Zardoz (1974)
“The gun is good, the penis is evil!”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Response to Peary’s Review: He refers to director Boorman’s presentation as “laughable”, deplores the “embarrassingly pretentious and trite scenes and dialogue”, and notes that audience members will become “hopelessly bewildered” by the muddled themes. (See SciFilm’s review for a detailed outline of various “messages” found in the film). With all that said, I can see its cult appeal: any film brave enough to state “The gun is good, the penis is evil!” must be viewed as pure camp all the way. My advice is to enjoy the special effects, laugh at the outrageous costumes, and forget that Boorman ever meant this film as a serious cautionary tale. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Categories
Links: |
One thought on “Zardoz (1974)”
Not a must. I was tempted to call it one due to its (noted) cult status. FFs who ‘survive’ it could be up for some kind of ‘purple heart’ equivalent. Alas, though the 1st two-thirds are a unique howl/snore-fest (10 min. in, note the character who exclaims, “How pointless! How pointless!” and perhaps heed the warning), the last 30 min. (which includes the worst take on a ‘performance artist piece’) are so mind-numbingly awful that I wouldn’t wish them on anyone. It’s a long haul to discovering ‘the origin of the Vortex’; by that time, we’re past caring.
For those still determined, chuckle-inducing moments include:
-a number of statements by Charlotte Rampling, inc. “I’ve always voted against forced farming.”
-finding out the name of ‘The Book’
-when it’s learned that Zardoz had “a simple way of controlling the Outlands.”; not THAT simple, actually, what with having to navigate a huge stone-head, apparently from the heavens
-the “We take life from you…” sequence
-Connery in a wedding dress (complete with veil and moustache)
-Connery being asked to “Inseminate us all…” (ALL?!)
-Connery’s immortal words to his followers, “Stay close to me, inside my aura.”