Browsed by
Category: Original Reviews

Responses to Peary’s “must see” movie reviews, as well as my own “must see” movie reviews up to and after 1986 (when Peary’s book was published).

China Gate (1957)

China Gate (1957)

“What did you expect? A notarized guarantee that the baby would be born with eyes aimed your way?”

Synopsis:
During the French Indochine War, a racist American mercenary (Gene Barry) reconnects with his half-Chinese wife (Angie Dickinson) whose son he has rejected for looking “too Chinese”. Meanwhile, “Lucky Legs” (Dickinson) agrees to accompany Barry and a small group of international soldiers to a Communist munitions stockpile known as “China Gate”, where one of Dickinson’s would-be lovers (Lee Van Cleef) eagerly awaits her.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Angie Dickinson Films
  • Cold War
  • Cross-Cultural Romance
  • Lee Van Cleef Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Race Relations and Racism
  • Soldiers

Review:
Sam Fuller’s ninth feature-length film — made between House of Bamboo (1955) and Run of the Arrow (1957) — was this staunchly anti-Communist adventure flick taking place just before America’s formal engagement in the Vietnam War. Interestingly, its primary focus is on race relations, with Dickinson’s “booze smuggler” (she’s a thinly veiled prostitute) demonstrating spectacularly awful choice in men through her marriage and procreation with bigoted Barry.

Barry’s rejection of his own son based purely on his appearance is at least a refreshingly forthright depiction of white supremacy at its most insidious; but watching Dickinson try again and again to make things work with her estranged husband — simply for the opportunity to send her son to America, though we get the sense she still loves Barry for some reason — leaves us feeling decidedly icky. Adding some much-needed pathos to the storyline is Nat “King” Cole as a Black American mercenary named Goldie who is openly disgusted by Barry’s treatment of his son, and who is (thankfully) able to show this emotion without fear of racial reprisal.

The bulk of the drama focuses on the group’s intrepid journey across a jungle of wilderness, using Dickinson as a decoy and featuring plenty of gritty violence along the way. Joseph Biroc’s atmospheric cinematography is top-notch throughout, effectively portraying the shadowy dangers this group undergoes:

While this film isn’t must-see viewing, it will be of interest to Fuller fans, and is worth a one-time look.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Joseph Biroc’s cinematography

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look. Listed as a Cult Movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

War and Peace (1956)

War and Peace (1956)

“War is the most horrible thing in life.”

Synopsis:
In Napoleonic-era Russia, the illegitimate son (Henry Fonda) of a dying count marries a beautiful woman (Anita Ekberg) who simply wants his inheritance. Meanwhile, Prince Andrei (Mel Ferrer) falls in love with the sister (Audrey Hepburn) of Fonda’s friend Nikolai (Jeremy Brett) — but when both Andrei and Nikolai go off to fight, Hepburn is seduced by Ekberg’s scheming brother (Vittorio Gassman), thus putting her romance with Andrei in jeopardy.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Anita Ekberg Films
  • Audrey Hepburn Films
  • Henry Fonda Films
  • Historical Drama
  • King Vidor Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Mel Ferrer Films

Review:
King Vidor directed this sprawling, 3-1/2 hour adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s epic novel, with many characters and scenes necessarily reduced but the story’s essential narrative threads kept intact. Hepburn is well-cast (and luminously beautiful) as Natasha Rostova:

… and it’s satisfying seeing her romanced on-screen by her real-life husband Ferrer.

Gassman — soon to star as a boxer in Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958) — is appropriately smarmy and charming as the man who manages to cruelly seduce Natasha away from her true love:

… and Ekberg is likewise well-cast (in her breakthrough role) as a woman so sexy that Fonda throws all better sense out the window to marry her.

Unfortunately, it’s universally agreed that middle-aged Fonda was not a good choice to play the central young protagonist Nikolai. Whenever he refers to Natasha as “Na-TASH-a” you hear Fonda’s folksy American roots — and his delivery of the line “Damn you, Napoleon; damn you to hell!” is appropriately lambasted.

The biggest “stars” of this film, however, are Jack Cardiff’s consistently stunning cinematography and the fine historical sets and costumes, which are a pleasure to behold.

Meanwhile, in a story entitled War and Peace, you can expect to see plenty of battles and troops, which are indeed on ample display here, all effectively framed in VistaVision.

However, while Hepburn fans will surely want to see her in this central 1950s starring vehicle — made in between Sabrina (1954) and Funny Face (1957) — it’s not must-see for all film fanatics.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Jack Cardiff’s cinematography

  • Rich sets and costumes

Must See?
No, but it’s certainly worth a one-time look.

Links:

Verboten! (1959)

Verboten! (1959)

“I will show you there is a difference between a Nazi and a German!”

Synopsis:
When an American sergeant (James Best) is wounded while exploring a sniper-infested village in Germany near the end of World War II, he’s nursed to health by a German woman (Susan Cummings) who he marries — but is Cummings genuinely in love with Best, or just exploiting his access to food? Meanwhile, Cummings’ impressionable younger brother (Harold Daye) becomes more deeply involved in a group of neo-Nazi “werewolves” whose deceptive leader (Tom Pittman) works alongside Best.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cross-Cultural Romance
  • Nazis
  • Sam Fuller Films
  • World War II

Review:
Former G.I. Samuel Fuller wrote, directed, and produced this punchy look at life in post-war Germany, as former Nazis and everyday Germans tried to find a place for themselves in a landscape run by the American Military Government. Made on an incredibly low budget, the film’s sparse sets nonetheless effectively set the tone for a politically confused nation with starving citizens unsure where to turn or what to do next.

Verboten! is notable for preceding Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) in its frank depiction of the atrocities of concentration camps, with ample use made of actual footage — and if Fuller is typically blunt in his handling of dramatic scenes, it’s in service of a story worth telling.

This one is a must-see for Fuller fans, and recommended for others.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Expressive low-budget sets

  • Joseph Biroc’s atmospheric cinematography

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look as a unique film by a unique director.

Links:

Hound-Dog Man (1959)

Hound-Dog Man (1959)

“There comes a time when a boy can lay his belly to the ground and feel the heartbeats of the earth coming up to grass roots; that’s his time to prowl.”

Synopsis:
A boy (Dennis Holmes) and his teenage brother (Fabian) leave their farming parents (Arthur O’Connell and Betty Field) to go on a hunting trip with a womanizing older friend (Stuart Whitman) who flirts with a pretty teen (Carol Lynley). Will Spud (Holmes) be able to keep the hound dog he finds on their journey — and will Whitman keep away from a married woman (Margo Moore) long enough to recognize Lynley is a better match for him?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Betty Field Films
  • Carol Lynley Films
  • Coming of Age
  • Don Siegel Films
  • Musicals

Review:
Following the success of Old Yeller (1957) (based on a children’s novel by Fred Gipson), Jerry Wald at 20th Century Fox secured the film rights for an earlier novel by Gipson, and Don Siegel was hired to direct. The result is this inconsequential coming-of-age tale which turned into a starring vehicle for teen heartthrob Fabian:

… whose character has a crush on pop singer Dodie Stevens (similarly cast for her timely appeal).

While this is purportedly a tale of a boy desperately wanting a dog:

… much more narrative focus is placed on Lynley’s hope that Whitman will take her seriously as a romantic partner.

It’s all innocuous enough but not very engaging — and the songs (other than the earworm refrain to the title song) aren’t all that memorable.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Good use of outdoor locales

Must See?
No; you don’t need to seek out this hard-to-find title. It’s likely included here given Peary’s love of ’50s rock ‘n roll.

Links:

Richard III (1956)

Richard III (1956)

“Shall I be plain? I wish the bastards dead.”

Synopsis:
In 15th century England, hunchbacked Richard the Duke of Gloucester (Laurence Olivier) seeks support from his cousin the Duke of Buckingham (Ralph Richardson) in gradually bringing down all those ahead of him in line to the throne — including King Edward (Cedric Hardwicke) himself, their brother George (John Gielgud), and Edward’s young children; but Richard soon becomes increasingly paranoid that his newly won success is in jeopardy.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Claire Bloom Films
  • John Gielgud Films
  • Laurence Olivier Films
  • Play Adaptations
  • Ralph Richardson Films
  • Royalty and Nobility
  • Ruthless Leaders
  • Shakespeare
  • Siblings

Review:
Peary doesn’t review this BAFTA-winning adaptation of Shakespeare’s play, but he does name Laurence Olivier Best Actor of the Year in his Alternate Oscars, where he describes Olivier’s work as “riveting” and calls it “one of the finest performances of the decade.” He points out that “Olivier the director wisely had Olivier the actor deliver Richard’s soliloquies to us, in a direct manner to suggest it gives him pleasure to reveal his diabolical nature, confess heinous past crimes, and plot aloud his future atrocities to an audience who can do nothing about it.”

He notes that Olivier’s Richard “is as straightforward with us as he is duplicitous with those in the English court,” and writes, “As he strides into a long shot so we can get a good look at his gnarled form or moves to within an inch of the camera, he reveals a sly wit, a frightening ferocity and egocentricity, and a snide superiority and vengeful anger toward the nondeformed world he wants to ‘bustle in’.”

He adds, “What is jolting as he speaks to us is that he isn’t the typical madman lusting for power, but a clear-headed, ambitious schemer extraordinaire.”

For those unfamiliar with the play (like me), it will take a bit of research to understand how all the specific characters fit into place — but the overall sense that no one will be spared from Richard’s evil is crystal clear. Peary writes that “Olivier’s Richard expresses the same amusement and amazement as we do that his bold plot works so smoothly, that he can eliminate his opposition one by one without anyone being the wiser, and that, in a creepy scene, he can seduce the virtuous Lady Anne [Claire Bloom] and have her kiss him lewdly although she wants him dead and is not physically attracted to him.”

The supporting performances throughout are excellent; while Olivier wanted Orson Welles to play Buckingham, I think Richardson fits the bill nicely as his right-hand schemer:

… and the VistaVision cinematography and historic sets are gorgeous. This film isn’t an easy watch, but it’s worth the effort.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Laurence Olivier as Richard III
  • Otto Heller’s cinematography
  • Roger Furse’s production design and Carmen Dillon’s art direction

Must See?
Yes, for Olivier’s performance and as an overall powerful Shakespearean adaptation. Listed as a film with Historical Relevance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book, and nominated as one of the Best Pictures of the Year in Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Horse Soldiers, The (1959)

Horse Soldiers, The (1959)

“War isn’t exactly a civilized business.”

Synopsis:
During the Civil War, a cavalry brigade led by Col. Marlowe (John Wayne) is sent behind Confederate lines to destroy a railroad, accompanied by a surgeon (William Holden) who Marlowe has issues with. When the unit stops at a plantation owned by Miss Hunter (Constance Towers), she and her slave Lukey (Althea Gibson) are caught spying and taken along as prisoners during the rest of the raid.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cavalry
  • Civil War
  • Deep South
  • Doctors and Nurses
  • John Ford Films
  • John Wayne Films
  • Westerns
  • William Holden Films

Review:
Loosely based on Grierson’s Raid during the Vicksburg Campaign of the American Civil War, this wartime-western by director John Ford gave John Wayne and William Holden their sole opportunity to co-star in a feature — and is notable for a brief (albeit interrupted) fist fight between the two when they try to “duke it out” (sorry, couldn’t resist that one).

It’s also noteworthy for featuring color-line-breaking tennis star Althea Gibson as Towers’ slave Lukey:

… and for affording Towers — probably best known by film fanatics for her starring roles in Sam Fuller’s Shock Corridor (1963) and The Naked Kiss (1964) — her breakthrough leading role. Ford’s direction and cinematography (with support from DP William Clothier) is as top-notch as always:

… but the storyline isn’t particularly memorable (other than showing us how very, very young — or old — so many Confederate soldiers were).

Note: Watch for Anna Lee in a bit part as a Confederate mom desperate for her young son to stay behind when the only “men” left in town are sent to fight.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine direction and cinematography


Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look.

Links:

Wings of Eagles, The (1957)

Wings of Eagles, The (1957)

“Say it, mister: I’m gonna move that toe!”

Synopsis:
After becoming paralyzed due to a fall, former WWI ace flier Frank “Spig” Wead (John Wayne) — who is separated from his wife (Maureen O’Hara) and two young girls — receives help from a longtime friend (Dan Dailey) in learning to walk again, and starts a new life for himself as a Hollywood writer before returning to service in WWII.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biopics
  • Dan Dailey Films
  • Disabilities
  • John Ford Films
  • John Wayne Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Maureen O’Hara Films
  • Military
  • Ward Bond Films
  • Writers

Review:
John Ford’s affectionate homage to his screenwriter friend Frank “Spig” Wead — perhaps best knowing for writing the play upon which Howard Hawks’s Ceiling Zero (1936) was based, and for scripting Ford’s They Were Expendable (1945) — is a classic inspirational biopic which plays loose with the facts to portray a man obsessively dedicated to his craft, living through a troubled marriage, and rallying to recover after a seemingly devastating accident. The film’s best-known scene shows the ever-chipper Dailey encouraging Wayne to “move that toe!” and get circulation back into his paralyzed body:

… which, by gum, he manages to do. Ward Bond has fun impersonating a Ford-like director who gives Wayne his chance at success in Hollywood:

… and O’Hara is ever-feisty as his disillusioned wife (who somehow thinks it’s okay to leave her young girls alone at home to fend for themselves while she’s off at a bridge club; what a different era that was).

This one is only must-see for John Ford completists or diehard fans of the lead stars.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine cinematography

Must See?
No; you can skip this one.

Links:

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958)

Big Deal on Madonna Street (1958)

“Are we going through with this job or not?”

Synopsis:
A group of inept thieves — including a boxer (Vittorio Gassman), a ladies’ man (Renato Salvatori), a safecracker (Totò), a Sicilian (Tiberio Murga) who keeps his chaste sister (Claudia Cardinale) locked away, and a photographer (Marcello Mastroianni) caring for his young son — attempt to carry out a heist but find their plans continually foiled.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Claudia Cardinale Films
  • Ex-Cons
  • Heists
  • Italian Films
  • Marcello Mastroianni Films
  • Satires and Spoofs

Review:
This comedic caper flick by Italian director Mario Monicello — a spoof of Jules Dassin’s Rififi (1955) — shows exactly how many things can go wrong (and will) when a group of bumbling crooks attempt to pull off a heist they’re so clearly incapable of.

Running throughout the featherweight screenplay are two would-be romances. Salvatori is interested in Cardinale:

… while Gassman woos a beautiful young woman (Carla Gravina) working as a maid for the elderly women who live next door to the joint they want to break into.

Meanwhile, Mastroianni takes loving care of his squalling toddler, whose mom is in prison for smuggling cigarettes.

Do the bungling thieves get away with their heist? (Your first guess is probably the correct one.) I’m sure audiences at the time enjoyed this type of escapist fare, but it’s not must-see viewing for modern film fanatics — unless you happen to have a specific interest in Italian cinema.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Gianni de Venanzo’s atmospheric cinematography
  • Good use of neorealist sets

Must See?
No, though it’s worth checking out if you’re curious. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Othello (1951)

Othello (1951)

“I am not what I am.”

Synopsis:
When a Moorish military commander named Othello (Orson Welles) marries the daughter (Suzanne Cloutier) of a Venetian senator (Hilton Edwards), his evil ensign Iago (Micheál MacLiammóir) begins to plant seeds of jealousy by falsely insisting that Desdemona (Cloutier) is having an affair with Othello’s captain Cassio (Michael Laurence).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cross-Cultural Romance
  • Homicidal Spouses
  • Jealousy
  • Orson Welles Films
  • Play Adaptation
  • Race Relations and Racism
  • Shakespeare

Review:
Orson Welles’s production of the Shakespearean tragedy Othello was legendarily challenging to make, as chronicled in Welles’s 1979 documentary Filming Othello (the full transcript is available here, and you can easily find the movie itself on YouTube). Just days into shooting, Welles learned that his Italian producer was going bankrupt, and that he would have to finance the film himself — which he did, by appearing in other movies and shooting the film in piecemeal over the next few years. The result is a highly atmospheric, bric-a-brac rendering of the play’s key scenes, sometimes filmed in silhouette or with stand-ins, and making creative use of whatever could save money — i.e., filming Roderigo’s death in a bathhouse given lack of any costumes:

Micheál MacLiammóir’s performance as Iago (he went on to write a memoir about the making of the film entitled Put Money in Thy Purse) is simply chilling:

As anyone familiar with the play knows, Iago’s ability to turn Othello into a homicidal husband using merely lies and false evidence is a testament to the nefarious power of mental persuasion. Welles himself does a fine job in the lead role, effectively portraying a man who doesn’t want to believe what he’s hearing, yet, tragically, does:

While I’ve never found Othello to be an “easy” watch, either as a play or a film, this version — right alongside Filming Othello (1979) — merits a look for the sheer audacity of Welles’s creativity under extreme financial pressure.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Micheál MacLiammóir as Iago
  • Orson Welles as Othello
  • The powerful opening sequence
  • Atmospheric cinematography and direction

Must See?
Yes, for its historical significance.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant
  • Important Director

Links:

Come Back, Africa (1959)

Come Back, Africa (1959)

“The liberal doesn’t want a grown up African.”

Synopsis:
A Black South African (Zacharia Mgabi) leaves his poverty-stricken kraal to work in the Johannesburg gold mines, but finds his efforts to work foiled at every turn; meanwhile, his wife (Vinah Bendile) puts her own life at danger while working as a domestic servant.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Africa
  • African Films
  • Racism and Race Relations
  • Survival

Review:
The making of this underground film about Apartheid-era South Africa — chronicled in the documentary An American in Sophiatown (2007) — is inextricable from the movie itself, which simply follows a loose script and shows non-actors living out their existence amidst real-life settings.

Director Lionel Rogosin — influenced specifically by Italian neo-realists and Robert Flaherty’s work — wanted to make a “docufiction” film, but told a number of cover stories to people he encountered in order to get this done, primarily insisting he was making a musical (which accounts for the many scenes of various musicians, including the appearance of Miriam Makeba just before she reached international fame):



The dominant theme of the film, however, is of Mgabi’s unsuccessful attempts to find and keep any kind of steady employment. We see his terrible mistreatment at the hands of a bigoted white housewife (Myrtle Berman, who in real life was an anti-Apartheid activist):

… and his short-lived attempts at working as a garage attendant, a waiter, and a laborer. Life is cruel and dehumanizing for Blacks in this setting, and the culminating scene merely brings this home with a sickening punch. While the storyline and acting are as amateur as you might expect from a low-budget venture like this, it remains worth a look simply for the glimpse it provides of a certain hidden era in history.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Invaluable footage of Apartheid-era South Africa

Must See?
Yes, simply for its historical relevance. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links: