Greed (1924)
“You won’t touch my money, I tell you!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review: (I’m actually not sure “avarice” is the best word to describe her pitiful character, who seems to suffer from an extreme form of OCD.) Peary adds that “the film also benefits from Von Stroheim’s typical array of unusual supporting characters”: … “the intensity of his directing and the acting”: … “his attention to set design”: … “and his decision to film on location in San Francisco and even Death Valley for the classic finale.” Peary writes that “the worst result of the extreme studio-imposed editing is that the changes in the characters’ personalities once money enters their lives are too rushed… For the naturalism of Norris to be conveyed propertly, the deterioration of their marriage and their descent from nice people to ‘animals’ must have a more natural progression.” Thankfully, this concern is addressed and fixed in the restored version, which is recommended. Indeed, the entire storyline remains remarkably compelling and relevant; I’m hard-pressed to think of a better film about the consequences of money-driven psychosis, greed, and envy. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Categories
(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die) Links: |
One thought on “Greed (1924)”
A once-must, for its place in cinema history.
I’ve seen the TCM restoration, but I doubt I would watch it again. Though. since it’s cut, it’s not nearly the challenge of something like ‘Berlin Alexanderplatz’, ‘Greed’ is still somewhat daunting because of its currently available length (esp. for a silent). I wonder who else but diehard film junkies (or von Stroheim fans) would take up that challenge.
To be honest, I didn’t actually love the film but it’s difficult to deny its worthy ambition / value – and the two lead performances are a plus.