Lady in the Lake (1947)
“We have a nasty little motto around here: every man has his price.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: Perhaps due to logistical constraints, far too many scenes are static, simply showing Marlowe’s conversation partners talking into the camera, most of them over-emoting without subtlety. (Faring particularly poorly is Jayne Meadows as Mildred Haveland, a landlady whose nerves appear to be merely skin-deep.) The storyline is standard private eye fare, with shady women, belligerent police, a tanned lothario (Dick Simmons): … fistfights, and plenty of secret identities — but it’s hard to remember much about this flick once it’s done other than the highly experimental way in which it was filmed. Redeeming Qualities and Moments: Must See? Links: |
2 thoughts on “Lady in the Lake (1947)”
Not must-see.
Chandler / Marlowe fans would probably object to this film altogether (if they bothered to watch it). This is a particular case in which the book is far superior to the movie (it’s one of my favorites in the Marlowe series).
As much as I like Montgomery as a performer in general, his directorial choice of the Marlowe POV just doesn’t work (mainly since it draws too much attention to itself) – above that, his one-note delivery as Marlowe tends to just be irritating after awhile (making Marlowe less fun as a character than the way he’s originally written).
Poor Totter (who is usually more effective) tries her best, and Steve Fisher’s adaptation does have the occasional Chandler-esque zing to it… but read the book instead; it’s sooooo good!
Good for Robert Montgomery to experiment like this. Good cast, especially Audrey Totter – Audrey,as ‘Adrienne Fromsett’, wears a brooch with the intials AF.
In real life Audrey’s married name was Audrey Fred. She kept the brooch and her granddaughter has it now.
What a memento!