Five Against the House (1955)

Five Against the House (1955)

“It’s the greatest hoax of the century — it’s nefarious as Fu Manchu, and as practical as a zipper!”

Synopsis:
Three college buddies plan a casino heist as a lark, intending to give back the money immediately. But when one of them — damaged Korean War veteran Brick (Brian Keith) — decides he wants to keep the money, it’s up to his friend Al (Guy Madison) to stop the entire scam.

Genres:

  • Brian Keith Films
  • Casinos
  • Heists
  • Kim Novak Films
  • Phil Karlson Films
  • Veterans

Review:
This unusual caper flick (directed by Phil Karlson) effectively draws upon the theme of veterans struggling to live “normal” lives in mainstream society. While Al (Madison) is on the fast track to success as a lawyer, and desires nothing more than to marry his sweetheart (Kim Novak) and settle down, his friend Brick (Keith) represents the opposite extreme: a man so broken by his experiences as a soldier that no amount of schooling or friendship can erase the damage that’s been done. Meanwhile, their young, carefree buddies Ronnie (Kerwin Matthews) and Roy (Alvy Moore) serve as a telling contrast: they are content with simply having fun, scoring with chicks, tormenting a naive freshman (Jack Dimond), and (for Ronnie at least) proving their genius against the seemingly impervious machinations of a casino.

Karlson maintains genuine tension and interest throughout the movie, thanks to fine performances by most of the actors, clever dialogue, and a nicely shot casino heist. The emphasis on character and friendship is refreshing — rather than watching seasoned crooks hoping to make “one final score” (an overused trope if there ever was one), we see a drama which may revolve around a heist, but is ultimately about pride (Ronnie), survival (Brick), and loyalty (Madison).

Note: Ronnie’s cool, calculated plotting is reminiscent of John Dall’s character in Hitchcock’s Rope (1948) — though ultimately Five Against the House is more concerned with the veterans’ stories than with Ronnie’s potential psychopathy.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Brian Keith’s sympathetic performance as the damaged war veteran
  • Kim Novak in one of her earliest roles
  • The tense casino heist (especially well-played by Eric Berg as the cash cart man)
  • A clever script with many memorable lines:

    “I think you two are going to like marriage… I’ve heard it described as something like tennis, played with 40-mm cannons.”

Must See?
No, but it’s a nifty caper flick, and definitely worth watching if you can find a copy.

Links:

2 thoughts on “Five Against the House (1955)

  1. Not a must. I imagine Peary includes it in his book mostly out of admiration for Karlson, a good director when the script allowed him to be.

    Which is not the case here. The premise is an interesting one – the comparison to ‘Rope’ is well noted – and the performances are fine. For the first hour, however, it just sounds to the ear that nobody talks the way any of these characters talk – and that’s waaay distracting. Poor Moore is saddled with the most jarring lines – though his vaguely gay “Ruffian.” to Madison is kind of funny. (As well, Keith’s “Oh, I’ve been gettin’ into a lot of strange closets lately.” gives one pause.)

    At the film’s 2/3-point, when the heist kicks in, the film becomes very compelling for about 10-15 min. – and Karlson is here clearly in his element. It’s taut and tense. (Although the tape-recorded ‘guy’ in the box is kind of silly.)

    Re: the cast, Novak comes off very well when singing ‘The Life of the Party’, and I’ve always felt Keith was underrated (he did way too much tv instead of more movies). But, again, actors are only as good as, in part, their scripts allow.

  2. ⭐️⭐️⭐️ out of ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

    Good heist flick with decent production, fine script and direction with good performances all round. Slick production.

    The theme of a soldier with psychological issues (Keith is excellent) must’ve been fairly new in this kind of film at the time though (I stand to be corrected on that point I’m sure).

Leave a Reply