Browsed by
Month: July 2022

Hell is For Heroes (1962)

Hell is For Heroes (1962)

“Lady, the whole world is full of trouble.”

Synopsis:
During World War II, an embittered private (Steve McQueen) joins a battalion run by a tough sergeant (Harry Guardino) and his even-keeled next-in-command (Fess Parker). Soon the men — including a hustler (Bobby Darin), a mechanically minded corporal (James Coburn), a naive young kid (Bill Mullikin), a Polish-born private (Mike Kellin) who looks after a displaced Polish soldier (Nick Adams), and a clerk (Bob Newhart) — are told they must return to battle despite being severely outnumbered by the Germans; will they find a way to survive?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Don Siegel Films
  • Fess Parker Films
  • James Coburn Films
  • Soldiers
  • Steve McQueen Films
  • World War II

Review:
Don Siegel directed and Robert Pirosh scripted this “anti-war” wartime battle flick, based on a real-life squad of men from the 95th Infantry Division tasked with holding off the Germans at the Siegfried Line. It features McQueen as a typically stoic tough guy:

… and Bob Newhart (in his film debut) as a bumbling outsider tasked with faking a phone call to his superiors in order to make spying Germans believe his team is doing just fine.

There are a few other mild attempts at humor, but for the most part, this is a bleak film that pulls no punches in depicting how relentlessly brutal war is.

SPOILERS AHEAD

Particularly hair-raising scenes include a few of the men snake-crawling across the ground while feeling with their fingers for landmines (tragically, Coburn misses one):

… Guardino screaming that his guts have been blown out while being carried off the battlefield:

… and a brutally graphic ending for McQueen. Indeed, “The End” appears on screen almost immediately after several major characters have been killed, thus denying the viewer any further closure or sense of what happens to the remaining men. This harsh film has a minor cult following given taut direction by Siegel and plenty of authentic-seeming fighting, but it’s not my personal cup of tea.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Several gut-wrenching sequences

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look.

Links:

Avventura, L’ (1960)

Avventura, L’ (1960)

“How can it take so little time to change, to forget?”

Synopsis:
After her best friend Anna (Lea Massari) mysteriously disappears during a boating trip in the Mediterranean, a young woman named Claudia (Monica Vitti) unexpectedly falls in love with her friend’s fiance, Sandro (Gabriele Ferzetti).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Italian Films
  • Michelangelo Antonioni Films
  • Monica Vitti Films
  • Mysterious Disappearance

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “slow, enigmatic work by Michelangelo Antonio” — which “many critics consider infuriatingly shallow and others think is fraught with insight into the psyche of the rich” — is a “pessimistic film… about the tenuous nature of modern relationships, the inability of people to communicate verbally, the lack of joy in lovemaking, the meaningless and alienated lives of the rich, the realization that we’ll all disappear from the face of the earth and that life, such as it is, will continue (and we will fade from memory).”

He points out that the “film is very slow-paced, has no real storyline, [and] uses dull dialogue to express the dullness of the uncommunicative characters.” He notes that while he personally finds “the film fascinating,” he now knows “better than to recommend it to the casual moviegoer.” Finally, Peary highlights the “mesmerizing photography by Aldo Scavarda.”

I agree that it’s easy to see how this “challenging” film would divide audiences. It’s gorgeous and provocative, but requires patience and some intentional analysis to appreciate the points its director seems to be making. According to Geoffrey Nowell-Smith’s essay for Criterion:

From the moment that Sandro’s pursuit of Claudia is suddenly converted into mutual passion, the film’s momentum changes. Anna recedes into the background, but her absence continues to haunt the narrative, right until the very end. This absence — which is also a presence — is a key to the film. It inevitably brings to mind Hitchcock, who plays with a similar motif in Rebecca (1940) and Vertigo (1958), and also dispatches his heroine early in a film exactly contemporary with L’AvventuraPsycho.

However, Nowell-Smith points out a crucial difference between Antonioni and Hitchcock’s approach: Antonioni did not provide easily discernible reasons or motivations for anything that happens (or doesn’t happen) to his characters; they simply exist and (inter)act. Antonioni followed up this film with three others also starring Vitti: La Notte (1961), L’Eclisse (1962), and Red Desert (1964); I’ll be reviewing and comparing those soon.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Monica Vitti as Claudia
  • Aldos Scavarda’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, for its historical relevance as “Antonioni’s breakthrough film.”

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Historically Relevant
  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Atlantic City (1980)

Atlantic City (1980)

“Now it’s all so goddamn legal.”

Synopsis:
When an aspiring croupier (Susan Sarandon) in Atlantic City is visited by her estranged husband (Robert Joy) and pregnant sister (Hollis McLaren), she unexpectedly finds herself caught up in an adventure involving her elderly neighbor (Burt Lancaster), a former low-level gangster caring for an aging moll (Kate Reid).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Burt Lancaster Films
  • Casinos
  • Drug Dealers
  • Gangsters
  • Has-Beens
  • Louis Malle Films
  • May-December Romance
  • Susan Sarandon Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that “there is much in this film” — which he considers to be director “Louis Malle’s best English-language film” — “to appreciate,” including “the seedy [title] city itself.” He argues that “even if you’ve never been there, you’ll feel nostalgia for the pre-casino days.”

Peary writes that playwright “John Guare’s exceptional, witty script is full of believable, interesting types — all hoping for that one shot at happiness.” He notes that Guare and Malle’s “major theme is reflected in the coupling of Lancaster and Sarandon,” whose “union serves as a metaphor for the present-day mixing of the old and new in Atlantic City”; he points out they “make a dynamic screen couple.” Finally, Peary notes that the film features “a nice choice of locations,” with “Malle’s eye for detail… as usual, impeccable.”

Peary doesn’t specifically call out performances in his GFTFF review, but he does nominate both Lancaster and Sarandon as Best Actor and Actress in his Alternate Oscars book. They’re perfectly cast, nicely complementing one another in terms of personality, grit, and desire for the finer things in life.

Speaking of this, when we first see Sarandon re-encountering her low-life husband — who not only cheated on her, but impregnated her impressionable sister! — we wonder what it says about Sarandon that she’s come to this sorry place in her personal life.

However, we soon learn that she made bad choices given few choices in her small Canadian town, and is now on a self-determined path to correct that. Meanwhile, seeing shabby but elegant Lancaster ordered around by a shrewish old woman:

… makes his accidental turn towards increased cash flow seem hopeful, despite our knowing it can’t end well given the involvement of brutal drug dealers.

The supporting cast nicely rounds out the story, with Joy and McLaren — once again playing a pregnant young woman, as she did in Outrageous! (1977) — believable as the clueless and hopelessly naive young couple who set the plot in motion; Reid — perhaps best known for her role as Dr. Ruth Leavitt in The Andromeda Strain (1977) — rather hilarious in a role that allows her to morph from nag to caretaker:

… and Michel Piccoli in a small role as Sarandon’s worldly instructor.

Malle’s action-packed yet character-driven drama has held up well, and remains well worth a look.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Burt Lancaster as Lou
  • Susan Sarandon as Sally
  • Fine supporting performances
  • Richard Ciupka’s cinematography
  • Excellent use of location shooting

Must See?
Yes, as a fine drama by a master director. Nominated as one of the Best Movies of the Year in Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Important Director
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Apocalypse Now (1979)

Apocalypse Now (1979)

“I don’t see… any method… at all, sir.”

Synopsis:
During the Vietnam War, a captain (Martin Sheen) is assigned the task of finding and assassinating a mad lieutenant colonel (Marlon Brando) who has become a god-like figure for natives living deep in the jungle.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Assassination
  • Dennis Hopper Films
  • Francis Ford Coppola Films
  • Frederic Forrest Films
  • Harrison Ford Films
  • Jungles
  • Marlon Brando Films
  • Martin Sheen Films
  • Robert Duvall Films
  • Scott Glenn Films
  • Vietnam War

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that while “Francis Coppola’s epic about the madness – ‘the horror!’ – of the Vietnam War is considered controversial,” “there is really no volatile material,” and he adds that “the only cause for debate among people interested in the war itself is Coppola’s best, most authentic sequence: stoned, leaderless soldiers fight continuously behind enemy lines while headquarters has forgotten about them.” He writes that “many visuals are exciting, but the picture is annoyingly self-conscious,” and “too often Coppola seems to be calling attention to his artistry and imagination.” He asserts that “the boat trip comes across like a ride at Disneyland, where the special-effects men have prepared tableaux on the banks at every turn of the river”:

… and he concludes his review by noting that “the scene in which Sheen and Brando lie around philosophizing while Coppola gets super-pretentious with his camera and character placement recalls the similarly shot, ultra-boring scene of Liv Ullmann and Ingrid Bergman in Ingmar Bergman’s Autumn Sonata.”

While it’s not a personal favorite, I’m a bigger fan of this wartime flick than Peary. Coppola was nothing if not forthright about his own concerns with the film not making sense (see the must-see documentary Hearts of Darkness: A Filmmaker’s Apocalypse [1991] for more on this), which makes it doubly impressive that the film actually does cohere. Sure, it’s more of a mood piece than a “rational” or straightforward adaptation of Joseph Conrad’s 1899 novella Heart of Darkness — but it works on its own terms as a surreal immersion piece. Coppola and his team set out to tell a tale of the Vietnam War that would highlight its deep absurdity and lasting impact on everyone involved, and in this, he succeeds.

We see characters ranging from an already-damaged captain (Sheen) who is shaken from an alcohol-fueled fugue to head out on a new mission:

… to the team of bureaucrats (including Harrison Ford) who cooly task Sheen with assassinating a member of his own military:

… to megalomaniac, helicopter-riding Lt. Colonel (Robert Duvall) who “loves the smell of napalm in the morning” and repeatedly insists to a California surfer named Lance (Sam Bottoms) that the war-ridden waters surrounding them are just fine to head out onto.

We also meet the other members of Sheen’s river patrol boat crew, including CPO Phillips (Albert Hall), “Clean” (14-year-old Laurence Fishburne), and “Chef” (Frederic Forrest):

… and eventually encounter a hopped up photojournalist (Dennis Hopper) who takes Sheen to see the mysterious Captain Kurtz (Brando).

The final half-hour — taking place deep in the “heart of darkness” in the jungle — evokes all sorts of problematic issues related to colonialism and exoticism of native peoples, but it’s palatable given that this is precisely the film’s point: we went in to “help” a country we knew little to nothing about, and emerged more confused and damaged than ever.

Note: Watch for a brief “cameo” by Scott Glenn as a member of Brando’s cult.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine performances by the entire cast

  • Vittorio Storaro’s cinematography
  • Good use of an eclectic score

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Boy and His Dog, A (1975)

Boy and His Dog, A (1975)

“You’re so funny when you’re sexually frustrated.”

Synopsis:
A survivor (Don Johnson) of a nuclear holocaust roams the wastelands of Arizona with his telepathically communicating dog Blood (Tiger), in search of females and food. Soon Vic (Johnson) is seduced by a beautiful young woman (Susanne Benton) who encourages him to come “downunder” to the Utopian town of Topeka — but will he follow her, given that he must leave his beloved canine companion behind?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Black Comedy
  • Dystopia
  • Jason Robards Films
  • Pets
  • Post-Apocalypse
  • Science Fiction
  • Survival
  • Talking Animals

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, this “cult science-fiction fantasy was capably adapted from Harlan Ellison’s Nebula Award-winning novella by L.Q. Jones,” who is “best known [as a supporting actor] for his appearances in Sam Peckinpah westerns.” He notes that good use was made of the “low budget, with extremely interesting visualizations of violent wasteland (anticipating Mad Max and The Road Warrior) and Topeka.”


Peary points out that while the picture “received much criticism for [its] depiction of women as sex objects,” “that is exactly the nightmarish vision Ellison and Jones see for this apocalyptic age” — not exactly “one they find appealing.” He adds that the “best part of [the] film is [the] wicked rat-a-tat dialogue between Vic and Blood, taken almost word for word from Ellison,” and describes Vic and Blood “like a comedy team cast in an absurd play.”

Peary elaborates on his review in his Cult Movies 2 book, where he points out how “violent, sexy, [and] sometimes vulgar” this black comedy is despite its seemingly “kiddie fare” title, and he discusses some key changes made between the novella and this adaptation — primarily around the role of Quilla June (Benton), who was virginal in the book but here is a power-hungry seductress.

Personally, I have mixed feelings about this movie — and even Peary concedes that it’s “not for everyone.” While I can see its dark appeal as a film with “bizarre humor,” it’s too harsh for my tastes, especially given that there really isn’t a sympathetic character in sight (other than perhaps Blood, played in a “terrific performance” by Tiger of “The Brady Bunch” fame). Sure, this may be highly realistic for a movie portraying the darkest of End Times, but it’s hard to watch — especially without a woman to root for. While I’m glad I finally revisited this cult classic, it’s not a personal favorite.

Note: Watch for Jason Robards, Jr. in a key role as a member of the triumvirate committee “downunder”.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Appropriately bleak sets and atmospheric cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a cult favorite — though it may or may not be to your liking.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

Android (1982)

Android (1982)

“You — you’re both androids!”

Synopsis:
A male android (Don Opper) onboard a spaceship with a mad doctor (Klaus Kinski) and a newly formed female android (Kendra Kirchner) falls for a beautiful human fugitive (Brie Howard) who — along with two criminal compatriots (Norbert Weisser and Crofton Hardester) — is on the run from the law .

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Androids and Clones
  • Fugitives
  • Mad Doctors and Scientists
  • Science Fiction

Response to Peary’s Review:
In his brief review of this “low-budget debut film” by writer-actor Dan Opper — which “became a quick cult favorite in England,” but “never really caught on” in America — Peary simply notes that putting “all these weird characters together” means “there’s bound to be mayhem.” He asserts that while “it has charm, a Chaplinesque lead character, and behind-the-camera intelligence going for it,” it “is one film that really should have been zanier.”

I agree. There is very little going on here other than Opper (who is appropriately child-like and charming) wanting to experience love and sex for the first time (with Howard), and being disillusioned by his maker (Kinski).

None of the characters or plot details are sufficiently fleshed out. We simply know that Opper is in the midst of a bunch of questionable characters:

… and that he will at some point be joined (or replaced) by his new female companion.

To its credit, the film ends on an empowering note, but it’s not really worth the ride until then.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Don Opper as Max 404

Must See?
No, though sci-fi fans might be curious to check it out given its cult status.

Links:

American Graffiti (1973)

American Graffiti (1973)

“Maybe I’ve grown up. Maybe I changed my mind.”

Synopsis:
On prom night in 1962, a teenager (Ron Howard) about to head off to college tells his long-time girlfriend (Cindy Williams) that he wants them to see other people while they’re apart; meanwhile, his college-going buddy (Richard Dreyfuss) becomes obsessed with a beautiful blonde (Suzanne Somers) in a white convertible who flirts with him, then gets caught up with a group of local gangsters causing havoc; a nerd (Charles Martin Smith) takes temporary possession of Howard’s car and quickly scores a beautiful date (Candy Clark); and a slightly older local (Paul Le Mat) ends up driving around town with a precocious twelve-year-old (Mackenzie Phillips).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Candy Clark Films
  • Comedy
  • Coming of Age
  • Ensemble Cast
  • Harrison Ford Films
  • Kathleen Quinlan Films
  • Paul Le Mat Films
  • Teenagers

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, “George Lucas directed this wonderfully exuberant youth comedy which is set one eventful night in Modesto, California, in 1962” — an “idealized remembrance of things past, of innocent youth spent eating fries and malts at the drive-in hangout, cruising the main strip, drag-racing, bragging about your one ‘cool’ friend, making out, hanging out, dancing real close, listening to rock music on the car radio, playing pranks on [the] police, telling off an obnoxious teacher.”

He points out that “fittingly, we don’t see our young heroes and heroines having dinner at home with their parents, doing their homework, or attending classes.” Instead, the film is structured around one strategically compressed night in which “at the beginning and conclusion, we see our four male heroes together”:

… and “in between, they go their separate ways.” Peary notes how “smoothly” Lucas moves “between the four storylines, which at times intermingle”: Howard and Williams’ romantic challenges; Dreyfuss’s adventures with “three toughs” (led by Bo Hopkins):

… “Smith having “the wildest night imaginable” with “batty blonde Candy Clark”:

… “and Le Mat unexpectedly finding a “great companion” in Phillips.

He writes that “the pace is swift, the dialogue is consistently witty and clever, and the characters are terrific,” and he adds that the “film features the first great golden-oldies soundtrack” (costing only $80,000!).

In Alternate Oscars, Peary names this the Best Film of the Year, and points out that “because of this seminal youth film the next two decades would be overrun with pictures about overly worried or overly excited teenagers… but none would be such labors of love.” As he writes, “None would have the sense of fun, humor, warmth toward characters, or genuine nostalgia that is evident in Lucas’s every shot and line of dialogue,” and he points out that this film “was an instant classic” (though not beloved by all critics), “a smash hit, [and] a vehicle that helped launch numerous careers (even Harrison Ford has a small part).”

I’m in agreement with Peary’s laudatory review, and was very pleasantly surprised to find this nostalgia-laced classic so authentically engaging. There doesn’t seem to be a wrong step taken here, from careful selection of each supporting character in the large ensemble cast to Lucas’s penchant for cultivating improvised “mistakes”. Watching Laurent Bouzereau’s must-see documentary (1998) about the film’s 28-day rapid-fire production shows that input from producer Francis Ford Coppola and cinematographer Haskell Wexler also seemed to play a crucial role in the film’s creative success. This film remains well worth a revisit.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine performances by the entire cast




  • Excellent cinematography
  • Effective production design
  • George Lucas, Gloria Katz, and Willard Huyck’s script
  • Impressive sound mixing
  • The rocking soundtrack

Must See?
Yes, as an American classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Antonio das Mortes (1969)

Antonio das Mortes (1969)

“God made the world; the devil made the barbed wires.”

Synopsis:
A Brazilian outlaw known as Antonio das Mortes (Mauricio do Valle) is hired by a corrupt police chief (Hugo Carvana) to kill a revolutionary known as Coirana (Lorival Pariz), but eventually has a change of heart and tries to convince a blind, wealthy landowner (Joffre Soares) with an unfaithful wife (Odete Lara) to distribute his food to the masses.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Hit Men
  • Revolutionaries
  • South and Central American Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “major work of Brazil’s Cinema Novo” — a “myth-epic” — was “a very popular film among U.S. and European leftists at the time of [its] release.” He describes it as a “political allegory” that “is both extremely theatrical and, at times ritualistic”:

… and points out that viewers will “be reminded of Sergio Leone’s Clint Eastwood bounty-hunter films, Eastwood’s [non-GFTFF-listed] Joe Kidd (in which he turns against the men who hired him), El Topo (the bearded Do Valle looks like a fat Alexandro Jodorowsky), Godard (if he ever made a period piece, it would be similar), and South American dance, folkloric, and religious pageants.”

Peary argues that while the “picture is ambiguous at times and downright weird at others,” it’s “endlessly fascinating and colorful” and features “fine photography.” Martin Scorsese is also a diehard fan; on YouTube you can find a 25 minute interview of him discussing this movie and the impact it’s had on him as a filmmaker.

I’m less impressed. While it’s easy to see how movie lovers in the late 1960s would hail director Glauber Rocha’s flick — a sequel to his earlier Black God, White Devil (1964) — for its bold break from stylistic and narrative conventions, it’s more of a political and cinematic curiosity today. With that said, film fanatics will still likely be curious to check out either this film, Black God, White Devil, or the middle film in Rocha’s “trilogy”, Entranced Earth (1967) (the latter two titles are listed in 1,001 Movies You Must See Before You Die).

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Affonso Beato’s cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s recommended for its historical relevance.

Links:

War Wagon, The (1967)

War Wagon, The (1967)

“I didn’t bring you here to be the best of friends; we’ve gotta lot of things to do.”

Synopsis:
A wrongfully imprisoned rancher (John Wayne) returns to his hometown to seek revenge on the corrupt businessman (Bruce Cabot) who cheated him out of his homestead, enlisting help from a safecracker and gunslinger (Kirk Douglas) who once shot at him; an alcoholic young explosives expert (Robert Walker, Jr.); and a Kiowa translator (Howard Keel).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bruce Dern Films
  • Ex-Cons
  • Heists
  • Howard Keel Films
  • John Wayne Films
  • Keenan Wynn Films
  • Kirk Douglas Films
  • Ranchers
  • Revenge
  • Westerns

Review:
Burt Kennedy — perhaps best known for scripting many of Budd Boetticher’s films for Batjac Productions — directed this comedic revenge western, co-starring John Wayne and Kirk Douglas and featuring a tank-like “war wagon” (hence the film’s title) which is quite a sight to behold.

The entire plot revolves around Wayne concocting and carrying out an elaborate plan to steal gold dust from Cabot’s wagon, which is not only heavily armed but well-guarded by dozens of men; it thus takes a clever ruse and a highly specific set of skills from all involved on Wayne’s team to pull off the heist. Wayne is a solid protagonist as usual:

… but classic film fans may be most curious to see the supporting performance by Walker, Jr. (son of Robert Walker and Jennifer Jones), who looks like a blend of his two famous parents.

While this film moves along nicely and features fine location shooting, it isn’t must-see viewing.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Excellent use of location shooting in Mexico

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see for western fans.

Links:

American Friend, The (1977)

American Friend, The (1977)

“I would like to be your friend. But friendship isn’t possible.”

Synopsis:
When Swiss frame-maker Jonathan Zimmerman (Bruno Ganz) meets art broker Tom Ripley (Dennis Hopper) at an auction sale of a painting made by a presumably-dead American artist (Nicholas Ray), he finds himself unexpectedly caught up in a dangerous plan to assassinate a couple of Mafia-wanted men.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bruno Ganz Films
  • Dennis Hopper Films
  • Friendship
  • Hit Men
  • German Films
  • Mafia
  • Wim Wenders Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, “Wim Wenders’s dazzling psychological thriller, adapted from Ripley’s Game by Patricia Highsmith, was the first film of [the] West German film renaissance to be truly accessible to American audiences,” given that “the colors are splashy rather than subdued”:

… “there are references to familiar English-language rock songs; the picture is set partly in America, and English is the dominant language; Dennis Hopper (as Tom Ripley) co-stars”:

… “and supporting parts are played by well-known American director Sam Fuller (as a Mafia man)”:

… “and Nicholas Ray (as the supposedly dead artist whose paintings Ripley sells).”

Peary points out that “Wenders’s sharply edited action sequences are influenced by Fuller,” while “his use of the frame as an arena for tension and to expose character isolation was influenced by Ray.”

However, he adds that “the storyline and characters… are most reminiscent of Hitchcock, specifically Strangers on a Train — which was also based on a Highsmith novel.”

Peary describes the film’s complex plot as follows in GFTFF: “In Germany to sell a painting, Ripley is slighted by Jonathan (Bruno Ganz), a simple Swiss frame-maker, who won’t shake his hand because of his shady reputation.”

“Insulted, Ripley secretly recommends Jonathan to a rich criminal friend (Gérard Blain) who is looking for a non-criminal to assassinate Mafia men.”

“Knowing Jonathan has leukemia, Tom starts a rumor that he is no longer in remission. Soon Jonathan believes he is about to die” and, “wanting to leave money to [his] wife and child after his death, he is talked into committing the crimes — although he has never done an incorrect act in his life. Meanwhile he and Tom become friends, while his marriage to Marianne (a fine performance by Lisa Kreuzer, Wenders’s wife) deteriorates because of his lies about his activities.”

Peary points out that while “conscience, guilt, and morality based on a religious code were important to Highsmith,” “Wenders doesn’t deal with these themes” — instead, “as his world has no God, he is concerned with existential themes (depressed Ripley worries that his meaningless life is endless; depressed Jonathan fears his life will soon be over) and male bonding and friendship between opposites.”

Indeed, both men could be viewed as “aliens in their respective environments”, given that “Tom admires Jonathan’s stable family life, while Jonathan admires Tom’s freedom from family responsibilities and his criminal activities” and is “appreciative that Tom helps him engage in excitement.”

Peary’s assessment — including his additional musings in Cult Movies 2, where he discusses the film in further detail — accurately sums up this often enigmatic thriller, which gets dark quickly but remains highly engaging throughout. We can’t stop watching Ganz as he spirals into increasingly violent situations, knowing that one way or another, he’s doomed.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Bruno Ganz as Jonathan Zimmermann
  • Dennis Hopper as Tom Ripley
  • Lisa Kreuzer as Marianne Zimmermann
  • Robby Müller’s cinematography
  • Good use of location shooting
  • Jürgen Knieper’s score

Must See?
Yes, as a foreign classic.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links: