FilmFanatic.org

Synopsis:
In Harlem, a 15-year-old named Duke (Hampton Clanton) is eager to buy a gun from Priest (Carl Lee) so he can take over as leader of the Pythons gang, whose current president, Blood (Clarence Williams, III), is a heroin addict.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• African-Americans
• Gangs
• Race Relations and Racism
• Shirley Clarke Films

Review:
Shirley Clarke directed and Frederic Wiseman produced this low-budget, neo-realist flick about young Black gang members jockeying for power and attempting to survive in a White man’s world.

Indeed, the film opens with a fiery speech by a street-speaker about the evils of “White demons” ruling over black bodies and lives for 600 years:

… and from there, we see a White teacher taking his Black students on a trip to Wall Street, explaining the origins of the name.

The irony of what follows next in the loose narrative — which includes plenty of violence, poverty, and drug use — is not lost, given that the lives of the young adults in this film are fueled by all the options NOT given to them in a White man’s America. Unfortunately, this film is currently unavailable except in bootleg versions, which compromises the viewing experience — especially given that it’s often challenging to make out exactly what characters are saying; however, Clarke’s fluid direction and DP Baird Bryant’s fast-moving, ultra-mobile camerawork at least provide us with a visceral sense of this world.

In 1,001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, editor Stephen J. Schneider describes this hard-to-find film as “a raw, unflinching look at the power struggles and casual violence of Harlem’s street gangs,” and argues you should “find a copy somewhere, somehow — you won’t regret it.” Viewers will have to decide for themselves if it’s worth seeking out, but it does represent a significant attempt in mid-century cinema to represent a more authentic perspective on Black American life (albeit one helmed by a White woman).

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Baird Bryant’s cinematography
  

Must See?
Yes, simply for its historical relevance. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

• Historically Relevant

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• Time Out Capsule Review

Synopsis:
When a motorcyclist (Colin Campbell) and his young girlfriend Dot (Rita Tushingham) have a falling out shortly after their marriage, Reggie (Campbell) moves in with his friend Pete (Dudley Sutton), not realizing Pete is gay.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Homosexuality
• Marital Problems
• Motorcyclists
• Newlyweds
• Rita Tushingham Films

Review:
Canadian director Sidney Furie helmed this adaptation of a novel by Gillian Freeman (written under the pseudonym “Eliot George”) about motorcycle culture and homosexuality in mid-century Britain. Naturally, the book was toned down quite a bit in order to pass censors, with the first portion of the “kitchen sink realism” storyline focusing on Reggie and Dot’s doomed working-class marriage. The couple are so immature and inexperienced that their idea of marital bliss (at least at first) is having privacy for sex, and going to a carnival-like “chalet” where Dot instantly gets her hair dyed blonde after years of her mother telling her not to.

When it becomes clear that the couple have a lot of maturing to do in order to begin to function as co-habiting adults, the narrative shifts towards both motorcycle culture:

… and the friendship subplot between Reggie and Pete. It’s crystal clear to everyone (except apparently Reggie) that Pete is gay, which strains credulity a bit — though Reggie (just like Dot) really is young and naive on every level.

Sutton’s performance as Pete is a stand-out: he conveys depth, longing, and a life filled with camouflage.

It was interesting reading this quote from Sutton on IMDb’s biography page about him:

[My role in Leather Boys] was the breakthrough moment for me but it wasn’t shown very widely because it had a homosexual theme to it. It was a risky part to take, but then I was very political and, although I am not gay myself, I really did care about the trouble my gay friends were having. People were being put in prison, beaten up, blackmailed, so when that job came up I thought, ‘I’m going to play it as a man who is in love, not a flapping, limp-wristed camp thing that everyone can laugh at.’

Indeed, it’s not until the film’s final moments when we see a more cliched and seedy glimpse into the world Pete maneuvers through.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Dudley Sutton as Pete
  
• Rita Tushingham and Colin Campbell as the naive young newlyweds
  
• Enjoyable motorcycling sequences (particularly when the group rides through Edinburgh)
  
• Fine cinematography by Gerald Gibbs
  

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look for its historical significance in gay cinema.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• Mondo Digital Review

Synopsis:
When a young woman (Lee Remick) and her daughter (Kimberly Block) reunite with Remick’s ex-con husband (Steve McQueen), Remick finds that the trauma of McQueen’s abusive childhood is still preventing him from future happiness and success.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Don Murray Films
• Ex-Cons
• Lee Remick Films
• Play Adaptation
• Robert Mulligan Films
• Steve McQueen Films

Review:
Scripted by Horton Foote and based on his 1954 play “The Traveling Lady,” this Southern Gothic drama by director Robert Mulligan is atmospherically shot (by DP Ernest Laszlo) but falls short of its narrative potential. The main challenge is that we don’t sufficiently understand McQueen’s deeply troubled, highly erratic character; we’re simply informed he was bullied as an orphan when adopted by a cruel woman (Georgia Simmons) whose presence upstairs in a decaying mansion is primarily hinted at rather than directly shown (she’s on-screen just a couple of brief moments).

If the shot above reminds you of Norman Bates about to confront his “mother” in Psycho (1960), you wouldn’t be too far off, given that the music (by Elmer Bernstein) becomes incredibly ominous whenever McQueen is forced to face his demons (i.e., his mother) and acknowledge various truths of his life to her, including his secret marriage and child as well as his lifelong dream of being a rockabilly singer (the film gets its title from a song the obviously-dubbed McQueen performs).

The most tender moments take place between the young family out at the shack they’re renting, where they experience some happiness before things inevitably fall apart.

Note: Watch for Don Murray in a crucial but underdeveloped role as McQueen’s loyal buddy:

… and Black stage actress Estelle Hemsley in a bit role as Simmons’ aged caretaker:

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Lee Remick as Georgette
  
• Steve McQueen as Henry
  
• Ernest Laszlo’s cinematography
  

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a one-time look if you’re a fan of either of the stars. Listed as a Sleeper in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• DVD Savant Review
• TCM Article

Synopsis:
During World War II, a French corporal (Jean-Pierre Cassel) repeatedly attempts to escape from German prison camps, taking various compatriots with him each time.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Escape
• French Films
• Jean Renoir Films
• Prisoners of War
• World War II

Review:
Jean Renoir’s second-to-last feature film was this wartime flick — based on a memoir by Jacques Perret — with thematic similarities to his earlier classic, Grand Illusion (1937) given that both films center on French men’s attempts to escape German POW camps. According to Wikipedia, “Renoir’s friend and assistant director Guy Lefranc had also been a World War II prisoner of war and had developed the project for seven years;” apparently 10 percent of all Frenchmen during World War II were captured as POWs by the Germans, meaning this story had the potential to represent an underexplored facet of France’s wartime experiences.

Curiously, however, Renoir adds comedy into the mix — and while there’s nothing wrong with approaching serious topics like war through comedy, one wonders exactly what it achieves here, other than opportunities for slapstick:

… or perhaps highlighting the absurdity of the entire situation.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Atmospheric cinematography
  

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see for Renoir completists.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• TCM Article (scroll down)

Synopsis:
After the sole prostitute (Silvana Corsini) of a low-rent gigolo (Franco Citti) is sent to prison, “Accattone” (Citti) falls for a poor but beautiful young woman (Franca Pasut) who he ends up caring for.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Italian Films
• Pier Paolo Pasolini Films
• Prostitutes and Gigolos

Review:
Pier Paolo Pasolini’s debut film as a director was this relentlessly bleak look at life on the periphery of society, starting with the senseless assault of Corsini by Accattone’s group of thuggish friends:

… and leading into more details of their collectively aimless existence, which consists of a resistance to work, an inability to care for offspring, and an overall air of pugnacious rebellion. (“Give me a gun and there’d be nobody left standing.”)

When Accattone falls for Pasut, we vacillate between believing he’ll instantly exploit her, and wondering if she may be the woman who finally turns him “straight”.

Regardless, there’s very little here to give one much hope about the state of post-war Italy and its poverty-stricken inhabitants.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Fine direction by Pasoloni
  

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look as Pasolini’s confident debut film.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• Eye For Film Review

Synopsis:
The editor (Adam West) of a wildlife preservation magazine is sent out west with Larry (Larry Fine), Moe (Moe Howard), and Curly Joe (Joe DeRita) to stop the slaughter of buffalo being perpetrated by a villain (Don Lamond) whose goal is to promote an Indian uprising; meanwhile, Annie Oakley (Nancy Kovack) helps West earn a job as sheriff, and is secretly at work behind the scenes at all times, especially when a host of notorious outlaws arrive in town.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Comedy
• Outlaws
• Westerns

Review:
The Three Stooges’ final of six films together — made after a brief late-career resurgence in their popularity — was this western spoof directed by Moe Howard’s son-in law (Norman Maurer), and featuring Adam West in a decidedly unheroic role a year before he would go down in history as TV’s best-known Batman.

Everything about this silly flick is predicated on one’s appreciation of the Stooges’ humor:

… and one’s enjoyment at seeing them in an anachronistic western environment.

The biggest highlight of the film is Nancy Kovacks as sharp-shooting Annie Oakley, who comes to the rescue with a grin of delight time and again.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Nancy Kovack’s fun turn as powerhouse Annie Oakley
  

Must See?
No; skip this one unless you’re a diehard Three Stooges fan.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• Spinning Image Review

Synopsis:
When a young soldier (Martin Sheen) comes home from fighting in WWII, he soon finds himself caught between the squabbling marriage of his mother (Patricia Neal) and father (Jack Albertson).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Grown Children
• Marital Problems
• Martin Sheen Films
• Patricia Neal Films
• Play Adaptation
• Veterans

Review:
Belgian director Ulu Grosbard helmed this adaptation of Frank Gilroy’s Pulitzer Prize-winning Broadway play (which he also directed on stage). Jack Albertson and Martin Sheen reprised their original roles, while Patricia Neal — having spent the previous few years recovering from a series of aneurysms — took over the lead female role, using this as an opportunity to prove to herself that she could still perform (she very much could). The tale itself is harsh and challenging; however, the truths it unearths about a troubled marriage — as well as the direct impact this can have on kids well into their adulthood — is timeless, and well played.

Unfamiliar viewers should note that the film takes place just after WWII, not the Vietnam War, as one might think from Judy Collins’ folksy music playing across the credits.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Patricia Neal as Nettie
  
• Jack Albertson as John
  
• Martin Sheen as Timmy
  

Must See?
Yes, as a fine adaptation of Gilroy’s play, and especially for Neal’s performance.

Categories

• Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• DVD Savant Review
• TCM Article
• TV Guide Review

Synopsis:
A pregnant unwed French woman (Leslie Caron) finds lodging in an l-shaped room in a boarding house run by a stingy woman (Avis Bunnage), where she quickly befriends a trumpeter (Brock Peters) and a former music hall performer (Cicely Courtneidge), and falls for an aspiring writer (Tom Bell) who doesn’t know about her unborn baby.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Bryan Forbes Films
• Leslie Caron Films
• Pregnancy
• Strong Females

Review:
Peary doesn’t review this “kitchen sink drama” by director Bryan Forbes in his GFTFF, but does name Caron Best Actress of the Year in his Alternate Oscars, where he notes she “broke out of her Hollywood shackles with a bold performance.” He provides some context for this seemingly “pro-life” (actually pro-choice) film, noting that “in its day” it “was quite daring because it broke away from the tradition of having the pregnant woman either suffer a miscarriage, give birth to a stillborn baby, or die herself” as “a payback for having ‘sinned.'”

POTENTIAL SPOILER ALERT

He points out that “Caron’s Jane doesn’t have the baby because she is against abortions per se (at one time she takes pills to cause a miscarriage) but because her baby’s birth will be a means of injecting ‘life’ – figuratively and literally – into her dreary existence.” While she “loves the people in her boardinghouse,” they “are all lonely, unfulfilled, and unhappy” — what you might call “deadbeats.”

Peary writes that in this non-MGM film, Caron “revealed a sexual maturity that her fans were unprepared for,” looking “like a real woman for a change” and “more appealing than ever.” Moreover, “there was something enticing as well as admirable about this woman who refuses to marry the man who impregnated her, or let a quack male doctor give her an abortion so he can pay his bills, or get an abortion though it would guarantee the love of Toby [Bell], the man she loves.”

Indeed, Caron’s nuanced, highly empathetic performance grounds this film, reassuring us that Jane herself will be okay no matter how others around her treat her (which is often quite shabbily). It’s a harsh film but a daringly frank one, and well worth a look.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Leslie Caron as Jane
  
• Fine supporting performances
  
• Atmospheric cinematography
  

Must See?
Yes, primarily for Caron’s performance but also as an overall good show. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

• Good Show
• Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• TCM Article
• NY Times Original Review

Synopsis:
Four beautiful American nurses (Margaret Markov, Andrea Cagan, Ricky Richardson and Laurie Rose) working in a Latin American hospital are kidnapped by the leader (Carmen Argenziano) of a revolutionary group and forced to help them as medics.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Jonathan Demme Films
• Prisoners
• Revolutionaries

Review:
This jungle exploitation flick was made explicitly to show off girls, guns, sex, and violence — and that’s exactly what it provides in spades:

The film’s production history says most of what one needs to know about how it emerged, and why; as noted on Wikipedia:

The film came about because Roger Corman had a production deal in the Philippines with a young producer there, Cirio Santiago. Corman wanted to give Santiago a story outline and [director Joe] Viola did up a treatment in an afternoon, which became the film. Jonathan Demme shot some second unit footage, which impressed Roger Corman enough to support Demme’s debut as director, Caged Heat (1974).

There you go. The dialogue and delivery are at least occasionally laughably bad, for those who enjoy that sort of thing:

“Do you know what I hope? I hope someday you’re on a date, and then some maniacs come along and shoot your date, and drag you into the jungle, and then attack you, and then not even tell you why!”

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

• Effective use of location shooting
  

Must See?
Nope, unless this genre is your cup of tea.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• Time Out Capsule Review