt for his decision during a time of crisis:

… the rest of the plot simply plays like a standard tale of a White man attempting to lose himself in foreign lands with a beautiful native girl (while getting inextricably caught up in local politics). The eventual appearance of James Mason’s “Gentleman Brown” is a welcome plot turn, but the storyline as a whole fails to compel.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Paul Lukas as Stein
  • James Mason as Gentleman Brown
  • Freddie Young’s cinematography

Must See?
No, though fans of the stars and/or Richard Brooks will likely be curious to check it out.

Links:

One thought on “Lord Jim (1965)

  1. Not must-see – and in total agreement with the reasons given in the astute assessment. Kind of a slog, really, in spite of its Mason plus-factor.

Leave a Reply