Plaisir, Le / House of Pleasure (1952)
“Happiness is not a joyful thing.”
|
Synopsis: |
|
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review: However, he argues that “the other two segments are disappointing, flimsy, and — except for the wondrous interplay between Ophuls’s moving camera and the high-kicking, spinning dancers in the ball sequence of ‘The Mask’ — flatly directed.” It’s hard to see how Peary could possibly make this claim, given that every single scene and sequence of this film is innovative in its direction. What’s less captivating overall (for me) are the stories themselves, which eventually build to a sense of coherence — pleasure always comes at a cost — but are not necessarily narratively compelling. With that said, it’s impossible to keep one’s eyes off of Ophuls’s prowess throughout this film: his camera is (almost) never not on the move, and it boggles the mind how many seamless tracking shots he manages to include, from the whirling opening sequences of the ball: … to the extended sequence showing Renaud closing up her “house” for the night (significantly, we’re never allowed inside, instead simply watching everything from a distance, often through constructed barriers): … to the devastating next-to-last sequence, shown from a woman’s point of view: While this isn’t Ophuls’s best film, it’s well worth a look by all film fanatics simply to see his brilliance at work. Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments: Must See? Categories
Links: |






















































































