Superman (1978)

Superman (1978)

“I’m here to fight for truth, and justice, and the American way.”

Synopsis:
The infant son of a scientist (Marlon Brandon) from the dying planet of Krypton is sent to Earth, where he is adopted by the childless Kents (Glenn Ford and Phyllis Thaxter) and grows into a misunderstood teen (Jeff East). When young Clark grows up (played by Christopher Reeve), he moves to the bustling city of Metropolis, where he becomes a reporter at the Daily Planet and falls for a co-worker named Lois Lane (Margot Kidder); meanwhile, his alter-ego Superman fights to protect the world against scheming criminal Lex Luthor (Gene Hackman), who is plotting to destroy California’s coastline.

Genres:

  • Aliens
  • Christopher Reeve Films
  • Comics and Comic Strips
  • Fantasy
  • Gene Hackman Films
  • Glenn Ford Films
  • Harry Andrews Films
  • Journalists
  • Margot Kidder Films
  • Maria Schell Films
  • Marlon Brando Films
  • Mistaken Identities
  • Ned Beatty Films
  • Romance
  • Superheroes
  • Susannah York Films
  • Terence Stamp Films
  • Trevor Howard Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “wonderful surprise… blockbuster” likely “wouldn’t have worked at all if unknown Christopher Reeve” — possessing “the handsome, square-jawed face of a classic movie hero” — hadn’t been “the ideal choice to play the most famous comic-book hero” in American history, a man “as honest, kind, loyal, dependable, and moral as he looks”. Superman is indeed an “epic film”, one which takes its time relating the story of Superman’s background. First we see his origins on the planet Krypton, where his father Jor-El (infamously played by a wildly overpaid Marlon Brando) and mother Lara (Susannah York) reluctantly prepare to send baby Kal-El to Earth in an attempt to save his life. Next we see vignettes from his childhood and adolescence with the kindly Kents (Glenn Ford and Phyllis Thaxter — both perfectly cast), and we watch his “coming-of-age” as he heads north to learn about his destiny as a superhero on Earth.

Once Superman (now played by Reeve) arrives in Metropolis, the meat of the story begins, as we’re introduced to both the film’s villain (Gene Hackman) and Reeve’s love interest, Lois Lane (Margot Kidder, who Peary argues is “also perfectly cast” — though many fans seem to disagree). Like Peary, I’m not fond of the “broad comedy involving Luthor and his cohorts” (Ned Beatty as Luthor’s right-hand man Otis is particularly annoying), but agree that the rest of the film “smoothly mixes myth, lyricism…, comedy (mostly deadpan), science fiction, romance, suspense, and tragedy.” Reeve was (sadly) never better than here in his first, most iconic role; he has great fun embodying both sides of Superman’s personality, and makes for a genuinely empathetic superhero. His scenes with Lane are surprisingly romantic, with their nighttime flight over New York City a particular highlight of the film (indeed, the special effects — while a tad “old fashioned” — are just as fun now as they once were). Film fanatics will likely be pleasantly surprised when they revisit this must-see blockbuster, which set the standard for future superhero flicks.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Christopher Reeve as Superman
  • Margot Kidder as Lois Lane
  • Superman’s nighttime flight with Lois
  • Striking set designs
  • Glenn Ford and Phyllis Thaxter as Clark’s Earthly parents
  • Gene Hackman as Lex Luthor
  • Superman’s many heroic feats throughout the film
  • Oscar-winning special effects
  • Geoffrey Unsworth’s cinematography
  • Humorous dialogue: [Lex Luthor] “We all have our little faults; mine’s in California.”
  • John Williams’ memorable score

Must See?
Yes, as a genuine blockbuster classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic

Links:

Cooley High (1975)

Cooley High (1975)

“As soon as I get out, I’m off like a big black bird — to Hollywood!”

Synopsis:
An aspiring teenage writer (Glyn Turman) in 1960s Chicago spends his time hanging out with friends (including Lawrence Hilton-Jacobs), ditching school, and hitting on a pretty new girl (Cynthia Davis).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • African-Americans
  • High School
  • Teenagers

Review:
Based on an autobiographical screenplay by Eric Monte (co-creator of the television series “Good Times”), Cooley High is often referred to as “the black American Graffiti,” given its similarly episodic treatment of life and love among high school seniors. The primary difference, of course, is that the central characters in Cooley High live in the projects of Chicago — a vastly different world than that of the privileged white teens in Graffiti. Monte’s ear for authentic dialogue brings this world richly alive, and the boys’ banter is one of its strengths, as is much of the rich location footage around the city. Unfortunately, however, the screenplay itself is too fragmented to hold much interest; strangely enough, we never feel much investment in the characters themselves. Cooley High should be seen once by all film fanatics for its historical relevance, but likely won’t be repeat viewing for most.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • An authentic look at African-American teenagehood in 1960s Chicago

Must See?
Yes, simply for its historical popularity.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Get Out Your Handkerchiefs (1978)

Get Out Your Handkerchiefs (1978)

“Why don’t you just give up on me? I’ve jinxed every guy I’ve known.”

Synopsis:
The husband (Gerard Depardieu) of a depressed woman (Carole Laure) finds her another lover (Patrick Dewaere) in an attempt to make her happy, but it’s not until 13-year-old Christian (Riton Liebman) arrives in their lives that Laure finds her emotions stirred for the first time in years.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bertrand Blier Films
  • French Films
  • Gerard Depardieu Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Marital Problems
  • May-December Romance
  • Obsessive Love

Review:
One expects nothing less than sheer romantic anarchy when watching a Bertrand Blier film, and Get Out Your Handkerchiefs — a dark satire which won an Oscar as Best Foreign Film of the year — is no exception. Blier fearlessly posits that the attainment of true love and happiness is seldom (if ever) possible through “traditional” arrangements, then explores what the ramifications of following one’s heart rather than social conventions might look like. His characters rarely act the way we expect them to — as demonstrated here by Depardieu’s Raoul, who genuinely loves his melancholic wife so much that he will gladly give up sole “ownership” of her if bringing a new lover into the mix will make her happy. As it turns out, however, rather than sparking any kind of renewed emotions in Solange (Laure), Stephane (Dewaere) ultimately brings more joy as a companion to Raoul (indeed, the potency and fulfillment of male friendship is another theme Blier seems intent on exploring in his films — though he wouldn’t take this to its logical homoerotic conclusion until later on, in films like 1986’s Menage).

More so than any other director, Blier seems utterly unafraid to demonstrate his incomprehensibility of women. Here, Solange is a literal archetype of feminine mystique — a beautiful woman so low in affect, and so single-mindedly focused on getting pregnant and knitting, that Dewaere openly questions at one point whether she might actually just be dumb. As noted above, she ultimately becomes merely a passive foil for Raoul and Stephane’s friendship — she’s a project they work on together feverishly, collaborating like giddy schoolboys. Once Liebman’s 13-year-old Christian enters the story, however, things take on a decidedly discomfiting tinge, and viewers applauding themselves for accepting the unconventional love triangle established thus far may find their sense of propriety tweaked, as it eventually becomes apparent that Liebman will function as a weirdly Freudian child-love interest for Solange. Liebman is fabulous in an undeniably tricky role: he projects otherworldly maturity in spades, and is clearly meant to come across as the “oldest” (emotionally-speaking) of the three central males in the film. The story’s denouement, naturally, takes on all sorts of wild and unexpected turns, and may or may not feel satisfying — but at the very least, Blier lives up to his reputation as an auteur who’s unafraid to go where few others will dare.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Depardieu and Dewaere as Raoul and Stephane
  • Carole Laure as Solange
  • Riton Liebman as Christian
  • Blier’s utterly unique (naturally!) screenplay

Must See?
Yes, as an Oscar-winning film by a maverick filmmaker. Listed as a film with historical importance and a cult movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Important Director
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Little Fugitive (1953)

Little Fugitive (1953)

[Note: The following review is of a non-Peary title; click here to read more.]

“Ya shot him, Joey! Ya shot your brother!”

Synopsis:
A little boy (Richie Andrusco) who mistakenly believes he’s murdered his older brother (Ricky Brewster) flees to Coney Island, where he survives on his own until his brother finds him.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Carnivals and Circuses
  • Childhood
  • New York City
  • Runaways
  • Siblings
  • Survival

Review:
It’s difficult to understand how Peary missed listing this unique little film in his book as must-see, given its significance on several levels — its cinematic influence on the French New Wave, its status as a “cultural window” into New York’s Coney Island in the 1950s, and its Oscar-nominated screenplay. The story of how husband-and-wife team Morris Engel and Ruth Orkin — with the assistance of a few friends and colleagues — made this cinema verite film on location in New York with a shoestring budget and amateur actors has gone down in cinematic history, as has Francois Truffaut’s quote that “our New Wave would never have come into being if it hadn’t been for the young American Morris Engel, who showed us the way to independent production with his fine movie, Little Fugitive“. Most importantly, however, it is an enjoyable, finely crafted story, told simply but well.

It’s remarkably easy to forget that Little Fugitive (an exemplar of American neo-realism) is a fiction film, given how fully “invested” unknown Richie Andrusco is in the central role of Joey; it’s his ease in front of the camera that propels the story through its mostly wordless screenplay. Richard Brewster as Joey’s brother Lennie does a fine, natural job as well, as does Jay Williams (playing himself?) as Jay the Pony Man at Coney Island, who becomes Joey’s closest pal. At times the film’s ultra-low budget is glaringly apparent, especially when it comes to sound; indeed, the entire film was shot without sound, to save money, with dialogue dubbed in later, and Foley artists providing ambient sound. However, once you accept this limitation, it simply adds to the film’s overall charm. Another low-budget concession — Lester Troob’s harmonica-rich score in place of a “traditional” orchestral score — is a winning element as well, and quickly becomes a defining aspect of the film (I love how Joey later finds an abandoned harmonica on the beach, thus creating an additional meta-narrative tie to the score).

There are many memorable moments sprinkled throughout the movie: my favorites include Joey fooling around with an old-fashioned view camera while its operator is away processing a still (I love the cameraman’s reaction when he comes back to find Joey under the camera’s hood — he’s bemused rather than annoyed):

… and Joey carefully convincing a baby on the beach to give up the glass bottle he’s been using as a sand toy.

(Given that Engel and Orkin used “real” extras, the cultural mix of visitors is refreshingly authentic.) Equally fascinating, however, are the many “time capsule” shots — functioning as ambience rather than to propel the narrative — which simply show Coney Island as it once was, with lovers and families of all kinds out for a good time.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Richie Andrusco as Joey
  • Richard Brewster’s as Joey’s brother Lennie
  • Jay Williams as Jay the Pony Man
  • Fine on-location, hand-held cinematography
  • An invaluable time-capsule view of Coney Island in the 1950s


  • Lester Troob’s harmonica-driven score

Must See?
Yes, for its historical significance as an Oscar-nominated, groundbreaking, influential independent film — and as an all-around good show! It was inducted into the National Film Registry in 1997.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Historically Relevant
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

M*A*S*H (1970)

M*A*S*H (1970)

“Follow the zany antics of our combat surgeons as they cut and stitch their way along the front lines.”

Synopsis:
During the Korean War, two irreverent surgeons (Donald Sutherland and Elliott Gould) and their colleagues in a Mobile Army Surgical Hospital try to distract themselves from the horrors of the battlefield.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Black Comedy
  • Bud Cort Films
  • Doctors and Nurses
  • Donald Sutherland Films
  • Elliott Gould Films
  • Ensemble Cast
  • Korean War
  • Michael Murphy Films
  • Robert Altman Films
  • Robert Duvall Films
  • Sally Kellerman Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “rare anti-war film to make money during a time the U.S. was at war” is “best known for radically diverging from conventional narrative techniques” by doing away with a linear storyline and focusing instead on “establishing [a] uniquely absurd ambience”. Most Americans will simply know it as the precursor to the wildly popular television series (which ran for 11 seasons), but it holds special interest for film fanatics as the movie that first established Robert Altman as an auteur with a unique vision for feature-length filmmaking. As a comedy, it’s held up remarkably well over the years, with most vignettes remaining bitingly funny (though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of the final, hectic football game). The ensemble cast members — particularly Sutherland, Gould, and Sally Kellerman (as “Hot Lips” Houlihan) — are all “first-rate”, and “deservedly became stars as a result of their performances”. As Peary notes, Altman’s greatest challenge in M*A*S*H was “to get us to believe that such irreverent characters… really are sensitive about the men being killed in the war”, but he achieves this by showing us that “their zany, childish antics are just an emotional release — while performing surgery, they come through.”

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Elliott Gould and Donald Sutherland as Captains Hawkeye and Trapper John
  • Sally Kellerman as “Hot Lips” Houlihan
  • A fine ensemble cast
  • Many darkly humorous sequences
  • Johnny Mandel’s instantly hummable theme song (which carried over to the T.V. series, but without 14-year-old Mike Altman’s dark lyrics)

Must See?
Yes, as a groundbreaking Altman film, and as a cult classic.

Categories

  • Cult Movie
  • Historically Relevant
  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Sixteen Candles (1984)

Sixteen Candles (1984)

“This is the single worst day of my entire life.”

Synopsis:
A teenager (Molly Ringwald) who is upset that no one in her family remembers her sixteenth birthday lusts after a hunky classmate (Michael Schoeffling), but must deal instead with the attentions of an insistent geek (Anthony Michael Hall).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Comedy
  • High School
  • Misfits
  • Teenagers

Response to Peary’s Review:
In his directorial debut, writer-director John Hughes is, as Peary notes, moderately successful in “making a comedy out of teenage angst, pain, and insensitivity”. Ringwald is “absolutely fantastic [at] presenting a real, special teenager” — and while she’s not always likable (she “can be cruel — as she reveals in her insults toward Hall”), most will be able to relate to at least one of her many pressing adolescent dilemmas.

Equally enjoyable is Anthony Michael Hall as The Geek — a larger-than-life comedic foil who emerges as an empathetic character, and is someone we can’t help liking and rooting for; his interactions with Ringwald are the highlights of the film.

Unfortunately, much of the screenplay is far too sophomoric to appeal to anyone but younger audiences — all scenes featuring Gedde Watanabe’s infamous Asian exchange student, Long Duk Dong, for instance, are particularly cringe-worthy.

However, Sixteen Candles should probably be seen once by all film fanatics simply for its historical relevance as the first of Hughes’ series of groundbreaking teenage films.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Anthony Michael Hall as “The Geek”
  • Molly Ringwald as Samantha (Peary nominates her for an Alternate Oscar as Best Actress of the Year)
  • Paul Dooley as Samantha’s father

Must See?
Yes, simply for its historical importance as Hughes’ directorial debut.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Femmes Fatales (1976)

Femmes Fatales (1976)

“As soon as my eyes are closed, they barge in.”

Synopsis:
A gynecologist (Jean-Pierre Marielle) and a pimp (Jean Rochefort) trying to flee from the world of women find themselves pursued by a militant army of sex-crazed females.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Battle-of-the-Sexes
  • Bertrand Blier Films
  • French Films
  • Living Nightmare
  • Satires and Spoofs

Response to Peary’s Review:
In his review of this mind-bending “cult comedy” (a.k.a. Calmos) by director Bertrand Blier, Peary’s first wry comment is that it “would probably cause more arguments if anyone could figure out what it’s about.” He argues that the film has a “promising beginning”, but then “takes an odd, foolish turn, moving out of a rudely funny, believable realm… into a confusing surreal fantasy”. He takes issue with Blier’s decision to have the men “become sexual objects to be used and humiliated” by women who “become the aggressors [and] think that men are only good for one thing”, and notes that Blier still “treats his actresses in the old-fashioned way, as impersonal sexual entities”. What Peary fails to recognize, however, is that Blier (as usual) is simply taking his bizarrely conceived scenario to the ultimate limit, without concern for either reality or propriety. This is, after all, a film about “misogynistic, gross, irresponsible, superior” men, and it’s their warped world view we’re seeing on display here; everything that happens — a true living nightmare — is told from their perspective, and while it may not be “believable” by any stretch of the imagination, it’s far from confusing.

Instead, scene after scene will simply leave you gaping in wonderment at the sheer audacity of Blier’s vision: Marielle (who keeps loaves of bread in his desk drawer at work, and accepts gifts of pate from his patients) finding his pre-appointment snack ruined by a gorgeous female client loudly scratching her genitalia; Marielle comforting Rochefort (the closest they get to homoerotic love) as he wakes up from a nightmare about women (“They bug me even in my sleep!”); Marielle and Rochefort gorging on rich food and wine with some local priests who have temporarily taken them under their wing; Brigitte Fossey (Marielle’s beautiful wife) trying in vain to tempt him into bed; and countless others. The final sequence — which goes above and beyond the film’s prior level of perversity — is guaranteed to leave you floored, if not mildly queasy (which, I imagine, may have been Blier’s intent). Ultimately, Femmes Fatales is a film which needs to be seen to be believed; and while it certainly won’t be for all tastes, it’s unique enough to be must-see viewing at least once for all film fanatics.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Jean-Pierre Marielle as Paul Dufour
  • Jean Rochefort as Albert
  • Brigitte Fossey as Marielle’s wife
  • Countless memorable sequences
  • Claude Renoir’s vibrant cinematography
  • Georges Delerue’s jazzy score

Must See?
Yes, as a most unique and entertaining film.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem

Links:

Karate Kid (1984)

Karate Kid (1984)

“We make sacred pact. I promise teach karate to you, you promise learn. I say, you do, no questions.”

Synopsis:
A New Jersey teenager (Ralph Maccio) moves to California and falls in love with a beautiful blonde (Elizabeth Shue) whose thuggish ex-boyfriend (William Zabka) bullies him mercilessly. To prepare for fighting back, Danny (Macchio) is given karate lessons by an elderly handyman (Pat Morita) in his building, who teaches him that strength comes from within.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bullies
  • Coming-of-Age
  • Cross-Class Romance
  • Martial Arts
  • Mentors
  • Underdogs

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary accurately describes this popular cult film as a “likable fairytale” about a “very likable teenager” who encounters “a few obstacles along the way before [he and his girlfriend] can live happily ever after.” He notes that, like Rocky (also directed by John Avildsen), this “extremely pleasing” film “has wit and sentimentality”, and makes you want to “cheer the underdog”, who will “do the impossible because he has a lot of heart and character”. The elements of the film that don’t work so well (i.e., Zabka’s one-dimensional “Aryan” baddie) are overshadowed by those that do — including fine central performances by Macchio and Morita (who was nominated for an Academy Award as best supporting actor), nice supporting work by Shue and Randee Heller (as Macchio’s mom, who Peary wishes “had a more significant part” — me, too), and countless memorable scenes (“Wax on… Wax off.”).

Note: Interestingly, Peary notes near the end of his review that he wishes “Morita would dump Zabka’s sadistic coach in the garbage” — which is exactly how The Karate Kid, Part II (1986) (not listed in Peary’s book) begins…

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Pat Morita as Mr. Miyagi
  • Ralph Maccio as Daniel
  • Elizabeth Shue as Ali
  • Randee Heller as Danny’s mom

Must See?
Yes, as a pleasing cult film.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

Supergirl (1984)

Supergirl (1984)

“Such a pretty world; I can’t wait until it’s all mine.”

Synopsis:
Superman’s cousin (Helen Slater) is sent to Earth to retrieve a missing talisman known as an Omegahedron, and finds herself confronting a power-hungry witch named Selena (Faye Dunaway).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Faye Dunaway Films
  • Mia Farrow Films
  • Peter O’Toole Films
  • Strong Females
  • Superheroes
  • Witches, Wizards, and Magicians
  • World Domination

Review:
This fourth installment in Ilya and Alexander Sarkind’s Superman franchise is a tedious disappointment. Beautiful, feisty Helen Slater is perfectly cast as Superman’s cousin (known as “Linda Lee” on Earth), but she’s saddled with such an inane, uninteresting storyline that she never really has a chance to shine. None of the plot developments in the movie make much sense or are even remotely plausible: for instance, while we somehow believe that Superman’s crash landing in Smallville and adoption by the kindly Kents was “meant to be” (and part of the scope of his larger legacy), Supergirl’s descent onto a girls’ boarding school (where Lois Lane’s younger sister happens to attend — how convenient) is simply sloppy screenwriting. Meanwhile, Dunaway’s obsession with getting a hunky gardener (Hart Bochner) to fall in love with her rather than Supergirl merely perpetuates the stereotype that what all women really want is a “good [sexy] man” (and Bochner himself is such an uninteresting clod that we never really think he’s good enough for Supergirl, anyway). Dunaway’s over-the-top performance is unintentionally campy, but there’s little humor to be had at her expense — and Brenda Vaccaro as her sidekick fares even worse. Unfortunately, Supergirl is a disappointment all the way around.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Helen Slater as Supergirl
  • The impressive sets of Argo City (Supergirl’s home planet)

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see viewing for diehard Superman fans.

Links:

4D Man (1959)

4D Man (1959)

“Nothing can stop him… A man in the fourth dimension is indestructible!”

Synopsis:
A scientist (James Congdon) experiments with an amplifier that would allow objects to pass through solid matter into the “fourth dimension”; but when his scientist brother (Robert Lansing) discovers that he possesses this “lifeforce” power himself, dire consequences ensue.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Horror
  • Science Fiction
  • Scientists
  • Siblings
  • Supernatural Powers

Review:
Irvin Yeaworth is best known for directing The Blob (1958), a low-budget surprise hit which gave Steve McQueen his first leading role. Yeaworth’s next film was this equally engaging sci-fi horror flick, which — in its treatment of mad scientists, megalomania, and dual personalities — evokes numerous other classic genre films, most notably The Invisible Man and Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The storyline, while occasionally cliched and overwrought, is mostly compelling, primarily thanks to the fact that the screenwriters take their time establishing the film’s central characters: first we’re introduced to “wild child” James Congdon’s relentless pursuit of his scientific passion:

which brings him to his more “established” older brother’s laboratories.

Next, a potentially rocky love triangle emerges between Congdon and feisty Lee Meriwether (Lansing’s assistant, who he’s about to propose to).

Finally, the story shifts to its central premise — the surprise powers possessed by Lansing, who becomes the film’s conflicted protagonist. By the time Lansing begins to experiment with his “4D” abilities (the film’s special effects are low-budget but effective):

and discovers the hideous truth that he is sapping his own “lifeforce” at an astonishing rate, we care about him as an individual, and feel sorry for the inevitable mess he’s gotten himself into.

For a much more detailed analysis of the film (giving away additional plot spoilers), see DVD Savant’s thorough review.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Robert Lansing as Scott Nelson
  • Fun visual effects

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended, and definitely must-see for sci-fi fans.

Links: