Honeymoon Killers, The (1970)

Honeymoon Killers, The (1970)

“No woman’s going to support me!”

Synopsis:
An overweight nurse (Shirley Stoler) falls in love with a gigolo (Tony Lo Bianco) she meets through a Lonely Hearts club, and soon begins posing as his sister on trips to bilk lonely women — but how long can they get away with their scheme, especially when it turns murderous and Stoler’s jealousy is provoked?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Black Comedy
  • Criminal Couple On the Run
  • Homicidal Spouses
  • Newlyweds
  • Serial Killers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “unusual, violent sleeper is [both] a chilling reenactment of the grisly ‘Lonely Hearts’ murders that drew national attention in the late forties”, and a “fascinating, semi-comical examination of the true-life delirious romance between an ill-tempered, sexually frustrated 200-pound nurse named Martha Beck (well played by Shirley Stoler, who resembles her) and her speciously charming and handsome but not-so-smart Spanish lover, gigolo Ray Fernandez (a marvelous performance by Tony Lo Bianco).” He notes that the “film is cleverly scripted; has several odd yet interesting characters; probes America’s pathetic ‘lonely hearts’ subculture; and is one of the few ‘criminal couple-on-the-run’ movies that neither romanticizes the crimes (the murders are extremely shocking) nor glamorizes the criminals.” He points out that “director-writer Leonard Kastle was more interested in the relationship between the jealous Beck (who pretended to be Fernandez’s sister) and her unfaithful lover than in their crimes, but while he believed their love for each other was their one redeeming quality, it was not enough to fully redeem them after their murders.”

Peary argues that while “the direction by newcomer Kastle… is amateurish at times”, it “is quite innovative when it counts”: he “uses the camera skillfully so that we are aware of settings and spatial relationships”, such as creating “a sense of claustrophobia by placing Lo Bianco, his new romantic conquest, and huge Stoler in a tiny space so that they drive each other crazy.” Kastle gives his actors “free reign to create broad characters”, resulting in “several strong performances” — and he “uses the music of Gustav Mahler effectively, at times to counterpoint the triviality of what is happening on the screen.” Peary elaborates on all aspects of his praise for (and analysis of) this film in his first Cult Movies book, making it clear that “one-hit-wonder” Kastle was quite the polymath talent. It’s too bad for film fanatics that he never made another movie — music (opera in particular) was his first love — but in the meantime, we can appreciate (while shuddering in horror) the gruesome real-life “opera” he puts on for us here.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Tony Lo Bianco as Ray
  • Shirley Stoler as Martha
  • Strong supporting performances

  • Oliver Wood’s cinematography


Must See?
Yes, as a true cult classic.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

Yentl (1983)

Yentl (1983)

“Why is it people who want the truth never believe it when they hear it?”

Synopsis:
In early 20th century Eastern Europe, a young woman named Yentl (Barbra Streisand) — whose father (Nehemiah Persoff) has secretly taught her to read sacred literature — disguises herself as a boy named ‘Anshel’ and leaves her village to study. She soon befriends (and falls in love with) a student named Avigdor (Mandy Patinkin) who is engaged to beautiful young Hadass (Amy Irving) — but when the couple’s ability to marry is threatened, Streisand finds herself in a uniquely challenging position.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Amy Irving Films
  • Barbra Streisand Films
  • Feminism and Women’s Issues
  • Gender Bending
  • Historical Drama
  • Jews
  • Love Triangle
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Musicals

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that despite Hollywood’s snubbing of what they perceived to be Barbra Streisand’s “tremendous ego trip” in adapting Isaac Bashevis Singer’s short story “Yentl the Yeshiva Boy” (which she ultimately had to “direct, produce, and co-write”, given lack of interest or financial support), he finds “the film quite enchanting, humorous, inspiring, and extremely ambitious”. He notes that “Streisand uses her unique character — who has lived as both woman and man — as a positive influence on both Avigdor and Hadass”, given that “it is through Yentl-‘Anshel’ that they become more enlightened in regard to how men and women should perceive and relate to one another”. Peary adds that the “12 Michel Legrand songs” — which are “all utilized as Yentl’s internal monologues” — won’t “appeal to everyone, but Streisand sings them with conviction and they show that this director really wanted to understand her character” (as opposed to “the typical male director” who “might have asked for a less introspective score”). Peary points out that “Streisand handles herself well as director, deftly moving from funny moments to tender scenes between ‘Anshel’ and Hadass to the jolting scene in which Yentl reveals herself to Avigdor (a masterly directed and acted bit)” — and he argues that “one shouldn’t so easily dismiss the fact that this first-time director managed to get excellent performances from her two co-stars as well as the touching, humorous, very warm performance she herself gives”.

I’m in agreement with Peary’s appreciative review of this film, which has held up well and does indeed show tremendous talent from Streisand on numerous fronts. While Streisand chooses not to explore the intriguing potential of gender bending sexual preferences — that is, none of the characters openly reflects on what it means that s/he may be sexually attracted to someone (seemingly) of the same gender — she does effectively highlight how restrictive laws for women once were (and still are for many across the globe). As painful as it is watching Streisand conceal and alter her identity simply to have a chance to study, it’s equally challenging seeing how servile and guileless Irving’s character has been raised to be. By the end of this film, we’re grateful for the disruption ‘Yentl’ has brought to one microcosm of her society, but sad that “once she makes [Avigdor and Hadass] an ideal mate, she must step aside” — and move to America in order to continue her own journey.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Barbra Streisand as Yentl/Anshel (nominated by Peary as one of the Best Actresses of the Year in his Alternate Oscars)
  • Mandy Patinkin as Avigdor
  • Amy Irving as Hadass
  • Fine direction and cinematography
  • Michel Legrand’s score

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful film featuring fine performances.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Lenny (1974)

Lenny (1974)

“The point — the point is the suppression of words. Now, dig.”

Synopsis:
The life of controversial comic Lenny Bruce (Dustin Hoffman) is told in flashback by his ex-wife (Valerie Perrine), mother (Jan Miner), and agent (Stanley Beck).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biopics
  • Bob Fosse Films
  • Dustin Hoffman Films
  • Flashback Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Morality Police
  • Stand-Up Comedy

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that director “Bob Fosse’s seamy, sex-laced biography of controversial comic Lenny Bruce… centers on his difficult marriage to stripper Honey Harlowe (played with vulnerability by Valerie Perrine) and his troubles with policemen and judges for using supposedly obscene material in his nightclub act.” He notes that “Hoffman is very convincing in the title role, displaying Bruce’s quick mind, his obsessive nature…, and, ultimately, his utter helplessness and despair when he realizes he’ll never be able to express himself openly in his profession.” Peary argues that while Hoffman “is magnificent in those scenes where Bruce tries to talk sense to conservative judges”, becoming “like Don Quixote fighting windmills”, the “film fails because of Fosse’s self-conscious direction and because Julian Barry’s script, adapted from Barry’s play, forgets to include moments in which Bruce shows he has a real sense of humor.” He writes that while “one can understand Bruce’s seriousness in his later years”, “except for a scene with his relatives, he’s not funny in his early years — even on stage.” Peary asserts that the “film could use some laughter because it’s deadly long at 112 [minutes] and very depressing”, adding that “this would make an appropriate second feature to Raging Bull“.

I’m not quite in agreement with all of Peary’s points. While the film is indeed depressing, I don’t find it overlong, and wasn’t particularly struck by a dearth of funny routines. Bruce’s audience laughs plenty when they’re shocked by the language he uses, and that’s the primary focus of the film: Bruce’s controversial (!) belief that he should be allowed to use everyday profanity in his comedy. In fact, there’s ample humor as Bruce good-naturedly (albeit very pointedly) does his routine while cops line the walls, substituting “blah blah” for the actual swear words while still being completely understood by his audience; his point is extremely well taken. What I’m most disturbed by is Bruce’s treatment of Perrine, who’s simultaneously adored and demonized for her sexuality (what else is new?). With that said, Barry’s screenplay neatly shows how Bruce’s rightful indignation ultimately consumed his life; it’s sad seeing his obsession with his court cases taking over his routines (and, of course, seeing his drug-induced ramble in a final performance). There may have been many complicated reasons leading to Bruce’s premature death by overdose, but at least here we’re clearly shown how the mutually reinforcing demons of addiction and hopelessness played pivotal roles.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Dustin Hoffman as Lenny Bruce
  • Valerie Perrine as Honey
  • Jan Miner as Lenny’s mom
  • Bruce Surtees’ cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful biopic.

Categories

  • Noteworthy Performance(s)
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Jason and the Argonauts (1963)

Jason and the Argonauts (1963)

“The gods want their entertainment.”

Synopsis:
In ancient Greece, Jason (Todd Armstrong) gathers together a group of strong and talented “argonauts” — including Hercules (Nigel Green) — to accompany him on a quest for a “golden fleece”, and eventually falls in love with the sorceress Medea (Nancy Kovack). Along the way he’s aided by Queen Hera (Honor Blackman), who quibbles with her husband, Zeus (Niall MacGinnis), up on Mount Olympus.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Ancient Greece and Rome
  • At Sea
  • Fantasy
  • Niall MacGinnis Films
  • Ray Harryhausen Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that “Ray Harryhausen’s spectacular special effects highlight this marvelous fantasy-adventure”, directed “by Don Chaffey with equal amounts of wit and excitement” and “beautifully filmed by Wilkie Cooper” with “the mysterious blue ocean, white sandy beaches, and strange rock formations found around Palinuro, Italy and the actual Greek temples found in Paestrum” giving “the picture historical authenticity” — and “Bernard Herrmann’s score giv[ing] grandeur to the production.” Peary writes that “Beverly Cross’s imaginative, literate script keeps the story on a high intellectual plane so that it will appeal to adults as well as kids”: this “film is about the decision by Man, as represented by Jason:

… to choose his own life’s course, to challenge the gods’ unfair laws, to no longer be frightened by the gods into blind obedience” — with some amusingly droll “marital squabbles between MacGinnis and Blackman” sprinkled throughout for levity.

However, at the front and center of this story — naturally — are Harryhausen’s special effects. Peary writes that “it’s just amazing how believable the movements of his creatures are”, and gives kudos to the excellent “composite photography”.

He calls out his own favorite moments as “the ‘Clashing Rocks’ sequence when huge bearded Triton, his fishtail flopping in the ocean, emerges from the water, holds the mountains apart, and watches the Argo sail under his arm:”

“And, of course, the truly stupendous climactic swordfighting-skeletons sequence — Harryhausen’s ultimate achievement.”

I can’t disagree with either of these choices, though I would add in how thrilling it is to watch the giant statue of Talos coming to life:

… and to see the gruesome harpies relentlessly plaguing blind Phineus (Patrick Troughton) finally caught and caged.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • The amusing quibbling and game-playing between Hera and Zeus
  • Many memorable special effects and stop-motion sequences
  • Bernard Herrmann’s score

Must See?
Yes, as an enjoyable Harryhausen outing with some truly impressive special effects.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

In Cold Blood (1967)

In Cold Blood (1967)

“If this can happen to a decent, God-fearing family, who’s safe anymore?”

Synopsis:
Two sociopathic ex-convicts (Robert Blake and Scott Wilson) planning to rob a safe in the home of a Kansas businessman (John McLiam) end up murdering McLiam and his wife (Ruth Storey) and two kids (Brenda Currin and Paul Hough), leaving no witnesses behind. Soon they’re on the run from the law, but they don’t have long before their cold-blooded crimes will catch up with them.

Genres:

  • Ex-Cons
  • Paul Stewart Films
  • Richard Brooks Films
  • Robert Blake Films

Review:
Writer-producer-director Richard Brooks was purportedly obsessed with getting as many details correct as possible in his “new realism” adaptation of Truman Capote’s best-selling non-fiction novel about the senseless murder of the Clutter family in Kansas. This tale has now been told and retold numerous times, not only through Capote’s book and this cinematic version (which aired a year after the book was published), but through two biopics — Capote (2005) and Infamous (2006) — centered on Capote’s life during his lengthy investigation of the story. On its own merits, Brooks’ version has held up well, featuring natural performances by the two relatively unknown leads (an intentional decision on Brooks’ part); appropriately noir-ish cinematography by Conrad Hall; and an effective soundtrack by Quincy Jones. The narrative choice not to show the murders until near the end of the film is a smart one, instead treating the story as an investigation into how these clueless killers were caught and eventually made to confess. Thankfully, Brooks doesn’t exploit the grisly murders; there is an appropriate air of sobriety to the proceedings throughout, with just a touch of flashback exploration into Blake’s traumatic childhood.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Robert Blake as Perry
  • Scott Wilson as Dick
  • Conrad Hall’s cinematography

  • Quincy Jones’ soundtrack

Must See?
Yes. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

Links:

Hellcats of the Navy (1957)

Hellcats of the Navy (1957)

“It’s a question of your confidence in my judgment.”

Synopsis:
When a submarine commander (Ronald Reagan) makes a tough call in allowing an officer to die rather than subjecting his entire crew to danger, his colleague (Arthur Franz) believes Reagan was motivated by the officer’s dalliance with his fiancee (Nancy Davis).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Military
  • Ronald Reagan Films
  • World War II

Review:
Peary cites this “curio’s selling point — Ronald Reagan romances Nancy Davis” — as a “major reason why it is so dull”, noting that if “Reagan weren’t president and Nancy his First Lady, [the] film would have been forgotten”.

He argues that it’s a “terrible movie, but it is interesting because it stars Reagan and explores the nature of command.” He adds that “Nancy Reagan haters will enjoy the sailors passing around her 8-by-10 glossy (she looks sixty and shriveled) and getting all hot and bothered”.

Clearly, Peary’s comments are biased by the era when GFTFF was published (smack dab in the middle of Reagan’s 8-year presidency); it’s a bit easier these days to separate the actor from the politician, and to that end, Reagan is actually quite credible (if unexceptional). The storyline is standard Hollywoodized fare, exploring leadership and trust issues in times of heightened tension and combat.

It’s not by any means must-see, but might be of minor interest to fans of submarine warfare.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Irving Lippman’s cinematography

Must See?
No; feel free to skip this one unless you’re curious.

Links:

Mighty Joe Young (1949)

Mighty Joe Young (1949)

“Am I dreaming, or did I see a gorilla and a beautiful dame?”

Synopsis:
A nightclub owner (Robert Armstrong) convinces a young woman (Terry Moore) living in Africa to come to Hollywood with her giant ape, Joe, and perform in shows with a rodeo star (Ben Johnson) — but will Joe adjust to life on the stage rather than in the wild?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Ben Johnson Films
  • Fantasy
  • Friendship
  • Primates
  • Ray Harryhausen Films
  • Terry Moore Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that while the “script wavers” for this “underrated fantasy gem about a friendly, incredibly strong 10-foot gorilla”, Joe remains “a fabulous, lovable (yet not completely domesticated) creature”, and “the special-effects and stop-motion work by King Kong‘s famous Willis O’Brien and Ray Harryhausen are marvelous.” He praises the fact that “Joe actually seems real, so subtle are his movements and expressions” — which is indeed true; it’s easy to forget exactly how much work went into creating this pre-CGI film. Moore is sweet yet strong as Joe’s “owner”, and her dedication to ensuring he doesn’t remain stuck in a life of humiliation is endearing. The final sequence at the burning orphanage is genuinely harrowing.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Willis O’Brien and Ray Harryhausen’s deservedly Oscar-winning special effects and animation

Must See?
Yes, for its historical relevance as Harryhausen’s breakthrough debut.

Categories

Links:

Apartment, The (1960)

Apartment, The (1960)

“When you’re in love with a married man, you shouldn’t wear mascara.”

Synopsis:
An aspiring insurance clerk (Jack Lemmon) allows his married colleagues to use his apartment as a love nest in exchange for advancement opportunities at work — but when he falls in love with his building’s elevator operator (Shirley MacLaine) and learns she’s the mistress of his supervisor (Fred MacMurray), he begins to rethink his goals.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Billy Wilder Films
  • Fred MacMurray Films
  • Jack Lemmon Films
  • Infidelity
  • Love Triangle
  • Romantic Comedy
  • Shirley MacLaine Films
  • Suicide

Review:
The Apartment — directed by Billy Wilder and co-scripted by I.A.L. Diamond — won five Oscars (including Best Picture) and was nominated for five more, possibly as a belated or combined acknowledgement of the team’s comedy classic Some Like It Hot (1959) from the year before. In his Alternate Oscars, Peary gives the Best Picture award for 1960 to Psycho rather than this film, which he argues “was daring in its day because of the amorality of its characters and because it mixed humor with such serious elements as a suicide attempt”, but today is “somewhat dated and… still has a dubious premise”. While I can’t argue with Peary’s choice of Psycho as Best Picture, I disagree that this film — inspired by a sequence from David Lean’s Brief Encounter (1945) — is dubious or dated; it’s actually held up remarkably well on numerous fronts.

While one might question the need for a usable apartment when hotel rooms are readily available, it seems clear that this type of arrangement is about much more than a private space for sex: it’s about making the woman feel comfortable, happy, and unashamed of her fling (much easier in a fully furnished apartment with a kitchen, bar, sofa, and record player). It’s also, of course, about power: as an underling lost in a sea of other employees, Lemmon “freely” giving up his apartment night after night (even during bitterly cold weather, when he has nowhere else to go) is a way for him to demonstrate his loyalty and willingness to suffer in order to become part of the upper-echelon crowd. His aspiration story is a fascinating one, but so is MacLaine’s tale of woebegone romance — and the lives of the other supporting characters (including MacMurray, wonderfully cast against type here) are rich as well. Wilder’s direction, combined with Joseph LaShelle’s cinematography, create a seamy yet emotion-drenched world where unlikely couplings can take place, and power dynamics can eventually be disrupted.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Jack Lemmon as C.C. Baxter (nominated as one of the Best Actors of the Year in Alternate Oscars)
  • Shirley MacLaine as Fran Kubelik
  • Fine supporting performances
  • Joseph LaShelle’s b&w cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a fine and deserving Oscar winner. Listed as a film with Historical Importance in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

It Came From Beneath the Sea (1955)

It Came From Beneath the Sea (1955)

“I’m a scientist, commander — I don’t need to be reminded that your objectives are not necessarily my own.”

Synopsis:
A submarine commander (Kenneth Tobey) enlists the help of a pair of scientists (Faith Domergue and Donald Curtis) in identifying and snaring an atomically charged octopus wreaking havoc in the ocean — but will his romantic interest in Domergue get in the way of his military duties?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Love Triangle
  • Mutant Monsters
  • Ray Harryhausen Films
  • Science Fiction
  • Scientists

Review:
Special effects guru Ray Harryhausen’s next film after The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms (1953) (also co-starring Kenneth Tobey) was this similarly-themed mutant-monster flick, featuring impressive animation of an octopus (actually a six-tentacled creature — a.k.a. a “hexapus”) taking down the Golden Gate Bridge. As narrative filler, we’re given an unintentionally chuckle-worthy love triangle between Domergue, Tobey, and Curtis, filled with plenty of thinly veiled sexual allure (Domergue strokes beakers in her lab while Tobey first converses with her) and amusing banter — such as Tobey mollifying the agitated Domergue by showing her he knows what she REALLY wants in a fancy restaurant:

Tobey (to Domergue): “We, my dear doctor, are going to dance.” (To Curtis): “With your permission, sir.”
Curtis: “Live it up, children.”
Domergue: “But… you haven’t even asked me!”
Tobey: “That’s the way we do it in the navy.”
Domergue: “But I haven’t even had my dinner!”
Tobey (to Curtis): “Would you order another t-bone, doctor?
Domergue: “I don’t like t-bones, and you’re being a fool!”
Curtis: “Don’t believe her, Pete. She says that to all the boys.”
Domergue: “You’re both being fools! Just because you’re men, you think that…”
Tobey (leaning in seductively): “Do you like lobster?
Domergue (tentatively): “Yes…”
Tobey: “Broiled, with garlic butter and parsley?”
Domergue (smiling and laughing): “Yes.”

This film is also notable for marking the beginning of Harryhausen’s decades-long collaboration with producer Charles Schneer, during which time they made 20 Million Miles to Earth (1957), Mysterious Island (1961), First Men in the Moon (1964), The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958), Jason and the Argonauts (1963), and Clash of the Titans (1981).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Fun special effects by Ray Harryhausen

Must See?
Yes, for Harryhausen’s work, and as a representative “’50s monster movie”.

Categories

  • Representative Film

Links:

Streetcar Named Desire, A (1951)

Streetcar Named Desire, A (1951)

“Deliberate cruelty is not forgivable! It is the one unforgivable thing, in my opinion, and the one thing of which I have never, never been guilty.”

Synopsis:
When a mentally and emotionally fragile woman (Vivien Leigh) comes to stay with her pregnant sister (Kim Hunter) and callous brother-in-law (Marlon Brando) in New Orleans, she struggles to hold on to her dignity, but experiences renewed hope for a bright future when she begins dating Brando’s co-worker (Karl Malden).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Deep South
  • Elia Kazan Films
  • Karl Malden Films
  • Kim Hunter Films
  • Marlon Brando Films
  • Mental Breakdown
  • Play Adaptation
  • Tennessee Williams Films
  • Vivien Leigh Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that in Elia Kazan’s Oscar-winning adaptation of the 1947 Broadway play, “Vivien Leigh gives an emotionally shattering performance as Blanche Dubois, the most vulnerable, bruised, and battered of Tennessee Williams’ tragic heroines,” whose “unhappy and humiliating past and the passing of her youth have left her on the brink of sanity”. Given that “brutish, t-shirt clad” Stanley (Brando) “won’t let her find needed escape and solace in her desperate flights into fantasy” — and they are stuck in stiflingly close quarters with one another — she eventually devolves and decomposes to the point of no return. Peary notes that while the “film is a bit theatrical — at times it looks like an old kinescope” — “Elia Kazan’s direction of actors was never better… and Brando’s devastating portrayal (‘Stella!!!’) is regarded as one of the screen’s greatest characterizations.”

In Alternate Oscars, Peary agrees with the Academy’s choice of Leigh as Best Actress of the Year, noting, “Those of us who see the optimistic twenty-six-year-old Leigh in Scarlett [from Gone With the Wind] surely see in Blanche the older Leigh who suffered from depression and experienced mental breakdowns”. Indeed, there’s “no doubt her own condition helped her sympathize with Blanche — at times it seems like she is exorcising her own demons.” He spends considerable time discussing how Blanche is “on her last legs” since “she has lost her youth” and “has no prospects”, and points out that the “part is difficult because Blanche has no foundation, no key that can be turned to put her back into the correct mode of motion and speech” — “not anymore”, given that “everything solid has been clawed out of her.” Only during a brief, “seemingly minor scene in which Blanche flirts with a young man who is collecting for the newspaper” does she “regain her power” and “shine” — at which point she is “wistful, poetic, haunting, alluring, and both amoral… and moral”.

Leigh’s performance is undeniably the centerpiece of this devastating film (one I find both challenging and mesmerizing to watch), but there is much more to make note of as well. Brando’s screen presence is a visceral gut-punch of brutality; while we completely understand Hunter’s physical attraction to him — and it makes sobering sense that she would put up with his domestic violence, given the warped nature of such enmeshments — it’s less easy to understand how she deals with his “subhuman” personality. Regardless, such is love and lust — and Hunter masterfully embodies her complex character in a way that allows us to stick with and believe in this aspect of the story. Also notable is the highly atmospheric cinematography by Harry Stradling, who sharply highlights nearly every scene in black-and-white contrast, showcasing the many extremes at play in this toxic swirl of a muggy landscape. Meanwhile, Alex North’s score is haunting, percussive, lyrical, and mystical — the perfect background to a gothic tale of madness.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Vivien Leigh as Blanche DuBois
  • Marlon Brando as Stanley Kowalski
  • Kim Hunter as Stella Kowalski
  • Karl Malden as Mitch
  • Harry Stradling’s cinematography

  • Atmospheric sets
  • Alex North’s score

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful cinematic adaptation of a classic play.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links: