Browsed by
Month: December 2020

Driller Killer, The (1979)

Driller Killer, The (1979)

“What’s happening to you?”

Synopsis:
A painter (Abel Ferrara) living in New York with his “sensible” girlfriend (Carolyn Marz) and her “spacy” lover (Baybi Day) becomes increasingly unhinged as he struggles to pay his bills, and a rock band rehearses incessantly above his apartment. Soon he is taking his fury out on random male victims across the city, using a power drill as his weapon of choice.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Artists
  • Mental Breakdown
  • Revenge
  • Serial Killers

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “sleazy cult film was the first venture of independent New York director Abel Ferrara,” who — under the stage name ‘Jimmy Lane’ — “plays a struggling artist” who “paints obsessively and begins to lose his senses” and eventually “has a complete breakdown”. Peary notes that this “grisly film is not your typical slice-and-dice splatter fare”, given it’s “not about a man stalking scantily clad females” (the “artist’s victims are all men”) — but while Peary asserts he believes “Ferrara is making some point about the artist feeling hatred toward men because he fears he is a homosexual himself,” I disagree with that interpretation; Ferrara’s victims are almost all down-on-their-luck vagrants who perhaps represent Ferrara’s fears of his own fate if he isn’t able to survive as an artist — a point highlighted when his finally-finished “masterpiece” is scorned by his agent (guess what happens to him?). Peary writes that Ferrara “scores with a lot of weird touches and humor”, but the “storyline is hard to follow and the violence is unnecessarily graphic”; indeed, this creatively filmed but self-indulgent flick can easily be skipped.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Good use of location shooting in New York City
  • Atmospheric cinematography

Must See?
Nope; you can most certainly skip this one unless you happen to be interested in Ferrara’s output.

Links:

Barefoot Contessa, The (1954)

Barefoot Contessa, The (1954)

“Life every now and then behaves as if it has seen too many bad movies.”

Synopsis:
While at her funeral in Italy, a movie director (Humphrey Bogart), a press agent (Edmond O’Brien), and a count (Rossano Brazi) recall the mysterious life and motivations of a beautiful Spanish woman (Ava Gardner) who became an internationally beloved superstar.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Actors and Actresses
  • Aspiring Stars
  • Ava Gardner Films
  • Edmond O’Brien Films
  • Flashback Films
  • Hollywood
  • Humphrey Bogart Films
  • Joseph L. Mankiewicz Films

Review:
Joseph L. Mankiewicz wrote and directed this beautifully photographed (by Jack Cardiff) but narratively stilted homage to a gorgeous movie star with inscrutable tastes and motivations.

Gardner — who struggles to maintain a semblance of a Spanish accent — is a woman who easily resists the lure of money and fame, as presented in the opening sequence by a caddish first-time producer (Warren Stevens) who wrongly assumes Gardner will accept his offer to become Hollywood’s next great discovery:

Instead, Gardner is drawn to the honest friendship of Bogart (whose voiceover perspective opens the film), a jaded but happily married director who is willing to mentor Gardner and help her learn to act.

Edmond O’Brien won an Oscar for his brief work as an enthusiastic promoter:

but his role is minimal, despite taking on voiceover duties for awhile in the middle of the flashback-filled screenplay.

Finally, Gardner’s widowed husband (Brazi) tells his perspective as the first man Gardner falls for and is willing to marry, not knowing he holds dark secrets that will doom her to unhappiness yet again. During this portion of the episodic film, Valentina Cortese — so effective in Jules Dassin’s Thieves Highway (1949) — plays a thankless, underwritten role as Brazi’s concerned sister.

Since we know from the get-go how this tragic tale ends, there’s ultimately little to do but enjoy Jack Cardiff’s predictably beautiful cinematography.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Gorgeous cinematography


Must See?
No; you can skip this one unless you’re a diehard Gardner fan.

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Summer Place, A (1959)

Summer Place, A (1959)

“Are you bad, Johnny? Have you been bad with girls?”

Synopsis:
A self-made millionaire (Richard Egan) travels with his wife (Constance Ford) and daughter (Sandra Dee) to a summer resort run by Egan’s former flame (Dorothy McGuire), her alcoholic husband (Arthur Kennedy), and their son (Troy Donahue). Soon Egan and McGuire have rekindled their romance, and Dee and Donahue have fallen for one another — but will Ford’s prudish sensibilities and sinister plans to milk her husband for alimony ruin everyone’s chance for happiness?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Arthur Kennedy Films
  • Beulah Bondi Films
  • Class Relations
  • Cross-Class Romance
  • Delmer Daves Films
  • Dorothy McGuire Films
  • First Love
  • Sandra Dee Films
  • Teenagers
  • Troy Donahue Films
  • Virginity

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary argues that this “first-rate trash about ‘we’ve gotta-be-good‘ young lovers… trying to find a refuge from their mixed up parents” is “lots of fun: it’s corny, there’s a lot of emphasis on sex, there’s hysteria.” He writes that “Dee and Donahue are a movie match made in camp heaven:

and Ford is deliciously diabolical.”

Indeed, there is so much overwrought melodrama and laughable dialogue in this soaper it’s hard to know where to begin in a critique. For instance, abusive Ford subjects Dee to a full physical examination after she’s been shipwrecked for a night with Donahue, despite Dee crying out in agony:

“I haven’t done anything wrong. I’ve been a good girl. I haven’t done anything wrong. Please, I want my father. No! No! No! I’ve been a good girl! No! No!”

Eventually, of course, Donahue and Dee’s love for one another transcends their parents’ fruitless attempts to keep them apart and they land in the Ultimate Trouble. Meanwhile, Kennedy’s alcoholism continues to worsen:

while McGuire and Egan live out their newly validated romance in a Frank Lloyd Wright house by the shore.

How will everything work out for the young lovers? You’ll have to watch to see — but be forewarned that Max Steiner’s recognizable score will remain stuck in your head indefinitely.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Fine Technicolor cinematography and location shooting



Must See?
Yes, once, simply for its notoriety.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Compulsion (1959)

Compulsion (1959)

“Do you really think these boys don’t know the difference between right and wrong?”

Synopsis:
A pair of college students (Bradford Dillman and Dean Stockwell) challenge each other to commit the “ultimate crime”, believing they can get away with murder given their “superior intellect” — but a local policeman (E.G. Marshall) is convinced that a pair of glasses found left on the scene belong to Stockwell, and soon the men have confessed. Will an infamous lawyer (Orson Welles) be able to defend them from the death penalty?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Courtroom Drama
  • Dean Stockwell Films
  • E.G. Marshall Films
  • Orson Welles Films
  • Psychopaths
  • Richard Fleischer Films

Review:
Richard Fleischer directed this adaptation of a novel about the infamous Leopold and Loeb murder case, based on a 1956 novel of the same title. While the names of the main characters have been changed, it is more faithful to the true facts of the crime than Hitchcock’s adaptation of Patrick Hamilton’s play Rope (1929) — thus providing viewers with a more realistic look at how such a heinous event played out (though the crime itself, thankfully, isn’t shown on screen). Top-billed Orson Welles deserves his status, turning in a noteworthy performance in what can only be described as a challenging role (how in the world do you successfully defend these two psychopaths?). However, Stockwell and Dillman are also perfectly cast, with Dillman fiendishly reveling in the power he believes he wields through his intelligence, and Stockwell clearly under his sway but also showing stark evidence of his own moral disturbances. This one remains worth a look.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Orson Welles as Jonathan Wilk
  • Dean Stockwell as Judd Steiner
  • Bradford Dillman as Arthur Straus
  • Fine cinematography

Must See?
Yes, once, as a powerful courtroom drama. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Good Show

Links:

Time to Love and a Time to Die, A (1958)

Time to Love and a Time to Die, A (1958)

“Remember, my boy: it’s easier to die than to live!”

Synopsis:
A German soldier (John Gavin) on leave in his bombed-out hometown falls in love with and marries a beautiful young woman (Lilo Pulver); but what will happen when he’s called back to war on the Russian front?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Douglas Sirk Films
  • Keenan Wynn Films
  • Romance
  • Soldiers
  • World War II

Review:
Douglas Sirk’s next-to-last feature film before directing Imitation of Life (1959) and then retiring from film-making was this colorful CinemaScope adaptation of a novel by Erich Marie Remarque (who plays a small supporting role as a persecuted professor).

A Time to Love and a Time to Die (the title is succinct and direct) is essentially a wartime romance:

… taking place within Germany’s deadly final days during World War II, when soldiers felt defeated by the inevitability of their country’s loss, and unsure what moves to make next — other than simply continuing to follow instructions and seek joy where they could find it. Upon arriving in his hometown, Gavin accepts an invitation from a former classmate (Thayer David) — now a high-level Nazi — to refresh himself in David’s palatial home:

Despite his discomfort, he realizes that maintaining appearances and not rocking the boat too much will ultimately help him in his quest to locate both his own missing parents, and Pulver’s father — who’s been sent to a concentration camp. Meanwhile, he uses connections and a spiffy suit from a high-class lieutenant (Keenan Wynn):

… to gain entrance to a secret nightclub, where he’s able to offer Pulver a glorious night on the town:

— at least until the club is directly bombed and they must flee for their lives.

Other than Gavin and Pulver taking a chance on love and happiness in the midst of chaos and uncertainty:

… the storyline centers on Gavin’s gradually shifting sense of moral responsibility; to his credit, Sirk doesn’t overplay this theme, instead allowing it to unfold somewhat naturally (with a surprise ending). While this isn’t must-see viewing for all film fanatics, Sirk fans will surely want to check it out.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Russell Metty’s cinematography
  • A bold look at highly varied German stances during WWII

Must See?
No, but it’s recommended for one-time viewing.

Links:

Treasure of the Sierra Madre, The (1948)

Treasure of the Sierra Madre, The (1948)

“The way I see it, gold can be as much of a blessing as a curse.”

Synopsis:
Two penniless drifters (Humphrey Bogart and Tim Holt) partner with an aging prospector (Walter Huston) to search for gold in the Sierra Madre Mountains of Mexico, but quickly find their quest marred by bandits, greed, and distrust.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Betrayal
  • Gold Seekers
  • Greed
  • Humphrey Bogart Films
  • John Huston Films
  • Mental Breakdown
  • Walter Huston Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary notes that this adaptation of B. Traven’s novel represents “masterful storytelling by John Huston, who won Oscars for his direction and his script adaptation” — indeed, it “is one of the greatest American films.” He writes that “Humphrey Bogart had one of his finest roles as Fred C. Dobbs, revealing the brittleness and paranoia that his ’40s heroes felt but held in check.” Meanwhile, Supporting Oscar-winning Huston plays a “wise, fast-talking” man who “teaches his two partners about mining” but warns that they may “become distrustful of each other” — which does indeed happen, leading to a “brilliantly played character transformation” by Bogart in which he “nears madness”. Peary notes that this “epic has dynamic scenes in wilderness and civilization, superior dialogue, exciting action-adventure, [and] interesting characters” — but “what really makes this film special is that Dobbs, who proves anything but moral or heroic, is the lead (most emphasized) character rather than having that designation going to the moral Curtin [Holt], who, in movie storytelling terms, is the more logical choice.”

In Alternate Oscars, Peary names this the Best Movie of the Year (over Laurence Olivier’s Hamlet), and elaborates on what makes it such a fine picture. He writes that in order to “achieve authenticity, as well as a dirty, gritty, dangerous feel to his picture, Huston insisted on shooting on location in Mexico” — making it “the first narrative American movie filmed entirely out of the States” — and “hired Mexican character actors and amateurs,” wisely chancing on “including long bits of dialogue that were delivered in Spanish and had no subtitles.” However, Peary argues that “Huston’s major contribution to the film was making Gold Hat” (a bandito played by Alfonso Bedoya) “a continuing character”: he’s a “vile, smiling, almost comical” bandit who “could have been conceived by Luis Bunuel” and “is one of the screen’s great punk-bully villains”, with his “great moment” coming when “he tries to pass himself and his men off as federales, and Dobbs (Bogart) asks to see their badges:

“Badges? We ain’t got no badges. We don’t need no badges. I don’t have to show you any stinking badges.”

Peary notes that while “at first glance The Treasure of the Sierra Madre seems to be an action-adventure film geared for young boys, with its treasure hunt in unknown territory, gunplay, fisticuffs (the scene in which Dobbs and Curtin fight with their boss… in a bar is a classic), tension and squabbling among partners, brutal villains, [and] no women”, it’s “also a complex character study about what the discovery of gold can do to individuals.” Peary further points out how “most of the tension in the picture is caused by intrusion: the lure of gold intruding on [the] minds of and relationships among the three men, and different characters intruding on space ‘belonging’ to others.” Suffice it to say there’s much rich material here to be explored, and Huston does a marvelous job presenting a story with numerous surprises — both brutal and heartwarming — but one that never pulls any punches.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Humphrey Bogart as Fred Dobbs
  • Walter Huston as Howard
  • Tim Holt as Curtin
  • Ted McCord’s cinematography


  • Highly effective location shooting in Mexico

  • Many memorable moments

Must See?
Yes, as a genuine classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Ruby Gentry (1952)

Ruby Gentry (1952)

“No woman like her: one minute fighting, scratching, the next minute she’s as sweet and soft as any woman alive.”

Synopsis:
A young woman (Jennifer Jones) from the “wrong side of the tracks” — who has been adopted by businessman Jim Gentry (Karl Malden) and his sickly wife (Josephine Hutchinson) — is dismayed when her lover (Charlton Heston) decides to marry a wealthy socialite (Phyllis Avery). Ruby (Jones) makes the best of things by marrying Malden once his wife passes away, but society still won’t accept Ruby — and when a tragic accident ensues, the town’s relentless disparagement drives Ruby to seek revenge.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Charlton Heston Films
  • Class Relations
  • Cross-Class Romance
  • Deep South
  • Jennifer Jones Films
  • Karl Malden Films
  • King Vidor Films
  • Revenge
  • Strong Females

Review:
Peary doesn’t review this King Vidor-directed melodrama in his GFTFF, but he designates it as a Personal Recommendation in the back of his book, and names Jones one of the Best Actresses of the Year in his Alternate Oscars. Unfortunately, I’m more in alignment with DVD Savant’s critical review of the film, which he refers to as a “ragged bush-league soap opera” in which “a lusty female is the source of all evil”. Savant writes that while “Jones had great gifts as an actress,” her “roles in many of her American films post-Duel in the Sun” — including this one — “are gross caricatures”; and he notes that while “the forced theatrics are not quite as exaggerated as Pearl Chavez’ antics in Duel in the Sun,” “they’re also not as entertaining” — though “fans of champion scenery chewing will find plenty of delight amid Heston’s strutting and Jennifer Jones’ over-emphatic presence.” Indeed, there’s very little to recommend about this clunker, which seems poorly conceived on every level. The voice-over narration by a timid doctor (Barney Phillips) secretly in love with Ruby feels out of place, and Ruby’s character veers wildly from beginning to end. She’s most enjoyable about an hour into the film, when things suddenly get a lot more interesting — though at this point there are only 20 minutes left in the all-around unbelievable storyline, and we’re simply waiting to see how things will resolve.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Russell Harlan’s cinematography


Must See?
No; you can skip this one. Listed as a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Links:

Champion (1949)

Champion (1949)

“What you don’t know would fill a book — but you’ve got guts!”

Synopsis:
A man (Kirk Douglas) and his brother (Arthur Kennedy) find work at a diner, where Douglas romances the beautiful daughter (Ruth Roman) of the owner but disappears when he’s forced by her father into a shotgun marriage. With the help of a retired trainer (Paul Stewart), Douglas works his way to the top of his game and eventually becomes famous — but will he alienate everyone he loves during his climb to success?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Arthur Kennedy Films
  • Boxing
  • Corruption
  • Kirk Douglas Films
  • Mark Robson Films
  • Ruth Roman Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that while “most boxing films contend that the sport corrupts individuals”, this classic — directed by Mark Robson, and “shot like a B-film in shadowy noir style by Franz Planer” — “contends that some individuals want to be corrupted”. Kirk Douglas stars as Midge Kelley — one of his “quintessential ‘heels'”, a “ruthless man who’ll do anything necessary, rub shoulders with anyone…, and step on friends and loved ones in order to get ‘people to call me mister‘.” Peary describes him as “the typical man in the American rat race, a scoundrel moving up in the business world” in which “boxers sell out their scruples to get ahead,” and “men such as Midge dupe the public into idolizing them and buying tickets to their fights.” In Alternate Oscars — where Peary gives Douglas the Best Actor Award — he adds that “Midge’s motivation isn’t so bad” and “we like Midge at times because he is protective of his brother, smothers his mother with kisses, and has guts enough always to get in the last punch, even when defeated.” In addition to Douglas’s fine central performance, Champion is noteworthy for its striking cinematography and a well-cast roster of supporting players, especially Kennedy as Douglas’s “lame” brother:

… Ruth Roman as a young woman who falls for Douglas’s charms before he makes a name for himself:

… Paul Stewart as a self-proclaimed “boxing addict” who agrees to help Douglas out.

… and Lola Albright as a sculptress who’s shocked to find that Douglas’s ambitions really do trump all else.

Note: To see Roman, Stewart, and Kennedy co-starring the same year in very different roles, be sure to check out The Window (1949).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Kirk Douglas as Midge
  • Fine supporting performances

  • Franz Planer’s cinematography

Must See?
Yes, for Douglas’s performance and as an all-around good show.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Passage to India, A (1984)

Passage to India, A (1984)

“India forces one to come face to face with oneself.”

Synopsis:
A young woman (Judy Davis) travels to British-colonized India with the mother (Peggy Ashcroft) of her intended (Nigel Havers), and given their interest in getting to know the “real” India, they soon find themselves invited by a local widowed doctor (Victor Banerjee) to visit the nearby Marabar Caves. When the journey turns unexpectedly traumatic, Banerjee’s name and livelihood are in jeopardy; can he count on the support of the local school superintendent (James Fox) to help him be acquitted of a crime he didn’t commit?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Alec Guinness Films
  • Courtroom Drama
  • David Lean Films
  • Falsely Accused
  • India
  • James Fox Films
  • Racism and Race Relations

Response to Peary’s Review:
As Peary writes, David Lean returned “after a 14-year hiatus” to write and direct “this epic adaptation of E.M. Forster’s novel, which had long been considered unfilmable.” He notes that just like the “sexual tension when the virgin girls move through phallic and vaginal rock formations in Picnic at Hanging Rock,” that “sensation is captured again when the dazed, sexually repressed/frustrated Miss [Adela] Quested [Davis] stands inside a dark cave and looks out toward the entrance, where Aziz stands, ready to come inside” (he is eventually accused of attempted rape). Peary argues, however, that the “ambiguities that result from our not knowing what happened make us even further detached from the major characters than we already are.” He posits that while “we watch an interesting story, we marvel at the majestic sights, and we’re impressed by the acting,” it’s “hard to be more than a spectator and get emotionally involved.” He adds that while “we delight in watching Lean become another British director to take swipes at the snooty British upper crust,” his “failure to individualize a sufficient number of Indians… is regrettable.”

I’m ultimately more taken with this adaptation than Peary seems to be. Of course the issue of “what happened in the caves” is of paramount importance — and was famously never revealed by Forster himself — but is meant to be shrouded in mystery, as it is here. (I disagree with Peary’s suggestion that the film indicates Aziz “did attempt something” and “might have been guilty.”) What is clear, however, is that Adela’s ambivalence over whether or not to marry Havers — combined with the sensory overwhelm of being in a hot new country with so many sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and customs to become used to — combine to put her into a decidedly hallucinatory and unwell state. As DVD Savant writes in his review, “In one of the best-edited scenes, Lean communicates Adela’s sexual fear in a confrontation with erotic sculptures and a horde of very non-cute monkeys. She’s never even in the same frame with a monkey, yet Lean makes us feel their threat. Monkeys show up at several key moments in the movie, and seem to represent the savagery and sexual chaos that the British fear in the Indian culture.”


To that end, Lean does a powerful job representing the very-real tensions between colonial Britons and fed up Indians, who are rightfully ready for change and increasingly intolerant of Britain’s patronizing attitudes and actions. Dr. Aziz (Banerjee) personifies this tension, with his attitude shifting over the course of the film as he gradually realizes that his own well-being — and that of his nation — will depend on extrication from his desire to “present well” to the British. Fox’s role (though minor) is equally pivotal in the movement towards respectful equality between Indians and the British.

While Peary writes that “it’s hard to tell if Lean is trying to impress us with the glorious scenery or the cinematography itself”, this comment doesn’t make much sense — he does impress us, but I’m not sure how or why this is problematic. India’s landscape is indeed gorgeous and awe-inspiring, and Ernest Day’s cinematography is stellar.

Meanwhile, the performances across the board — particularly by Davis, Ashcroft, and Banerjee:


— are outstanding, with just one exception: Lean’s selection of Alec Guinness to play a minor role as a Hindu-Brahmin professor feels decidedly antiquated and inappropriate. (They apparently didn’t get along well on set.)

However, Guinness is on screen for such little time that it doesn’t much impact the overall movie. This remains a powerful, finely crafted epic by a master director, and is well worth a one-time visit.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Victor Banerjee as Dr. Aziz
  • Judy Davis as Adela
  • Peggy Ashcroft as Mrs. Moore
  • Gorgeous cinematography
  • Excellent use of outdoor locales

Must See?
Yes, as a beautifully-mounted and haunting adaptation.

Categories

  • Important Director
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

They Live By Night (1948)

They Live By Night (1948)

“I like opening my eyes and seeing you.”

Synopsis:
An ex-con (Farley Granger) who has just escaped from prison with two compatriots — Chickamaw (Howard Da Silva) and T-Dub (Jay C. Flippen) — falls in love with the daughter (Cathy O’Donnell) of a collaborating gas station owner (Will Wright) and they are quickly married by an officiant (Ian Wolfe) who knows they’re on the run. Will Keechie (O’Donnell) and Bowie (Granger) — who is pressured into committing more crimes with Chickamaw and T-Dub — have a chance at happiness together, or will the determined wife (Helen Craig) of Chickamaw’s still-imprisoned brother take advantage of her knowledge of the criminals’ whereabouts?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Criminal Couples On the Run
  • Ex-Cons
  • Farley Granger Films
  • Newlyweds
  • Nicholas Ray Films

Review:
Nicholas Ray’s feature debut was this adaptation of Edward Anderson’s Depression-era novel Thieves Like Us (remade under its original title by Robert Altman in the 1970s). At this point in his young career, Farley Granger had just three films under his belt — The North Star (1943), The Purple Heart (1944), and Rope (1948) — while Cathy O’Donnell was best known for her breakthrough role in The Best Years of Our Lives (1946); together, they present an authentically fresh-faced couple who clearly can’t get a break, yet are given the gift of each other — for at least a short while.

Ray effectively portrays a hard-edged world in which the future happiness of a young criminal (Granger insists he was innocent when sent to jail as a teenager) is dependent on his collaboration with career-long crooks, who have no interest in giving up their life of crime, and ineluctably draw Granger back in time and again. O’Donnell, meanwhile, has been stuck living with criminals her entire life:

… and is naively desperate for a viable chance at romance and a “normal” life. Of course, everything about their courtship and marriage is tinged by the inevitable fatality of living life on the lam, so we mostly watch their travails with a sense of sadness and doom.

The film is atmospherically shot throughout, presenting a shadowy world of criminality and deception, but also moments of tentative intimacy. O’Donnell’s loyalty to Granger exists in parallel with that of Helen Craig’s Mattie, who will stop at nothing to secure the funds needed to free her own man, and plays a pivotal role in the film’s resolution.

Other supporting performances are strongly drawn as well — most notably Howard Da Silva as malicious yet insecure one-eyed Chickamaw:

… Ian Wolfe as a man used to marrying couples under all kinds of hurried circumstances:

… and Byron Foulger as an innkeeper eager to tutor his young son (Teddy Infuhr) in the ways of his craft.

Many have pointed out that this film bears similarities to Fritz Lang’s You Only Live Once (1937), and it is also often cited as the forerunner to Bonnie and Clyde (1967) — but Ray brings his own unique sensibility to the genre of “criminal couples on the run”; this one remains worth a look.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Farley Granger as Bowie
  • Cathy O’Donnell as Keechie
  • Many memorable supporting performances



  • Highly atmospheric cinematography

Must See?
Yes, as a powerful noir debut by a master filmmaker. Listed as a Cult Movie and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book. Nominated as one of the Best Pictures of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Important Director

Links: