Browsed by
Month: February 2012

Tillie’s Punctured Romance (1914)

Tillie’s Punctured Romance (1914)

“The death of Mr. Banks leaves his niece Tillie the sole heir.”

Synopsis:
A con-artist (Charlie Chaplin) convinces a farmer’s daughter (Marie Dressler) to elope with him to the city after stealing her father’s stash of money. Once there, he quickly takes up with his former flame (Mabel Normand), but shifts his allegiances once again when he hears that Tillie (Dressler) has inherited a million dollars from her deceased uncle.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Charlie Chaplin Films
  • Comedy
  • Con-Artists
  • Inheritance
  • Marie Dressler Films

Review:
Directed by Mack Sennett, this early Charlie Chaplin/Marie Dressler vehicle is notable as the first feature-length comedy film, and as such will be of at least passing interest to film fanatics. Unfortunately, the movie itself is little more than an extended slapstick scenario, with Chaplin’s “Little Punk” doing whatever it takes to milk poor Dressler of her familial funds, overweight Dressler mugging like crazy for the camera, and Mabel Normand having fun playing Chaplin’s no-good sidekick (watch for an interesting scene in which she and Chaplin watch a silent film about cons like themselves). Given that Peary doesn’t list short films in his book, it’s a bonus as well to see the Keystone Kops showing up near the end of the story; regardless of how much one actually enjoys their antics, film fanatics should at least be familiar with their schtick.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • An early glimpse at several silent screen icons

Must See?
Yes, but simply for its historical importance as the first feature-length comedy. Available for free viewing at www.archive.org.

Categories

Links:

Surrender (1927)

Surrender (1927)

“You seemed to like me when I wore a peasant’s garb. Is it my uniform that makes a difference?”

Synopsis:
The daughter (Mary Philbin) of a rabbi (Nigel De Brulier) is torn between her attraction to a Russian Cossack (Ivan Mozzhukhin) and her revulsion towards him once he invades her village.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Jews
  • Play Adaptation
  • Silent Films

Review:
Based on a 1915 Hungarian play by Alexander Brody, this obscure movie by silent film director Edward Sloman remains one of the few early Hollywood portrayals of European Jewish village life, and as such will be of minor interest to film fanatics; unfortunately, however, the storyline itself leaves much to be desired. It tells the tragic tale of an arrogant but handsome Cossack (Mozzhukhin) who meets a beautiful Jewish girl (Philbin) in a meadow one day, flirts with her, and quarrels with her protective father (De Brulier). Upon leading an invasion of Philbin’s village, Mozzhukhin spies De Brulier (who has hidden Philbin in the sacred cabinet where his Torah is kept) and the two quickly enter into a battle of wills. When Mozzhukhin asserts that Philbin’s affections will be the price for not only the life of her fiancee (Otto Matieson) but her entire village, we wonder what kind of choice she will make — but the denouement eventually devolves into a completely unrealistic situation between Mozzhukhin and Philbin, and the film’s coda is even less convincingly handled. Nonetheless, this one does remain worth a look simply for its fascinating glimpse at life for early-20th-century European Jews.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • An interesting and respectful look at traditional Jewish village life

  • Fine cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look if you’re curious. Listed as a Sleeper in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Seven Chances (1925)

Seven Chances (1925)

“I don’t want the money; it has already cost me the only girl I ever loved.”

Synopsis:
When a financially strapped young businessman (Buster Keaton) and his partner (T. Roy Barnes) learn from a solicitor (Snitz Edwards) that Keaton will inherit seven million dollars from his deceased relative if he marries that evening by 7:00, Keaton immediately proposes to his girlfriend (Ruth Dwyer), but accidentally offends her, and must search elsewhere for a bride when she turns him down.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Buster Keaton Films
  • Comedy
  • Inheritance
  • Silent Films

Review:
The premise of this Buster Keaton comedy is both inspired and infuriating, the latter due to the lead character’s frustrating passivity, as well an overall sense that the entire situation could have easily been handled in a much more “rational” manner (but then, of course, there would be no comedy). With that enormous caveat stated, however, I’ll concede that there’s much comedic brilliance here to enjoy: Keaton is at the top of his game visually, and the entire affair becomes increasingly surreal on every count (which is perhaps how the film should be viewed). The image of thousands of would-be brides descending on our hapless protagonist is one that will surely linger in your memory (especially if you begin to wonder about the life story behind each of those hard-worn faces…), and Keaton’s final race to make it back home to his beloved will have you scratching your head at the diversity of the geological path he takes.

Note: My reaction to this film reminds me of how I felt while watching Brewster’s Millions (1945), where the exhaustion of watching a financially-loaded time-bomb situation play out had me unexpectedly in knots.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • A clever (if mildly infuriating) premise

  • Some fine visual gags
  • The inspired “avalanche ending”

Must See?
No, though it’s strongly recommended for its final third. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Cameraman, The (1928)

Cameraman, The (1928)

“Don’t be discouraged. No one would ever amount to anything if he didn’t try.”

Synopsis:
A would-be news cameraman (Buster Keaton) tries to break into the business with the assistance of a pretty MGM secretary (Marceline Day) who gives him tips on which events to cover.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Buster Keaton Films
  • Comedy
  • Movie Directors
  • Silent Films

Review:
Buster Keaton’s first film made for MGM Studios (before the imminent demise of his illustrious career) was this simple yet enjoyable tale of a photographer desperate to gain work as a newsreel director — in large part to impress a sweet girl he’s fallen head-over-heels in love with. Despite fairly severe creative constraints imposed by MGM, Keaton (directed by Edward Sedgwick) manages to make the most of this slight storyline: the largely-improvised dressing room scuffle is truly inspired, and the ending is surprisingly satisfactory. While Keaton made many masterful movies — and film fanatics shouldn’t feel obligated to see all of them — I do recommend this one as “must-see” simply given the intrinsic interest of its subject matter.

Note: MGM apparently referred to this film for years as a “perfect comedy”, and showed it to all its directors and producers to learn from.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • A sweet would-be romance between Keaton and Day
  • Fine slapstick by Keaton
  • Interesting historical footage of early Chinatown

Must See?
Yes, as one of Keaton’s most enjoyable (and cinematically relevant) outings. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book. Selected for the National Film Registry in 2005.

Categories

  • Good Show

Links:

Flesh and the Devil (1926)

Flesh and the Devil (1926)

“My boy, when the devil cannot reach us through the spirit, he creates a woman beautiful enough to reach us through the flesh.”

Synopsis:
A soldier (John Gilbert) on leave from military training falls in love with a beautiful woman (Greta Garbo) who fails to tell him she’s already married; after killing her husband (Marc McDermott) in a duel, Gilbert leaves for overseas service, asking his lifelong friend (Lars Hanson) to look out for Garbo — with unexpectedly heartbreaking effects.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Clarence Brown Films
  • Friendship
  • Greta Garbo Films
  • John Gilbert Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Silent Films

Review:
Directed by Clarence Brown, this historical onscreen pairing of Greta Garbo and John Gilbert (their first) is notable as the film which brought Garbo to stardom. Garbo plays a seductive temptress who wreaks havoc on the lifelong friendship between Gilbert and Hanson; unfortunately, other than one potent scene hinting at more complexity with her mysterious character (as she looks at herself vainly in the mirror while trying on widows’ veils), we don’t learn enough about her to really understand her motivations. The primary draw of this disappointingly scripted film is William Daniels’ luminous cinematography, which is consistently a treat to behold, and certainly contributed to Garbo’s imminent cinematic mystique.

Note: It’s difficult to ignore the homoerotic tensions between Gilbert and Hanson, who are often pictured as remarkably physically intimate.

Their blood-brothers friendship ultimately drives the entire narrative, and is the most intriguing (if underdeveloped) aspect of the script.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Genuine chemistry between Garbo and Gilbert
  • The creatively filmed duel
  • Fine, atmospheric cinematography by William Daniels

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look simply for its historical relevance as the first of Garbo’s four pairings with Gilbert, and as the film which brought Garbo to stardom. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book. Added to the National Film Registry in 2006.

Links:

Young Sherlock Holmes (1985)

Young Sherlock Holmes (1985)

“I suspect foul play.”

Synopsis:
Young John Watson (Alan Cox) meets Sherlock Holmes (Nicholas Rowe) at boarding school, and proceeds to help him solve a series of mysteries involving hallucinogenic-inspired suicides.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Barry Levinson Films
  • Cults
  • Detectives and Private Eyes
  • Historical Drama
  • Murder Mystery
  • Sherlock Holmes Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary notes that the primary problem of this “amiable if weakly written tale” (produced by Steven Spielberg, and scripted by Christopher Columbus) about “teenage Holmes… solving his first mystery” is that “it will take viewers about half the time it takes Holmes to figure out [the] whodunit”, thus leaving us “not overly impressed with his detective work”. He argues that “the opening scenes are the best, not only because [director Barry] Levinson provides some authentic Victorian flavor when filming snowy London or the school campus, but because we can see hints of the adult Holmes in the inquisitive, cocky, maturing teenager”.

However, he points out that “later the familiar overblown Spielberg adventure spectacle [taking place at] the Egyptian temple with bald, diabolical priests involved in a sacrificial ritual… replaces mystery-solving and our hero could be any indomitable Spielberg teenager, rather than a detective extraordinaire”.

This is all true, and yet I’ll admit to an overall fondness for this finely produced, creative imagining of Holmes and Watson befriending each other years before their “actual” first encounter as adults (per Doyle’s original stories).

Things start off with a bang, as we witness a series of truly gruesome hallucinogenic fits (courtesy of “excellent special effects by [George Lucas’s] Industrial Light and Magic”]:

and are introduced to both Watson and Holmes (who are “well cast and play… well together”).

An early scene in which Holmes’s schoolmate-nemesis (Earl Rhodes) challenges Holmes to find a hidden vase on campus within an hour provides plenty of evidence of Holmes’ brilliant deductive capacities, and several interactions between Holmes and his fencing instructor (Anthony Higgins) show us his capabilities as a fast-thinking combatant.

It’s true that later events take quite the Indiana Jones-inspired turn, but these sequences are creepily conceived and finely mounted, and I was willing to go along for the ride. While it’s certainly not “must see”, I’d recommend this one as worth a once-look.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • The incredibly animated (by Industrial Light and Magic) hallucinations
  • Fine period production design
  • Atmospheric cinematography

Must See?
No, though it’s recommended for Holmes fans.

Links:

Tramp, Tramp, Tramp (1926)

Tramp, Tramp, Tramp (1926)

“I’ll get the money in three months if it takes a year.”

Synopsis:
The son (Harry Langdon) of a struggling shoemaker (Alec B. Francis) enters a cross-country walking race hosted by a big-name shoe manufacturer (Edwards Davis), hoping to win the prize money as well as the heart of Davis’s daughter (Joan Crawford).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Comedy
  • Harry Langdon Films
  • Joan Crawford Films
  • Silent Films

Review:
It’s been widely noted that many of the sight gags in Harry Langdon’s feature debut film are reminiscent of those in movies by his comedic peers (Harold Lloyd, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton), making this an inauspicious beginning to his all-too-brief stint in the cinematic limelight. Nonetheless, Langdon’s uniquely hapless persona lends itself well to the series of mishaps he encounters while on his cross-country journey to California: when he finds himself hanging precariously over a deep precipice, for instance, we know that the only way he’ll get out of his dilemma is — despite his best (counterproductive) efforts — through sheer, dumb luck. My favorite scene is an early one, when Langdon meets the love of his life (Crawford) in person for the first time, and doesn’t quite know what to do with himself. Watch for the creepy final scene, in which Langdon is allowed to make explicit fun of his “baby-face” image.

Note: Tramp, Tramp, Tramp is noteworthy for providing Joan Crawford with one of her earliest significant roles; fun use is made of her soon-to-be larger-than-life persona through her presence in a series of posters.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Langdon’s “meet-cute” with Crawford
  • Several amusing sight gags


Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look simply as Langdon’s first feature film.

Links:

Seven-Per-Cent Solution, The (1976)

Seven-Per-Cent Solution, The (1976)

“I am on the case, and you have placed me there: now you must be good enough to follow my instructions.”

Synopsis:
Dr. Watson (Robert Duvall) tricks Sherlock Holmes (Nicol Williamson) into traveling to Vienna to visit Dr. Freud (Alan Arkin), in hopes of encouraging him to cure his cocaine addiction. Once there, Holmes temporarily forgets his obsession with his arch-enemy Moriarty (Laurence Olivier) by assisting with a case involving a beautiful, drug-addicted singer (Vanessa Redgrave).

Genres:

  • Alan Arkin Films
  • Alcoholism and Drug Addiction
  • Detectives and Private Eyes
  • Herbert Ross Films
  • Laurence Olivier Films
  • Robert Duvall Films
  • Samantha Eggar Films
  • Sherlock Holmes Films
  • Vanessa Redgrave Films

Review:
Critical opinions are highly mixed about this Oscar-nominated adaptation of Nicholas Meyer’s best-selling novel (scripted by Meyer himself), which fancifully explores the consequences of Sherlock Holmes seeking help for his deep-seated cocaine addiction from Sigmund Freud. It’s a clever conceit, and works wonderfully well — at least until the screenplay suddenly shifts (in its final 45 minutes) to an outlandish cross-country chase, which many (myself included) agree is an inappropriate tonal direction for the story to take. Regardless, there’s plenty in this lushly produced movie for both film fanatics and Holmes fans to enjoy, starting with fine performances by the lead actors — most notably Nicol Williamson as Holmes himself. Williamson was better known on stage than on-screen, but his invigorating performance here makes one wish he’d been given more leading cinematic roles. Duvall is appropriately stalwart and loyal as Dr. Watson, and Arkin imbues Freud with just the right amount of self-confidence and quiet brilliance to be convincing. Holmes and Freud are indeed — as imagined here by Meyer — a perfectly matched pair of deductive minds; it’s refreshing to see Holmes humbled just enough to receive help in solving his lifelong neurotic antipathy towards Moriarty.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Nicol Williamson as Sherlock Holmes
  • Robert Duvall as Dr. Watson
  • Alan Arkin as Dr. Freud
  • Wonderful period sets

Must See?
No, but it’s highly recommended, and a must for Holmes fans.

Links:

Long Pants (1927)

Long Pants (1927)

“Don’t worry, mother — those pants will never go to his head!”

Synopsis:
A young man (Harry Langdon) who has just been given his first pair of “long pants” fancies himself engaged to a vampish conwoman (Alma Bennett); after cruelly abandoning his local sweetheart (Priscilla Bonner) on their wedding day, he plots to help Bennett escape from prison.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Comedy
  • Coming-of-Age
  • Frank Capra Films
  • Harry Langdon Films
  • Silent Films

Review:
Harry Langdon’s second film with director Frank Capra (after The Strong Man) is a sadly unsavory affair. One watches with the intention of simply enjoying baby-faced Langdon’s skillful slapstick maneuvers, but a central plot element — his desire to kill his fiancee (Bonner) after stupidly falling for a passing vamp — undoes whatever potential for humor the story may have had. Yes, Langdon’s characters were notoriously “dumb”, and this is what we’re supposed to have fun with — but homicidal? No, it just doesn’t fly. There are a couple of reasonably enjoyable comedic sequences (most notably one involving Langdon’s persistent attempt to convince a policeman-like ventriloquist’s dummy to come to his assistance), but overall, this one’s a dud.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Some amusing slapstick sequences

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see for Langdon fans. Listed as a film with Historical Importance (I’m not sure why) and a Personal Recommendation (really??) in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Strong Man, The (1926)

Strong Man, The (1926)

“Once there was a plain little girl who dared to love a brave, handsome soldier. But when he wrote that he was coming to America, she stopped writing and hid — for she had never told him she was blind.”

Synopsis:
After the end of World War I, a Belgian soldier (Harry Langdon) captured by a German enemy (Arthur Thalasso) is brought to America to perform as a sidekick in Thalasso’s strong man circus act. Once there, he seeks out a beautiful woman (Priscilla Bonner) who was once his penpal, not realizing she’s kept away from him because she’s blind.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Blindness
  • Comedy
  • Frank Capra Films<
  • Harry Langdon Films
  • Immigrants and Immigration
  • Morality Police
  • Silent Films

Review:
Although he’s less well-known than Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, or Harold Lloyd, baby-faced Harry Langdon is considered one of the key players from the silent comedy era. TCM provides the following overview of his screen persona:

“His childlike face covered by traditional pantomime white make-up, he wore a tightly buttoned jacket as though he were a boy who had outgrown it. Juvenile in appearance, he played the bewildered, clumsy, wide-eyed simpleton out of step with the behavior of normal adults, eerily baffled by erotic situations and naively trusting in the world’s goodness.”

The Strong Man (also notable as Frank Capra’s feature-length directorial debut) is cited by many as Langdon’s best film, and it is indeed an enjoyable affair. The most amusing sequence occurs just after Langdon’s character has arrived in America, as he’s looking for his long-lost penpal (“Mary Brown”) and meets up with a con-artist (Gertrude Astor) who has slipped a wad of money into his pants to elude the police. Astor tells the naive Langdon she’s “Little Mary”, and the two head off (in wonderfully forthright pre-Code manner) to her apartment. Their perfectly timed slapstick interactions together — as Astor does whatever it takes to try to slip the cash out of Langdon’s pants, and Langdon misinterprets her actions as lustful pursuit — are simply classic.

The remainder of the storyline is a tad schmaltzy (Capra’s “touch” is already evident), as Langdon romances the impossibly sweet Brown, and learns that Brown’s preacher-father (William V. Mong) is leading a gang of righteous townsfolk in a crusade against the evil bootleggers who have taken over their performing hall. But throughout this narrative, Langdon is given plenty of opportunities to show off his slapstick genius; fans won’t be disappointed in the slightest, and those just discovering his work will be glad for this fine introduction.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Harry Langdon at his inimitable best
  • The entire hilarious sequence with Astor

Must See?
Yes, for its historical relevance as Langdon’s best film. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links: