Browsed by
Month: September 2023

Saturday Night Fever (1977)

Saturday Night Fever (1977)

“You make it with some of these chicks, they think you gotta dance with them.”

Synopsis:
When a teen (John Travolta) in Brooklyn falls for a beautiful dancer (Karen Lynn Gorney) he sees in a local discotheque, he begins pursuing her both as a dance partner and a romantic partner.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Class Relations
  • Dancers
  • John Travolta Films
  • New York City
  • Social Climbers
  • Womanizers

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, “John Travolta danced the disco beat to instant superstardom in this smash hit” in which he “plays 19-year-old Tony, who lives in a lower-middle-class Catholic neighborhood in Brooklyn” and on “Saturday nights” is “top dog at the local disco.”

Indeed, “dancing gives him his only fulfillment” — though “he senses that it can’t last forever,” and “across the bridge is Manhattan — the promised land.”

Peary asserts that the movie’s theme “is that every person has the talent to ‘make it,’ to escape the neighborhood where there are no opportunities; all anyone needs is drive and opportunities” — and for “Travolta and Gorney, opposites who get serious about each other,” the “disco’s upcoming dance context [is] their springboard to the big time.”

Unfortunately, the “film is shallow,” but Peary argues that “Travolta is electrifying, whether getting dressed in his room, wiggling down the street:

… trying desperately to express himself in conversation, making love, or, of course, putting on an amazing display on the dance floor.” He adds that the “disco score, featuring popular Bee Gees songs, is super,” and points out that the film is “stylishly, feverishly directed by John Badham, who isn’t ashamed to explore Travolta’s sexual appeal.”

Peary elaborates on Travolta’s breakthrough big-screen performance in Alternate Oscars, where he names him Best Actor of the Year and writes: “There was doubt that Travolta could make the transition from television, where he’d built up a following as Vinnie Barbarino in the high school comedy Welcome Back, Kotter.” However, “in his first movie lead (he’d been funny in a secondary role in Carrie) he became the sensation of the year, a magazine cover boy and sex symbol.” He points out that Travolta — who is “captivating” — is “great out on the dance floor, making sexual moves to the Bee Gees that have the females in the 2001 [Club] sighing:

… but he’s just as much fun to watch while strutting down the street as if he knows everyone is watching, or gazing at himself in the mirror — a moment of narcissism for a young boy without much self-esteem.”

He highlights how Travolta “has sweet, puppy-dog eyes, a sheepish face, and a delivery that starts out aggressive but ends up sounding hurt or defensive, as if he expects to be put down”; and he smiles “appreciatively if he gets a compliment, as when his boss gives him a raise:

… and when Stephanie [Gorley] admits he’s interesting and even intelligent.”

In his review for DVD Talk, Stuart Galbraith IV argues that:

The movie benefits from an almost classical script rich in characterizations. I was impressed by how in the movie tells us so much about Tony in just the first two minutes. Before the end of the first reel the audience learns Tony: likes to chase women, is a kind and thoughtful brother, is trusting and kind-hearted to strangers, thinks fast on his feet, and is popular in his neighborhood. The posters in his bedroom say it all — on the walls are Bruce Lee, Farrah-Fawcett, Rocky, and Al Pacino (as Serpico).

Interestingly, in the original magazine article upon which this script was based — later acknowledged by the author to be made up — the lead character (here named Vincent) daydreams explicitly of disturbing violence.

… Whenever he gazed into the mirror, it was always Pacino who gazed back. A killer, and a star. Heroic in reflection. Then Vincent would take another breath, the deepest he could manage; would make his face, his whole body, go still; would blink three times to free his imagination, and he would start to count.

Silently, as slowly as possible, he would go from one to a hundred. It was now, while he counted, that he thought about death.

Mostly he thought about guns. On certain occasions, if he felt that he was getting stale, he might also dwell on knives, on karate chops and flying kung fu kicks, even on laser beams. But always, in the last resort, he came back to bullets.

Fortunately, this isn’t how Tony is portrayed on-screen — though his buddies’ crude and immature behavior is often challenging to watch, as is Tony’s rejection of his original dance partner (Donna Pescow), who is eventually subjected to highly disturbing treatment.

Indeed, women aren’t exactly portrayed in the best light in this film. While Gorney — who Peary claims “can’t act” — refreshingly stands up for herself time and again, she’s referred to repeatedly as “practicing to be a bitch” and is given a hard time for being a “social climber.” Other young women (i.e., Denny Dillon’s “Doreen”) clamor to dance with, sleep with, or simply be nearby Tony:

… while the women back at home (Tony’s mother and grandmother) merely fuss over food or show deep distress when Tony’s priestly brother (Martin Shakar) has a career crisis.

Another subplot — involving neurotic Bobby (Barry Miller), who has gotten his girlfriend pregnant and is seeking advice from everyone around him on what to do — is intentionally meant to mirror James Dean and Sal Mineo’s relationship in Rebel Without a Cause (1955), though in a less nuanced and more distributed way.

Ultimately, Saturday Night Live is a film to watch for Travolta’s dynamic performance and as a snapshot of a certain era — not because of any particularly profound insights it offers into the human condition. Be forewarned that you will get “Night Fever” stuck in your head for hours (if not days) after watching this flick.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • John Travolta as Tony
  • Excellent use of location shooting across the city
  • The Bee Gees’ iconic score

Must See?
Yes, for Travolta’s performance and its historical significance.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Valley, The / Vallee, La (1972)

Valley, The / Vallee, La (1972)

“I can’t hide the fact that I’m interested in these feathers.”

Synopsis:
When the bored wife (Bulle Ogier) of a French diplomat meets a young man (Michael Gothard) in possession of some fine exotic feathers, she joins his group — including a male leader (Jean-Pierre Kalfon), two female followers (Valerie Lagrange and Monique Giraudy), and a child — through the jungles of Papua New Guinea in search of a paradisical valley.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Barbet Schroeder Films
  • Character Arc
  • Counterculture
  • Explorers
  • French Films
  • Native Peoples

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “most unusual” film by Barbet Schroeder was “released when young people all over the world were searching for alternative lifestyles.” He points out that “in addition to being a fascinating adventure” of “a group of French [sic] men and women who journey through uncharted regions of New Guinea in search of a ‘mythical’ valley, supposedly an Eden,” it “has ethnographic interest because of scenes in which the professional actors interact with primitive Mapuga tribesmen who know nothing about films or cameras” (or so Peary assumes).

He marvels that “some of the stars even participated in tribal rituals that required them to strip and don ornamental bracelets, beaded necklaces, and weird hats” (the horrors!):

… and argues that “one always feels that the expedition is for real, and that if the valley is not found, the actors, Schroeder, and cameraman Nestor Almendros are doomed” (I didn’t sense this, but maybe I’m naive or jaded). Finally, Peary points out that “the picture is beautifully, hauntingly photographed” (true) and notes that the “original music is by Pink Floyd.”

I have mixed feelings about this cult film, which at first seems to be pushing a typically countercultural agenda that an authentic and meaningful life is to be found in breaking free from society’s dominant norms around sex and clothing and overall purpose for being.

By the end, however, the storyline has taken a reasonably nuanced arc, thus leaving one less certain.

When the film opens, we’re appropriately annoyed by Ogier’s spoiled White rich woman, who lives such a pampered life she spends her hours attemping to obtain and then sell illegally gotten plumage.

Upon arrival at Gothard’s campground, we can tell she’s intrigued by the “alternative lifestyle” on display, though most likely simply from voyeurism and excitement-seeking. Once she begins her actual trek with the motley troupe, however, we can see her opening up, both physically and spiritually:

… and while there are tensions, clearly Ogier’s character seems “meant” for this quest. (She’s never forced to come along, and in fact is advised against it.) Once they arrive deep within the jungles and interact with the Mapuga, she is eager to share her many insights — at which point we hear a refreshing counterbalance to her naive giddiness.

Viviane (Ogier): Olivier, isn’t it wonderful? We’ve become so close to them. We’re practically like them… I’m happy. We’ve found truth, you know.

Olivier (Gothard): It’s just the opposite… We’re lying. Whatever Gaetan [Kalfon] says, we’re tourists here.

Viviane: It’s disgusting, hearing you talk like that!

Olivier: Dancing’s easy. Could you work with them?

Viviane: Yes, absolutely!

Olivier: Women are even more exploited here. You know, Viviane, among [this tribe], society is bound by very strict rules.

Viviane: Same with ours!

Olivier: It’s not the same thing… We’re trying to break ours. When they dance, it’s not just for the pleasure of it, it’s to obey something… We seek after pleasure, and maybe peace. They couldn’t care less about that.

While it’s most certainly not Olivier’s place to assert what the tribe’s true motivations and feelings are, his cautionary words are an important antidote, leading the film towards its appropriately ambivalent ending.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Intriguing anthropological footage
  • Néstor Almendros’s cinematography
  • Pink Floyd’s fragmentary score

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a one-time look for its cult appeal.

Links:

Patton (1970)

Patton (1970)

“They’ll lose their fear of the Germans; I hope to God they’ll never lose their fear of me.”

Synopsis:
During World War II, controversial General George S. Patton (George C. Scott) puts his career in jeopardy by refusing to tone down his strong beliefs and provocative behavior.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biopics
  • George C. Scott Films
  • Karl Malden Films
  • Military
  • Nonconformists
  • Ruthless Leaders
  • World War II

Review:
Peary doesn’t review 1970’s Best Picture Winner in GFTFF, but he does discuss it in Alternate Oscars, where he notes that it “was geared to be, politically speaking, a middle-of-the-road film that wouldn’t offend anyone, and it was rewarded with across-the-board popularity.” Indeed, it became “a favorite movie of the hawkish presidents and military men, who jotted down every quote the aggressive general uttered about the nature of war and the responsibilities of the officers and soldiers who fought it.” He adds that “those who insisted the Vietnam War was being lost because sound military strategy was being compromised by diplomacy, discovered in this film the historical figure they wanted our generals to emulate.”

Peary asserts that “Patton was appealingly presented as a nonconformist within the military, a poet and historian who often speaks his mind against authority figures” — and he points out that “any time Patton says something that might have raised the ire of college-age viewers, [co-screenwriters Francis Ford] Coppola and Edmund H. North wisely have Karl Malden’s Omar Bradley counter with a more reasoned statement, as if he and not Patton represented the thinking of the filmmakers.”

Peary concedes that “Patton contains a great performance by Scott and holds up fairly well as a biography and as a war movie” — but he points out that:

“Under close scrutiny you’ll notice that this film has a flimsy structure with five or six basic scenes that are repeated over and over in different settings, as the war progresses. Repeatedly, Patton startles officers with his idiosyncracies, frightens soldiers with his discipline, shows (when his guard is down) that he really cares about the men who serve under him, gets into trouble for being outspoken, and so on.”

He asserts it’s “also annoying… that every time Coppola and North want us to know what a military genius Patton is, we cut to German headquarters, where we hear their top brass exalting him.”

I’m not as irritated by the structure of the film as Peary is, given that it shows the actual — albeit inevitably fictionalized — arc of this real-life general’s career, which likely did flow somewhat like this; and it feels relevant to highlight how highly German enemies thought of him given his rocky reception back at home.

In terms of Scott, Peary points out that his “tour-de-force performance… overwhelmed everyone in 1970” and “his blunt, imposing opening speech in front of a huge American flag became an instant classic — he could have stopped right then and won the Oscar.”

He adds, “It leads me to believe Scott would have been even more effective in a one-man show about Patton, because the other characters and repetitive scenes and conversations got in the actor’s way. Still, for giving one of the cinema’s most forceful and memorable characterizations of an historical figure, he certainly was worthy of the award the Academy wanted to give him.” However, Peary himself gives the Alternate Oscar to Jack Nicholson in Five Easy Pieces (1970), which he also names as the Best Picture of the Year.

Note: An interesting bit of trivia is that “this was one of the few Oscar-nominated major films without a single female actor listed in the credits. There are only 3 lines of female dialogue in the film (during Patton’s PR appearances in England.)” Ouch.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • George C. Scott as Patton
  • Fine cinematography

  • Jerry Goldsmith’s score

Must See?
Yes, for Scott’s bravura performance and as an Oscar winner.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Breaking Away (1979)

Breaking Away (1979)

“He was as normal as pumpkin pie — and now look at him!”

Synopsis:
A small town teenager (Dennis Christopher) obsessed with bicycle racing and Italy hangs out with his buddies — Mike (Dennis Quaid), Cyril (Daniel Stern), and Moocher (Jackie Earle Haley) — while flirting with a beautiful college student (Robyn Douglass) and managing a rocky relationship with his car-salesman dad (Paul Dooley).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Class Relations
  • Coming of Age
  • Dennis Christopher Films
  • Dennis Quaid Films
  • Father and Child
  • Noncomformists
  • Peter Yates Films
  • Small Town America
  • Sports

Review:
Peter Yates directed this Oscar-nominated feel-good film (Steve Tesich won for best original screenplay) about class relations, friendship, identity, and father-son dynamics in Bloomington, Indiana. Featuring a memorable lead performance by Christopher as quirky high school grad Dave Stohler:

… whose adventures we get drawn into right away. Dave has huge (if naive) dreams, loyal (if confused) friends, and a frustrated (albeit loving) father who doesn’t hesitate to openly criticize his son.

Although some scenes are played for laughs, everything feels realistic here, from the quarry where the “cutters” (a.k.a. townies) go to swim:

… to the exciting closing bike race at Indiana University.

Barbara Barrie — so memorable many years earlier in One Potato, Two Potato (1964) — earned an Oscar nomination for her performance here as a supportive mother and wife who seems willing to put up with just about anything.

Equally noteworthy are Dennis Quaid, Daniel Stern, and Jackie Earle Haley (each with a highly distinctive personality) as Dave’s close friends; their unwavering support for one another is a refreshing throughline.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Dennis Christopher as Dave (nominated by Peary as one of the Best Actors of the Year in Alternate Oscars)
  • Jackie Earle Haley, Dennis Quaid, and Daniel Stern as Dave’s friends
  • Barbara Barrie as Evelyn Stohler
  • Paul Dooley as Ray Stohler
  • Fine location shooting in Bloomington, Indiana

Must See?
Yes, as a unique little film. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book, and nominated as one of the three possible Best Pictures of the Year in Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Getaway, The (1972)

Getaway, The (1972)

“We’ve come a lot of miles, but we’re not close to anything.”

Synopsis:
After making a deal with a corrupt parole officer (Ben Johnson) to help release her husband (Steve McQueen) from prison, a woman (Ali MacGraw) joins McQueen in conducting a required payback heist involving a double-crossing felon (Al Lettieri) who is nothing but bad news for all involved.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Ali MacGraw Films
  • Criminal Couples on the Run
  • Ex-Cons
  • Fugitives
  • Heists
  • Sam Peckinpah Films
  • Steve McQueen Films

Review:
Just after her star-making turn in Love Story (1970), Ali MacGraw was cast for her bankability as the lead in this heist-adventure flick, directed by Sam Peckinpah and based on a 1958 novel of the same name by Jim Thompson. Thankfully, the role suits her well, and she gives one of her best performances (though she didn’t think so). It’s easy to imagine this woman so in love with McQueen that she will do anything for and with him — and while there are significant plot twists related to what exactly this entails, it feels believable enough to stay engaged.

In addition to following the rocky travails of McQueen and MacGraw’s on-the-lam romance, we’re watching to see what will happen with a rogue henchman (Lettieri) who has captured the attention of a bored doctor’s wife he’s holding hostage (Sally Struthers).

Given that this is a Peckinpah film, viewers can expect plenty of stylized action and violence taking place across a range of settings — including (of course) a bank, a veterinarian’s office, a shady hotel, a train station, an electronics store, and a dump. If it’s hard to believe the characters can escape so many close calls with death, you’ll just have to suspend judgment.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Ali MacGraw as Carol McCoy
  • Al Lettieri as Rudy
  • Lucien Ballard’s cinematography
  • Quincy Jones’s score

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look.

Links:

Barbarosa (1982)

Barbarosa (1982)

“Find this Barbarosa, and kill him — kill him for me; kill him for yourself; kill him for your family as sworn.”

Synopsis:
After accidentally killing his brother-in-law, a farm boy (Gary Busey) partners with an outlaw named Barbarosa (Willie Nelson) who is living life on the lam from a patriarch (Gilbert Roland) who repeatedly sends out family members to attempt to kill the legendary bandit.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Feuds
  • Fred Schepisi Films
  • Friendship
  • Gary Busey Films
  • Outlaws
  • Revenge
  • Westerns
  • Willie Nelson Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “fine western has the appropriate feel of a story passed down through many generations so that it has become impossible to distinguish between fact and legend.” He notes that “Australian director Fred Schepisi filmed Texan William D. Witliff’s flavorful script in dusty, rugged land along the Rio Grande”:

… and “it’s in this unfriendly setting that mythical middle-aged outlaw Barbarosa (Willie Nelson) and a common-folk farm boy, Carl (Gary Busey) become dear friends.” It turns out that “Barbarosa has come to be regarded by the Mexican community as a legend, a man who can’t be killed” — and when he’s joined by Busey (who is similarly the target of a family vendetta), these “alienated men become like brothers — or like a wise, teaching father and a learning, respectful son.”

Peary writes that while “the story itself is familiar,” Schepisi manages to make every scene seem offbeat but authentic”:

… and though “the ending is predictable,” it “is still exciting.” He points out that Nelson and Busey are a terrific team: each is funny, full of warmth and honesty, and has a strong screen presence.” I’m essentially in agreement with Peary’s positive review: while this quirky western was a disappointment box office-wise (how could the estimated budget have been $11 million?) it remains worth a look for those interested in the genre.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Gary Busey and Willie Nelson as Carl and Barbarosa
  • Fine location shooting (with cinematography by Ian Baker)

Must See?
No, but it’s well worth a one-time viewing.

Links:

Missouri Breaks, The (1976)

Missouri Breaks, The (1976)

“Why don’t we just take a walk and we’ll just talk about the Wild West and how to get the hell out of it?”

Synopsis:
A rustler (Jack Nicholson) and his men seek revenge against a local rancher (John McLiam) who has hung one of their teammates, but must deal with an eccentric “regulator” (Marlon Brando) sent to take care of them.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Arthur Penn Films
  • Frederic Forrest Films
  • Harry Dean Stanton Films
  • Jack Nicholson Films
  • Marlon Brando Films
  • Outlaws
  • Ranchers
  • Randy Quaid Films
  • Westerns

Review:
Titled after “a forlorn and very rugged area of north-central Montana, where over eons, the Missouri River has made countless deep cuts or ‘breaks’ in the land,” this unique western — directed by Arthur Penn — is perhaps best known for Brando’s highly improvised, off-script performance as Robert E. Lee Clayton, a “regulator” (I hadn’t heard that term before) hired to take care of rustlers. Lang Thompson of TCM refers to him as “one of the weirdest characters who ever prowled the Wild West,” noting he “has an Irish brogue, takes baths at the oddest times, recites love poems to his horse, occasionally dresses in drag…, and has a knack for ingenious murders (he commits one with a harpoon in the shape of a crucifix).”



Nicholson is a fine foil for Brando, and is given a lovely, unexpected romance with Braxton’s conflicted daughter (Kathleen Lloyd).

The rest of the supporting cast is excellent as well — including Harry Dean Stanton as Nicholson’s right hand man:

… Katherine Lloyd as Nicholson’s love interest:

… and Frederic Forrest as Cary, who meets an especially undignified death.

While it’s not must-see viewing, it’s well worth a look by western fans or fans of the stars.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Strong performances by the cast

  • Many oddly quirky moments
  • Fine period design
  • Michael Butler’s cinematography
  • John Williams’ interesting score

Must See?
No, but it’s definitely worth a look as a unique western. Listed as a Cult Movie in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Four Friends (1981)

Four Friends (1981)

“We’re all gonna do wonderful things — and if anyone disagrees, they can leave.”

Synopsis:
A Yugoslavian-American immigrant (Craig Wasson) berated by his strict father (Miklos Simon) finds solace in lifelong friendship with his high school buddies David (Michael Huddleston), Tom (Jim Metzler), and Georgia (Jodi Thelan).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Arthur Penn Films
  • Counterculture
  • Friendship
  • Immigrants and Immigration
  • Lois Smith Films
  • Love Triangle

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary describes this Arthur Penn-directed flick as a tale of a “young Yugoslavian immigrant” whose “only constants through” the “tumultuous sixties” are “his need for fatherly approval and the mutual love between him and his two high school chums… and the girl all three love.” He notes that “the relationship between the passive guys and the unpredictable girl whom they treat like a queen recalls Jules and Jim:”

… and adds, “In the America we see [here], everyone’s life has epic proportions: hopes and dreams result in bitter disappointment, but sadness and pain are tempered by rewarding friendships; throughout, one’s love for America never dissipates.” (Wasson’s character is obsessed with the national anthem.)

Peary argues that although “Arthur Penn’s film has the makings of a masterpiece” (I disagree), it isn’t: “while it contains many lovely moments and devastating scenes, a few important sequences fail” and “although they are talented, you don’t really care if Wasson and Thelen get together”; he rightfully points out that “Thelen’s characterization is more annoying than captivating.”

Peary ends his review by noting the “excellent” (I disagree) “autobiographical script by Steve Tesich, who won an Oscar for Breaking Away (1979).” He asserts that this flick is “better the second time around” — but I won’t be giving it another whirl.

Unfortunately, this movie is a frustrating disappointment: not only do we not care about the protagonists, but the script is poorly written, inserting new characters and scenarios at random with an assumption we’ll simply understand who they are and how they fit into the arc. We get it that pretty Georgia (whose name we will never, ever forget given that “Georgia On My Mind” is played repeatedly) is bewitching to these three men, who all want a chance to be with her in one way or another — that’s boring, but makes sense as a theme. However, things take a seriously off-kilter turn when Danilo (Wasson) falls in love with the sister (Julia Murray) of his disabled friend Louie (Reed Birney) and visits her palatial home, only to quickly learn that DEEP dysfunction lurks therein.

An ensuing scene of “epic proportions”, featuring Murray and Birney’s father (James Leo Herlihy), seems to belong in another Arthur Penn movie altogether. Poor Lois Smith — in a tiny role as Wasson’s new mother-in-law — has an awkward monologue shortly thereafter:

… at which point we shift to seeing how Wasson, Thelan, Huddleston, and Metzler make their way through the remaining years of counter-cultural unrest (Metzler goes to Vietnam) and experimentation (Thelan becomes a hippie-ish single mom, marrying Huddleston while pregnant with Metzler’s baby, and roaming on her own through some kind of punk concert at one point). Meanwhile, the ongoing topic of Danilo seeking approval from his abusive immigrant father:

… instantly hearkens back to the similar narrative thread in Tesich’s much better Breaking Away, which it seems was his one-hit wonder. While boasting impressive directorial credentials, this one isn’t must-see except for diehard Penn fans.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Ghislain Cloquet’s cinematography

Must See?
Nope; you can safely skip this one.

Links:

Coffy (1973)

Coffy (1973)

“Her whole life is gone. She can never get it back, and you’re living real good; that ain’t right.”

Synopsis:
A Black nurse (Pam Grier) seeks revenge on all the corrupt men whose actions and greed have led to her little sister’s drug addiction.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • African-Americans
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Doctors and Nurses
  • Drug Dealers
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Pam Grier Films
  • Revenge
  • Strong Females
  • Vigilantes

Review:
Jack Hill directed this hugely successful Blaxploitation film which offered Pam Grier her breakthrough role (to be followed by several other titles which I’ll be reviewing soon). As Coffy opens, we think we may simply be watching a straightforward tale of drugs and vice in the hood, as a drug dealer (Morris Buchanan) takes the presumably dope-sick Coffy (Grier) home:

… expecting sex in exchange for drugs, only to be killed off by Coffy in a furious rage.

From there, we see Coffy attempting to do her official work at a hospital, but being too traumatized to focus:

… given she is deeply concerned about her sister, who is in a rehab center for drug use.

Throughout the remainder of the film, we see Greer inhabiting a variety of clever guises to continue her vengeance. She visits a scarred prostitute (Carol Lawson):

… and uses violence to convince her to share details of where notorious pimp King George (Robert DoQui) hides his drug stash, then easily infiltrates George’s stallion as a new hire:

… though she’s instantly disliked by George’s top girl (Linda Haynes). Coffy is soon kidnapped by a sociopathic john (Allan Arbus) who’s taken a liking to her:

… and the jam-packed plot continues to thicken, including more revealed about the aspiring politician (Booker Bradshaw) Coffy is in love with.

In its low-budget, high-sensation way, Coffy effectively conveys the complexities of corrupt systems in which everyone is out for themselves, and innocent participants will most definitely be sacrificed; in a world like this, it’s obvious that we need dedicated, savvy vigilantes just like Coffy.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Pam Grier as Coffy

Must See?
Yes, for Grier’s performance and for the film’s historical relevance.

Categories

  • Cult Movie
  • Historically Relevant
  • Noteworthy Performance

Links:

Big Brawl, The / Battle Creek Brawl (1980)

Big Brawl, The / Battle Creek Brawl (1980)

“That kid don’t fight right. He fights foreign.”

Synopsis:
In 1930 Chicago, the son (Jackie Chan) of a Chinese-American grocer (Chao Li Chi) who is being menaced by thugs promises to fight in a Texas battle on behalf of the local crime lord (Jose Ferrer), in exchange for his family’s lifelong protection from harrassment.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Asian-Americans
  • Boxing
  • Historical Drama
  • Jose Ferrer Films
  • Martial Arts

Review:
This film — directed by Robert Crouse, who helmed Enter the Dragon (1973) and Black Belt Jones (1974) — was similarly meant to bring American fame and success to its star, Jackie Chan, who had been acting in his native Hong Kong since the 1960s. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen, and it took 15 more years — when Rumble in the Bronx (1995) was released and became a cult favorite — for American audiences to take to Chan. I haven’t seen Rumble… or any other Jackie Chan movies (yet), but after researching a bit, I discovered that the only movies Peary was likely to have seen for possible inclusion in GFTFF were this and one other title. According to Wikipedia:

By the mid-1990s, [Chan] was the most popular action movie star in Asia and Europe. Up until January 1995, his films had grossed over HK$500 million (US$70 million) in Hong Kong and ¥39 billion (US$415 million) in Japan, while having sold over 33 million box office admissions in France, Germany, Italy and Spain up until then. Despite his international success, he was not very successful in North America, where he had only two wide releases as a leading actor, The Big Brawl and The Protector.

Film fanatics of today — living in the 2020s with access to nearly everything — have so much more to choose from, and clearly, we all should see at least one Jackie Chan movie (though which one, I’m still not positive).

Regarding this earlier film, Chan acquits himself masterfully, and it’s actually a little puzzling as to why it didn’t have more of an impact at the time. The comparisons with Bruce Lee are obvious, but he also possesses a clown-like quality that is quite endearing. It’s also refreshing to see him in an inter-racial relationship with Kristine DeBell, who is his number one fan and supporter:

… in addition to his uncle (Mako), who is his trainer. From Chan’s initial acrobatics high up above the city in some scaffolding:

… to his first fight in an alley outside his father’s shop (when he alternates between offensive moves and pretending to be hurt):

… to seeing him training for ultimate dexterity with his uncle:

… it’s incredibly clear how much talent and stamina this man has. Meanwhile, his participation in a lengthy roller skate obstacle race (which also involves landing on mattresses and being hosed down by fierce water spigots):

… had me wondering anew about the infinite creativity of competitive money-making ventures during the Depression (though who knows how realistic this is). The culminating fight sequence on the streets of Texas is also noteworthy for its carnival-like atmosphere and some genuine tension between Chan and his much bulkier competitors.

Note: The film is clearly set precisely in 1930, given that we see a movie poster for Morocco (1930) on the theater Chan enters into near the end.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Jackie Chan’s incredible moves
  • Jose Ferrer as Dominici
  • Lalo Schifrin’s score

Must See?
No, but it’s worth a look for its historical significance as Chan’s first American leading role.

Links: