Count Yorga, Vampire (1970)
“Vampires have minds far superior to those of mortals.”
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review:
… and that he finds the “lengthy, terribly directed, bloody finale in the Count’s castle” “amusing”.
I don’t think the ending is particularly bad or amusing, but agree with Peary that this cult item is more a curio of its time than a classic. Its narrative “appeal” seems to be that young women of any era and setting — not just 19th century Transylvania — are at risk of being lured by seductive, deceptive vampires. But poor Lang is stuck between two terrible choices: becoming Quarry’s blood-sucking bride (at which point she’s reduced to gnawing on a kitten):
or staying with her obnoxious boyfriend (Murphy); I’m not sure which is a better fate (!).
I do wish this film had even a little bit more of a feminist “bite”; Perry’s girlfriend (Julie Conners), shown naked in bed, is portrayed in an especially offensive manner.
I wasn’t surprised to hear this was originally planned as a soft-core adult flick.
Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
2 thoughts on “Count Yorga, Vampire (1970)”
First viewing. Not must-see.
It’s watchable – but just barely. Genre fans – presumably well-versed in vampire flicks – are likely to find this wanting: it really has no unique angle to it. Patience may be required in the first, slow-moving 30 minutes. Beyond that point, there are still dull sequences; it’s not a film that’s all-that-well constructed, really.
⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Effective, low-key, creepy vampire film was the first to bring vampirism up to date at the time. Quarry is excellent in this and the sequel which is also good. Minor film so not must see but both are recommended.