Out of Towners, The (1970)
“A lot of people are going to pay for this night!”
“A lot of people are going to pay for this night!”
“I’m real temperamental, you know?”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: … but eventually, of course, find their way into each others’ arms. Surprisingly enough, we’re able to believe in their attraction, given that both are aspiring artists with deep insecurities, hoping for a little bit of what the other has to offer: Streisand’s Doris wants to sound (and feel) better educated, while Segal wants to let loose and love a little. Both lead actors acquit themselves nicely, with Streisand demonstrating impeccable comedic timing, and Segal — who starred in Carl Reiner’s Where’s Poppa? (1970) that same year — once again effectively portraying a befuddled fellow who (at least at first) can’t seem to catch a break. Note: Watch for 17-year-old Marilyn Chambers in her film debut as the girlfriend of Segal’s understanding friend Barney (Robert Klein): … and Allen Garfield in a bit role as a clothing store owner trying to woo Streisand into bed: Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“Maxwell Smart is a fool and a bumbler.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: … Smart chasing bad guys through Universal Studios: … Smart “out-skiing” a red-clad sexy agent (Sylvia Kristel): … Smart driving his desk through city streets during a high-speed chase: … and (unfortunately) much more. The final shoot-out sequence attempts to be clever by incorporating a cloning machine: … but it’s too little, too late. Consider yourself forewarned. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“Peace, prosperity — and plumbing!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: … but he knows that requesting direct support for this would go nowhere. Therefore, he devises a plan to flatter the U.S. into thinking they are making a key ally while knowing Ruritania can’t possibly craft an actual working rocket:
The U.S. understands this as well, of course. As a confident delegate (John Phillips) argues:
And so on. Naturally, nothing goes as planned — especially with Kosoff’s brilliance and Cribbins’ persistence both underestimated. Meanwhile, the Grand Duchess (Rutherford) is simply out-of-it and confused, adding to the overall chaos of the diplomatic situation: … and a bumbling spy (Terry-Thomas) sent to suss things out doesn’t get very far: Unfortunately, Cribbins is an annoying protagonist, and the special effects are laughably primitive throughout — but this film does deserve some props for its timely skewering of international relations at a particular time in history. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“I will be happy when I have done something.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: The screenplay opens with Vincent arriving in a town (supposedly) riddled with plague: … where he rescues an orphaned girl from the wrath of the masses. While we think the storyline will continue telling us about de Paul’s influence with the village, instead it shifts gears to show us how de Paul previously worked for the aristocracy: … and is able to leverage their deep respect for him into sustained support for an ever-increasing swath of charitable organizations. Interestingly, de Paul’s most controversial move — i.e., the one which apparently pushed his donors and volunteers to the brink of their shared humanity — was caring for abandoned foundlings: This is in diametrical opposition to the attitude held by most do-gooders today, with our strong belief that we must save all young lives — even unborn lives — at any cost. Perhaps most impressive about Cloche’s film is how authentically he shows us the manifestation of de Paul’s faith and humility in action: de Paul can’t not strive to make an even deeper impact on those most in need, ultimately at a cost to his own well-being. While little seems to have been written or discussed about Monsieur Vincent in recent years (and I’m unfamiliar more broadly with Cloche’s work), this film remains well worth a look. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Categories
Links: |
“All I can tell you is her name is Charity — of which she has none.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: … the disappointing storyline is (perhaps intentionally) as melodramatic as can be, with Welch’s black-clad villainness a caricature rather than a reasonably nuanced antagonist. To his credit, Fuller makes excellent use of a small budget as he demonstrates his love of this fast-paced world, showcasing the emergence of relevant technologies that shifted the landscape from laborious hand-set type to Mergenthaler’s linotype machine: However, this isn’t quite enough to keep us fully invested, especially with Welch hissing her way onto the screen far too often. While Fuller fans won’t want to miss this self-proclaimed personal favorite, it’s not must-see viewing for all film fanatics. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“A funeral’s hardly the place to talk about a murder — even privately.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Unfortunately, their performances get off to a rocky start, with too many repetitive shots simply showing them giving each other a knowing glance when they first meet: Donlevy is more effective as the gullible mobster taken in by everyone around him: … though it’s supporting players Bonita Granville: … and thuggish William Bendix: … who really stand out as authentically engaged in their roles. Indeed, Bendix’s gleeful sadism is perhaps the film’s most memorable aspect, with most of his lines revealing a single-minded focus on harming people:
Storywise, the narrative is as complex as one would expect in such a twisted tale of criminality, politics, and love triangles; it’s too bad it all ends like a light-hearted rom-com. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“Do I look like a bed sitting room?!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Richardson’s stuffy Lord Fortnum tries to protest the changes he feels happening to him: … but is ultimately powerless, and turns into a lower-class “bedsit” room (he’s shown below in his new form, being given a “wellness check” by Hordern): Other absurdities abound, including Tushingham being pregnant for 18 months with a monstrous creature, and being coerced into marrying lecherous Hordern in a cobbled ceremony: … (though she simply continues her relationship with Warwick anyway). There are many more peripheral characters floating around the set (filmed “on location at a refuse dump in West Drayton, England”), but since none of them do anything particularly sensical, it’s challenging to provide a meaningful analysis of the storyline they exist in. Yes, a nuclear holocaust will surely wreak unimaginable havoc on our psyches, and many individuals may try to simply “carry on” as a way of coping — but I’m hard-pressed to see what other point there is to this rambling tale of post-apocalyptic absurdity. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“I wouldn’t like him if I liked him!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: The real-life individuals wouldn’t sound quite so polished and acerbic in their dialogue and come-backs, of course — but the overall tension feels real. (Who hasn’t been forced at some point to live with less-than-ideal roommates, and make some compromises?) Less convincing to me is that a single mom like Mason would allow herself to rely entirely on a (married) boyfriend for financial support in New York; we see humorous vignettes of her trying to get back in shape to perform as a dancer, but what has she been doing in the meantime? Eventually, of course, Mason and Dreyfuss fall for one another — and whether you buy the authenticity of their trajectory (and care for them at all) will determine your appreciation for this film. Thankfully, the young actress playing Mason’s daughter (Cummings) Lucy is natural (i.e., not-annoying): … and while both Dreyfuss and Mason are somewhat manic, we’re willing to excuse this given that they’re both performers in a high-stress city. I found myself rooting for them by the end, and pleased by how things turned out. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
“You’ve gotten pretty cynical, haven’t you, Moses?”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: … but otherwise sitting alone in his apartment gambling, smoking weed, listening to music, watching T.V., or playing “Clue” to keep his sleuthing wits sharp. Roger L. Simon’s screenplay — based on his own novel — does an excellent job portraying the sense of nostalgia and confusion felt by many Baby Boomers once the headiest days of protest were over. We learn that Moses drifted into a marriage that has since devolved, with his ex-wife (Bonnie Bedelia) now dating an obnoxious New Age man (Ron Rifkin) involved in a group called BEST (sound like “EST”, anyone?). Moses feels a sense of rejuvenation when he meets up with a former flame (Anspach) who convinces him to take a job: … but things soon turn very dark, leading Moses on a labyrinthine journey across various portions of Los Angeles. (The film’s sense of place and time is spot-on; I quickly found myself counting how many locations I could recognize — and there were quite a few.) In true form for such a tale, we’re not always entirely sure what’s going on and who various characters are, but we get the gist, and it all eventually coheres. The diverse supporting cast is nicely filled out, with John Lithgow as Cunningham’s mysterious campaign manager: … and F. Murray Abraham playing a notorious former radical: Watch also for Mandy Patinkin in a bit role (his big-screen debut) as a bumbling pool cleaner: While it’s not must-see viewing, this well-made film moves along at an engaging pace and will certainly appeal to fans of private eye flicks. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:
Must See? Links: |