Browsed by
Category: Response Reviews

My comments on Peary’s reviews in Guide for the Film Fanatic (Simon & Schuster, 1986).

Wrong Box, The (1966)

Wrong Box, The (1966)

“Thank you for pointing out to me how obscene eggs are.”

Synopsis:
As the members of a group investment scheme gradually die off, two elderly brothers — Masterman (John Mills) and Joseph (Ralph Richardson) Finsbury — find themselves last in line to inherit the money. Mills, concerned about the well-being of his soft-spoken nephew (Michael Caine), intends to kill off his brother so that the money will be Caine’s; meanwhile, enroute to visit their “dying” uncle (Mills), Richardson’s two scheming nephews (Peter Cook and Dudley Moore) mistakenly believe Richardson has died in a train wreck, and seek the help of an unscrupulous doctor (Peter Sellers) in falsifying the date on his death certificate.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Black Comedy
  • Bryan Forbes Films
  • Death and Dying
  • Dudley Moore Films
  • Inheritance
  • John Mills Films
  • Michael Caine Films
  • Mistaken Identities
  • Peter Sellers Films
  • Ralph Richardson Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that while the “actors are funny [and] the lines are funny”, this “once-popular black comedy” — based on a novel by Robert Louis Stevenson and Lloyd Osborne, about an outdated inheritance scheme known as a “tontine” — “isn’t funny”. He accurately points out that “director Bryan Forbes has no sense of comedy pacing”, and that the “picture has no snap”, instead going “on and on without hitting any comedy peaks”. Indeed, in comparison with a comedic gem like Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949) — which the opening scenes here weakly attempt to emulate — The Wrong Box is positively a dud. I disagree with Peary that the “lines are funny”; indeed, I found myself disappointed again and again by the inanity of both the dialogue and the scenarios. For instance, in a scene involving a group of female Salvation Army soldiers, a character cries out “Mercy!”, at which point one of the soldiers steps forth as though called by name, saying, “Yes?” (Thud.) There’s simply no humor in an interaction like this.

Ultimately, Forbes tries too hard, pulling out every trick in the book — including weirdly unnecessary inter-titles, a bit of slow-motion, and tricky editing — in an attempt to bring the material to life. Meanwhile, the majority of the characters come across as either insipid (i.e., Michael Caine and his would-be lover, played by Nanette Newman, whose entire romance seems pointless to the plot) or evil, leaving precious few folks left to root for or enjoy. Exceptions include Richardson’s wickedly droll turn as a polymath professor who simply won’t shut up; Wilfrid Lawson as an inconceivably decrepit butler; and Peter Sellers in a scene-stealing performance as an outrageously corrupt doctor. While I agree with Peary that (many of) the actors do a fine job, their efforts are ultimately wasted in a vehicle that doesn’t do them or the premise justice.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Peter Sellers as Dr. Pratt
  • Ralph Richardson as Joseph Finsbury
  • Peter Cook as Morris Finsbury
  • Wilfrid Lawson as Peacock the butler
  • Fine period sets and costumes
  • John Barry’s score

Must See?
No; this one is a disappointment.

Links:

Beach Party (1963)

Beach Party (1963)

“Bring me my pendulum, kiddies — I feel like swinging!”

Synopsis:
An anthropology professor (Robert Cummings) spying on a group of bikini-clad teenagers decides to “gain access” to their clique by befriending a young woman (Annette Funicello) whose commitment-phobic surfer-boyfriend (Frankie Avalon) has started flirting with a busty blonde (Eva Six).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dorothy Malone Films
  • Generation Gap
  • Jealousy
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals
  • Robert Cummings Films
  • Scientists
  • Teenagers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary opens his review of this “first of AIP’s successful Frankie Avalon-Annette Funicello beach series” by noting that viewers of-a-certain-age watching the opening scene — with “the stars riding along, top down, singing the title song” — will “flash back to when [they] once had a crush on one of the two wholesome stars, or feel nostalgic because [they] used to watch these films at the drive-in and actually enjoy them”.

With that caveat out of the way, he quickly concedes that “the picture goes downhill when nostalgia gives way to annoyance at the stupidity of the characters Avalon and Funicello play”, not to mention the fact that “all the teens in the film have IQs lower than their ages”. He argues that at least the “campy film… pokes fun at itself” — though this is small solace for the drivel one has to sit through in the meantime. Having now viewed all three of the “Beach Party” flicks recommended in Peary’s book — this one, Beach Blanket Bingo (1965), and How to Stuff a Wild Bikini (1965) — I can safely say that seeing one will suffice to give film fanatics a sense of the genre; it might as well be this inaugural entry, and then ffs can consider themselves done unless otherwise compelled.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Dick Dale and the Del Tones’ performance

Must See?
Yes, but ONLY to have seen one entry in the infamously popular “Beach Party” franchise.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

Little Colonel, The (1935)

Little Colonel, The (1935)

“Papa Jack is sick — and those two men might hurt him!”

Synopsis:
A crusty former Confederate colonel (Lionel Barrymore) disowns his daughter (Evelyn Venable) when she marries a Yankee (John Lodge) — but his heart is slowly melted when he meets his six-year-old granddaughter (Shirley Temple), whose quick temper bears an uncanny resemblance to his own.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Historical Drama
  • Lionel Barrymore Films
  • Peacemakers
  • Shirley Temple Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that this postbellum tale of a “stubborn and quick-tempered” young girl who “pleads with [her grandfather] to save her parents from thieves who are trying to steal a valuable land deed” remains an “enjoyable Temple vehicle, with some nice interplay between her and Barrymore… and some nifty dancing by Temple and Bill ‘Bojangles’ Robinson”. Indeed, Temple’s staircase dance with Robinson (preceded by Robinson’s solo, one he had perfected for years) remains a true highlight — not just of this film but of cinematic dance performances in general — and shouldn’t be missed. However, given the current possibility to watch isolated musical numbers through venues such as YouTube, film fanatics shouldn’t feel compelled to watch the entire movie, given that I just voted The Littlest Rebel (1935) as film fanatics’ “go to” Temple vehicle, and The Little Colonel essentially offers more of the same — with the critical difference that Temple’s character here isn’t all sugar-and-spice. To that end, Temple does hold her own admirably against Barrymore (perfectly cast), and Peary’s right to note that their “war game with toy soldiers is a highlight” of the screenplay. The rest of the storyline, however, is pure melodrama, and not really noteworthy in any way.

Note: Listen for a sly exchange between Temple and Hattie McDaniel (as “Mom Beck”), when McDaniel comments on Temple’s penchant for wanting “blue stories”.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Stellar dancing by Temple and Robinson

Must See?
No, though all film fanatics should immediately check out the staircase dancing sequence on YouTube, if they haven’t already seen it.

Links:

Littlest Rebel, The (1935)

Littlest Rebel, The (1935)

“Uncle Billy can do anything! He can sing and dance and climb trees, and do everything in the world — I know he can bring Daddy back!”

Synopsis:
When a Confederate officer (John Boles) sneaks back to his plantation to visit his daughter (Shirley Temple) and dying wife (Karen Morley), he’s arrested by a Yankee colonel (John Holt), who — thanks to Temple’s charm — takes pity on him and helps him try to escape.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Civil War
  • Fugitives
  • Historical Drama
  • Karen Morley Films
  • Plantations
  • Shirley Temple Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary accurately notes that Depression-era child star Shirley Temple is “in peak form as a charming little Southern girl” in this “enjoyable film” (directed by David Butler), “with the very self-assured, likable Temple displaying amazing acting and dancing talents”. He points out that “her cheerful tap routines with [Bill ‘Bojangles’] Robinson” — a.k.a. “Uncle Billy” — are “classics”, and that Temple’s “love and respect for her black ‘uncle’ are touching”. He acknowledges, however, that it would be “hard to accept” that the slaves on Temple’s plantation “seem so happy” if “Boles and Morley weren’t so nice”; indeed, modern viewers will likely be greatly disturbed by the film’s decidedly patronizing attitude towards slavery, one which portrays loyal Robinson as an endless source of avuncular kindness rather than someone who might be interested in escaping to his freedom. Regardless, The Littlest Rebel remains a classic Temple vehicle, not least because of the undeniable chemistry she and Robinson possess together; it thus earns my vote as the movie film fanatics should consider watching if they want to get a taste of what Temple’s phenomenal fame was all about. Watch for the “delightful” (if utterly unrealistic) “scene in which Temple asks President Lincoln (Frank McGlynn, Sr., in a fine bit)” for a special favor.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Shirley Temple as Virgie
  • Temple and Robinson’s magnificent dancing sequences

Must See?
Yes, as a representative Temple flick, and to see Robinson at his dancing finest.

Categories

  • Representative Film

Links:

Libeled Lady (1936)

Libeled Lady (1936)

“The things I do for that newspaper…”

Synopsis:
A dedicated newspaper editor (Spencer Tracy) puts his wedding on hold when he learns about a potential libel suit involving an heiress (Myrna Loy) falsely accused of being a “husband stealer”. Tracy hires his former colleague (William Powell) to temporarily wed his own fiancee (Jean Harlow), then romantically pursue Loy in an attempt to prove she really is guilty of husband-stealing — but naturally, romantic entanglements prove this process much more difficult than originally conceived.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Framed
  • Heiresses
  • Jean Harlow Films
  • Journalists
  • Myrna Loy Films
  • Spencer Tracy Films
  • William Powell Films

Review:
Peary argues that the “fast pacing, funny wisecracks by the dozens, and the sexual chemistry between the characters… make you overlook the confusing plot” of this “classic screwball comedy with a powerhouse cast” — but I disagree that the film is confusing in any way. While there are plenty of twists and turns in the plot (and in motivations of the characters), each one is simply a delicious new development in what amounts to an immensely clever script (by Maurine Dallas Watkins, Howard Emmett Rogers, and George Oppenheimer, based on a story by Wallace Sullivan). Peary points out that “highlights include the wedding scene, in which Harlow weakly kisses husband Powell and gives a heartfelt smooch to best man Tracy” and “charlatan Powell [proving] he wasn’t lying when he told Loy and her father (Walter Connolly) that he is a fisherman”.

Peary accurately notes that the film “is a particularly strong showcase for Harlow, whose character is sometimes tough, sometimes sentimental, sometimes infuriated, sometimes a good sport, always sexy, always funny”. He writes that he loves “her angry pout and how she huffs and puffs through a room with shoulders and legs working in unison”. In his Alternate Oscars, Peary votes Harlow Best Actress of the Year for her role here as Gladys, noting that Harlow “has never gotten enough praise” as “one of the great movie discoveries of the thirties”, and further pointing out how ably she “exchang[es] wisecracks with Powell and Tracy”. I agree, but also find the lead performances by Powell and Loy to be spot-on, with Loy a particular treat to watch as she demonstrates unexpected layers of complexity to her seemingly ice-cold heiress; her initial rebuffs towards overly-confident “ladies man” Powell are especially humorous.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Jean Harlow as Gladys
  • William Powell as Bill Chandler
  • Myrna Loy as Connie Allenbury

Must See?
Yes, as a delightful screwball comedy. Voted one of the Best Pictures of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Bells of St. Mary’s, The (1945)

Bells of St. Mary’s, The (1945)

“It looks like St. Mary’s is in a bad way.”

Synopsis:
When sent to help manage the inner city school of St. Mary’s, Father O’Malley (Bing Crosby) clashes on certain issues with the school’s director, Sister Benedict (Ingrid Bergman). However, they both want the best for their students, and work hard to convince a stingy local businessman (Henry Travers) to donate his new building to the school.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Bing Crosby Films
  • Ingrid Bergman Films
  • Leo McCarey Films
  • Nuns
  • Priests and Ministers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that while this “sentimental sequel” to Leo McCarey’s Going My Way (1944) “doesn’t reach the glorious heights of the original”, it “improves with repeated viewings and certainly deserves its status as a Christmas perennial.” He concedes that “the story is a bit flimsy, the con-man tactics of Crosby and Bergman are a bit disturbing, and there are a couple of ludicrous plot twists… that were designed solely to manipulate viewers into shedding tears” — but he posits that “the picture is ultimately heartwarming”, and that “the pairing of Crosby and Bergman works like a charm”.

The fact that this dated, overly sentimental film still remains of interest at all rests solely on the capable shoulders of Bergman, who, “more beautiful than ever — whether teaching a young boy to box or just reacting to good news from Crosby or Travers — is simply magnificent”. Her performance is head-and-shoulders above the material she’s given to work with, which unfortunately simply involves more of the cloying do-gooder vignettes evidenced in Going My Way. Here, Crosby and Bergman are committed (in different ways) to helping the teenage daughter (Joan Carroll) of a “single mother” (Martha Sleeper) whose musician-husband (William Gargan) walked out on them years earlier; will Crosby locate said “missing father”, and help facilitate an unrealistically happy reunion? What do you think? Meanwhile, the entire subplot revolving around Travers’ sudden change of heart simply defies belief. Regardless, film fanatics may want to check this one out once, simply for Bergman. She’s marvelous.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Ingrid Bergman as Sister Benedict

Must See?
No, though it’s worth a look for Bergman’s performance.

Links:

Roberta (1935)

Roberta (1935)

“John, everyday you act worse — but today you’re acting like tomorrow.”

Synopsis:
An American football player (Randolph Scott) visits his aunt (Helen Westley) at the Parisian design house she manages (known as “Roberta”), and begins to fall for her lovely young assistant (Irene Dunne); meanwhile his bandleader-friend (Astaire) meets up with his childhood sweetheart (Ginger Rogers), a singer posing as a Polish countess.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Irene Dunne Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals
  • Play Adaptations
  • Randolph Scott Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary accurately advises viewers to “forget the dull, convoluted Dunne-Scott plotline” of this “third Astaire-Rogers musical” — based on a Broadway play by Jerome Kern and Otto Harbach, which was itself based on a novel by Alice Duer Miller — and instead “watch [the] supporting players”. He argues that Astaire’s “Huck… is the least abrasive, most likable character he played in his films with Rogers”, and that “Rogers’s fake Polish countess… is refreshingly not deceitful or antagonistic”; he points out that “the two are actually playful and seem to be enjoying each other — even when they are not dancing”. He enumerates some of the film’s dancing/musical highlights, including their duet to “I’ll Be Hard to Handle” (“during which Rogers wears pants for the first time” — not something I would have really paid much attention to!), and their “magical reprise of ‘I Won’t Dance’, to which Astaire did a simply marvelous solo tap earlier”. Unfortunately, while there’s no arguing that the Astaire/Rogers dance scenes are quite enjoyable, the overlong movie spends far too much time with Scott (playing an annoying, incomprehensible character) and Dunne (whose operatic solos seem entirely out of place here).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Astaire and Rogers improv dancing to “I’ll Be Hard to Handle”
  • Astaire’s piano solo and dance to “I Won’t Dance”

  • Astaire and Rogers dancing to “Smoke Gets In Your Eyes”
  • Some lovely ’30s gowns (the feathery one below is showcased by none other than young RKO starlet Lucille Ball)

Must See?
No; despite some fun dance numbers, this one is only must-see for Astaire-Rogers completists.

Links:

Shall We Dance (1937)

Shall We Dance (1937)

“We’re about the only two people in the world who don’t think we’re married.”

Synopsis:
A ballet dancer (Fred Astaire) smitten with a popular musical comedy star (Ginger Rogers) pursues her onboard an ocean liner, where the pair are mistakenly identified as married.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dancers
  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Musicals

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary accurately notes that this seventh on-screen pairing of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers — featuring a “silly plot” about dancers “mistaken for marrieds” — is “not great, but… enjoyable”. Edward Everett Horton’s performance (as Astaire’s manager) almost satirically epitomizes the type of flustered character he became known for in the series, while Eric Blore has fun in a bit role as a moralistic hotel manager valiantly attempting to determine whether Astaire and Rogers really are married or not. The film’s highlights, naturally, are when Astaire and Rogers dance and/or sing “to the songs of George and Ira Gershwin”, including “‘They All Laughed’, ‘They Can’t Take That Away From Me’…, ‘Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off’ — during which Astaire and Rogers are on roller skates — and ‘Shall We Dance’.” Indeed, the score itself almost makes it must-see from a cultural perspective (though I suppose one could simply watch clips of each song or dance separately on YouTube). While it’s hard to choose, I’d say my all-time favorite of the bunch is Astaire’s solo dance to “Slap That Bass”, taking place in a boiler room; watching just a few seconds of rehearsal footage from this number made me appreciate all over again exactly how much of a joyfully limber-footed genius Astaire really was.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Creative opening titles
  • Astaire’s solo dance to “Slap That Bass”
  • Astaire and Rogers’ dance to (and duet of) “Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off”
  • Astaire crooning “They Can’t Take That Away From Me” to Rogers
  • Typically fine Art Deco sets by Van Nest Polglase
  • George and Ira Gershwin’s incomparable score

Must See?
No, though it’s definitely worth a look just for the songs and dances (naturally).

Links:

Carefree (1938)

Carefree (1938)

“She’s untapped… Why, she’s got everything wrong with her!”

Synopsis:
A man (Ralph Bellamy) experiencing troubles with his fiancee (Ginger Rogers) asks his psychiatrist-friend (Fred Astaire) to help Rogers overcome her reluctance to marry him. Soon, however, Rogers falls in love with Astaire, and he attempts to rectify the sticky situation through the use of hypnosis.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Jack Carson Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Mind Control and Hypnosis
  • Psychotherapy
  • Ralph Bellamy Films
  • Romantic Comedy

Response to Peary’s Review:
In his review of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers’ eighth onscreen pairing, Peary writes that they “somehow got stuck in [a] second-rate screwball comedy where songs and dances are an afterthought” (Irving Berlin’s score is merely serviceable), and accurately notes that “the storyline would be offensive if it weren’t so stupid”. Indeed, the entire love triangle premise — involving Rogers acting silly and reckless while under hypnosis, and changing allegiances back and forth between potential partners — is both tiresome and tasteless. Peary points out that while the “picture is brief”, it “seems to drag because there are only four dances”, and notes that the “musical highlight” of the film (a welcome relief!) is when Astaire and Rogers (both “in a cheery mood”) dance “The Yam” — which “becomes breathtaking as Astaire repeatedly puts a foot on a tabletop (several tables are used) and swings Rogers over his leg”. Given my full agreement with Peary’s review, I was astonished to find that Carefree seems to be highly regarded by just about every other critic, with the New York Times referring to it as “in excellent musical comedy taste”, DVD Savant labeling the script “exceptionally clever”, and Time Out relegating it simply to the ranks of “not quite as unrelievedly marvelous as the earlier films”. Apparently each film fanatic will have to decide for him/herself whether this one is a clunker or a worthy entry in Astaire and Rogers’ oeuvre.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Astaire’s golf club “dance”
  • Fred and Ginger doing “The Yam”

Must See?
No; in my opinion, this one is only must-see for diehard Astaire-and-Rogers completists.

Links:

Flying Down to Rio (1933)

Flying Down to Rio (1933)

“What have these South Americans got below the equator that we haven’t?”

Synopsis:
Flirtatious bandleader Roger Bond (Gene Raymond) falls in love with a beautiful Brazilian socialite named Belinha (Dolores Del Rio), unaware that she’s already engaged to his friend Julio (Raul Roulien). Meanwhile, when Bond brings his band — including dancers Fred (Fred Astaire) and Honey (Ginger Rogers) — to Rio for a gig at Belinha’s father’s hotel, he discovers that members of a powerful bank eager to take over the hotel are determined to stop the show from taking place.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dolores Del Rio Films
  • Fred Astaire Films
  • Ginger Rogers Films
  • Love Triangle
  • Musicals
  • Romantic Comedy

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that despite being fourth- and fifth-billed in their first onscreen pairing (behind top-billed romantic leads Dolores Del Rio and Gene Raymond), Rogers and Astaire “steal [this] film” as they “do their one duet” together, dancing “The Carioca” and “giving off electricity that Raymond and… Del Rio are unable to equal”. He notes that “despite some dull spots and a flimsy plot”, the picture remains “romantic, sexy, and delightfully and inventively kitschy”, with “some tricky camera work, unusual art design by Van Nest Polglase and Carroll Clark, and some creative production numbers” — most notably the “unforgettable” aerial ballet finale featuring “scantily clad chorus girls strik[ing] provocative pre-Hollywood poses on the wings of airplanes in flight”.

Indeed, while “Rogers and Astaire are the main reason this film” has remained in film lovers’ consciousness (most know of it simply as the movie that sparked Astaire and Rogers’ lengthy onscreen partnership), it’s ultimately more “bizarre” than “innocuous”, and offers some unexpected pleasures here and there — such as the use of shadowy silhouettes (accompanied by an unforgettably wonky musical theme) to represent the three “evil” bank members, or the surreal outcome of Del Rio and Raymond’s overnight island stay. Meanwhile, the culminating aerial sequence (complete with one chorine nearly falling to her death!) is certainly worth a look for curiosity-value alone — though it’s not quite enough to raise the film as a whole to the level of “must see” viewing.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Astaire and Rogers dancing the Carioca
  • Astaire finding himself unable NOT to dance when he hears band music starting up
  • The justifiably infamous “aerial ballet” scene
  • Some fun pre-code zingers (see quote at beginning of review)

Must See?
No, though of course anyone interested in the evolution of the Astaire-Rogers films will want to check it out.

Links: