FilmFanatic.org

Synopsis:
Sherlock Holmes (Christopher Plummer) and Dr. Watson (James Mason) try to unravel the mystery of Jack the Ripper, who has been killing prostitutes across London; when they learn that a high-level conspiracy may be behind the murders, they attempt to track down the woman (Genevieve Bujold) who holds the key to the entire affair.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Christopher Plummer Films
• Detectives and Private Eyes
• Genevieve Bujold Films
• Historical Drama
• Jack the Ripper
• John Gielgud Films
• James Mason Films
• Murder Mystery
• Prostitutes and Gigolos
• Serial Killers
• Sherlock Holmes Films
• Susan Clark Films

Review:
This oddly unsatisfying Victorian-era thriller should be much better than it is: despite the inspired casting (Plummer and Mason are wonderful together), an effective recreation of foggy London, several unexpectedly humorous moments, and a satisfying denouement, it’s too bloody difficult to follow. Only during the final 15 minutes of the film — once Holmes neatly unravels the entire affair in front of the British prime minister (John Gielgud) — does one finally understand who all the key players are, and why Holmes has been tracking them; indeed, Murder by Decree is a rare thriller which may be more enjoyable upon second viewing. Plummer and Mason are the main reasons to check this one out.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• Christopher Plummer as Holmes
  
• James Mason as Watson
  
• Susan Clark as frightened prostitute Mary Kelly
  
• Watson chatting with a prostitute who’s inordinately proud to still have all her teeth
  
• The clever ending, in which Holmes solves everything
  

Must See?
No, but fans of Sherlock Holmes will certainly want to check it out. Listed as a Sleeper and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• Moria Review
• Time Out Capsule Review

Synopsis:
When former singer Marian Washburn (Maureen O’Hara) confesses to shooting her young protegee (Gloria Grahame), Marion’s pianist-friend (Melvyn Douglas) tries to convince police detective Jim Fowler (Jay C. Flippen) that she’s lying.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Criminal Investigation
• Flashback Films
• Gloria Grahame Films
• Maureen O’Hara Films
• Melvyn Douglas Films
• Mentors
• Nicholas Ray Films
• Singers

Review:
This melodramatic flashback film — written by Citizen Kane‘s Herman Mankiewicz, and directed by Nicholas Ray — bears a vague resemblance to All About Eve (1950) in its tale of quibbling mentor/protegee, but is ultimately much less satisfying: because the characters (particularly O’Hara) are underdeveloped, we never quite believe or understand their motivations, and the entire narrative drifts along without much defining energy. Fortunately, O’Hara and Douglas are both fine (albeit unexceptional) in their roles, and Grahame gives a typically eccentric performance as loopy Susan — though it’s undeniably strange to hear her dubbed voice (in real life, she was tone deaf) crooning beautiful melodies. I was most impressed by Edward Stevenson’s lovely gowns; both leading ladies look gorgeous in them.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• Gloria Grahame as Susan
  
• Jay C. Flippen as droll Inspector Fowler
  
• Edward Stevenson’s gowns
  

Must See?
No, but it’s worth viewing once.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• TCM Article
• Time Out Capsule Review

Synopsis:
When wealthy Mr. Enderby (Finlay Currie) falls dead from a heart attack, plucky Miss Marple (Margaret Rutherford) suspects foul play, and tries to determine who among his greedy heirs is the murderer.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Amateur Sleuths
• Inheritance
• Margaret Rutherford Films
• Murder Mystery
• Robert Morley Films

Review:
British comedic actress Margaret Rutherford is primarily known for two eccentric characterizations: medium Madame Arcati in Noel Coward’s Blithe Spirit (1945) (originally a stage play), and amateur sleuth Miss Marple in George Pollock’s four screen adaptations of Agatha Christie’s novels; of the latter, Murder at the Gallop is the only one listed in Peary’s book, and thus is the only one I’ve seen (so far). While purists have complained that jowly Rutherford doesn’t fit Christie’s description of prim, spinsterish Miss Marple, the inimitable actress brings her own unique charm and energy to the role, and the result is sheer delight: with her otherworldly facial grimaces and her indomitable lust for sleuthing (and snooping), Rutherford carries the film with ease. The mystery itself is well-plotted (I was unable to guess the true culprit), the supporting performances are all fine, and Ron Goodwin’s lilting thematic score provides a welcome touch of humor to the proceedings.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• Margaret Rutherford as Miss Marple
  
• Atmospheric b&w cinematography
  

Must See?
Yes, simply for Rutherford’s performance — but it’s likely that any of the other three films in the series (Murder She Said, Murder Most Foul, or Murder Ahoy) would suffice as well.

Categories

• Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review

Synopsis:
An aspiring dancer (Mary Eaton) leaves behind her small-town sweetheart (Edward Crandall) for a chance at fame in New York; meanwhile, her corrupt partner (Dan Healy) takes advantage of her, and her best friend (Gloria Shea) hopes Crandall will fall for her instead.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Aspiring Stars
• Career-versus-Marriage
• Dancers
• Love Triangle

Review:
This early variation on the cinematic trope of marriage-versus-career — with an enormous dollop of “I want to be a star!” thrown in — received decidedly lukewarm reviews upon its release, for good reason. The performances are sub-par (most of the actors lean towards the over-emoting techniques of silent cinema), while the narrative is full of cliches — including a tepid “unrequited-love” triangle, an overbearing stage mother, and a lecherous Broadway cad. One scene in particular — in which poor Gloria Shea is run over by a car after being left behind by Crandall and Eaton — is so ridiculous it nearly approaches camp. Glorifying the American Girl is primarily notable these days for showcasing a handful of famous performers (including Eddie Cantor and Helen Morgan) in their prime, and for its cinematically innovative opening sequence; it’s too bad the rest of the film fails to live up to this early potential.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• The creative opening sequence, depicting streams of hopeful starlets heading across the United States towards New York
  
• The dazzling “Follies” finale
  
  

Must See?
No.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review

Synopsis:
Famed writer William Burroughs reads excerpts from his novels and shares anecdotes about his tumultuous, drug-filled life.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Biopics
• Documentaries
• Writers

Review:
Made when its titular subject was 69 years old, and appearing to be on the brink of death — though the tenacious coot lived another 14 years — this bio-doc offers a gritty, first-hand glimpse into the past and personality of one of America’s strangest novelists. Through extensive interviews with Burroughs himself, as well as other key figures in his life — including his good friend (and erstwhile lover) Allen Ginsberg, his sycophantic personal assistant, and his aloof, dismissive brother — one gradually discovers the seemingly limitless number of personal demons Burroughs fought against all his life (including the accidental shooting of his wife, a heroin addiction, and the premature death of his drug-addicted son). While Burroughs remains indispensable as a cultural document, however, it’s not particularly innovative cinema, and thus isn’t must-see viewing for film fanatics.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• An intriguing overview of Burroughs’ tragic life
  
• Fun banter between lifelong friends Burroughs and Allen Ginsberg
  
• Burroughs describing his technique of “cut-ups”
  

Must See?
No; while interesting, this one is only must-see for Burroughs fans.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review

Synopsis:
In post-Civil War America, ambitious munitions manufacturer Victor Barbicane (Joseph Cotten) develops a source of power strong enough to propel a rocket. He enlists the help of rival scientist Stuyvesant Nicholls (George Sanders) in building a rocket to the moon — but Nicholls believes Barbicane’s intentions are ultimately evil, and sabotages their trip.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Debra Paget Films
• George Sanders Films
• Historical Drama
• Joseph Cotten Films
• Jules Verne Adaptations
• Rivalry
• Science Fiction
• Space Exploration

Review:
Widely acknowledged as one of the least inspired Jules Verne adaptations to come out of 1950s Hollywood, From the Earth to the Moon (directed by special effects guru Byron Haskin, though his talents are wasted) is disappointing from start to finish. Screenwriters Robert Blees and James Leicester deviate substantially from the source material: in Verne’s story, Barbicane and Nicholls are friendly academic rivals who spend most of their trip politely arguing over engineering issues; in the film, this rivalry is beefed up to catastrophic proportions simply to add drama to the narrative.

(Naturally, a romance — involving an impossibly made-up Debra Paget — is included as well.)

Making matters worse, the science is both sloppily handled and inconsistent: for instance, an elaborate, presumably essential centrifugal spinner is used during take-off to “counterbalance gravity”, yet stowaway Paget emerges perfectly fine from the limp space suit she’s hidden out in. Don’t bother seeking this one out.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• Joseph Cotten as Victor Barbicane
  

Must See?
No; this one is only for die-hard Jules Verne fans — and even they will likely be disappointed.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• Moria Review
• TCM Article
• All Movie Guide Review

Synopsis:
An overweight lab technician (Victor Buono) strangles a series of women, due to sublimated rage towards his overbearing mother (Ellen Corby).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Criminal Investigation
• Grown Children
• Serial Killers

Review:
Made during the midst of the infamous Boston Strangler killings, this reasonably effective exploitation flick (much less “authentic” than 1968’s The Boston Strangler, starring Tony Curtis) primarily serves as a vehicle for the inimitable Victor Buono, whose portrayal as a psychotic Mama’s boy is utterly creepy. Much like Laird Cregar’s “Jack the Ripper” in The Lodger (1944), Buono hulks around the screen like a wounded, petulant animal, his beady eyes betraying the deep-seated love-hate relationship he possesses with his abusive mother. While the narrative itself is fairly standard fare — frustrated detectives sigh each time a new strangling takes place, and vow to “catch the bastard” — Buono keeps us involved and eager to see what happens next.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• Victor Buono as Leo Kroll
  
• Diane Sayer in a bit role as a carny

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• All Movie Guide Review

Synopsis:
During World War II, Czechoslovakian resistance fighters — led by paratrooper Karel Vavra (Alan Curtis) — plot to assassinate Nazi Commander Reinhard Heydrich (John Carradine), with devastating consequences.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

• Assassination
• Douglas Sirk Films
• John Carradine Films
• Nazis
• Resistance Fighters<
• World War Two

Review:
Notorious as both Douglas Sirk’s American directorial debut, and perhaps the best film to come out of Poverty Row’s Producers Releasing Corporation (PRC), Hitler’s Madman has, unfortunately, not held up very well. Functioning largely as wartime propaganda, it does manage to effectively highlight the many atrocities carried out by Nazis in Czechoslovakia:

(particularly the brutal finale — an infamous crime against humanity):

… but it suffers from trite dialogue (“Hope — I’d forgotten there was such a word”), wooden acting (particularly by Alan Curtis in the lead):

… and an overall production air of “Hollywood Studio as Europe”. Evidence of Sirk’s visual genius emerges every now and then (particularly in the use of extreme angles), and John Carradine is well-cast as villainous Heydrich (Peary nominates his performance for an Alternate Oscar!), but the limited script and cast prevent this from being anything more than simply dated entertainment.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

• John Carradine as Heydrich
  
• Early evidence of Sirk’s talent with composition
  
  

Must See?
No. While it’s listed as a film with historical importance in the back of Peary’s book, I don’t think film fanatics need to see it.

Links:

• IMDb entry
• NY Times Original Review
• TCM Article
• Time Out Capsule Review