Browsed by
Category: Response Reviews

My comments on Peary’s reviews in Guide for the Film Fanatic (Simon & Schuster, 1986).

King of Hearts (1966)

King of Hearts (1966)

“All life is a spectacle — you’re on a stage.”

Synopsis:
During the final days of World War I, a meek private named Charles Plumpick (Alan Bates) is sent to a French village to find and dismantle a bomb. Once there, he discovers that most of the citizens have fled, and that harmless insane asylum inmates are roaming the town. They crown Plumpick their “King of Hearts”, and he falls in love with the sweet inmate “Coquelicot” (Genevieve Bujold).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Alan Bates Films
  • French Films
  • Genevieve Bujold Films
  • Mental Illness
  • Race Against Time
  • Romance
  • World War I

Response to Peary’s Review:
I agree with Peary that this “phenomenally popular” cult film of the “late sixties and early seventies” now comes across as “terribly dated” and thematically “trite”. As Peary notes, countless other films have shown us that “those people on the outside of jails and asylums are the ones who should be institutionalized, [and] that war is bad” — these aren’t particularly unique insights. King of Hearts is primarily worth watching today for its status as a 1960s anti-war film which appealed to those “seduced by all films that defended nonconformity and opposed war.”

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Genevieve Bujold as “Coquelicot”
  • Pierre Lhomme’s colorful cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look for its status as an erstwhile cult favorite. Discussed at length in Peary’s Cult Movies (1981).

Links:

Stars Look Down, The (1940)

Stars Look Down, The (1940)

“These men and women are the backbone of nations, the stuff of human destiny — simple, working people, such as there are the world over, in all countries, and in all times.”

Synopsis:
An idealistic young man (Michael Redgrave) from a Welsh mining town hopes to return with a university degree and improve conditions for the miners. His plans are disrupted, however, when he marries a socially ambitious woman (Margaret Lockwood) in love with his money-grubbing friend (Emlyn Williams).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Carol Reed Films
  • Henpecked Husbands
  • Love Triangle
  • Michael Redgrave Films
  • Mining Town

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “fine, interesting, depressing” adaptation of A.J. Cronin’s novel is “generally regarded as the first British film with social relevance.” Director Carol Reed does an excellent job showing “the contempt rich owners have for their underpaid employees and the distrust labor has for its union leaders”; unfortunately, however, this powerful narrative thread is done in by Redgrave’s romance with the insufferable Lockwood, who has zero redeeming qualities. It’s literally painful to watch the likable yet horribly naive Redgrave cuckolded by his wife — especially since his distraction from his noble goals has grave consequences for the entire mining town. Although I admire The Stars Look Down, it’s not a film I’m eager to revisit.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • A gritty, realistic look at life in a Welsh mining town
  • One of the first British films to deal seriously with a socially meaningful issue

Must See?
Yes, simply for its historical importance.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant
  • Important Director

Links:

Tender Mercies (1983)

Tender Mercies (1983)

“Every night when I say my prayers and I thank the Lord for his blessings and his tender mercies, you and Sonny hit the list.”

Synopsis:
A former country music star (Robert Duvall) starts a new life with a young widow (Tess Harper) and her son (Allan Hubbard).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Character Studies
  • Has-Beens
  • Musicians
  • Robert Duvall Films
  • Romance

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary seems less than impressed with this Oscar-winning film, directed by Bruce Bereford and written by Pulitzer-prize winning playwright Horton Foote. In his review, he argues that “the attempt at realistic dialogue between common people who aren’t pretentious often comes across as pretentious”, but I disagree: Tender Mercies is a fable-like, episodic character study rather than an exercise in realism, and I find the sparse dialogue to be appropriate. Duvall is both sympathetic and believable as a man so burnt-out on fame and fortune that he gladly finds redemption in the form of a sweet, simple, religious woman; his interactions with Hubbard (a wonderfully natural child actor) are especially poignant. Even more impressive, however, is the way in which Foote’s screenplay never takes obvious turns: we fully expect Mac to start drinking again once he steps back into the world of country music, but our expectations are foiled. Although it ends on a melancholy note, Tender Mercies is a surprisingly feel-good film, one which is guaranteed to leave a lasting impression.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Robert Duvall’s sympathetic performance as Mac
  • Betty Buckley as Mac’s ex-wife
  • Beautiful cinematography of Texas landscapes
  • Horton Foote’s refreshingly uncliched screenplay
  • Some genuinely touching country music songs

Must See?
Yes, simply for Duvall’s Oscar-winning performance.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Reefer Madness / Tell Your Children / The Burning Question / Dope Addict / Doped Youth / Love Madness (1936)

Reefer Madness / Tell Your Children / The Burning Question / Dope Addict / Doped Youth / Love Madness (1936)

“The motion picture you are about to witness may startle you.”

Synopsis:
A principal (Joseph Forte) warns parents against the evil influence of “marihuana” by telling the story of an upstanding teen named Bill (Kenneth Craig) whose life went downhill after he was led into a life of wild partying by drug dealers Mae (Thelma White) and Jack (Carleton Young).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Downward Spiral
  • Falsely Accused
  • Morality Police

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this cult exploitation film (with more alternate titles than you can count on one hand) was clearly “made by people who obviously knew nothing about their subject”, and “reinforces every falsehood you’ve ever heard about marijuana: that you become immediately addicted, that it is violence-inducing, that it’s as bad as heroin, [and] that it ends in one’s ‘inevitable insanity’.” Reefer Madness possesses a handful of unintentionally hilarious moments — such as a young addict (Dave O’Brien) laughing maniacally, or characters reacting to weed as though it’s the latest form of speed — but I’ll admit I don’t enjoy it much on the whole: it’s too hard to keep track of the characters, and, despite its short length of only 67 minutes, the storyline tends to drag. Nonetheless, while Reefer Madness is undeniably a “terribly made, sensationalized, preposterous film”, it remains “the ultimate camp film”, and is required viewing for anyone seriously interested in the history of cinema.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • A hilariously uninformed representation of the effects of marijuana
  • Countless campy moments
  • Dr. Carroll testifying to Bill’s unexplainable outburst of laughter during a class reading of Romeo and Juliet
  • Ralph (O’Brien) prompting Mae to play the piano “faster — faster!”

Must See?
Yes, both for its undisputed cult status, and as a representative example of post-Hays Code exploitation films. Discussed at length in Peary’s Cult Movies.

Categories

  • Cult Movie
  • Representative Film

Links:

Taxi Zum Klo (1981)

Taxi Zum Klo (1981)

“I’m your normal, tired, neurotic, polymorphously perverse teacher.”

Synopsis:
A sexually adventurous gay schoolteacher (Frank Ripploh) resists monogamy with his new partner (Bernd Broaderup).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Character Studies
  • German Films
  • Homosexuality
  • Sexuality
  • Teachers

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this humorous cult film by German writer/director Frank Ripploh (who essentially plays himself) is a “self-indulgent”, “crudely made, disjointed, but intriguing autobiographical account.” Ripploh isn’t afraid to portray himself as a bit of a jerk: he’s the kind of guy who, lacking toilet paper, wipes his bum on a guest towel, then nonchalantly puts it back on the rack. Later, when he openly cheats on his new partner (the good-looking yet frustratingly passive Broaderup), we’re disturbed, but not all that surprised — and, at the very least, we respect Ripploh’s honesty about his need for sexual adventure.

Taxi Zum Klo (which translates into “Taxi to the [Public] Toilet”) is especially effective at showing how Ripploh was able to keep his sex life completely separate from his career as a schoolteacher. In one particularly overt instance, Ripploh cross-cuts between innocent shots of his tutoring session with a young male student, and his transvestite friend commenting disparagingly while watching a cautionary school film about a pedophile. It may be a heavy-handed message, but it’s an important one — and it works within the context of the film’s unabashed presentation of explicit gay male sexuality (surely an eye-opener for many at the time).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • A no-holds-barred look at male gay life in 1980s Berlin

Must See?
Yes, both for its status as a cult film and as a cultural window into a unique subculture.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

“10” (1979)

“10” (1979)

“She was the most beautiful girl I have ever seen.”

Synopsis:
A middle-aged composer (Dudley Moore) in a steady relationship with a singer (Julie Andrews) becomes obsessed with a beautiful young woman (Bo Derek) he spots through a car window.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Blake Edwards Films
  • Composers
  • Dudley Moore Films
  • Julie Andrews Films
  • Midlife Crisis
  • Obsessive Love
  • Romantic Comedy

Response to Peary’s Review:
Although “10” immediately evokes images of cornrowed sex goddess Bo Derek running across a beach, it’s not her story; instead, the film centers on a man (Moore) who has fame, money, and a beautiful lover, yet suffers from the incurable sense that the grass is always greener — sexually speaking — on the younger side. Unlike the obnoxiously dissatisfied schmuck played by Albert Brooks in Modern Romance (1981), Moore’s restless composer makes for an unusually sympathetic protagonist: he’s someone we care about even though we immediately recognize the folly of his desires.

Andrews is fine as Moore’s long-suffering girlfriend, and gets to sing a couple of nice Henry Mancini songs — but her too-perfect British accent quickly becomes distracting. More impressive, believe it or not, is Derek, who — once she finally becomes a three-dimensional character rather than simply the distant object of Moore’s lust — gives a natural and appealing performance. Though director Blake Edwards tries a bit too hard for laughs with his repeated attempts at slapstick humor (as when Moore tumbles down a hill and struggles to climb back up again), overall this remains a surprisingly honest look at middle-aged male sexuality.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Dudley Moore as the lust-struck composer
  • Beautiful Bo Derek in her first significant screen role
  • Moore’s constant voyeurism through his telescope

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look simply to see Derek in her infamous breakthrough role.

Links:

Naked Prey, The (1966)

Naked Prey, The (1966)

“Man — lacking the will to understand other men — became like the beasts, and their way of life was his.”

Synopsis:
A safari leader (Cornel Wilde) in 1800s Africa is captured by a tribe, set loose with no clothing or weapons, and hunted by a group of warriors.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Africa
  • Cornel Wilde Films
  • Escape
  • Hunting
  • Survival

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “brutal adventure movie” — which bears resemblance to The Most Dangerous Game (1932) in its tale of a man hunted as human prey — is indeed an “unusual, exciting, often frightening film”, with very little dialogue or plot. Although director/producer/star Cornel Wilde pushes the metaphor of “kill or be killed” a bit too far (the extraneous footage of African fauna in battle quickly becomes repetitive), it’s still remarkably exciting to see Wilde outrunning his captors, and using his substantial wits to survive.

What Peary curiously neglects to mention in his review, however, is the sticky issue of how the African natives are portrayed. On the one hand, Wilde respects the warriors as individuals, showing them stopping to mourn each other as they’re killed.

And it’s undeniably refreshing to see Africans gaining a sort of revenge against the whites who so brutally invaded their culture. On the other hand, they’re still clearly posited as The Exotic Others: the women dance around without shirts on, the warriors are essentially portrayed as savage and uncivilized, and Wilde (The White Man) is the undisputed protagonist. On the whole, however, I would still vote for The Naked Prey as a rare mid-century American film which at least attempts to humanize Africans.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Cornel Wilde as The Man
  • Plenty of exciting action sequences

Must See?
Yes, to see Wilde in his most iconic role.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Breaking Glass (1980)

Breaking Glass (1980)

”I don’t like the way life is for the majority of us — I don’t say I can change it, but I can sing about it.”

Synopsis:
An anti-establishment punk singer (Hazel O’Connor) rises to fame and sells out.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Aspiring Stars
  • Musicals
  • Musicians
  • Punk Rock

Response to Peary’s Review:
Breaking Glass tells the familiar story of an idealistic artist who discovers, lo and behold, that fame and fortune come at a price. While the film’s screenplay doesn’t cover much new territory, it nonetheless serves as an effective vehicle for charismatic punk New Waver Hazel O’Connor, whose music is raw and seductive. Peary notes that this is a “sad, thematically bewildering” film, but I think that’s exactly the point: we’re supposed to mourn Hazel’s gradual loss of political and artistic autonomy, and to empathize with the angry confusion she feels by the end. The scene in which she defends herself during a radio interview is particularly poignant. Who ever said punk was upbeat?

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Hazel O’Connor as Kate
  • Phil Daniels as Kate’s manager
  • O’Connor’s increasingly bizarre outfits and make-up
  • An eclectic, often enjoyable soundtrack of New Wave punk

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look simply for its erstwhile status as a cult favorite.

Links:

On the Waterfront (1954)

On the Waterfront (1954)

“I’ve been on the docks all my life, boy, and there’s one thing I’ve learned — you don’t ask no questions, you don’t answer no questions.”

Synopsis:
A longshoreman (Marlon Brando) stands up to his corrupt union boss (Lee J. Cobb), against the advice of his brother (Rod Steiger).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Character Arc
  • Corruption
  • Elia Kazan Films
  • Eva Marie Saint Films
  • Karl Malden Films
  • Lee J. Cobb Films
  • Marlon Brando Films
  • Political Awakening
  • Rod Steiger Films
  • Romance
  • Siblings
  • Waterfront

Response to Peary’s Review:
I’m in complete agreement with Peary’s assessment of this “terrific film”, which remains one of my favorite movies of all time. As Peary notes, On the Waterfront — which won eight Oscars — possesses “great acting, a fascinating premise, strong direction by Elia Kazan, tough dialogue by Budd Schulberg, and many classic scenes.” Marlon Brando (young and sexy) is nothing short of brilliant as Terry Malloy; nearly as impressive (Brando’s hard to top!) are Eva Marie Saint in her award-winning screen debut as Edie, and Rod Steiger as Terry’s protective yet misguided older brother.

On the Waterfront has been criticized on multiple fronts over the years: by those upset about its portrayal of the longshoreman’s union in the 1950s as corrupt; by those who claim On the Waterfront is essentially anti-union (I disagree); and — most famously — by those who believe Kazan was trying to offer Terry’s story as an apologetic for his own name-spilling to the House of Un-American Activities Commission (HUAC). Ultimately, however, I choose to view the film as a fable-like character study about personal redemption, rather than a polemic on unions, corruption, or Kazan himself.

The film’s primary flaw (as noted by Peary) is the fact that “too much Christian morality is expounded by the overacting Karl Malden” — indeed, the scenes with Father Barry are a major distraction. Fortunately, there are enough memorable moments in On the Waterfront — Terry walking with Edie in the park; Terry’s poignant talk with Charlie in the taxi cab; the final climactic moments on the docks — to make up for those which don’t quite work. Also noteworthy are Leonard Bernstein’s majestic score (his first), and Boris Kaufman’s luminous black-and-white cinematography. Ultimately, On the Waterfront remains a glorious example of collaborative filmmaking, and merits multiple viewings by film fanatics.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Marlon Brando as Terry Malloy
  • Eva Marie Saint as Edie
  • Rod Steiger as Charley
  • The touching romance between Terry and Edie
  • Terry and Edie’s first walk in the park together
  • Terry and Charley’s taxicab scene
  • The final climactic showdown between Brando and Cobb
  • Boris Kaufman’s evocative b&w cinematography
  • Leonard Bernstein’s soaring score

Must See?
Absolutely. Despite its flaws, this remains both a personal favorite and a genuine classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Distant Thunder (1973)

Distant Thunder (1973)

“Wars are waged by kings; we are ordinary, simple folk.”

Synopsis:
In 1943 India, a young Brahmin named Gangacharan (Soumitra Chatterjee) and his wife (Babita) settle in a village, where Gangacharan assumes the roles of teacher, healer, and priest. But when war affects the village in the form of famine, Gangacharan finds that his privileged status will not guarantee rice for his family.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Character Arc
  • Class Relations
  • India
  • Satyajit Ray Films
  • Village Life
  • World War II

Response to Peary’s Review:
As noted by Peary, this “lovely, underrated film by Satyajit Ray” possesses “breathtaking” cinematography by Soumendu Ray, and “many moments that will stay with you.” It tells the heartbreaking yet fascinating tale of a tragic moment in Indian history when, as summarized in the closing subtitles, “Over five million died of starvation and epidemics in Bengal in what has come to be known as the man-made famine of 1943.” Due to the British government cornering civilian food supplies in order to feed its armies, villagers were unable to secure even a subsistence-level amount of rice, and it was soon unavailable at any price.

Despite the enormity of the subject matter, Ray characteristically takes a deeply personal approach, focusing primarily on the character arc of the main protagonist (Gangacharan), who gradually learns that, when it comes to survival in times of war, caste matters not at all. Equally compelling, however, are the subplots about Gangacharan’s wife Ananga (Babita) and her friends, who do what they can to bring food to their households — for Ananga, this means lowering herself enough to help mill rice, while her married friend Chutki (Sandhya Roy) sleeps with a disfigured man (Noni Ganguly) in exchange for some of his precious supply. Ultimately, Ray shows both the worst and the best sides of humanity in his film, as each character discovers what he or she is willing to compromise for his own survival — and for the survival of others.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Soumitra Chatterjee as the proud Brahmin who undergoes a change of heart
  • Babita as Gangacharan’s beautiful wife
  • Beautiful cinematography of Indian countryside

Must See?
Yes. Though not all critics agree, I believe this foreign gem is further evidence of Satyajit Ray’s incomparable gifts as a filmmaker, and should be seen by all film fanatics.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Important Director

Links: