Soft Skin, The (1964)
“I’ve discovered life wasn’t what I expected lately.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: It’s difficult at first to accept the pudgy, nondescript Desailly as a likely candidate to attract the attentions of a sexy young thing like Dorleac — yet we soon understand that it’s his celebrity (there are posters plastered around Riems announcing his upcoming lecture) and his intellect that she finds so appealing. Meanwhile, it’s equally difficult to understand exactly why Desailly would feel a desire to cheat on his sexy wife (Benedetti) — but then again, motivations for infidelity often makes little sense! The three leads (especially Dorleac and Benedetti) all provide solid performances, and Raoul Coutard’s lovely b&w cinematography firmly grounds the film within its cinematic era. While this isn’t must-see viewing by Truffaut, it’s certainly worth a one-time look. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Links: |
2 thoughts on “Soft Skin, The (1964)”
Not a must.
~not even very interesting, really. A man has an affair. Big deal. This extremely tired premise is aided by nothing – nothing – to make it the least bit compelling. The characters aren’t interesting. At all. Seriously, the film basically just sits there, with little else on its mind other than some guy having an affair. Yawn.
Oh. And there’s a particularly dumb – and not all that believable – ending.
Your response is exactly how I felt for far too long when beginning to watch this movie (for the first time).
While I eventually became more engrossed in Desailly’s dilemma — primarily because of how stupidly he was handling things in Reims — I’ll agree that Truffaut needed to kick things up a notch much earlier in the film. He needed to help us see why, exactly, we should commit to watching yet another disastrously adulterous affair being played out on screen.
But Coutard’s cinematography is gorgeous, as usual.