Libeled Lady (1936)

Libeled Lady (1936)

“The things I do for that newspaper…”

Synopsis:
A dedicated newspaper editor (Spencer Tracy) puts his wedding on hold when he learns about a potential libel suit involving an heiress (Myrna Loy) falsely accused of being a “husband stealer”. Tracy hires his former colleague (William Powell) to temporarily wed his own fiancee (Jean Harlow), then romantically pursue Loy in an attempt to prove she really is guilty of husband-stealing — but naturally, romantic entanglements prove this process much more difficult than originally conceived.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Framed
  • Heiresses
  • Jean Harlow Films
  • Journalists
  • Myrna Loy Films
  • Spencer Tracy Films
  • William Powell Films

Review:
Peary argues that the “fast pacing, funny wisecracks by the dozens, and the sexual chemistry between the characters… make you overlook the confusing plot” of this “classic screwball comedy with a powerhouse cast” — but I disagree that the film is confusing in any way. While there are plenty of twists and turns in the plot (and in motivations of the characters), each one is simply a delicious new development in what amounts to an immensely clever script (by Maurine Dallas Watkins, Howard Emmett Rogers, and George Oppenheimer, based on a story by Wallace Sullivan). Peary points out that “highlights include the wedding scene, in which Harlow weakly kisses husband Powell and gives a heartfelt smooch to best man Tracy” and “charlatan Powell [proving] he wasn’t lying when he told Loy and her father (Walter Connolly) that he is a fisherman”.

Peary accurately notes that the film “is a particularly strong showcase for Harlow, whose character is sometimes tough, sometimes sentimental, sometimes infuriated, sometimes a good sport, always sexy, always funny”. He writes that he loves “her angry pout and how she huffs and puffs through a room with shoulders and legs working in unison”. In his Alternate Oscars, Peary votes Harlow Best Actress of the Year for her role here as Gladys, noting that Harlow “has never gotten enough praise” as “one of the great movie discoveries of the thirties”, and further pointing out how ably she “exchang[es] wisecracks with Powell and Tracy”. I agree, but also find the lead performances by Powell and Loy to be spot-on, with Loy a particular treat to watch as she demonstrates unexpected layers of complexity to her seemingly ice-cold heiress; her initial rebuffs towards overly-confident “ladies man” Powell are especially humorous.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Jean Harlow as Gladys
  • William Powell as Bill Chandler
  • Myrna Loy as Connie Allenbury

Must See?
Yes, as a delightful screwball comedy. Voted one of the Best Pictures of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Freaky Friday (1976)

Freaky Friday (1976)

“I wish I could switch places with her, for just one day.”

Synopsis:
A teenage girl (Jodie Foster) and her mother (Barbara Harris) switch bodies for a day, getting to experience life from the other’s perspective. They soon find that life as both a teenager and a housewife is incredibly hectic, as Harris attempts to help her husband (John Astin) prepare for a gala event that night, while Foster navigates through the treacherous waters of high school.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Barbara Harris Films
  • Comedy
  • Fantasy
  • Jodie Foster Films
  • Marie Windsor Films
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities

Review:
Based on a 1972 children’s novel by Mary Rodgers, this live-action Disney film was just one of five films 14-year-old Jodie Foster appeared in that year (others include Taxi Driver, The Little Girl Who Lives Down the Lane, and Bugsy Malone) — thus indicating her enduring popularity after years of work as a child actor in television and on the big screen. She does a fine job in her role here as a slovenly, athletic tomboy who spends most of her screentime “inhabited” by her mother — but it’s Harris (primarily playing teenage “Annabel”) whose performance really stands out.

Better known for her work on Broadway than in films, this may actually be Harris’s best leading role onscreen: her no-holds-barred portrayal of an adolescent trapped in an adult body is a sheer pleasure to watch, from beginning to end. In early scenes, we see her luxuriating over the fact that she’s not only liberated from attendance at school but suddenly has a sexy, braces-free demeanor — only to quickly demonstrate how inadequately prepared she is to handle everything associated with the ’70s vision of womanhood/motherhood, from putting on false eyelashes (a great scene!):

… to preparing an impromptu meal for 30 to managing a household full of domestic assistants.

Fortunately, the film as a whole is mostly deserving of her stand-out performance, with the switched-identities element particularly well handled throughout. While we only see each character in her original body for the first 12 minutes of the film (and during the tail-end of the hectic finale), we nonetheless continue to believe in and understand exactly what’s happened to them, thanks to clever use of voice-over (plus, of course, the spot-on performances by the female leads). If there’s one slight downside, it’s that Harris’s travails as teenage “Annabel” are so much more intrinsically interesting and hilarious than Foster’s as the adult “Ellen”. Foster is primarily shown being humiliated time and again at school — either from her lack of knowledge about “modern” equipment (she has no idea how electric typewriters work):

… or her overabundance of knowledge in history class (where she’s viewed as a know-it-all), or her utter clumsiness on the hockey field (where she’s literally pummeled by members of the opposing team).

In sum, “Ellen”/”Mrs. Andrews” simply isn’t as interesting a character as “Annabel”.

Regardless, the fast-paced screenplay (written by Rodgers herself) keeps us on our toes throughout, right up until the surprisingly enjoyable slapstick finale (involving a cop chase and an elaborate water-skiing revue). It’s also fun to see how cleverly Rodgers incorporates sly sexual innuendos without ever bordering on poor taste — i.e., the titillated reaction by Astin when Harris accidentally calls him “Daddy” a few times.

Meanwhile, both Harris and Foster learn important lessons in how to empathize with each other (naturally), but this thankfully isn’t hammered over our heads. Somewhat surprisingly, Freaky Friday remains worth a one-time look by all film fanatics — primarily for Harris’s performance, but also as a pleasantly enjoyable situation comedy. Watch for the inspired final shot/scene.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Barbara Harris as Ellen/Mrs. Andrews
  • Jodie Foster as Annabel
  • Fun opening credits

Must See?
Yes, for Harris’s stand-out performance. Listed as a Sleeper in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Poor Little Rich Girl (1936)

Poor Little Rich Girl (1936)

“That kid in there’s a novelty — just what we need for our act!”

Synopsis:
The only daughter (Shirley Temple) of a wealthy widower (Michael Whalen) is suddenly on her own when her caretaker (Sara Haden) is accidentally killed while taking her to boarding school. Soon Temple joins forces with a pair of married musical performers (Jack Haley and Alice Faye) who are eager to add her to their act — but when will her true identity be revealed?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Alice Faye Films
  • Heiresses
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Shirley Temple Films

Review:
This in-name-only remake of Mary Pickford’s 1917 silent classic offered mega-child-star Shirley Temple yet another opportunity to charm Depression-era audiences in the way she did so well — and to that end, it certainly succeeds. Temple is as adorably precocious as ever, singing a few cutesy tunes while instantly charming an old curmudgeon (Claude Gillingwater):

… aiding the fortunes of a talented young couple in desperate need of a break (Haley and Faye):

… and avoiding capture by a nebulously lecherous stalker (John Wray).

Highlights include Temple singing to her dolls (who eventually get up and dance):

… and her truly impressive tap finale with Haley and Faye, which apparently took countless attempts to get just right. However, this one ultimately isn’t must-see viewing; Peary lists other Temple titles in his GFTFF, and film fanatics need only see one or two at most to get a representative sense of what Temple’s phenomenal fame was all about.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Temple singing “Oh My Goodness!” to her dolls
  • Temple, Faye, and Haley’s impressive finale tap dance to “Military Man”

Must See?
No, though of course Shirley Temple fans will want to check it out.

Links:

Barkleys of Broadway, The (1949)

Barkleys of Broadway, The (1949)

“You’re wasted in musical comedy. You could be a great tragic actress!”

Synopsis:
Popular dancing duo Dinah (Ginger Rogers) and Josh (Fred Astaire) Barkley find their marriage and their joint career threatened when Rogers meets a French playwright and director (Jacques Francois) who leads her to believe that her true calling is serious drama.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Musicals
  • Oscar Levant Films

Review:
Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers’ tenth and final collaboration together (after a ten-year hiatus) was this innocuous Technicolor musical originally intended to reunite Astaire and Judy Garland after their successful pairing in Easter Parade (1948). Much has been made of the fact that Rogers was a little heavier here than in her earlier films with Astaire — a ridiculous complaint given that she dances wonderfully, and remains athletically trim. Indeed, Astaire and Rogers still sparkle while they’re dancing (either together or solo), and fans of the duo will surely be glad for one more chance to see their incomparable magic onscreen. Less easy to forgive is the lackluster script and premise (by Betty Comden and Adolph Green), which, as noted in All Movie Guide’s review, “is the kind of situation that Comden and Green [were] so adept at spoofing, but they’re asked to play it straight here.” Nonetheless, it is interesting to see how eerily the storyline echoes the “split” between Astaire and Rogers years earlier, when Rogers largely turned away from dancing and went on to forge an Oscar-winning career for herself as a “serious actress”.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Ginger Rogers as Dinah Barkley
  • Some fine Rogers-and-Astaire dance numbers

  • Astaire performing “Shoes With Wings On”

Must See?
No, though fans of Rogers and Astaire will certainly want to check it out.

Links:

Story of Vernon and Irene Castle, The (1939)

Story of Vernon and Irene Castle, The (1939)

“Who’s gonna pay money to see a man dance with his wife?”

Synopsis:
Near the turn of the 20th century, married couple Vernon (Fred Astaire) and Irene (Ginger Rogers) Castle become a cultural phenomenon, known the world over for their elegant ballroom dancing — but with World War I on the horizon, their happiness is ultimately short-lived.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biopic
  • Dancers
  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Musicals

Review:
This biopic of the world’s most famous married dancing couple seems like a no-brainer casting choice for long-time dancing “couple” Astaire and Rogers, who inhabit their based-on-real-life roles with grace and respect, remaining true to the dancing styles of the era while exhibiting their characteristic genius on the dance floor. It’s nice to see the duo in a non-combative onscreen collaboration (for the first time since their earliest films), and the Castles’ ongoing marital devotion is nicely portrayed. Knowing that Vernon Castle died in a plane crash during WWI adds a level of poignancy to the material, as one watches the events unfold with a sense of impending doom; to that end, the final half-hour — as we’re kept in suspense about exactly when and how Castle’s death will occur — eventually feels a bit drawn-out. But the “rise to fame” story that’s taken place until then is pleasantly handled, and will surely appeal to those curious about the phenomenal fame of the Castles.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Astaire’s informal “soft shoe” while at the train station
  • Astaire and Rogers dancing the “Castle Walk”, among other popular dance
  • Clever use of special effects


  • A refreshing glimpse of Astaire and Rogers playing a loving married couple

Must See?
No, though it’s a lovely “finale” to Astaire and Rogers’ long-time RKO collaboration.

Links:

Don’t Bother to Knock (1952)

Don’t Bother to Knock (1952)

“I should have known better — you’re not cured!”

Synopsis:
The elevator operator (Elisa Cook, Jr.) for a fancy hotel enlists his niece (Marilyn Monroe) to babysit for the daughter (Donna Corcoran) of a couple (Jim Backus and Lurene Tuttle) attending an awards event at the hotel. Soon Monroe begins flirting with an embittered guest (Richard Widmark) who is reeling from a recent breakup with his girlfriend (Anne Bancroft) — but their flirtation quickly turns dangerous as disturbed Monroe begins to believe Widmark is actually her deceased fiance.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Anne Bancroft Films
  • Governesses and Nannies
  • Marilyn Monroe Films
  • Mental Breakdown
  • Richard Widmark Films
  • Roy Ward Baker Films

Review:
Don’t Bother to Knock is best known for featuring young Marilyn Monroe in an uncharacteristically dark leading role, playing a nuanced character with more to her than mere sex appeal. To that end, her performance is impressive (we believe her pitiful “Nell” is psychotically disturbed), but the film as a whole suffers from a strange lack of authentic tension — perhaps because we never really sense a character played by MM could commit murder, or perhaps because Widmark’s character isn’t sufficiently developed. The claustrophobic events — all taking place in “real time” within the hotel — speed by at a fast-paced clip; ironically, however, this short-changes the pivotal “change-of-heart” supposedly experienced by Widmark’s character, whose real love interest (a young and beautiful Bancroft, singing several songs in her charismatic screen debut) has broken up with him because she claims he lacks sufficient empathy for others. With that said, Roy Ward Baker’s direction is solid, the economic script (just 76 minutes long) makes good use of the setting, and one does stay involved throughout.

Favorite (throwaway) exchange early in the film:

Widmark: You married?
Will Bouchey (as bartender): Sure. Who isn’t.
Widmark: You and your wife fight?
Bouchey: [beat, while he stirs a drink] Sometimes she sleeps.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Marilyn Monroe as Nell Forbes
  • Anne Bancroft as Lyn Lesley
  • Some creative direction by Roy Ward Baker

Must See?
No, though it’s definitely worth a look simply to see Monroe (and Bancroft)’s impressive “early” performances.

Links:

Bells of St. Mary’s, The (1945)

Bells of St. Mary’s, The (1945)

“It looks like St. Mary’s is in a bad way.”

Synopsis:
When sent to help manage the inner city school of St. Mary’s, Father O’Malley (Bing Crosby) clashes on certain issues with the school’s director, Sister Benedict (Ingrid Bergman). However, they both want the best for their students, and work hard to convince a stingy local businessman (Henry Travers) to donate his new building to the school.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bing Crosby Films
  • Ingrid Bergman Films
  • Leo McCarey Films
  • Nuns
  • Priests and Ministers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that while this “sentimental sequel” to Leo McCarey’s Going My Way (1944) “doesn’t reach the glorious heights of the original”, it “improves with repeated viewings and certainly deserves its status as a Christmas perennial.” He concedes that “the story is a bit flimsy, the con-man tactics of Crosby and Bergman are a bit disturbing, and there are a couple of ludicrous plot twists… that were designed solely to manipulate viewers into shedding tears” — but he posits that “the picture is ultimately heartwarming”, and that “the pairing of Crosby and Bergman works like a charm”.

The fact that this dated, overly sentimental film still remains of interest at all rests solely on the capable shoulders of Bergman, who, “more beautiful than ever — whether teaching a young boy to box or just reacting to good news from Crosby or Travers — is simply magnificent”. Her performance is head-and-shoulders above the material she’s given to work with, which unfortunately simply involves more of the cloying do-gooder vignettes evidenced in Going My Way. Here, Crosby and Bergman are committed (in different ways) to helping the teenage daughter (Joan Carroll) of a “single mother” (Martha Sleeper) whose musician-husband (William Gargan) walked out on them years earlier; will Crosby locate said “missing father”, and help facilitate an unrealistically happy reunion? What do you think? Meanwhile, the entire subplot revolving around Travers’ sudden change of heart simply defies belief. Regardless, film fanatics may want to check this one out once, simply for Bergman. She’s marvelous.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Ingrid Bergman as Sister Benedict

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look for Bergman’s performance.

Links:

Monkey Business (1952)

Monkey Business (1952)

“I’m beginning to wonder if ‘being young’ is all it’s cracked up to be.”

Synopsis:
A scientist (Cary Grant) experimenting with a potion to restore youth and vitality tries it on himself and is shocked to discover how effective it suddenly is — not realizing that one of his lab chimpanzees accidentally got into his supplies and tainted the water supply with the secretly powerful new brew. Meanwhile, Grant’s wife (Ginger Rogers) insists on trying the potion herself, while his boss (Charles Coburn) is desperate to determine exactly what is making the new mixture work so well.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cary Grant Films
  • Charles Coburn Films
  • Comedy
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Howard Hawks Films
  • Hugh Marlowe Films
  • Marilyn Monroe Films
  • Scientists

Review:
With Howard Hawks at the helm, a script by Ben Hecht, Charles Lederer, and I.A.L. Diamond, and a cast including Cary Grant, Ginger Rogers, and Marilyn Monroe, one can’t help expecting more from this somewhat disappointing screwball farce. The premise is an overly simple one and doesn’t really go anywhere interesting, other than to reveal the subconscious marital tensions behind the oh-so-perfect façade of Grant and Rogers’ “ideal” 1950s marriage (he’s the genius, she lovingly supports him even when he’s infuriatingly distracted).

While Peary nominates both Grant and Rogers as Best Actor and Actress of the Year in his Alternate Oscars, I find their depictions as increasingly regressive adolescents silly rather than engaging. It is fun to see Monroe in an early sexpot role as Coburn’s secretary-in-name-only (she can’t even type):

Her freeway drive with Grant makes one wonder where their flirtation may go, but her character sadly fizzles into the background.

The best part of the film comes during its final half-hour, when true chaos has erupted and the pace picks up enough to carry us along in its true silliness.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • The absurdly slapstick final half-hour

Must See?
No; while many find it amusing, it’s ultimately not must-see. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Let’s Make Love (1960)

Let’s Make Love (1960)

“Oh, there’ll be children… Lots of children!”

Synopsis:
On the advice of a consultant (Tony Randall), billionaire Jean-Marc Clement (Yves Montand) attends a rehearsal of a musical show mocking his image, intending to shut it down — but he immediately becomes smitten with its star, sexy singer Amanda Dell (Marilyn Monroe), and decides instead to go along with her assumption that he’s a Clement-impersonator hoping for a bit part in the show.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • George Cukor Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Marilyn Monroe Films
  • Millionaires
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Tony Randall Films
  • Yves Montand Films

Review:
Marilyn Monroe’s second-to-last feature — made between Some Like it Hot (1959) and The Misfits (1961) — shows clear evidence of her growing comfort with fully inhabiting a nuanced role. While she’s still indubitably a sex-symbol first and foremost (she wears some of her most revealing outfits throughout the film, including body stockings and leotards), she’s also very much playing a real person here — someone with genuine compassion for both her current boyfriend (a troubled singer played by Frankie Vaughan) and the man (Montand) she believes is an out-of-work actor needing pointers on how to break into show business. She’s neither dumb (she attends night school) nor a gold-digger — and while she might represent too much of an archetypal “mother figure” for modern feminist tastes, she’s someone we can’t help feeling empathy with throughout the storyline.

Meanwhile, Montand is surprisingly well-cast as a billionaire needing to be coached on his performance style (by Milton Berle, Bing Crosby, and Gene Kelly in brief cameos) in order to win Monroe’s heart. Despite his reputation as an unrepentant ladies’ man, one gets the genuine impression that he really does want to find someone who will love him for himself — thus turning him into somewhat of a blithering idiot when faced with the woman he hopes will become his life-partner. Indeed, we feel a surprising amount of compassion for him as he finds himself (nicely) rejected time and again, once he’s distanced from the comfortable trappings of his money and reputation. Meanwhile, he and Monroe possess a natural chemistry together that makes sense, given the real-life affair they embarked upon for a brief while.

With all that said, the film is certainly not without its flaws, and most critics view it as a decidedly lesser entry in both actors’ oeuvres. Randall’s character barely registers at all, while Monroe’s romance with Vaughan is given far too little depth to help us understand his character as anything other than the conveniently plot-driven “romantic rival” Montand must defeat. Meanwhile, the cameos by Berle et al. come across as somewhat contrived. However, the strength of the two lead performances — as well as some knock-out numbers performed by Monroe (most notably her pole-dance rendition to Cole Porter’s “My Heart Belongs to Daddy”), and a fine supporting performance by Wilfrid Hyde-White as Montand’s no-nonsense business front — make this one worth at least a one-time look.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Yves Montand as Jean-Marc Clement
  • Marilyn Monroe as Amanda
  • Wilfrid Hyde-White as George Welch
  • Monroe performing several enjoyably provocative numbers

Must See?
No, though I personally recommend it.

Links:

Roberta (1935)

Roberta (1935)

“John, everyday you act worse — but today you’re acting like tomorrow.”

Synopsis:
An American football player (Randolph Scott) visits his aunt (Helen Westley) at the Parisian design house she manages (known as “Roberta”), and begins to fall for her lovely young assistant (Irene Dunne); meanwhile his bandleader-friend (Astaire) meets up with his childhood sweetheart (Ginger Rogers), a singer posing as a Polish countess.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Irene Dunne Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals
  • Play Adaptations
  • Randolph Scott Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary accurately advises viewers to “forget the dull, convoluted Dunne-Scott plotline” of this “third Astaire-Rogers musical” — based on a Broadway play by Jerome Kern and Otto Harbach, which was itself based on a novel by Alice Duer Miller — and instead “watch [the] supporting players”. He argues that Astaire’s “Huck… is the least abrasive, most likable character he played in his films with Rogers”, and that “Rogers’s fake Polish countess… is refreshingly not deceitful or antagonistic”; he points out that “the two are actually playful and seem to be enjoying each other — even when they are not dancing”. He enumerates some of the film’s dancing/musical highlights, including their duet to “I’ll Be Hard to Handle” (“during which Rogers wears pants for the first time” — not something I would have really paid much attention to!), and their “magical reprise of ‘I Won’t Dance’, to which Astaire did a simply marvelous solo tap earlier”. Unfortunately, while there’s no arguing that the Astaire/Rogers dance scenes are quite enjoyable, the overlong movie spends far too much time with Scott (playing an annoying, incomprehensible character) and Dunne (whose operatic solos seem entirely out of place here).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Astaire and Rogers improv dancing to “I’ll Be Hard to Handle”
  • Astaire’s piano solo and dance to “I Won’t Dance”

  • Astaire and Rogers dancing to “Smoke Gets In Your Eyes”
  • Some lovely ’30s gowns (the feathery one below is showcased by none other than young RKO starlet Lucille Ball)

Must See?
No; despite some fun dance numbers, this one is only must-see for Astaire-Rogers completists.

Links: