Mike’s Murder (1984)
“You want to know everything? Well, believe me, you don’t.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
“You want to know everything? Well, believe me, you don’t.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
“When I’m old and gray, I won’t remember my past. We have to do it now, while we’re still young.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Playing the film’s titular protagonist, Robin Williams is competent and generally sympathetic, but slips into variations on himself far too easily to convince us that his T.S. Garp really exists as a viable character. Much more believable is Glenn Close in her Oscar-nominated feature debut as Garp’s eccentric, asexual mother: her performance remains the film’s primary redeeming virtue. Jon Lithgow (also nominated for an Academy Award) is both dignified and amusing in a supporting role as Garp’s transsexual friend, Roberta, but his character — like much of the film — is sadly under-written. Indeed, it’s disappointing to see so many intriguing storylines — including Mary Beth Hurt’s affair with a graduate student (Mark Soper): … Close’s relationship with a reformed hooker (Swoozie Kurtz): and the existence of a group of extremist feminists known as the Ellen James society: (who cut off their tongues in solidarity with a young rape victim) — treated with so little consideration. By the end of the film, one can only guess at the richer themes and characterizations in Irving’s novel, which fail to make a lasting impression on-screen. Redeeming Qualities and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“I’m sure glad I didn’t raise me any girls… Who knows how they’da turned out!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Corman, working with a slightly higher budget than usual, does an admirable job recreating the Depression era exploits of the Barkers, who — much like Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow — became notorious celebrities in their day. But the Barkers’ criminal misadventures ultimately take a backseat to the more fascinating saga of their bizarrely dysfunctional family dynamics, which eventually — perhaps inevitably — precipitate their fatal undoing. Winters (100% invested in her role; she’s perfectly cast here) is the glue that holds this perverted household together; but when she starts ordering the deaths of innocent hostages — first a vivacious young swimmer (Pamela Dunlap) who flirts (at her own unknowing peril) with De Niro, then a compellingly decent millionaire (Pat Hingle) who’s been kidnapped for ransom — her children finally begin to realize that Mommy doesn’t always know best. Alas, by this point it’s too late for any genuine redemption to come to the Barker clan — so bloodthirsty audiences can rest assured that a riveting denouement lies in wait. Note: In a 1970 interview with Sight and Sound magazine, Corman himself acknowledged that comparisons with the previous year’s cult hit Bonnie and Clyde were inevitable, but noted that his approach “was not to romanticize or glorify, but to stay closer to what I felt the reality was.” While Bonnie and Clyde is clearly the superior film in many ways, the two movies ultimately rest upon their own unique merits. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Categories
Links: |
“Why should you want a girl like me? We were never really married.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: La Cava does manage to slide some nifty sexual innuendos into his Code-era script: a bathing-averse boy naively whines that he “wants to watch [Margo] take a bath”; there are repeated references made to the fact that McDonald and Kelly aren’t “really” married since they never had a chance to consummate their vows. Unfortunately, however, La Cava wastes the talents of lovely Phyllis Thaxter as a young widowed mother Gogarty meets about halfway through the film; while we want her to emerge as a viable rival for Gogarty’s affections (they’re infinitely better suited for one another!), instead she simply serves as convenient bait to make McDonald jealous. Living in a Big Way is redeemed in part by several energetic dance sequences (choreographed by Kelly and his longtime creative partner, Stanley Donen), which any true Kelly fan won’t want to miss; but the film as a whole isn’t must-see viewing. Note: Kelly’s character appears to be slapped with such a ridiculous-sounding last name simply because he’s in a screwball comedy; it’s repeated ad nauseum throughout the film, presumably due to its inherent giggle-value (?). Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
“I’ve made her a great success in the theater; she must live like a successful woman.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: To her credit, Arzner recognized the limitations of what she was given to work with; in a 1977 interview with Guy Flatley for The New York Times, she noted:
To be fair, Sten actually exhibits a flirty, emboldened charm appropriate for the character she’s playing; it’s her lackluster costars (Atwill in particular is regrettably wooden), and the stale, overly familiar plot — a much-sanitized version of Zola’s episodic novel — which really sink this film. Ultimately, only Gregg Toland’s stunning cinematography (see stills below) elevates Nana a notch above pedestrian. Redeeming Qualities and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“Love alone can make the fallen angel rise — for only two together can enter Paradise.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: It’s smoldering Darnell who — much to Faye’s reported dismay — really carries the film (indeed, Faye was so upset about this fact that she blamed Preminger for butchering her role through editing, and infamously walked away from Fox Studios before her contract was up). While wide-eyed, leggy Darnell was never a truly accomplished actress (my first film appreciation professor — during a discussion of 1950’s No Way Out — snarkily pointed out that Darnell’s idea of acting was to pout or sneer), she radiates insouciant sex appeal, and fits the femme fatale bill perfectly. **** SPOILERS **** Therefore, when she dies halfway through the film, so does any inherent tension in the story. The issue of how poor, duped Faye will respond to news of Andrews’ deception fails to hold our attention; meanwhile, her more intriguing spinster sister (Anne Revere) — with a “love lost” story of her own — is given far too little screen time. While many critics have noted that the film’s unsatisfying denouement is its weakest element — and I’ll agree — ultimately it’s just a capstone on what is mediocre noir at best. Note:The following year, many of the key plot and character elements of Fallen Angel — a roadside California diner, a troubled drifter, an ambitious femme fatale waitress, etc. — would show up in the superior noir classic The Postman Always Rings Twice. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
“There’s a lotta things about me you don’t know anything about, Dottie — things you wouldn’t understand. Things you couldn’t understand. Things you shouldn’t understand.”
“A Sharps buffalo rifle… This is gettin’ downright romantic!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review: are clearly meant to embody counter-culture anarchists rebelling against The Establishment (as represented by the buffoonish James and his sexy wife, Elizabeth Ashley): they never generate our sympathy, given that they’re essentially trigger-happy scofflaws who disrespectfully kill animals for kicks. A brief attempt is made to provide us with some background “motivation” on why they’ve chosen their current lifestyle — Bridges is fleeing an unhappy marriage and a “stifling” life of privilege, while Waterston is posited as a “lost” Indian divorced from his tribal values — but both threads are dropped without a trace. Meanwhile, the central drama of the story — whether James will discover the identities of Bridges and Waterston — carries no genuine suspense or interest, given that he’s just as unappealing as his nemeses. Not even the auspicious arrival of Slim Pickens in the final third of the film redeems this disappointing revisionist western. Redeeming Qualities and Moments: Must See? Links: |
“Listen, Ange: I’ve been looking for a girl every Saturday night of my life. I’m thirty-four years old — I’m just tired of looking, that’s all.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: While the societal pressure to get married and have children may not be quite as strong today as it was in the 1950s, the urge to find one’s soulmate and build a life together is certainly just as relevant — and who among us can’t relate to feeling hopeless in romance at least once? If the film has a fault — and it’s a minor one — it may be in the casting of Betsy Blair (“Mrs. Gene Kelly”) as an unattractive “dog” of a woman; yet Blair transcends this limitation through her performance, managing to project “wallflower” simply through her posture and expression. She and Borgnine make a most appealing romantic couple, one we can’t help rooting for. Note: Marty holds additional historical significance as the first film based directly on a television drama; Rod Steiger played the title character in the original production. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Categories
(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die) Links: |
“You know what I do to squealers? I let ’em have it in the belly, so they can roll it over for a long time, thinkin’ it over.”
[Note: The following review is of a non-Peary title; click here to read more.]
Synopsis: |
Genres:
Review: Indeed, Kiss of Death brought immediate fame to Widmark, and it’s easy to see why: while many note that Mature gives one of the best performances of his career here, his character: — a conflicted con hoping for a second chance — is literally dwarfed by Udo, who dominates each scene he’s in. As played by Widmark, giggling Udo emerges as one of the quintessential “villains” of cinema; critic James Agee (cited in the All Movie Guide OVerview) wrote, “You feel that murder is the kindest thing he’s capable of.” The film itself (co-written by Ben Hecht and Charles Lederer) is competent noir, with several suspenseful sequences (particularly the final showdown between Mature and Widmark) and atmospheric location cinematography in New York City — but it’s Widmark who ultimately elevates it to “must see” status. Note: Blink and you’ll miss Karl Malden in a tiny role as a police sergeant grilling Mature. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Categories
Links: |