Unconquered (1947)
“We may need more guns than words to build a future.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: … albeit with an evil White profiteer (Da Silva): abetting their efforts. Given privileged star status are stalwart Cooper and plucky Goddard, destined to end up back together no matter how much fighting, bloodshed, and Indian torture they must endure in the meantime. Adding insult to injury is the simplified and (literally) white-washed treatment of slavery as a purely White endeavor (!) akin to indentured servitude. The redeeming elements of this flick — confidently directed, as usual, by DeMille — are the stunning Technicolor cinematography and vivid costumes and sets, which bring the era to life. Redeeming Qualities and Moments: Must See? Links: |
One thought on “Unconquered (1947)”
First viewing. Not must-see and in complete agreement with the assessment.
As noted, attractive-looking and well-produced historical fiction – which is generally played with staid earnestness but is nevertheless lacking some of the natural, spontaneous quality found, for example, in DeMille’s ‘Union Pacific’.
Among the credited screenwriters is Charles Bennett – partnered a number of times with Hitchcock (most notably for ‘The 39 Steps’, ‘Sabotage’ and ‘Foreign Correspondent’) – which may account for some of the welcome strength in the script but the dialogue also contains more than a fair amount of standard Hollywood-speak.
Still, leads Cooper and Goddard acquit themselves well (poor Paulette – oh, the abuse!) and Da Silva dependably displays a smooth but dastardly villain.