Six of a Kind (1934)
“Maybe I’d better murder them and get it over with, huh?”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: In order for this kind of “comedic” scenario to work, the honeymooning couple would have to be posited as worthy of being tortured in some way — yet Ruggles and Boland are actually quite charming, and we desperately wish they could simply get on with the middle-aged canoodling they’re so eager for. Instead, we’re forced to suffer through scene after scene of Allen’s pure idiocy literally placing her hosts’ lives at risk. Suffice it to say that I was indescribably happy once Fields and Skipworth entered the scene, and the storyline finally turned to the silly subplot about hidden money and false accusations. Fields is in top form, and does a great (if nerve-wracking) pool sketch. Note: This film possesses an odd connection with Frank Tashlin’s Hollywood or Bust (1956) — viz. the presence of an enormous dog on a cross-country road trip to Hollywood… In both instances, the dog provides (sadly) minimal comedic value. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
One thought on “Six of a Kind (1934)”
OUCH! Not a must, no-no-no-no-no!
First viewing.
So. Very. Tiresome.