Browsed by
Month: April 2022

Fires On the Plain (1959)

Fires On the Plain (1959)

“I was told to die, and I intend to.”

Synopsis:
A tuberculosis-ridden Japanese soldier (Eiji Funakoshi) rejected by both his platoon and the local hospital wanders the desolate plains of the Philippines near the end of World War II, attempting to survive.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cannibalism
  • Japanese Films
  • Kon Ichikawa Films
  • Soldiers
  • Survival
  • World War Two

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, this “shocking vision of war by Kon Ichikawa, adapted by his wife, Natto Wada, from Shohei Ooka’s novel,” is a “unique, unforgettable anti-war film,” focused on the “defeated, retreating Japanese” soldiers “scattered about” the island of Leyte (in the Philippines) who are “awaiting death from starvation, disease, the Americans, or Filipino guerillas who are lighting signal fires off in the wilderness.”

We follow the simple yet horrifying tale of a soldier (Funakoshi) who “wanders deliriously around the island, willing to kill for food, encountering depravity and madness everywhere he goes.”

As Peary writes, “The island becomes a graveyard, with the corpses of the invaders rotting in the mud” and “the survivors hav[ing] become ghouls, cannibalizing their fellow soldiers”: yet “our soldier is a lost soul — his rotting teeth prevent him from eating human meat, his tubercular condition prevents others from eating his flesh, so his misery will not end.”

Yes, this film is exactly as bleak as it sounds, with no reprieve other than glimpses of Funakoshi’s enduring humanity, and the beauty of cinematographer Setsuo Kobayahi’s landscapes.

Alongside Ichikawa’s earlier, more hopeful anti-war film Harp of Burma (1956), this film remains essential if brutal one-time viewing.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Eiji Funakoshi as Tamura
  • Setsuo Kobayashi’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a horrifying yet essential entry in Japanese cinema.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem

Links:

Porgy and Bess (1959)

Porgy and Bess (1959)

“Porgy’s my man now.”

Synopsis:
After her boyfriend Crown (Brock Cole) kills a man (Joel Fluellen) and flees, Cole’s girlfriend Bess (Dorothy Dandridge) seeks refuge with a disabled man named Porgy (Sidney Poitier) and the two begin a sweet new life together; but when Bess’s former drug dealer Sportin’ Life (Sammy Davis, Jr.) comes calling with the allure of heroin, Bess is torn between her two lives.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • African-Americans
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Dorothy Dandridge Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals
  • Otto Preminger Films
  • Sidney Poitier Films

Review:
This notorious “lost film” — directed by Otto Preminger, and based on the 1935 opera by George and Ira Gershwin and librettist DuBose Heyward — can still only be seen in an inferior bootleg version, which compromises one’s appreciation of the original widescreen Todd-AO cinematography but at least allows one to get a sense of the movie. A quick read about the film’s production history gives an indication of how many challenges there were, starting with Rouben Mamoulian (the original director) parting ways after a fire burned down all the sets and costumes, and the reluctance of many cast members to play roles that were considered somewhat demeaning. (Poitier, whose singing was dubbed, always hated his participation in this film, which surely didn’t help the case towards its restoration.)

As someone unfamiliar with the original story or opera (other than the classic tune “Summertime”), I was pleased to finally learn who these famous characters are, and to see how authentically kind Porgy is towards Bess (who comes across as a decidedly flawed but sympathetic drug addict trying to turn her life around). The storyline is depressing and somewhat statically filmed, so it’s the songs one waits for — and Sammy Davis Jr.’s rendition of “It Ain’t Necessarily So” is a particular highlight.

While this movie musical isn’t must-see viewing, it’s certainly of interest as a notorious “lost film”, and film fanatics may be curious to check it out simply given its history and top-name cast.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • (Presumably) the Todd-AO cinematography
  • The inimitable score

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended if you come across a copy — and it will be fun to see the restored version one day! Chosen for inclusion in the National Film Registry of the Library of Congress in 2011.

Links:

Tamango (1958)

Tamango (1958)

“We can be free if we stand together.”

Synopsis:
The captain (Curt Jurgens) of a Dutch slave ship headed to Cuba attempts to secure the loyalty of his mulatto mistress (Dorothy Dandridge) while tamping down a rebellion started by a determined slave named Tamango (Alex Cressan).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • At Sea
  • Curt Jurgens Films
  • Dorothy Dandridge Films
  • French Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Rebellion
  • Race Relations and Racism
  • Slavery

Review:
Blacklisted American director John Berry — who worked with John Garfield in his final film, He Ran All the Way (1951) — helmed this powerful and distinctive drama of rebellion on a slave ship. While the ship is Dutch and the language spoken French, it is easy enough to view this as a rare (singular?) attempt to portray the evils of American’s chattel slavery history in a way simply not covered by any others at the time. We see the wheels of the slave trade at each early stage, beginning with a trade of bodies for guns:

… and moving swiftly into the specifics of the conditions endured by the able-bodied men and women who were crammed into a ship, shackled while being fed and “exercised” just enough to keep them healthy and alive. Within 12 minutes, we see the title protagonist (real-life medical student Cressan in his only acting role) fomenting rebellion:

… and veteran slave trader Jurgens ready to respond to each and every attempt with seasoned aplomb. Jurgens’ Achilles’ heel is beautiful Aiché (Dandridge), who evolves over the course of the film from a mistress who warily accepts her role, to someone who recognizes that her freedom can never be won under the thumb of white slavers. In one of the film’s most powerful scenes, she tells Jurgens how she really feels about him after he supposedly writes a statement freeing her:

Refreshingly, the storyline — based on a short story by Prosper Mérimée — never goes in expected directions, always keeping the humanity of the shackled slaves at the forefront. This rarely-seen film remains well worth a look, both as a powerful drama and for its historical relevance (including inevitable controversy).

Note: Film fanatics will likely recognize Jean Servais — star of Rififi (1955) — as the ship’s doctor, charged with keeping the slaves reasonably healthy.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Alex Cressan as Tamango
  • Dorothy Dandridge as Aiche
  • Curt Jurgens as Captain Reinker
  • A distressingly realistic depiction of life onboard a slave ship

Must See?
Yes, for its historical relevance and as an overall powerful drama.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Defiant Ones, The (1958)

Defiant Ones, The (1958)

“You’re married to me alright, Joker — and here’s the ring!”

Synopsis:
When a black convict (Sidney Poitier) chained to a white convict (Tony Curtis) are accidentally freed from a prison truck, they attempt to make their way to freedom while navigating their own racial tensions with one another.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fugitives
  • Lon Chaney, Jr. Films
  • Race Relations and Racism
  • Sidney Poitier Films
  • Stanley Kramer Films
  • Tony Curtis Films

Review:
Stanley Kramer directed this racially charged “buddy film” about convicts on the run who learn to tolerate and even appreciate one another through their attempts to survive. It remains an effectively bold movie for its time, addressing racism head-on and not shying away from its toxic consequences. Sidney Poitier and Tony Curtis both deservedly earned nominations as Best Actor of the Year for their performances, presenting fully human, sympathetic protagonists who we gradually come to care about.

The shackled men’s initial escape from the prison truck — spurred on by one of the drivers being distracted by Poitier and Curtis tussling — leads to a series of adventures filled with physical challenges (most performed by the stars themselves):

… and plenty of random luck, including their encounter with a surprisingly compassionate neighbor (Lon Chaney, Jr.) who doesn’t want to see them lynched:

… and seeking refuge with a lonely single mom (Cara Williams) who has the hots for Curtis.

The screenplay cuts back and forth between the fugitives’ escape, and the posse that’s out to find them, led by a humanitarian sheriff (Theodore Bikel) and a stern police captain (Charles McGraw) who hold differing opinions on whether to use deadly dogs as part of their hunt.

While this is very much a “message film” about racism, it’s effectively filmed, well-acted, and represents an important historical shift in roles for black characters; as such, it’s must-see viewing.

Note: Watch for a supporting role by former “Little Rascals” star Carl ‘Alfalfa’ Switzer [see center figure] as a member of the citizen posse:

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Fine performances by the leads
  • Sam Leavitt’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful and historically relevant film. Listed as a film with Historical Relevance in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Good Show

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Hanging Tree, The (1959)

Hanging Tree, The (1959)

“If you ain’t the devil, well, he’s sure sitting on your shoulder.”

Synopsis:
In a Montana gold mining town, a doctor (Gary Cooper) with a mysterious past cares for a young criminal (Ben Piazza) who has been shot by a local miner named Frenchy (Karl Malden) for attempting to steal gold from a sluice. Soon Rune (Piazza) is working for Dr. Frail (Cooper) as his servant, and the pair help heal a young Swiss woman (Maria Schell) who was stranded and blinded by the sun after a hold-up of her carriage.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Delmer Daves Films
  • Doctors and Nurses
  • Gary Cooper Films
  • George C. Scott Films
  • Gold Seekers
  • Karl Malden Films
  • Maria Schell Films
  • Westerns

Review:
Western fiction writer Dorothy Johnson crafted three stories that were eventually turned into GFTFF-listed films: A Man Called Horse (1970), The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962), and this refreshingly female-centric tale, scripted by Wendell Mayes and Halsted Welles and helmed by Delmer Daves (with a bit of directing support from cast member Karl Malden when Daves fell ill). Schell delivers a dynamic performance as a character whose unexpected presence upends the entire town:

(Props to the make-up crew for such realistic work on portraying her life-threatening injuries). This was Cooper’s final western, and he does a fine job playing a morally ambiguous, complex protagonist:

Meanwhile, Malden is suitably repulsive as a miner with nothing but selfish intents:

… and George C. Scott has a brief but memorable screen debut as a faith healer with deep animosity towards Doc Frail:

Also noteworthy is beautiful cinematography (much shot on-location near Yakima, Washington) by Ted D. McCord, with excellent use made of wide open spaces.

This unusual western remains worth a look.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Maria Schell as Elizabeth Mahler
  • Gary Cooper as Doc Frail
  • Karl Malden as Frenchy
  • An effective portrayal of a hard-scrabble mining town
  • Fine cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a unique western with a fine central performance by Schell.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Gunfight at the O.K. Corral (1957)

Gunfight at the O.K. Corral (1957)

“We’re not going to start a life together with a gun in your hand.”

Synopsis:
Famed sheriff Wyatt Earp (Burt Lancaster) — who falls in love with a beautiful gambler (Rhonda Fleming) — seeks help from his consumptive friend Doc Holliday (Kirk Douglas) in a shootout taking place in Tombstone, Arizona.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Burt Lancaster Films
  • Dennis Hopper Films
  • John Ireland Films
  • John Sturges Films
  • Kirk Douglas Films
  • Lee Van Cleef Films
  • Sheriffs and Marshals
  • Westerns

Review:
John Sturges directed and novelist Leon Uris wrote the screenplay for this fictionalized cinematic rendering of an oft-filmed event in American history. It’s a nicely shot western, with beautiful cinematography by Charles Lang and a standout performance by Jo Van Fleet as Doc Holliday’s boozy girlfriend:

Unfortunately, the rest of the storyline — overlong at 2+ hours — isn’t all that distinctive. While Lancaster and Douglas are believable as stoically loyal pals:

… Rhonda Fleming’s role as Lancaster’s love-interest isn’t well fleshed out:

… and we don’t get a strong sense of why so much tension has built between the Earps and the Clantons. Meanwhile, the title song as sung by Frankie Laine is simply an earworm (be forewarned).

Note: Watch for young Dennis Hopper as Billy Clanton.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Charles Lang’s cinematography
  • Jo Van Fleet as Kate
  • The exciting shootout sequence

Must See?
No, though western fans will likely be curious to check it out.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Throne of Blood (1957)

Throne of Blood (1957)

“This is a wicked world. To save yourself you often first must kill.”

Synopsis:
On their way home from an invasion, two loyal samurai — Taketori Washizu (Toshiro Mifune) and Yoshiteru Miki (Akira Kubo) — are told by a mysterious forest spirit (Chieko Naniwa) that they will become inheritors of their lord’s castle. When Washizu’s status-hungry wife (Isuzu Yamada) hears this news, she poisons two guards and sets in motion a bloody rampage of killings and treachery.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Akira Kurosawa Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Japanese Films
  • Royalty and Nobility
  • Samurai
  • Shakespeare
  • Toshiro Mifune Films

Review:
Akira Kurosawa had purportedly wanted to make an adaptation of Shakespeare’s Macbeth for awhile, but delayed this production given the release of Orson Welles’ adaptation in 1948. This highly stylized iteration (incorporating elements of Noh drama) succeeds on its own merits, transplanting Shakespeare’s play from Scotland to feudal Japan, retaining none of Shakespeare’s original text, and replacing the three witches with a forest spirit:

Indeed, as described by film scholar Stephen Prince in his essay for Criterion Collections:

Kurosawa’s movie is a brilliant synthesis of diverse cultural, aesthetic, and historical sources, only one skein of which derives from Shakespeare… Kurosawa often turned to foreign literary works for his films, but in all cases, the result was a transposition of the source rather than anything as straightforward as an adaptation. His appropriations of Shakespeare… were acts more of historiography than of analysis, and descriptions of the films as adaptations minimize the true nature of what Kurosawa accomplished. In Throne of Blood, with his keenly developed sense of Japanese history, he found a kind of mirror universe in the period of turmoil, treachery, and succession battles that Shakespeare wrote about in Macbeth.

Prince goes on to describe Japan’s Sengoku period (1467-1615), “which was marked by internecine conflicts among rival clans, the absence of a central political power, and the kind of treachery, prevarication, and murder that Kurosawa dramatizes” in this film — thus assuring us that the events displayed are entirely authentic to the setting. (It seems, sadly, that war and paranoid power grabs are both universal and timeless among humanity.)

In terms of parallels between the two tales, Washizu’s wife (stoic Yamada) is just as cruelly ambitious and neurotically guilty as Lady Macbeth, attempting in vain to cleanse her hands of the blood she’s caused to spill:

… and while Washizu himself suffers a different type of final blow than Macbeth, it is most definitely fatal (and oh-so-dramatic to watch on-screen).

This atmospheric film remains among Kurosawa’s best, and should be seen at least once by all film fanatics.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Toshiro Mifune as Taketori Washizu
  • Atmospheric cinematography and sets
  • Eiji Tsuburaya’s special effects

Must See?
Yes, as another masterful outing by Kurosawa.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Black Orpheus (1959)

Black Orpheus (1959)

“True love? Is there such a thing?”

Synopsis:
A guitar-playing cable-car conductor (Bren Mello) engaged to a pushy flirt (Lourdes de Oliveira) falls in love with a naive young woman (Marpessa Dawn) who has fled to Rio after being chased by a figure clad as Death (Adhemar Ferreira da Silva).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Carnivals and Circuses
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals
  • South and Central American Films
  • Star-Crossed Lovers

Response to Peary s Review:
As Peary writes, this “popular Brazilian film by Marcel Camus” — which was the “Academy Award Winner for Best Foreign Film” — “updates [the] myth of Orpheus and Eurydice to modern Rio,” set during “carnival time” when “the city is festive and romantic.” He points out this is “one of the first films with black characters that was popular with American white audiences:”

… and that “females tend to like it better than males, perhaps because of [the] extensive dancing and music (indeed, the film is like an epic dance).” He notes it’s “an extremely colorful film, with emphasis on local customs and costumes” as well as “splendid photography by Jean Bourgoin [that] captures [the] glorious setting.”


What Peary’s review curiously neglects to mention is the justifiable controversy over how, as described in Movie Diva’s review, “Poverty was romanticized, with the squalid favelas (shanty towns) shown as picturesque neighborhoods:”

… “blessed with great views and colorful décor, filled with charming, carefree, sexually joyful people.” Indeed, this film — made through the gaze of a white (French) male director — is notable for opening up the world’s eyes and ears to the joys of Brazilian music and dance, but at the cost of authenticity. As such, it’s a decidedly mixed bag — but it remains worth a one-time look by film fanatics simply for its visual and aural beauty, and for its historical relevance.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Jean Bourgoin’s cinematography

  • Colorful sets and costumes

  • An incredible score by Luiz Bonfá and Antonio Carlos Jobim

Must See?
Yes, for its historical relevance.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Ballad of a Soldier (1959)

Ballad of a Soldier (1959)

“Instead of my decoration, could I go home to see my mother?”

Synopsis:
During World War II, a 19-year-old private (Volodya Ivashov) is given unprecedented leave to visit his mother (Antonina Maksimova) for two days, Along the way he helps a wounded soldier (Yevgeni Urbansky) return to his wife, and falls for a beautiful young woman (Zhanna Prokhorenko) stowing away on a train.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • First Love
  • Road Trips
  • Russian Films
  • Soldiers
  • World War II

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this Soviet-era film — made with “sensitive and warm” direction by Ukrainian Grigori Chukhrai — remains “one of our most powerful anti-war films, one that effectively conveys the suffering of the men and (especially) women who are separated when there is a call to arms.” (Sadly, this remains as true and current as ever in the very region of the world where this movie takes place.) He notes that “the storyline is simple” but by opening the film with narration informing us that Ivashov “was killed in battle during WWII” we view the events that occur through a different perspective.

Peary asserts that “critic Dwight MacDonald correctly criticized this film (in 1960) for making all Russian people and soldiers so lovable” — well, except for that fellow on the train who blackmails Ivashov out of a can of meat:

… but he believes that “the anti-war message is sincerely delivered, and the emphasis on the suffering of those whose husbands and sons are in combat seems correct.” Peary further points out that Chukhrai’s “depiction of women is admirable,” and that he “lovingly films Russia’s landscape and the lovely faces of his actors and actresses.”

I’m in overall agreement with Peary’s review of this simple but touching film, one which humanizes the enemy (Russians) and touches upon the universality of our needs and desires (family, love, connection). Along with The Cranes Are Flying (1957), it provides compelling evidence of a short-lived period of Soviet cinema when creative constraints were temporarily lifted, and remains well worth a look.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Atmospheric cinematography

  • Numerous memorable moments

Must See?
Yes, as a classic of post-war Soviet cinema.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Cranes Are Flying, The (1957)

Cranes Are Flying, The (1957)

“That’s what love is, my dear: a harmless mental illness.”

Synopsis:
During World War II, a young Russian (Tatyana Samoylova) is devastated to learn that her fiance (Aleksey Batalov) has enlisted as a soldier, and soon finds herself wooed by Batalov’s persuasive cousin (Vasiliy Merkurev).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Infidelity
  • Love Triangle
  • Russian Films
  • World War II

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary notes, this “touching love story set during WWII” features “an illuminating performance by Tatyana Samoylova… who looks like a cross between the young Vivien Leigh and Jennifer Jones.”

He writes that “we and Batalov’s superpatriotic doctor father [Vasiliy Merkurev] sympathize with Samoylova… because she is brave, tender (she works in a hospital), and — despite her marriage — waits obsessively for her lover’s return.” Peary describes this as “the first Russian film to play in the U.S. after a cultural-exchange agreement,” noting that “it suffers” (I disagree) “whenever propaganda sneaks in and characters are induced to forget personal tragedy and realize that their future happiness will result if they play a part in Russia’s cultivation.” He points out several “powerful scenes,” including “Samoylova running up the stairs of her burning building and discovering that her apartment no longer exists”:

… “Batalov being shot, looking up into the birches and fantasizing his return to Samoilova and their marriage”:

… and “the terrifying seduction [rape] scene during which bombs explode, glass shatters, and wind blows.”

Other memorable scenes include early moments between the carefree young lovers:

… and two masterfully shot tracking sequences showing soldiers and their loved ones during departures and arrivals:

As Peary writes, the “direction by Mikhail Kalatozov is emotionally charged and visually innovative,” making this a consistently engaging Soviet-era film that is still very much worth viewing.

Notable Performances, Qualities, and Moments:

  • Tatyana Samoylova as Veronika
  • Atmospheric cinematography and overall camerawork

Must See?
Yes, as a fine post-WWII Soviet-era film.

Categories

  • Foreign Gem
  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links: