Dance, Fools, Dance (1931)

Dance, Fools, Dance (1931)

“Society: what is it but a lot of people who are for you when you’re on the up and up — and what would one of ’em do for you if it came to a showdown?”

Synopsis:
After the untimely death of their businessman father (William Holden), two formerly wealthy siblings — Bonnie (Joan Crawford) and Bob (William Bakewell) — go to work: Bonnie as a cub reporter, and Bob as a bootleg salesman for a local gangster (Clark Gable). Things get sticky, however, when Bonnie’s co-worker (Cliff Edwards) is killed while investigating some gangland murders, and Bonnie discovers that her brother played a part.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bootlegging
  • Clark Gable Films
  • Depression Era
  • Gangsters
  • Joan Crawford Films
  • Journalists
  • Siblings

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this enjoyable “early Joan Crawford talkie” is particularly notable for merging “her then-popular hedonistic flapper/dancing girl” — see, for instance, Our Dancing Daughters (1928) — “with the noble working girl she’d play in the following years.” Crawford is indeed “impressive” here, coming across as both “likable and extremely glamorous” — her character is sexy, savvy, and (unlike her spoiled alcoholic brother) easily able to dismiss her former life of comfort once she realizes how shallow her society “friends” really are; as Peary notes, both she and Gable (whose role is minimal) clearly exhibit the “star quality” that would rocket them to future success. While the storyline itself features a few too many coincidences to be entirely believable, it’s nonetheless an enjoyable snapshot of the Depression era, when countless Americans found themselves scrounging for work, and bootlegging dominated the criminal underworld. Watch for risque Pre-Code moments sprinkled throughout the film: in addition to the infamous early “underwear swim” (see photo still below), Crawford offers herself sexually to her boyfriend (Lester Vail) by stating unequivocally that she believes in trying out love “on probation”.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Joan Crawford as Bonnie Jordan (Peary nominates her for an Alternate Oscar as best actress of the year)
  • Clark Gable as Jake Luva
  • Crawford and Gable’s genuine chemistry together
  • Several deliciously naughty pre-code moments — including the infamous “underwear swim” off the yacht

Must See?
Yes, as one of Joan’s best early flicks.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Secret Places (1984)

Secret Places (1984)

“This is Laura… She’s come from abroad.”

Synopsis:
During World War Two, a teen (Tara MacGowran) befriends the daughter (Marie-Theres Relin) of a German refugee (Klaus Barner) and French actress (Claudine Auger).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Coming-of-Age
  • Friendship
  • Jenny Agutter Films
  • World War Two

Review:
Based on a novel by Janice Elliott, this WWII-era coming-of-age film features fine, authentic performances by Tara MacGowran and Marie-Theres Relin (Maria Schell’s daughter) in the lead roles, but fails to sufficiently develop any of its intriguing narrative strands. Relin’s dilemma — how will she cope with being a German teenager in England during the thick of war? — is a compelling one, but is quickly (and inexplicably) dropped as she and MacGowran become friends. Indeed, the entire film essentially consists of teasers: while there are hints of a possible lesbian attraction between the two girls, this is never explored; Jenny Agutter makes a brief appearance as a sympathetic teacher, but her role is minimal at best, and makes no real difference to the storyline; Cassie Stuart (looking like Aileen Quinn in Annie with her bouncy blonde head of curls) is appropriately giddy as a boy-crazy classmate, but her eventual dilemma (you guessed it) is both cliched and simply yet another distraction. Ultimately, Secret Places is too narratively scattered to recommend for anyone other than diehard coming-of-age fans.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Marie-Theres Relin as Laura
  • Tara MacGowran as Patience
  • Jenny Agutter in a bit role as one of the girls’ teachers

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look simply for the performances. Listed as a Sleeper in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Escape From New York (1981)

Escape From New York (1981)

“You go in, find the president in less than 24 hours, and you’re a free man.”

Synopsis:
In the near future, a group of rebels kidnap the president (Donald Pleasence) and hold him hostage on the island of Manhattan, which has been turned into a maximum security prison. A convict named Snake (Kurt Russell) is promised immunity in exchange for bringing the president back safely to the mainland, but must fight against the island’s ruthless leader, the Duke (Isaac Hayes).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Donald Pleasence Films
  • Ernest Borgnine Films
  • Harry Dean Stanton Films
  • Hostages
  • John Carpenter Films
  • Lee Van Cleef Films
  • New York City
  • Prisoners
  • Race-Against-Time
  • Science Fiction

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “mindless ‘escapism’ by John Carpenter” features “an intriguing premise and [a] good cast”, but fails to capitalize on its “political possibilities”, instead simply opting for “trite story points… and unreal, cliché characters.” Ken Russell’s blatant imitation of Clint Eastwood will indeed “get on your nerves”:

and none of the supporting actors are particularly impressive or memorable.

While Carpenter and his team make good use of a low budget to convincingly portray a decaying, blight-filled Manhattan, the city is ultimately more of a backdrop than a true “character” in the story. Plus, as Peary points out, “surely the bridges would have been destroyed by the government if Carpenter didn’t want to utilize one… in his escape plot” — it’s impossible to believe that a maximum security prison island would maintain such overt links to the outside world, albeit heavily mined ones. As a longtime cult favorite, Escape From New York deserves at least a look, but ultimately it’s a disappointment; most of its entertainment value these days stems from its over-the-top scenarios and dialogue (“I heard you were dead!”).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Impressive sets and props on a low budget

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a one-time look for its status as a cult favorite.

Links:

Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954)

Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954)

“In a case like this, either the cons run the prison or the prison runs the cons.”

Synopsis:
A group of prisoners (led by Neville Brand) riot for better living conditions; meanwhile, their sympathetic warden (Emile Meyer) tries to keep the situation under control while negotiating with both Brand and his superiors.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Don Siegel Films
  • Neville Brand Films
  • Prisoners
  • Rebellion

Review:
Don Siegel’s compelling, hard-hitting drama manages to humanize the diverse protagonists on both sides of the title controversy. The focused storyline effectively shows how easily inmates (with just a bit of advance organization) are able to physically overtake their understaffed guards — and how quickly their rebellion spreads to the other cell blocks in their overcrowded prison. Real-life war hero Neville Brand is perfectly cast as the leader of the riot; he’s a sympathetic, savvy, yet violent inmate who remains eerily focused on the task at hand. Meanwhile, the prison’s decent warden (nicely under-played by Emile Meyer) is both well-meaning and surprisingly humble, someone who understands the sticky situation he’s in — he’s battled for better conditions and more funding for years — and is simply trying to avoid as much bloodshed as possible. There are many moments of genuine tension throughout this gritty social drama, which only occasionally dips into didactic “message” mode, and features a realistically bittersweet ending.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Neville Brand as the riot leader
  • Emile Meyer as the humane warden of the prison
  • An effective portrayal of controversial conflict

Must See?
Yes, as both a powerful prison flick, and for its historical importance as Don Siegel’s first major film. Listed as a Cult Movie and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Important Director

Links:

Nick Carter, Master Detective (1939)

Nick Carter, Master Detective (1939)

“They’re after something now that’s going to break us if they get it.”

Synopsis:
Detective Nick Carter (Walter Pidgeon) investigates espionage at the Radex Airplane Factory while courting a lovely female nurse (Rita Johnson) and dealing with an admiring amateur sleuth (Donald Meek).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Detectives and Private Eyes
  • Jacques Tourneur Films
  • Spies
  • Walter Pidgeon Films
  • World War II

Review:
After acquiring the rights to adapt all 1,100 stories featuring famed fictional detective Nick Carter, MGM ended up producing just three “Nick Carter films” — all of which were based on original plots. This first entry in the “trilogy”, competently directed by Jacques Tourneur, features a debonair young Walter Pidgeon in the title role: he’s both a ladies’ man (he immediately captures the interest of Rita Johnson’s character) and a no-nonsense man-of-action, capable of drawing a gun on the enemy at a moment’s notice. Less impressive (though some disagree) is Donald Meek as “Bartholomew the Bee Man”, whose bumbling characterization is clearly meant to serve as a comedic foil, but instead is merely an unnecessary distraction. At less than an hour long, Nick Carter moves quickly, and features several exciting actions sequences; with that said, it’s really only “must see” viewing for fans of B-grade detective flicks, and/or those curious to see Pidgeon in one of his earliest roles.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Walter Pidgeon in his first leading role as Nick Carter
  • A fast-paced, entertaining screenplay

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look if you stumble upon it.

Links:

3 Worlds of Gulliver, The (1960)

3 Worlds of Gulliver, The (1960)

“I stop wars, put out fires, feed people, give them hope and peace and prosperity — how can I be a traitor?”

Synopsis:
Dr. Lemuel Gulliver (Kerwin Mathews) is shipwrecked and lands on the shores of Lilliput, where he tries to help mediate a rivalry between the Lilliputians and their neighbors on Blefescu.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fantasy
  • Giants
  • Ray Harryhausen Films
  • Rivalry
  • Royalty and Nobility

Review:
This live action adaptation of Jonathan Swift’s 18th century novel — featuring special effects by Ray Harryhausen — is an enjoyably innocuous children’s fantasy with just enough subtle satirical humor to appeal to adults. With that said, Harryhausen fans expecting to see ample use of stop-motion animation will be disappointed, given that there are only two short sequences involving his famed technique; instead, the primary visual appeal of the film lies in the remarkably effective scaled cinematography, which allows Gulliver to appear either over-sized or minuscule in comparison with his island neighbors. While the intricacies of Swift’s highly specific satire of British government are inevitably lost (particularly since the last two sections of the novel are left out altogether), screenwriters Arthur Ross and Jack Sher manage to poke more generic fun at both the petty nature of wars (the kings of Lilliput and Blefescu are locked in mortal combat over the correct way to crack eggs!) and the frighteningly absurd motivations behind witch hunts (which were often simply a convenient way to get rid of enemies). Bernard Herrmann wrote the score, which isn’t quite as distinctive as one might expect — but evidence of his musical genius comes through in certain sections, and adds an appropriately jaunty backdrop to Gulliver’s escapades.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Kerwin Mathews as Gulliver
  • Excellent use of scaled cinematography

  • The humorously ridiculous rivalry between the Lilliputians and the Blefescuians
  • Bernard Herrmann’s score

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended.

Links:

Strawberry Statement, The (1970)

Strawberry Statement, The (1970)

“The only way to make a revolution is to take the university and recapture it for the students and for the people!”

Synopsis:
A college student (Bruce Davison) joins a revolutionary movement on campus in order to get closer to a girl (Kim Darby) he’s interested in.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bud Cort Films
  • College
  • Coming-of-Age
  • Revolutionaries

Review:
Loosely based on James Kunen’s non-fiction account of his experiences at Columbia University in the 1960s, The Strawberry Statement offers a heady look at counterculture activism, one which unabashedly foregrounds the fact that a desire to “fit in” and “meet chicks” may have propelled many impressionable college students towards their nascent identities as revolutionaries. To his credit, director Stuart Hagmann never tries to present his protagonist (well played by a very young Bruce Davison) as anything other than utterly human; we believe in him because we can relate to his youthful desire for excitement and romance. Much has been made about the fact that Hagmann — primarily a director of commercials and television shows — can’t seem to keep his camera still, but modern audiences used to MTV jump cuts will likely find his direction relatively tame; and while his overhead shots of protesters splayed out in Busby Berkeley-like formations strike some as disingenuous, I believe they provide a nifty visual touch to the proceedings. Ultimately, The Strawberry Statement isn’t meant to be a neo-realist documentary, but rather a psychedelic envisioning of a specific time and place, as experienced by one young man; as such, it’s a dated but relatively worthy cinematic time-capsule.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Bruce Davison as Simon
  • Kim Darby as Simon’s love interest, Linda
  • Simon and Linda “holding up” a local grocery store
  • Good use of Bay Area locales
  • An effectively heady depiction of student protest in the 1960s

Must See?
No, but it’s certainly recommended for those interested in cinematic depictions of counterculture movements.

Links:

Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds, The (1972)

Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds, The (1972)

“My experiment has shown some of the strange effects radiation can produce, and how dangerous it can be if not handled correctly.”

Synopsis:
A harried single mother (Joanne Woodward) struggles to raise her two daughters: boy-crazy, baton-twirling Ruth (Roberta Wallach) and quiet, science-loving Matilda (Nell Potts).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Family Problems
  • Joanne Woodward Films
  • Paul Newman Films
  • Play Adaptations
  • Single Mothers

Review:
Paul Newman’s adaptation of Paul Zindel’s semi-autobiographical Pulitzer Prize-winning play is a bleak yet well-acted character piece which once again provides Newman’s wife, Joanne Woodward, with a chance to shine. As a cynical widow who embroils her two daughters in the web of bitterness she’s created for herself, Woodward’s character is far from likable, but eminently “real”; she’s surviving in the only way she knows how.

Both Wallach (daughter of Eli Wallach and Anne Jackson) and Potts (daughter of Newman and Woodward) are excellent and believable as well in their respective roles as Woodward’s radically different daughters. While the film’s odd title is puzzling at first, playwright Zindel’s metaphors are soon made apparent, as we realize that Matilda’s interest in the effect of noxious rays on living plants closely parallels her quest for self-preservation in the face of an impossibly dysfunctional mother. No easy answers are provided, but a small amount of movement and change occurs by the end of the film, thus leaving viewers with hope for the future.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Joanne Woodward as Beatrice Hunsdorfer
  • Nell Potts as Matilda
  • Roberta Wallach as Ruth

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended.

Links:

Lumiere (1976)

Lumiere (1976)

“We always meet again… In 16 years of friendship, in spite of births, sickness, travel, films, there always was room for you and me.”

Synopsis:
A renowned actress (Jeanne Moreau) and her friends (Lucia Bose, Caroline Cartier, and Francine Racette) deal with love and career choices in Paris.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Bruno Ganz Films
  • French Films
  • Friendship
  • Jeanne Moreau Films
  • Keith Carradine Films

Review:
Jeanne Moreau’s directorial debut offers more of a meditation on women’s lives than a compelling narrative; her attempt, a la Robert Altman, to touch upon the travails of a host of interwoven characters necessarily fragments the story, often to its detriment. Moreau herself ultimately emerges as the most sympathetic (and central) character: her story — thanks in no small part to her luminous performance — is eminently watchable, and her three love interests — played by Francois Simon (as her older “companion”), Francis Huster, and Bruno Ganz — are all perfectly cast. Unfortunately, we learn much less about either Cartier (virtually a non-presence) or Bose (a fine Italian actress whose character possesses an intriguing, though unplumbed, back story). Meanwhile, Racette primarily provides comic relief — as in the film’s most humorous scene, involving a hilarious Keith Carradine as a horny American who catches sight of Racette in a restaurant and tracks her down ruthlessly; this could be creepy, but Moreau wisely chooses to play it for laughs. Ultimately, Lumiere‘s fractured, imbalanced narrative prevents it from being “must see”, but Moreau’s ability to effortlessly evoke a particular milieu — one she’s intimately familiar with — makes it worth viewing at least once.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Jeanne Moreau as Sarah
  • Lucia Bose as Laura
  • Bruno Ganz as Heinrich Grun
  • Francois Simon as Gregoire
  • Julienne (Francine Racette) negotiating a romantic encounter with a horny American (Keith Carradine)

Must See?
No, though fans of Moreau’s work will likely be curious to check it out.

Links:

Male Animal, The (1942)

Male Animal, The (1942)

“I know I’m not a tiger — but I don’t like to be thought of as a pussycat, either!”

Synopsis:
Professor Turner (Henry Fonda) is warned by his supervisor (Eugene Pallette) that he cannot read a letter by a controversial anarchist in his class or he will risk losing his job; meanwhile, his wife (Olivia de Havilland) is courted by a returning football star (Jack Carson), and Turner finds his sense of masculinity sorely tested.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Comedy
  • Henry Fonda Films
  • Jack Carson Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Masculinity
  • Olivia de Haviland Films
  • Play Adaptations
  • Professors

Review:
This dated but amusing comedy about censorship in academia — as well as what it means to be a “real male” — is based on a 1940 play by James Thurber and Elliott Nugent, and was directed by the latter. Henry Fonda is well-cast as bespectacled Professor Turner, who finds himself increasingly put upon in both career and marriage, and must eventually decide to stand up for what he believes in and cares most about. Even more enjoyable than Fonda, however, is the ever-reliable Jack Carson as returning football star Joe Ferguson:

Carson manages to present Joe as a realistic threat to Turner’s marriage without ever coming across as villainous or unlikable; his opening greeting with trustee Ed Keller (nicely played by Eugene Pallette) is priceless.

Audiences today will likely have no idea who the controversial writer in question (Bartolomeo Vanzetti) is, but this shouldn’t affect one’s ability to appreciate the underlying dilemma at stake.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Fonda’s drunken diatribe about human males in relation to other animals
  • Jack Carson as erstwhile football star Joe Ferguson

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Links: