Moby Dick (1956)

Moby Dick (1956)

“I do not fear Moby Dick; I fear the wrath of God.”

Synopsis:
In 1840s New England, a sailor named Ishmael (Richard Basehart) befriends a heavily tattooed Pacific Island harpooner named Queequeg (Friedrich von Ledebur), and the pair join the crew of the whaling ship called the Pequod, helmed by Captain Ahab (Gregory Peck) and his right hand man, Starbuck (Leo Genn) — but will Ahab’s obsessive quest to find the great white whale (Moby Dick) responsible for the loss of one of his legs lead to the dire outcomes predicted by a soothsayer (Royal Dano)?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • At Sea
  • Fishermen
  • Gregory Peck Films
  • Harry Andrews Films
  • John Huston Films
  • Leo Genn Films
  • Orson Welles Films
  • Revenge
  • Richard Basehart Films

Review:
John Huston’s adaptation of Herman Melville’s 1851 novel remains an impressive distillation and expression of a literary work deemed daunting enough to merit its own website called “How to Read Moby Dick”. (Full confession: I haven’t read it – yet.) On its own merits, the film shows us a powerful tale of obsession on the high seas, with a narrative mirroring while diverging significantly from other “crazy sea captain” tales viewers may have seen, such as Mutiny on the Bounty (1935), The Caine Mutiny (1954), and Mister Roberts (1955). In this case, the chief mate Starbuck (Genn) recognizes the danger of allowing Captain Ahab’s obsession with Moby Dick to drive the whaling trip, yet can’t find any sympathy for his perspective; instead, he simply watches in horror as all men on board become caught up in Ahab’s lethal determination.

The film is beautifully shot (in Wales, Portugal, and Spain) with a strong sense of authenticity, both for locale and period detail:


Scenes with The Whale are impressive as well, especially considering how challenging it was to get anything workable at all on screen:

John Huston’s assertion that this was the most challenging film he ever made (which is saying a lot) rings true; one seriously worries for the safety of all while watching brutally realistic scenes at sea:

The performances across the board are excellent, with Peck especially noteworthy as Ahab (he was an inspired second choice), Genn excellent as Starbuck, Basehart appropriately peripheral as Ishmael, and von Ledebur stoically menacing as Queequeg (shout-out to make-up creator Charles E. Parker as well):

Orson Welles has a fine cameo early in the film as a pastor giving a sermon about — naturally — Jonah and the whale:

Also on view are Bernard Miles and Harry Andrews as shipmates:

… and Royal Dano as a man named Elijah who tries to warn the men about their treacherous journey:

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Gregory Peck as Captain Ahab
  • Leo Genn as Starbuck
  • Friedrich von Ledebur as Queequeg
  • Fine production design and attention to period detail

  • Oswald Morris’s cinematography

  • Impressive special effects

Must See?
Yes, as a good show by a master director.

Categories

  • Good Show

Links:

Miss Julie (1951)

Miss Julie (1951)

“I’m a servant today, but in two years I’ll be my own man.”

Synopsis:
In late 19th century Sweden, a servant (Ulf Palme) engaged to the house cook (Märta Dorff) seduces his mistress (Anita Björk), who has recently broken off her engagement to a count (Kurt-Olof Sundström) and who reflects back on being deeply damaged by her feminist mother (Lissi Alandh) and weak father (Anders Henrikson).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Class Relations
  • Cross-Class Romance
  • Flashback Films
  • Max von Sydow Films
  • Play Adaptation
  • Scandinavian Films

Review:
Swedish director Alf Sjöberg was primarily a stage director, but helmed about 20 cinematic features, including an early collaboration with Ingmar Bergman (1944’s Torment) and this adaptation of one of August Strindberg’s best-known plays. While the original storyline takes place in just one room (the manor kitchen) with only three characters, Sjöberg found numerous creative ways to open up the action and add strongly cinematic touches to the proceedings. Given that events in the play take place on Midsummer’s Eve, Sjöberg shows us the gay festivities of the day (including a maypole dance):

… and makes liberal use of flashbacks, as when Palme tells his tale of having an embarrassing crush on Björk when he was young (played by Jan Hagerman):

… and Björk divulges the abuse she suffered at the hands of her mentally ill mother:

Balancing this pair out is level-headed Dorff:

… who serves as a continuous voice of reason while Palme and Björk engage in an epic battle-of-the-classes-and-sexes. How things evolve may come as a surprise to those not familiar with the play, and viewers should be prepared for some pretty intense sequences. (What else would one expect from Scandinavian cinema?) Watch for Max von Sydow in an early supporting role as a farmhand:

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Anita Björk as Miss Julie
  • Ulf Palme as Jean
  • Märta Dorff as Kristin
  • Creative cinematic techniques

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look, especially for those interested in Scandinavian cinema.

Links:

Tales of Hoffman, The (1951)

Tales of Hoffman, The (1951)

“I have lost my reflection!”

Synopsis:
A poet (Robert Rounseville) enamored with a ballerina (Moira Shearer) recounts tales to his friend Nicklaus (Pamela Brown) about three previous loves: a mechanical dancer (Moira Shearer) created by a scientist (Leonide Massine) and operated by a devious magician (Robert Helpmann); a seductive courtesan (Ludmilla Tcherina) who steals his reflection for a magician (Robert Helpmann); and a consumptive young Greek woman (Ann Ayars) forced to sing to her death by an evil doctor (Robert Helpmann).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dancers
  • Episodic Films
  • Fantasy
  • Michael Powell Films
  • Obsessive Love
  • Operas

Review:
Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger produced and directed this Technicolor opera fantasy based on Jacques Offenbach’s 1881 opera of the same name. It tells a series of episodic musical tales centered around Hoffmann (Rounseville) himself, with a recurring roster of evil characters all played by Robert Helpmann.

The sets and costumes (by Hein Heckroth) and cinematography (by Christopher Challis) are consistently a wonder to behold:


… as are the enjoyably clever yet low-tech special effects.

Unfortunately, the film’s major and significant downfall (leaning me towards only recommending it rather than calling it must-see) is that, as noted in Bosley Crowther’s review for the New York Times, “it sates the senses without striking any real dramatic fire.” Lead actor Robert Rounseville is notoriously stiff throughout (though of course his vocals, for those who enjoy opera, are impeccable):

… and the final sequence is overall quite dull. With that said, most film fanatics will likely be curious to check this unusual, visually vibrant film — a favorite of both Martin Scorsese and George Romero — at least once; but don’t feel bad if it’s not quite your cup of tea.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Robert Helpmann as Lindorf, Coppélius, Dapertutto, and Dr Miracle

  • Pamela Brown as Nicklaus
  • Highly creative production design

  • Fine special effects
  • Gorgeous Technicolor cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s unique enough to be worth a one-time look. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

River, The (1951)

River, The (1951)

“It’s the same story everywhere I go; I spoil everything.”

Synopsis:
In colonial India, a young woman (Patricia Walters) and her beautiful best friend (Adrienne Corri) are both smitten by a visiting American veteran (Thomas E. Breen) who has lost one of his legs. Meanwhile, a half-Indian woman (Radhi) returns home to visit her widowed father (Arthur Shields), and Walters’ mother (Nora Swinburne), father (Edmond Knight), and their beloved nanny (Suprova Mukerjee) care for Walters’ younger siblings — including their only son, snake-loving Bogey (Richard R. Foster) — while Swinburne prepares to give birth to another child.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Coming of Age
  • Expatriates
  • India
  • Jean Renoir Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Veterans

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that “Jean Renoir’s lyrical film about an English family living in Bengal, on the Ganges” — based on a semi-autobiographical novel by Rumer Godden, who co-wrote the screenplay with Renoir — “deals with the merging of cultures” and “how these four young characters” (Walters, Breen, Corri, and Radha) “overcome their various forms of self-hatred.” He points out “it is beautifully shot by the director’s nephew Claude Renoir” and “there are some powerful passages,” with Walters giving “a lovely performance”:


… but he argues, “I don’t like the characters, and I believe that half the cast should have been replaced and that more emphasis should have been placed on how India affects the family.”

Peary’s complaints are rather broad and difficult to challenge. However, knowing the history of the film — that it was made with a number of non-actors (Walters, Breen, Radha), funded by an L.A. florist, and filmed on location in India for the first time (for a Hollywood movie) — adds to its unique stamp in world cinema; it’s especially noteworthy that Satyajit Ray was Renoir’s Assistant Director.

It seems that Godden’s intent (unnecessarily reinforced through an earnest voiceover) is simply to show a coming-of-age tale with all its emotional complexities and uncertainties, and to that extent it’s reasonably successful.

Meanwhile, there are numerous beautifully filmed sequences showing daily life in India, which must surely have been revelationary for viewers at the time. Indeed, Martin Scorsese’s 12-minute discussion of seeing the film as a child and the enormous impact it had on him is quite touching and worth seeking out, either on the DVD or on YouTube.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine location shooting in India

  • Claude Renoir’s beautiful Technicolor cinematography

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended for one-time viewing.

Links:

Steel Helmet, The (1950)

Steel Helmet, The (1950)

“If you die, I’ll kill you!”

Synopsis:
During the Korean War, a traumatized sergeant (Gene Evans) encounters a South Korean boy (William Chun) and a Black medic (James Edwards), and soon they all join forces with a patrol led by rule-following Lt. Driscoll (Steve Brodie), with other members of their ragtag platoon including a Japanese-American Nisei (Richard Loo), a former conscientious objector (Robert Hutton), a bald private (Richard Monahan), and a mute (Sid Melton). When they set up an observation post in a Buddhist temple and learn a North Korean soldier (Harold Fong) is lurking in their midst, their existence becomes even more tense.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Korean War
  • Misfits
  • Prisoners of War
  • Sam Fuller Films
  • Soldiers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “unusual, surprisingly powerful low-budget war film, written and directed by Samuel Fuller” is “about a hard-bitten sergeant (Gene Evans) whose platoon is wiped out but who survives himself because of his helmet” (hence the film’s title).

He notes that “Fuller’s unsentimental, deglamorized portrait of war is highly atmospheric, tense” and — despite the extremely low budget — “realistic,” with “the character relationships, particularly those between Evans and Chun and Brodie … intriguing.”

Made in just ten days on a budget of ~$100K, The Steel Helmet — Fuller’s third film, after I Shot Jesse James (1949) and The Baron of Arizona (1950) — was loosely based on journal entries made during his own time as a soldier. Fuller’s inclusion of a multi-ethnic cast allows him to touch upon topics otherwise undiscussed in Hollywood films at the time — such as Loo’s family being imprisoned in an internment camp during World War II, despite his own active involvement in the segregated Japanese-American 442nd Regimental Combat Team. “We have the same kind of eyes,” the North Korean soldier — known as The Red — goads him.

Meanwhile, Edwards’ Cpt. Thompson — trained as a surgeon — must take subtle and not-so-subtle racist jabs at every turn.

While chatting with Evans about his stint volunteering for a rifle outfit during WWII, for instance, Evans bluntly responds, “Yeah, that was to prove you guys could shoot besides drive trucks. I remember.” (Blacks were primarily relegated to logistics positions in the war.) When Edwards tells Evans he went back to school after WWII on the G.I. bill to study surgery, surly Evans retorts with: “Where? In a butcher shop?” Edwards seems to simply put up with such comments, though later we’re privy to some of his reasoning:

The Red: I just don’t understand you. You can’t eat with them unless there’s a war. Even then, it’s difficult. Isn’t that so?

Cpl. Thompson: That’s right.

The Red: You pay for a ticket, but you even have to sit in the back of a public bus. Isn’t that so?

Cpl. Thompson: That’s right. A hundred years ago, I couldn’t even ride a bus. At least now I can sit in the back. Maybe in fifty years, sit in the middle. Someday even up front. There’s some things you just can’t rush.

Fuller makes excellent use of sparse, fog-shrouded sets:

… and his pulpy script is filled with zingy lines (most mouthed by Evans):

“When my face gets tired, I sit down.”

“Nobody knows where we are except the enemy.”

“You got nothin’ out there but rice paddies crawlin’ with commies just waitin’ to slap you between two big hunks of rye bread and wash you down with fish eggs and vodka.”

This indie classic remains a tense and gritty portrayal of the inherent insanity of war (and racism), and is worthy of multiple viewings.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Gene Evans as Sgt. Zack
  • Fine supporting performances by the diverse and eclectic cast
  • Good use of low-budget locales and sets
  • Ernest Miller’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as an indie classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Important Director

Links:

Young Lions, The (1958)

Young Lions, The (1958)

“The German army is invincible because it is an army that obeys orders — any orders.”

Synopsis:
During World War II, a German ski instructor-turned-lieutenant (Marlon Brando) falls for a French woman (Liliane Montevecchi) and grows increasingly cynical while accompanying his ruthless captain (Maximilian Schell) in North Africa, and eventually visiting Schell’s flirtatious wife (May Britt). Meanwhile, two American recruits — a privileged musical star (Dean Martin) whose loyal girlfriend (Barbara Rush) once dated Brando, and Dean’s new Jewish friend (Montgomery Clift), who marries a WASP-ish girl (Hope Lange) — head over to Germany to fight, eventually encountering Brando.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Barbara Rush Films
  • Dean Martin Films
  • Edward Dmytryk Films
  • Hope Lange Films
  • Lee Van Cleef Films
  • Marlon Brando
  • Maximilian Schell Films
  • Montgomery Clift Films
  • Soldiers
  • World War II

Review:
Formerly blacklisted director Edward Dmytryk helmed this nearly-three-hour adaptation of Irwin Shaw’s 1948 novel, covering the trajectories of three different soldiers and their girls during World War II. Other than the convenient intersection of Brando and Rush in the film’s earliest scenes (at a ski resort):

… it’s difficult to understand why these particular storylines have been pulled together, other than to show us how American and German lives inevitably intersected. To that end, Martin’s character gets the film’s best line, spoken early on when he’s explaining his resistance to fighting:

“Look, I’ve read all the books. I know that in 10 years we’ll be bosom friends with the Germans and the Japanese. Then I’ll be pretty annoyed that I was killed.”

indeed, given that this film was released more than 10 years after the end of the war, some perspective had been gained — and it was likely easier for viewers to empathize with a conflicted Nazi like Brando.

Schell, on the other hand (in his American screen debut), simply oozes Aryan arrogance:

… representing everything about the Nazis’ approach to life and war that Brando comes to detest. Meanwhile, it’s unclear what kind of “understanding” Schell has with his beautiful wife (Britt), who almost instantly propositions Brando when he goes to visit her (at Schell’s request):

Brando’s other would-be love interest — patriotic Francoise (Montvecchi) — seems included simply to show his conflicted desire for more than Germany.

On the American side of things, the storyline about Clift’s “Noah Ackerman” hints at parallels to his character in From Here to Eternity (1953) — though this time he chooses to fight in order to stand up against (anti-Semitic) bullies who have stolen his money and are determined to give him a hard time:

Lange is appealing as Clift’s romantic partner waiting for him back at home, and her character’s world also exposes us to a bit more of America’s thinly veiled anti-Semitism when we hear her father (Vaughn Taylor) — who “never knew a Jew before” — openly telling Clift he wishes “to heaven [he’d] turn around and get on [a] bus and never see” his daughter again. (He has a change of heart.)

Martin’s “Michael Whiteacre” is the least developed of the three; we simply see him as a man who initially resists joining the army, but knows he must eventually move past his cowardice.

All three men grow and mature in some way, which is refreshing — but the overall storyline isn’t quite satisfying enough to recommend this one.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Joseph MacDonald’s CinemaScope cinematography

Must See?
No; it’s only must-see for fans of the lead actors.

Links:

Mister Roberts (1955)

Mister Roberts (1955)

“Maybe that’s why we’re on this ship — ’cause we’re not good enough to fight!”

Synopsis:
During World War II, the beloved executive officer (Henry Fonda) of a cargo ship repeatedly requests a transfer to be able to engage in combat, but is denied by his unreasonably insecure captain (James Cagney), who also refuses to grant his men — including Ensign Pulver (Jack Lemmon) — a much-deserved leave; will Mister Roberts (Fonda) prevail on their behalf?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • At Sea
  • Betsy Palmer Films
  • Henry Fonda Films
  • Jack Lemmon Films
  • James Cagney Films
  • John Ford Films
  • Joshua Logan Films
  • Mervyn Le Roy Films
  • Play Adaptations
  • Ruthless Leaders
  • Ward Bond Films
  • William Powell Films
  • World War II

Review:
This adaptation of Joshua Logan’s long-running Broadway play — itself based on a 1946 novel by Thomas Heggen — was fraught with directorial challenges: John Ford began the film but was eventually replaced by Mervyn LeRoy (with some scenes directed by Logan himself). Apparently Ford and Fonda — who starred in the lead role on Broadway for seven years:

— had a major falling out, ending their 16 year friendship and string of 8 films together. However, the resulting movie was no worse for wear as far as audiences were concerned, given that they made it the second highest grossing film of the year. Jimmy Cagney plays a Bligh/Queeg type of power-tripping naval leader, though no reason is given for his attitude other than class resentment.

William Powell gave his final screen performance as a laid-back ship’s doctor who is friends with Fonda:

… and Jack Lemmon won an Oscar for his supporting role as lazy Ensign Pulver, who is primarily interested in doing as little as possible other than bedding a beautiful nurse (Betsy Palmer):

Speaking of beautiful nurses, a bevy of them are conveniently spotted across the way, and end up on board the ship:

… while the local natives are exoticized on behalf of the men’s R&R.

Unfortunately, the humor in this film — including the men ogling the nurses using spyglasses and binoculars:

… Powell and Fonda crafting a faux-rum for Lemmon using grain alcohol, Coke, iodine, and hair tonic:

… Cagney’s obsession with a palm tree:

… and the men getting stinking drunk while on leave:

— hasn’t aged well. We primarily enjoy watching Fonda in a role he wears like a glove, epitomizing a man who does the right and decent thing without anticipating anything in return. Fonda makes this film worth a one-time look, but it’s not must-see viewing otherwise.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Henry Fonda as Mister Roberts
  • Fine CinemaScope cinematography

Must See?
No, though Oscar completists will want to see it. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book, and nominated as one of the Best Pictures of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars.

Links:

Caine Mutiny, the (1954)

Caine Mutiny, the (1954)

“A captain’s job is a lonely one; he’s easily misunderstood.”

Synopsis:
During World War II, a Naval minesweeper captain (Tom Tully) is replaced by a strict new captain (Humphrey Bogart) who quickly exhibits signs of extreme mental strain. When a lieutenant (Fred MacMurray) tries to warn his colleagues that Captain Queeg (Bogart) is paranoid, at first the ship’s executive officer (Van Johnson) doesn’t believe him — but soon Johnson and a new recruit (Robert Francis) are worried enough about Queeg’s competence that they take a drastic step.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • At Sea
  • Courtroom Drama
  • Cowardice
  • Edward Dmytryk Films
  • E.G. Marshall Films
  • Fred MacMurray Films
  • Humphrey Bogart Films
  • Jose Ferrer Films
  • Lee Marvin Films
  • Mutiny
  • Ruthless Leaders
  • Sailors
  • Van Johnson Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary isn’t a big fan of this adaptation of “Herman Wouk’s exciting novel” about a commander (Bogart) who had “been a hero, but too much combat has had an effect on his mind” and thus “he suffers from acute paranoia,” “drives the men too hard,” and “even conducts a full-scale investigation to determine who pilfered a quart of strawberries.”

Peary argues that the “picture seems more concerned not to hurt the image of the Navy than to condemn Queeg, or to probe the military mentality and suggest that his phobias are not rare among military leaders.” He further adds that “the direction by Edward Dmytryk is stagy — one never feels that the men are actually on a ship in mid-ocean.”

I disagree with Peary’s sentiments. While the studio-mandated inclusion of an insipid romance between Francis and his singer-girlfriend (May Wynn) is an annoying waste of screentime:

… the rest of the storyline plays out in an engaging and suspenseful fashion. MacMurray gets to play one of his anti-nice-guy roles as an aspiring novelist who means well with his armchair analysis of Queeg, but ends up (arguably) causing harm:

… while Johnson is solid as an uneducated but savvy officer, and Jose Ferrer is nicely cast as a lawyer who openly wishes he were defending someone other than Johnson and Francis, but steps up to the task.

However, it’s Bogart’s Oscar-nominated performance which really holds one’s attention, especially during the riveting final courthouse sequence.

Bogart’s Queeg is a complicated character, as are the others around him — and I appreciate the culminating sequence in which the courtroom verdict is complexified even a bit further. By the end of this film, we definitely understand that leading is hard, and that knowing what to do under extraordinary circumstances is rarely straightforward.

Note: Watch for former-Marine Lee Marvin in a small role as a lieutenant nicknamed “Meatball”:

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Humphrey Bogart as Captain Queeg
  • Jose Ferrer as Lt. Greenwald
  • Van Johnson as Lt. Maryk
  • Fred MacMurray as Lt. Keefer

Must See?
Yes, as a good show with a strong performance by Bogart.

Categories

  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

What Price Glory (1952)

What Price Glory (1952)

“It’s a lousy war, kid — but it’s the only one we’ve got.”

Synopsis:
During World War I, Captain Flagg (James Stewart) resists marrying his French sweetheart (Corinne Calvert), instead trying to get her hitched to his career-long rival, Sergeant Quirt (Dan Dailey). Meanwhile, a handsome young recruit (Robert Wagner) falls for a beautiful local girl (Marisa Pavan), but ongoing battles pull all the men away from their love lives.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dan Dailey Films
  • James Cagney Films
  • John Ford Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Rivalry
  • Robert Wagner Films
  • World War I Films

Review:
John Ford directed this colorful but unsatisfying adaptation of Maxwell Anderson and Laurence Stallings’ play (first made as a silent film by Raoul Walsh in 1926). My sentiments about this film are just about the same as for Walsh’s version, which I was similarly unimpressed with. Cagney and Dailey’s ongoing rivalry takes center stage at the expense of any other narrative hook:

… and Calvert is simply relegated to the role of a beautiful pawn whose only option to make it to Paris is seemingly to marry one of them:

We get to see handsome Wagner and lovely Pavan falling for one another (they even sing a romantic multilingual duet):

… but there’s nothing else to their relationship, either. This one is strictly must-see for Ford completists.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine cinematography by Joseph MacDonald

Must See?
No; you can skip this one.

Links:

Kid for Two Farthings, A (1955)

Kid for Two Farthings, A (1955)

“It’s a unicorn!”

Synopsis:
A young boy (Johnathan Ashmore) whose mother (Celia Johnson) works for a London tailor (David Kossoff) longs to find a unicorn that will grant his wishes — including his long-gone dad returning home from Africa; acquiring a new pressing machine for Kossoff; and helping a body-building sewist (Joe Robinson) in Kosoff’s shop earn enough money to marry his sexy sweetheart (Diana Dors). When Ashmore encounters a baby goat (a kid) with just one horn, he believes he’s found his unicorn, and gets right to work requesting wishes; meanwhile, Robinson reluctantly agrees to engage in paid matches with a bullying wrestler (Primo Carnera), who has his own eye on Dors.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Carol Reed Films
  • Pets
  • Wrestling

Review:
Carol Reed directed this quaint tale of a young boy whose belief in magic drives all the subplots in the film’s bustling narrative, which takes place within a colorful cityscape of eclectic characters:

Ashmore is charming as sweet Joe:

… though we don’t actually get to know him too well, given that his own needs and wishes are overshadowed by the dominant subplot between Robinson (who aspires obsessively towards body-building fame):

… and Dors, who oh-so-desperately wants to get a ring put on it:

These two are indeed gorgeous specimens, but unfortunately not all that bright or interesting. Meanwhile, Carnera’s oafish “Python” is a hiss-worthy but purely one-dimensional villain (below he’s trying to strangle Joe’s “unicorn”):

The most magical scenes are those simply showing the hustle and bustle of Joe’s child’s-eye view of the world:

… as his harried mother (Johnson) struggles to keep up with solo parenting and work:

… and Kossoff tries to bargain his way into purchasing his competitor’s old pressing machine:

The wrestling scenes are pure filler — though I suppose they fit with the film’s overall theme of showing everyday, working-class life and entertainment.

Fans of Carol Reed will want to check this one out simply to see the variety and creativity of his output, but it’s not must-see viewing for all film fanatics.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Edward Scaife’s cinematography


Must See?
No, though it’s worth a one-time look.

Links: