Browsed by
Category: Original Reviews

Responses to Peary’s “must see” movie reviews, as well as my own “must see” movie reviews up to and after 1986 (when Peary’s book was published).

Poor Little Rich Girl (1936)

Poor Little Rich Girl (1936)

“That kid in there’s a novelty — just what we need for our act!”

Synopsis:
The only daughter (Shirley Temple) of a wealthy widower (Michael Whalen) is suddenly on her own when her caretaker (Sara Haden) is accidentally killed while taking her to boarding school. Soon Temple joins forces with a pair of married musical performers (Jack Haley and Alice Faye) who are eager to add her to their act — but when will her true identity be revealed?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Alice Faye Films
  • Heiresses
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Shirley Temple Films

Review:
This in-name-only remake of Mary Pickford’s 1917 silent classic offered mega-child-star Shirley Temple yet another opportunity to charm Depression-era audiences in the way she did so well — and to that end, it certainly succeeds. Temple is as adorably precocious as ever, singing a few cutesy tunes while instantly charming an old curmudgeon (Claude Gillingwater):

… aiding the fortunes of a talented young couple in desperate need of a break (Haley and Faye):

… and avoiding capture by a nebulously lecherous stalker (John Wray).

Highlights include Temple singing to her dolls (who eventually get up and dance):

… and her truly impressive tap finale with Haley and Faye, which apparently took countless attempts to get just right. However, this one ultimately isn’t must-see viewing; Peary lists other Temple titles in his GFTFF, and film fanatics need only see one or two at most to get a representative sense of what Temple’s phenomenal fame was all about.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Temple singing “Oh My Goodness!” to her dolls
  • Temple, Faye, and Haley’s impressive finale tap dance to “Military Man”

Must See?
No, though of course Shirley Temple fans will want to check it out.

Links:

Barkleys of Broadway, The (1949)

Barkleys of Broadway, The (1949)

“You’re wasted in musical comedy. You could be a great tragic actress!”

Synopsis:
Popular dancing duo Dinah (Ginger Rogers) and Josh (Fred Astaire) Barkley find their marriage and their joint career threatened when Rogers meets a French playwright and director (Jacques Francois) who leads her to believe that her true calling is serious drama.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Musicals
  • Oscar Levant Films

Review:
Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers’ tenth and final collaboration together (after a ten-year hiatus) was this innocuous Technicolor musical originally intended to reunite Astaire and Judy Garland after their successful pairing in Easter Parade (1948). Much has been made of the fact that Rogers was a little heavier here than in her earlier films with Astaire — a ridiculous complaint given that she dances wonderfully, and remains athletically trim. Indeed, Astaire and Rogers still sparkle while they’re dancing (either together or solo), and fans of the duo will surely be glad for one more chance to see their incomparable magic onscreen. Less easy to forgive is the lackluster script and premise (by Betty Comden and Adolph Green), which, as noted in All Movie Guide’s review, “is the kind of situation that Comden and Green [were] so adept at spoofing, but they’re asked to play it straight here.” Nonetheless, it is interesting to see how eerily the storyline echoes the “split” between Astaire and Rogers years earlier, when Rogers largely turned away from dancing and went on to forge an Oscar-winning career for herself as a “serious actress”.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Ginger Rogers as Dinah Barkley
  • Some fine Rogers-and-Astaire dance numbers

  • Astaire performing “Shoes With Wings On”

Must See?
No, though fans of Rogers and Astaire will certainly want to check it out.

Links:

Story of Vernon and Irene Castle, The (1939)

Story of Vernon and Irene Castle, The (1939)

“Who’s gonna pay money to see a man dance with his wife?”

Synopsis:
Near the turn of the 20th century, married couple Vernon (Fred Astaire) and Irene (Ginger Rogers) Castle become a cultural phenomenon, known the world over for their elegant ballroom dancing — but with World War I on the horizon, their happiness is ultimately short-lived.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biopic
  • Dancers
  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Musicals

Review:
This biopic of the world’s most famous married dancing couple seems like a no-brainer casting choice for long-time dancing “couple” Astaire and Rogers, who inhabit their based-on-real-life roles with grace and respect, remaining true to the dancing styles of the era while exhibiting their characteristic genius on the dance floor. It’s nice to see the duo in a non-combative onscreen collaboration (for the first time since their earliest films), and the Castles’ ongoing marital devotion is nicely portrayed. Knowing that Vernon Castle died in a plane crash during WWI adds a level of poignancy to the material, as one watches the events unfold with a sense of impending doom; to that end, the final half-hour — as we’re kept in suspense about exactly when and how Castle’s death will occur — eventually feels a bit drawn-out. But the “rise to fame” story that’s taken place until then is pleasantly handled, and will surely appeal to those curious about the phenomenal fame of the Castles.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Astaire’s informal “soft shoe” while at the train station
  • Astaire and Rogers dancing the “Castle Walk”, among other popular dance
  • Clever use of special effects


  • A refreshing glimpse of Astaire and Rogers playing a loving married couple

Must See?
No, though it’s a lovely “finale” to Astaire and Rogers’ long-time RKO collaboration.

Links:

Don’t Bother to Knock (1952)

Don’t Bother to Knock (1952)

“I should have known better — you’re not cured!”

Synopsis:
The elevator operator (Elisa Cook, Jr.) for a fancy hotel enlists his niece (Marilyn Monroe) to babysit for the daughter (Donna Corcoran) of a couple (Jim Backus and Lurene Tuttle) attending an awards event at the hotel. Soon Monroe begins flirting with an embittered guest (Richard Widmark) who is reeling from a recent breakup with his girlfriend (Anne Bancroft) — but their flirtation quickly turns dangerous as disturbed Monroe begins to believe Widmark is actually her deceased fiance.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Anne Bancroft Films
  • Governesses and Nannies
  • Marilyn Monroe Films
  • Mental Breakdown
  • Richard Widmark Films
  • Roy Ward Baker Films

Review:
Don’t Bother to Knock is best known for featuring young Marilyn Monroe in an uncharacteristically dark leading role, playing a nuanced character with more to her than mere sex appeal. To that end, her performance is impressive (we believe her pitiful “Nell” is psychotically disturbed), but the film as a whole suffers from a strange lack of authentic tension — perhaps because we never really sense a character played by MM could commit murder, or perhaps because Widmark’s character isn’t sufficiently developed. The claustrophobic events — all taking place in “real time” within the hotel — speed by at a fast-paced clip; ironically, however, this short-changes the pivotal “change-of-heart” supposedly experienced by Widmark’s character, whose real love interest (a young and beautiful Bancroft, singing several songs in her charismatic screen debut) has broken up with him because she claims he lacks sufficient empathy for others. With that said, Roy Ward Baker’s direction is solid, the economic script (just 76 minutes long) makes good use of the setting, and one does stay involved throughout.

Favorite (throwaway) exchange early in the film:

Widmark: You married?
Will Bouchey (as bartender): Sure. Who isn’t.
Widmark: You and your wife fight?
Bouchey: [beat, while he stirs a drink] Sometimes she sleeps.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Marilyn Monroe as Nell Forbes
  • Anne Bancroft as Lyn Lesley
  • Some creative direction by Roy Ward Baker

Must See?
No, though it’s definitely worth a look simply to see Monroe (and Bancroft)’s impressive “early” performances.

Links:

Monkey Business (1952)

Monkey Business (1952)

“I’m beginning to wonder if ‘being young’ is all it’s cracked up to be.”

Synopsis:
A scientist (Cary Grant) experimenting with a potion to restore youth and vitality tries it on himself and is shocked to discover how effective it suddenly is — not realizing that one of his lab chimpanzees accidentally got into his supplies and tainted the water supply with the secretly powerful new brew. Meanwhile, Grant’s wife (Ginger Rogers) insists on trying the potion herself, while his boss (Charles Coburn) is desperate to determine exactly what is making the new mixture work so well.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cary Grant Films
  • Charles Coburn Films
  • Comedy
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Howard Hawks Films
  • Hugh Marlowe Films
  • Marilyn Monroe Films
  • Scientists

Review:
With Howard Hawks at the helm, a script by Ben Hecht, Charles Lederer, and I.A.L. Diamond, and a cast including Cary Grant, Ginger Rogers, and Marilyn Monroe, one can’t help expecting more from this somewhat disappointing screwball farce. The premise is an overly simple one and doesn’t really go anywhere interesting, other than to reveal the subconscious marital tensions behind the oh-so-perfect façade of Grant and Rogers’ “ideal” 1950s marriage (he’s the genius, she lovingly supports him even when he’s infuriatingly distracted).

While Peary nominates both Grant and Rogers as Best Actor and Actress of the Year in his Alternate Oscars, I find their depictions as increasingly regressive adolescents silly rather than engaging. It is fun to see Monroe in an early sexpot role as Coburn’s secretary-in-name-only (she can’t even type):

Her freeway drive with Grant makes one wonder where their flirtation may go, but her character sadly fizzles into the background.

The best part of the film comes during its final half-hour, when true chaos has erupted and the pace picks up enough to carry us along in its true silliness.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • The absurdly slapstick final half-hour

Must See?
No; while many find it amusing, it’s ultimately not must-see. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Let’s Make Love (1960)

Let’s Make Love (1960)

“Oh, there’ll be children… Lots of children!”

Synopsis:
On the advice of a consultant (Tony Randall), billionaire Jean-Marc Clement (Yves Montand) attends a rehearsal of a musical show mocking his image, intending to shut it down — but he immediately becomes smitten with its star, sexy singer Amanda Dell (Marilyn Monroe), and decides instead to go along with her assumption that he’s a Clement-impersonator hoping for a bit part in the show.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • George Cukor Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Marilyn Monroe Films
  • Millionaires
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Tony Randall Films
  • Yves Montand Films

Review:
Marilyn Monroe’s second-to-last feature — made between Some Like it Hot (1959) and The Misfits (1961) — shows clear evidence of her growing comfort with fully inhabiting a nuanced role. While she’s still indubitably a sex-symbol first and foremost (she wears some of her most revealing outfits throughout the film, including body stockings and leotards), she’s also very much playing a real person here — someone with genuine compassion for both her current boyfriend (a troubled singer played by Frankie Vaughan) and the man (Montand) she believes is an out-of-work actor needing pointers on how to break into show business. She’s neither dumb (she attends night school) nor a gold-digger — and while she might represent too much of an archetypal “mother figure” for modern feminist tastes, she’s someone we can’t help feeling empathy with throughout the storyline.

Meanwhile, Montand is surprisingly well-cast as a billionaire needing to be coached on his performance style (by Milton Berle, Bing Crosby, and Gene Kelly in brief cameos) in order to win Monroe’s heart. Despite his reputation as an unrepentant ladies’ man, one gets the genuine impression that he really does want to find someone who will love him for himself — thus turning him into somewhat of a blithering idiot when faced with the woman he hopes will become his life-partner. Indeed, we feel a surprising amount of compassion for him as he finds himself (nicely) rejected time and again, once he’s distanced from the comfortable trappings of his money and reputation. Meanwhile, he and Monroe possess a natural chemistry together that makes sense, given the real-life affair they embarked upon for a brief while.

With all that said, the film is certainly not without its flaws, and most critics view it as a decidedly lesser entry in both actors’ oeuvres. Randall’s character barely registers at all, while Monroe’s romance with Vaughan is given far too little depth to help us understand his character as anything other than the conveniently plot-driven “romantic rival” Montand must defeat. Meanwhile, the cameos by Berle et al. come across as somewhat contrived. However, the strength of the two lead performances — as well as some knock-out numbers performed by Monroe (most notably her pole-dance rendition to Cole Porter’s “My Heart Belongs to Daddy”), and a fine supporting performance by Wilfrid Hyde-White as Montand’s no-nonsense business front — make this one worth at least a one-time look.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Yves Montand as Jean-Marc Clement
  • Marilyn Monroe as Amanda
  • Wilfrid Hyde-White as George Welch
  • Monroe performing several enjoyably provocative numbers

Must See?
No, though I personally recommend it.

Links:

Boy Who Could Fly, The (1986)

Boy Who Could Fly, The (1986)

“Sometimes we need to believe in a little magic, especially when there’s so much pain.”

Synopsis:
After moving to a new town with her widowed mother (Bonnie Bedelia) and younger brother (Fred Savage), a teenage girl (Lucy Deakins) befriends and falls in love with her mute neighbor (Jay Underwood), who has believed he can fly ever since his parents died in a plane crash when he was five.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fantasy
  • Friendship
  • Nonconformists
  • Teenagers

Review:
Although it was well-received upon its release, this quirky ’80s teen romance will primarily be of interest to those who remember enjoying it years ago — especially one-time teenage boys who had a crush on beautiful 15-year-old Deakins (who looks remarkably like her screen mother, Bonnie Bedelia). The storyline, while sensitively handled in most cases, follows an overly worn path in showing how Deakins and her grieving family adjust to life in a new town: Savage (before his breakthrough fame on “The Wonder Years”) deals with predictably menacing neighborhood bullies who won’t let him ride his bike around the corner:

… Deakins longs from afar to be part of the predictably hip “in crowd” at school:

… and Bedelia (predictably) struggles to adapt to working life after 13 years away (she’s absolutely flummoxed by the introduction of computers into the insurance business).

The major selling point of the film is Deakins’ relationship with Underwood, which is touching, but leaves one with too many questions left unanswered about Underwood’s situation and supposed special abilities.

His character is referred to as “autistic”, but doesn’t necessarily display characteristic signs of this, instead apparently suffering from selective mutism and emotional disturbance after his parents’ untimely death. (Could this gaffe be a function of autism only recently being better understood?) Meanwhile, his alcoholic caretaking uncle (Fred Gwynne, playing his role as a caricature):

claims to have seen his nephew fly, but he’s clearly about as unreliable a witness as one could muster. Underwood’s number one fan appears to be a kind and understanding English teacher (Colleen Dewhurst):

but her role is severely underwritten, and we never understand exactly how or why she’s come to play such a critical part in his welfare.

Eventually, writer/director Nick Castle chooses to turn Underwood’s situation into an actual fantasy rather than an exploration of his troubled inner fantasy-life, which may have thrilled audiences at the time (the special effects enhance the film’s romantic potential) but is ultimately the less satisfying choice.

While I hate to be a grinch, I can’t agree with Peary’s assessment of this one as a Personal Recommendation.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Lucy Deakins as Milly
  • Bonnie Bedelia as Charlene

Must See?
No; this one will primarily be of interest to viewers who remember it fondly from their youth. Listed as a Sleeper and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Crowd, The (1928)

Crowd, The (1928)

“The crowd laughs with you always… But it will cry with you for only a day.”

Synopsis:
An idealistic young man (James Murray) born at the turn of the 20th century struggles to make a living in 1920s New York while maintaining a happy home life with his new wife (Eleanor Boardman) and young kids.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • King Vidor Films
  • Marital Problems
  • New York City
  • Silent Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “truly wonderful silent movie” — “directed with remarkable visual virtuosity by King Vidor” — will appeal to “fans of such films as 1939’s Made for Each Other and The Marrying Kind [1952].” He notes that “like those two films, it blends humor and heartbreak” in its tale of a “a young couple… who fall in love on a blind date, immediately marry, and almost break up due to financial and familial difficulties”, and points out that the “film’s theme is that since few people become rich it’s okay to be one of the faceless crowd, just as long as you never become trampled on by that crowd”. He notes that the “film has marvelous visuals of New York”, which is sometimes “portrayed as romantic… [and] at other times [as] frightening”, but always as “extremely crowded”. He further notes Vidor’s much-lauded technique of either showing “a crowd in a long shot and zoom[ing] into a close-up of an individual or begin[ning] with a close-up of an individual and pull[ing] back to reveal the enormity of the surrounding crowd”.

While I admire Vidor’s clear directorial prowess, what I find most impressive about this film is how “extremely engaging” the two leads are; they seem to genuinely be falling in love with each other during the initial Coney Island date sequence (and more so during their romantic Niagara Falls honeymoon sequence), and one fully believes in the arc of their troubled marital journey. Boardman (Vidor’s real-life wife) demonstrates true screen presence as “Mary”, leading one to wonder why her career never took off as it could have; meanwhile, Murray (as “John”) is convincingly irritating as her well-meaning but immature husband, who behaves like a jerk at times yet ultimately wants the best for his young family, and truly loves Mary. His character is both frustrating to watch, and entirely believable.

There’s a pivotal moment early in the film, when John is shown leaving the office with his friend (Bert Roach), who convinces him to take the night off from studying to go out on the town and have a fun time on a double date. In typically compacted cinematic fashion, John meets Mary on this date, immediately proposes to her, and from thence is shown prioritizing family life over personal advancement. It’s all the more ironic, then, that his subsequent lack of time to focus on “improving himself” results in a life of semi-poverty for his family. Could the real moral here be that one should wait to marry and start a family until one has secured a solid livelihood? Reviewers don’t seem to focus much on this point, though Peary does note that John “would rather spend time with [Mary] and their children than play up to the bosses in the hope of getting a promotion”.

Ultimately, The Crowd remains a real-life, warts-and-all romance above all else, showing how John and Mary weather the storms of overbearing in-laws, a deeply tragic personal loss, and John’s growing realization that his father’s dreams for him once upon a time — “There’s a little man the world is going to hear from all right” — are easier said than realized.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Eleanor Boardman as Mary (nominated as one of the Best Actresses of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars)
  • James Murray as John
  • Creative direction by King Vidor

  • A fun glimpse of 1920s New York

Must See?
Yes, for the fine lead performances and Vidor’s solid direction. Nominated as one of the Best Films of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Important Director
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Man Who Laughs, The (1928)

Man Who Laughs, The (1928)

“A Comprachico surgeon carved a grin upon his face so he might laugh forever at his fool of a father.”

Synopsis:
In 17th century France, a young boy (Julius Molnar Jr.) whose mouth has been carved into a permanent smile as punishment to his disloyal father is adopted by a kind mountebank named Ursus (Cesare Gravina). Years later, Gwynplaine (Conrad Veidt) and a young blind woman named Dea (Mary Philbin) find themselves in love, but Gwynplaine is unwilling to let Dea touch his disfigured face; meanwhile a fun-loving duchess (Olga Baclanova) toys with the idea of having Gwynplaine as a lover, but is surprised to learn that he’s actually a nobleman who is rightful heir to her property.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Conrad Veidt Films
  • Disfigured Faces
  • Historical Drama
  • Horror
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Royalty and Nobility
  • Silent Films

Review:
Former German set designer Paul Leni made only a handful of films in Hollywood before dying far too young from blood poisoning in 1929. His best known titles as a director are the episodic German fantasy film Waxworks (1924); a silent version of The Cat and the Canary (1927); and his penultimate feature, this unexpectedly creepy horror-melodrama based on a novel by Victor Hugo. There’s something inherently unsettling about facial disfigurement as represented on screen, with Georges Franju’s Eyes Without a Face (1960) perhaps epitomizing the sub-genre, and Hugo’s own The Phantom of the Opera (1925) offering a variation on the same theme of a disfigured man hiding his face from the sweet young woman he loves (played by Philbin in both films). Assisted by Jack Pierce’s stunning make-up design, Veidt fully inhabits the role of the unfortunate Gwynplaine, whose face is etched into a permanent smile no matter what his mood; it’s difficult to describe exactly how disturbing his scarred visage is until one sees it flashed across the screen time and again. (Veidt’s appearance here was acknowledged as a direct influence on Bob Kane, who created The Joker for DC Comics.)

Adding to the pathos of Veidt’s curse is the deeply disturbing backstory of how he received his disfigurement as a young boy; the thought of a group of malevolent gypsies known for causing permanent damage to young children chills me to my bones.

Indeed, the film’s opening sequences are its most powerful, with the remainder of the storyline occasionally bogged down by the complex “hidden identity” narrative arc, which detracts from the twisted love triangle between Veidt, Philbin, and Baclanova (looking eerily like Madonna), whose fetishistic desires compel her to toy with Veidt’s emotions; although she’s best known for her iconic work as the villainess in Tod Browning’s Freaks (1932), she’s equally compelling in this role. Meanwhile, wild-haired Gravina brings unexpected pathos to his role as Gwynplaine and Dea’s caretaker, who comes across as refreshingly sympathetic and paternal rather than exploitative. Enormous credit for the film’s overall success, however, belongs to Leni and his behind-the-scenes crew, who film the entire storyline with Expressionistic flair, utilizing atmospheric sets and cinematography to effectively highlight the horror-driven drama behind Hugo’s narrative.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Conrad Veidt as Gwynplaine
  • Olga Baclanova as the Duchess Josiana
  • Cesare Gravina as Ursus
  • The unsettling first portion of the film
  • Jack Pierce’s creepy makeup
  • Atmospheric sets and cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a truly compelling silent horror-melodrama — and for Veidt’s noteworthy performance. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Last Metro, The (1980)

Last Metro, The (1980)

“It takes two to love, as it takes two to hate.”

Synopsis:
In German-occupied France during WWII, the owner (Catherine Deneuve) of a theater hides her Jewish husband (Heinz Bennent) in the basement while rehearsing a play with a new leading man (Gerard Depardieu) and an ambitious young starlet (Sabine Haudepin).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Catherine Deneuve Films
  • Francois Truffaut Films
  • French Films
  • Gerard Depardieu Films
  • Resistance Fighters

Review:
Given that Francois Truffaut spent part of his childhood living in Nazi-occupied France, he had long wanted to make a film set during this era; he settled upon this fictionalized tale (albeit one loosely based on various real-life scenarios) of a female theater director hiding her Jewish husband in the theater’s basement while carrying on daily operations and rehearsals up above.

It was enormously popular with both American and French audiences upon its release, and was nominated for an Oscar as Best Foreign Film of the Year, but ultimately hasn’t held up all that well as a compelling tale of wartime occupation. Since so many other films have covered (and continue to cover) this devastating period in world history, one’s expectations can’t help but be raised — so to see Truffaut presenting the material in such a sanitized light is somewhat disturbing; as Time Out’s acerbic capsule review puts it, “Playing for cute nostalgia, Truffaut lets the realities go to hell.”

According to an interview with Truffaut cited in TCM’s article, he himself admitted that The Last Metro could be seen as representing “the theater and the Occupation [as] seen by a child”, which would explain why the life-and-death “danger” risked by Deneuve and Bennent on a daily basis never feels as threatening as it should, and why both characters are seen taking ridiculous risks time and again (i.e., Deneuve slips away to visit Bennent in the midst of a post-production party!!). With that said, Deneuve and Bennent’s underground relationship remains compelling throughout; we genuinely believe that this pair is deeply in love and would do what it takes to maintain contact — which is why a sudden romantic plot twist during the final half hour of the film makes absolutely no sense at all, and truly seems to come out of left field. (Some viewers claim to sense a sexual tension between the two individuals in question throughout the film, but I just can’t see it.) Fortunately, the film is at least a visual treat throughout, thanks to Nestor Almendros’ cinematography — but film fanatics needn’t consider this one of Truffaut’s “must see” titles.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Catherine Deneuve as Marion Steiner
  • Heinz Bennent as Lucas Steiner
  • Nestor Almendros’ cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a one-time look. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links: