Blonde Bombshell / Bombshell (1933)
“Deep down in every girl’s heart there’s the desire for the rite of real womanhood.”
Synopsis: |
Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:
Review: then by trying to adopt a baby: and finally by becoming engaged to a wealthy American (Franchot Tone) whose snooty parents (C. Aubrey Smith and Mary Forbes) are distinctly wary of their son’s new love interest. Meanwhile, her meddling publicist — played by heavy-drinking pre-Code actor Lee Tracy, probably best known for his role the same year in Dinner at Eight (1933) — tries to earn Harlow’s romantic affections while strategically foiling each of her ventures. There’s plenty here for fans of pre-Code comedies to enjoy, from racy dialogue to impressively frantic pacing to Harlow’s spot-on screechy performance; it’s definitely worth a look. Redeeming Qualities and Moments:
Must See? Categories
Links: |
One thought on “Blonde Bombshell / Bombshell (1933)”
Not a must.
On a revisit, I find I don’t have much enthusiasm for ‘Bombshell’. Fleming has certainly directed with a lot of flair. The cast is game. And the production has a polished shine to it. I just don’t find it to be very funny. (~the odd, juicy tidbit notwithstanding: i.e., “Excuse the noise, Loretta, we seem to be passing the stockyard.”)
I actually looked forward to rewatching this one, as I have a special fondness for Harlow. And the admittedly clever premise has such possibilities…that it’s somewhat disappointing to discover that most of the dialogue falls surprisingly flat. On top of which, the repetitive story construction soon resembles a dog chasing its tail. ~though I do like the sequence in which two women from an orphanage visit Harlow to determine her suitability as a single mother. At least the change in tone here is fun and Harlow takes delight in it.