When Worlds Collide (1951)
“The day may arrive when money won’t mean anything — not to you, not to anyone.”
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review:
Yet while I agree with Peary that this second film is more intrinsically engaging than Destination Moon, the latter is must-see for historical purposes (as the film which first made space exploration seem like a realistic possibility), while WWC will primarily be of interest to sci-fi fans interested in what is probably the first cinematic depiction of the destruction of the Earth.
In his more detailed analysis of When Worlds Collide, DVD Savant refers to it as “a charming hoot, but still a far better movie than the idiotic Armageddon.” He concedes, however, that “the scientific details are sketchy, especially from the maker of the fastidiously accurate Destination Moon.” For instance, he bluntly notes:
But what fun would that be to envision — right? Even more disturbing to my mind is the utter homogeneity of the core group of potential travellers, who are all (all) white.
You’d think that some kind of perspective on future diversity would be taken into consideration even back in 1951 — but so it goes. Regardless, those who enjoy ’50s sci-fi flicks will be able to take the film’s more dated elements in stride, and simply enjoy its “impressive special effects”, which “wowed ’em in 1951 and can still spark imagination and wonder” (though I’ll admit to finding some of them — i.e., the final matte paintings representing the planet Zyra — to come across as hopelessly artificial).
Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
One thought on “When Worlds Collide (1951)”
Not a must.
Largely in agreement, so not much to add. A nicely produced yet quaint sci-fi relic that carries a tidy little drama along with it. Yummy Derr and charming Rush make for a noble couple. Ultimately slightly silly, but it has a good pace and there’s a nice little twist of human conflict near the end.