Body Double (1984)
“You’re my only witness to this murder, and you’re a peeper. In my book, that’s a pervert and a sex offender.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review: and “the storyline’s so predictable that the intricacy of De Palma’s direction seems wasted” (only the fact that Wasson’s clearly being duped is predictable; everything else caught me by surprise). Meanwhile, he asserts that “when De Palma starts showing off with one of his long non-dialogue passages (when Wasson follows Shelton), the picture becomes boring.” He adds (I agree) that “as a platinum-blond [adult film] star, Melanie Griffith is the best reason to see this picture”. While I’m not as dismissive of this film as Peary seems to be, I’ll agree it’s not must-see viewing and ultimately one of De Palma’s lesser films. However, there’s enough creativity to recommend it for one-time viewing, especially if you’re a De Palma fan. Redeeming Qualities and Moments: Must See? Links: |
2 thoughts on “Body Double (1984)”
Agreed; not must-see and mainly for De Palma fans.
Slick but dumb Hitch homage. It’s *really* boring in its first 15 minutes as it struggles to get started. After that, it’s just labored. As a porn star in the film’s second half, Griffith gets one very good line to a clueless listener: “Good! Good. We need more comedians in our business.”
⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Another slick and entertaining Hitchcock riff. DP continues in a similarly controversial vein as Dressed to Kill. Wasson is likeable but deliberately somewhat nebbish and a born patsy.
Not by any stretch a must see despite being twisty and fun.