Browsed by
Category: Original Reviews

Responses to Peary’s “must see” movie reviews, as well as my own “must see” movie reviews up to and after 1986 (when Peary’s book was published).

Liaisons Dangereuses, Les (1959)

Liaisons Dangereuses, Les (1959)

“Which of us molded the other?”

Synopsis:
A French couple — Valmont (Gérard Philipe) and Juliette (Jeanne Moreau) — whose marriage revolves around seducing and then abandoning new “conquests” find their happiness compromised when Valmont beds a virginal teenager (Jeanne Valérie) whose fiance (Jean-Louis Trintignant) has been waiting patiently for her while pursuing his studies, then falls in love with a married woman (Annette Vadim) who sparks new feelings within him.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • French Films
  • Infidelity
  • Jeanne Moreau Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Roger Vadim Films
  • Sexuality

Review:
Roger Vadim’s adaptation of Pierre Choderlos de Laclos’ 1782 novel is an interesting entry in the cinematic annals of this scandalous story’s numerous iterations. Featuring a rich, jazzy soundtrack by Thelonius Monk, and upscale settings in snowy retreats:

… the action and settings have clearly been modernized, but the basic tenet of sociopaths using others for their own pleasure is as relevant as ever. Moreau and Philipe — in his final performance before dying at age 36 from liver cancer — are well cast in the lead roles as the master manipulators (here a married couple rather than friends, as in the novel) whose own sexual gratification revolves around their exploitation of others:

Vadim’s real-life wife Annette is appropriately tragic as Philipe’s most complex conquest:

… and Valérie and Trintignant are believable as a naive young couple whose lives are also changed forever by their involvement with Valmont and Juliette:

Fans of this harsh classic tale will want to check this version out — but/and should be prepared for a startling update to the story’s original ending.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Marcel Grignon’s cinematography
  • Thelonius Monk’s score

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended.

Links:

French Cancan (1955)

French Cancan (1955)

“Yes, it’s true. I’m his mistress and I’m proud of it.”

Synopsis:
A nightclub manager (Jean Gabin) hires a talented young laundry worker (Françoise Arnoul) to dance the cancan in his new facility — but Arnoul’s boyfriend (Franco Pastorino) is upset when she falls for Gabin, and a wealthy prince (Giani Esposito) is equally disappointed that Arnoul won’t accept his offer of marriage.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dancers
  • French Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Jean Gabin Films
  • Jean Renoir Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals

Review:
One of Jean Renoir’s three post-Hollywood musical comedies — after The Golden Coach (1952) and before Elena and Her Men (1956) [not listed in GFTFF] — was this vibrant fictional homage to the founding of the Moulin Rouge nightclub in Paris. It’s pure fantasy all the way, filmed entirely on sets:

… and with a featherweight storyline designed simply to showcase that love of the stage tends to triumph over all other considerations (even the promise of wealth and royalty).

Gabin strolls leisurely through his role as an aging but still desirable impresario:

… but it’s the dancing one really keeps an eye out for, and to that end the film opens and closes with plenty of spectacle.


Fans of such fare will surely enjoy this, but it’s not must-see viewing.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine period sets and Technicolor cinematography

Must See?
No, though of course Renoir fans will want to check it out.

Links:

Purple Plain, The (1954)

Purple Plain, The (1954)

“I think he cracked up years ago.”

Synopsis:
A Canadian RAF pilot (Gregory Peck) struggling with flashbacks to his wife’s death is taken by a kind doctor (Bernard Lee) to visit the home of a missionary (Brenda de Banzie) in Burma, where he meets and falls in love with a beautiful young nurse’s aide (Win Min Than). Soon Peck’s trauma decreases enough that he’s able to help support his crew through a dangerous and unexpected crash landing.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Airplanes and Pilots
  • Character Arc
  • Gregory Peck Films
  • Mental Breakdown
  • Survival
  • World War II

Review:
Former child-actor-turned-editor Robert Parrish didn’t get a chance to direct many films, but this BAFTA-nominated feature remains among his best. Evoking memories of his starring turn in Twelve O’Clock High (1949), Peck once again plays a fighter pilot under pressure, with Parrish making good use of atmospheric flashbacks to give us context for why Peck has “cracked up”:

The storyline then shifts into two new directions: Peck’s budding romance with Than —

… and a gripping crash-survival scenario.

As DVD Savant notes, the overall storyline “hits an emotional chord” through a story (by Eric Ambler) whose “details have an unspoken feeling of faith and abiding inner peace.” Indeed, it’s refreshing seeing Peck (in yet another fine performance) being given a new chance at life after the grief he’s suffered.

Also of note is British character actress Brenda de Banzie in a memorable role as an earnest, hymn-belting missionary:

While The Purple Plain isn’t must-see viewing, it’s recommended as a “good show”.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Gregory Peck as Bill Forrester
  • Brenda de Banzie as Miss McNab
  • Geoffrey Unsworth’s cinematography

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended for one-time viewing.

Links:

Gervaise (1956)

Gervaise (1956)

“Someone had you before me, and I’m glad it was him.”

Synopsis:
In 19th century France, an unmarried laundry woman (Maria Schell) with two kids endures taunts from a neighbor (Suzy Delair), then marries a roofer (François Perier) who turns to alcoholism after a nasty accident. A kind blacksmith (Jacques Harden) offers solace and love to Gervaise (Schell), but when her former lover (Armand Mestral) comes to live in their house, she reaches her last straw.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Feminism and Women’s Issues
  • French Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Maria Schell Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Rene Clement Films
  • Strong Females

Review:
Rene Clement directed this adaptation of Emile Zola’s 1877 novel L’Assommoir, a prequel of sorts to Nana (1880) and part of the same series of 20 naturalist novels about the Rougon-Macquart family. Clement’s steady directorial hand — supported by DP Robert Juillard and fine historical sets — is in clear evidence throughout, and Schell is appealing in the title role:

However, the overall storyline — about women’s issues vis-à-vis poverty and single motherhood — is so bleak, one must be in the right space to handle it. We feel for Schell’s predicament: it’s hard enough for her to earn a rough living as a laundry woman while enduring teasing about her marital status:

… but when her new husband turns to drink and then invites her older children’s father (Mestral) to come live with them, she is really put into a pickle. Things stay rough and don’t get a whole lot better; be forewarned.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Maria Schell as Gervaise
  • Fine attention to period detail

Must See?
No, though it’s recommended for one time viewing if you can stomach it. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Red and the Black, The (1954)

Red and the Black, The (1954)

“Never has sin been committed with less joy.”

Synopsis:
After seducing the mother (Danielle Darrieux) of the children he’s tutoring, an upwardly mobile aspiring priest named Julien Sorel (Gérard Philipe) takes a new position in the household of a lawyer (Jean Mercure) whose virginal daughter (Antonella Lualdi) falls for and seduces him — but how will Darrieux react when she learns her former lover has not gone into the priesthood after all?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Courtroom Drama
  • Cross-Class Romance
  • Danielle Darrieux Films
  • Flashback Films
  • French Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Infidelity
  • Social Climbers

Review:
French director Claude Autant-Lara helmed this adaptation — named Best Film of the Year by the French Syndicate of Cinema Critics — of Stendhal’s 1830 two-volume novel. The book is known as the first “psychological novel”, given Stendhal’s use of interior monologues for the main character — a rhetorical structure retained here to surprisingly good effect (i.e., they help us to better understand the thoughts and motivations of this complex character, but aren’t overused).

Sorel is an intriguing protagonist — someone we don’t especially like, but are curious to learn more about as we see the various moves he makes, especially knowing he’ll end up in court defending himself (the film is structured as a lengthy flashback occurring during his trial for shooting a woman). We wonder why he wants to be a priest, for instance — but a key scene when he observes a bishop genuflecting in front of the mirror helps us understand that he’s eager to climb the heights of this profession and be adored in precisely this way:

Meanwhile, his predatory seduction of Darrieux’s Mme. de Rénal feels loathesome, yet he does seem to eventually love her in his own way:

As the story progresses, we continue to learn more about Sorel’s ambitions and how calculated he is about every single decision in his life. While he’s temporarily foiled time and again, he eventually “succeeds” in landing a higher spot in society — only to have it all unravel due to jealousy and passion. C’est la vie.

Note: This film has existed in a variety of lengths over the years, ranging from 113 minutes to 194 minutes; the latter is the version I saw, and it never seemed to drag (though I did watch it over several different sittings).

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine sets, costumes, and cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look if it sounds of interest.

Links:

Hell and High Water (1954)

Hell and High Water (1954)

“Each man has his own reason for living — and his own price for dying.”

Synopsis:
When the Chinese are suspected of building a secret atomic base on a Pacific island, a former Navy captain (Richard Widmark) is hired to man a submarine taking a famous French scientist (Victor Francen) and his beautiful young protege (Bella Darvi) to investigate the situation.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • At Sea
  • Cameron Mitchell Films
  • Cold War
  • Richard Widmark Films
  • Sam Fuller Films
  • Scientists
  • Submarines

Review:
Writer-director Sam Fuller’s seventh feature-length film was this Cold War-era submarine flick described by DVD Savant as “the damndest, most adolescent expression of confused anti-war, pro-war, peacenik, gung-ho insanity to come from a major studio.” Having recently rewatched Fuller’s excellent The Steel Helmet (1950) and Fixed Bayonets! (1951), I’ll admit I was disappointed to see what a mess of cliches is on display here; it seems Fuller was much better off leaving women out of his wartime flicks, given that Darvi is simply relegated to a standard 1950s role as a woman so sexy she can’t possibly be a smart, multi-lingual scientist — can she?

Naturally, she’s instantly coveted by boorish Cameron Mitchell:

… but (spoiler) she only has eyes for Widmark (because of course, she has to be interested in someone on board, right?). The action scenes are beautifully filmed but otherwise standard submarine-drama, anti-Commie fare. I find it challenging to know what else to say about this film, which Fuller completists will be curious to check out but others can simply skip.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Joseph MacDonald’s CinemaScope cinematography

Must See?
Nope; you can skip this one unless you’re a Sam Fuller completist.

Links:

Late Chrysanthemums (1954)

Late Chrysanthemums (1954)

“All men are vampires, feeding on women.”

Synopsis:
Four former geishas navigate life in middle age: moneylender Kin (Haruko Sugimura) tries to get her friends to pay back their loans, while also hoping that her married former client (Ken Uehara) might rekindle their affair; Tamae (Chikako Hosokawa) mourns the fact that her grown son (Hiroshi Koizumi) will be leaving soon for Hokkaido; gambling-addicted Tomi (Yuko Mochizuki) is frustrated to hear that her daughter Sachiko (Ineko Arima) has chosen to get married to an older man; and Nobu (Sadako Sawamura) runs a restaurant with her husband.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Feminism and Women’s Issues
  • Has-Beens
  • Japanese Films
  • Survival

Review:
Peary lists only two films by prolific Japanese director Mikio Naruse in his GFTFF: this title and Floating Clouds (1955) (though I consider his When a Woman Ascends the Stairs [1960] to be a Missing Title, and have reviewed it here). Late Chrysanthemums offers a simple yet stark look at the realities of survival for women who have spent their lives relying on the “generosity” of men, and are too old to ply their trade any longer.

Not a lot happens in this film other than watching the women interact with one another:

… with their grown children:

… and with former clients — one of whom (Bontarô Miake) tried unsuccessfully to kill Sugimura and commit suicide, yet has the temerity to come asking her for a loan upon his release from prison!

Late Chrysanthemums — presumably so-named because the chrysanthemum “represents longevity, rejuvenation and nobility in Japan” — would make a good (albeit depressing) triple bill with Mizoguchi’s A Geisha (1953) and Street of Shame (1956), also about the challenges of survival for women in patriarchal post-WWII Japan.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine performances by the leads

Must See?
No, though it’s certainly worth a look. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

White Sheik, The (1952)

White Sheik, The (1952)

“I’m always dreaming.”

Synopsis:
A starstruck newlywed (Brunella Bovo) obsessed with fotoromanzi leaves her bewildered husband (Leopoldo Trieste) at their hotel in Rome to go meet her crush — a fictional character known as The White Sheik (Albert Soldi) — and soon finds herself much more deeply involved in his creative world than she anticipated.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Federico Fellini Films
  • Italian Films
  • Living Nightmare
  • Newlyweds
  • Obsessive Fans

Review:
Federico Fellini’s second directorial feature after Variety Lights (1950) — and his first solo film at the helm — was this bittersweet homage to both the seduction of make-believe, and the inevitable tensions that emerge when a couple is making a new life together. From the moment we first see wide-eyed young Bovo, we can tell that she is either terrified:

… and/or living in some kind of escapist fantasy reality, as evidenced by her decision to deceive her husband and set out for the recording studios where her beloved fictional universe is created.

To that end, we’re never quite sure exactly how “sane” Bovo is (and in a Fellini film, perhaps that’s irrelevant). Meanwhile, Trieste becomes more and more panicked as time progresses and he realizes his best laid plans for a methodical honeymoon in Rome — including introducing his new wife to his “respectable” family, and visiting the Pope — will not go anything like he planned.

Along the way, both protagonists are subjected to numerous humorous travails, with highlights including Bovo and Soldi’s trip on a “pirate ship”:

… Soldi and Bovo’s on-set interactions with Soldi’s furious wife (Gina Mascetti):

… and Trieste’s late-night encounter with two prostitutes (including Giuliana Masina as “Cabiria”):

Thankfully, the ending leaves us with some hope for these young newlyweds despite everything they’ve been through.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine performances by the leads

  • The fotoromanzi shooting sequence
  • Otello Martelli’s cinematography
  • Nino Rota’s score

Must See?
Yes, for its historical significance as Fellini’s first solo film. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant
  • Important Director

Links:

Variety Lights (1950)

Variety Lights (1950)

“I’m an artist. So are you!”

Synopsis:
When the director (Peppino De Filippo) of a vagabond vaudeville troupe falls for an ambitious and beautiful dancer (Carla Del Poggio) who insists on joining their show, he breaks the heart of his loyal girlfriend (Giulietta Masina), and the couple part ways — but will De Filippo and Del Poggio succeed in their dreams of fame and fortune?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Aspiring Stars
  • Federico Fellini Films
  • Italian Films
  • Love Triangle

Review:
Federico Fellini’s debut film as a director (albeit one co-produced and co-directed with Alberto Lattuada) was this light-hearted look at the vagaries of small-time show business. Much like All About Eve (1950) from the same year, this tale focuses on a beautiful young woman (Del Poggio) eager to do whatever it takes to secure her spot on stage, even if this means hurting the kind older woman (Masina) who is at first friendly and charitable to her. Masina (Fellini’s real-life wife) steals the show as “Melina Amour,” a self-confident performer who can’t fathom that De Filippo would betray her — and then must deal with the unfathomable.

However, Del Poggio (who reminds me of Rita Hayworth) holds her own as a young woman who is more single-mindedly ambitious than evil or unfeeling:

… and De Filippo strikes the right tone as a man both deeply committed to his career, and naively eager to “protect” Del Poggio’s virtue.

Variety Lights shows nascent evidence of Fellini’s trademark wit and surreality, most notably when the troupe is invited to a mansion to fix dinner and dance:

However, the bulk of the story focuses on foiled ambitions, broken hearts, and the ongoing challenges of making it in show business — and to that end, Del Poggio’s ultimate decision (and where it lands her) is a telling reveal.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Giulietta Masina as Melina Amour

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look for its historical importance as Fellini’s first film. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

We Are All Murderers (1952)

We Are All Murderers (1952)

“While offenders are murderers, they are also human.”

Synopsis:
A French resistance fighter (Marcel Mouloudji) remains indiscriminately violent after WWII has ended, leading to his arrest and placement on Death Row. Will his idealistic young lawyer (Claude Laydu) be able to convince the French justice system to give him another chance?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • French Films
  • Prisoners
  • Resistance Fighters
  • World War II

Review:
There doesn’t seem to be much written about this unique French docudrama — winner of the Special Jury Prize at the Cannes Film Festival — on the internet, though a Mini Biography at the IMDb helps us to better understand its co-writer and director:

André Cayatte was a lawyer turned novelist and journalist, then screenwriter in 1938, after which he became a film director in 1942. He was known in France from the 1940s to the 1970s for uncompromising films examining the complex ethical and political dimensions of crime and justice in the French judicial system. He saw film as a stimulus for reform, advocating social concerns, and in this way was much a seminal forerunner to Costa-Gavras.

Indeed, We Are All Murderers is most definitely a “message film” — and the message is complex enough to warrant the creative treatment it’s given here. As the film opens, we see a harsh life of poverty being endured by Mouloudji and his brother (Georges Poujouly), and understand this is meant to show how Mouloudji has eventually developed such sociopathic indifference towards fellow humans:

While Mouloudji seems too far gone to help, we wonder and worry about his younger brother, who disappears from the action for quite a while, but shows up again (crucially) later on:

Will Poujouly meet the same fate as Mouloudji — or will society intervene to prevent the cycle of poverty, illiteracy, and violence from occurring once again? Meanwhile, the bulk of the storyline is taken up with showing us life inside Death Row, which is punctuated by boredom, temporary camaraderie, and the constant anxiety of not knowing when your time will be up.

To that end, we briefly “meet” a few other prisoners throughout the span of the film, learning a little bit about what led each of them to this final point. A Corsican (Raymond Pellegrin), for instance, says, “I killed a person who transgressed. It was for honor.”:

… while another man (Julien Verdier) is duly haunted from having killed his own baby.

Another significant theme is how Mouloudji’s upper-class lawyer (Claude Laydu) has such incredible support on the home front, and was clearly “destined” for good things in life (in the same way Mouloudji never had a chance):

Finally, we see plenty of compassion on the part of priests and prison guards, who (mostly) seem to carry out their jobs with resolve and dignity:

While We Are All Murderers is at times a bit didactic, this can easily be forgiven in light of its unique approach and subject matter; it remains well worth a look.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • A provocative storyline with no easy answers

Must See?
Yes, as a unique foreign film. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links: