Browsed by
Month: August 2020

Allegro Non Troppo (1976)

Allegro Non Troppo (1976)

“The greatest ambition that burns and swells in the soul of every creative animator is to illustrate music, to give visual form and color to its notes.”

Synopsis:
In a parody of Disney’s Fantasia (1940), an Italian producer (Maurizio Micheli) announces a completely novel type of movie: classical music with animated accompaniment. Meanwhile, a pompous conductor (Néstor Garay) corrals a group of old female orchestra members and bullies a harried artist (Maurizio Nichetti) who has eyes for a pretty young cleaner (Marialuisa Giovannini).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Animated Features
  • Comedy
  • Episodic Films
  • Satires and Spoofs

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that this “ambitious, moderately successful film… both pays homage to Fantasia and mocks its Disney innocence.” In showing yet again “how classical music and animation can enhance one another, the picture consists of vignettes set to the music of Debussey, Dvorak, Ravel, Sibelius, Vivaldi, and Stravisnky” — but since “this is for adults, [the] sequences have to do with sin, sex, loneliness, [and] death.” Indeed, “most of the pieces are hard-edged and sad” – but “since the animation is colorful, the animal and human characters are quirky and likable, and there is enough humor”, we “never get depressed.” The “black-and-white live-action sequences” — which are “full of slapstick humor and dealing with a Felliniesque orchestra”:

— are a mixed bag, but ultimately an indelible part of the film’s unique style; it’s easy to see how this film has been “a nice change of pace from typical repertory-theater fare” (though as Peary notes, “you have to be in the right mood to enjoy it”).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Many enjoyably eccentric, well-animated sequences



Must See?
Yes, as a cult favorite.

Categories

  • Cult Movie

Links:

Voice in the Wind (1944)

Voice in the Wind (1944)

“Every man has to fight with the weapon for which he’s best fitted — and your weapon is music.”

Synopsis:
A Czech concert pianist (Francis Lederer) tortured by the Nazis for playing Smetana’s “The Moldau” is wandering as an amnesiac on a Caribbean island, where his wife (Sigrid Gurie) lies dying from the heartache of losing him.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Amnesia
  • Flashback Films
  • Musicians
  • Refugees
  • Star-Crossed Lovers
  • World War II

Review:
This well-intended but relentlessly gloomy, tediously paced flashback drama lingers for more than 15 minutes in an ill-defined opening space (which turns out to be the refugee mid-way island of Guadaloupe in the Antilles) on an unnamed woman (Gurie) in a deathbed:

… and a pianist (Lederer) who seems to have no memory.

Once we’re finally given a glimpse back into their life together (yes, they were a couple), we see that Lederer was banished from Europe for daring to a play a Czech nationalist song during a broadcast concert:

… and is now stranded on an island by the captain of a “murder boat” (i.e., a boat intended to take refugees partway to America and no further).

Given that this film was made and released during the midst of WWII, it makes sense that audience members might be shocked to hear about this type of atrocity, and grateful for a chance to hiss at venal Nazis — but these days it simply comes across as poorly acted and overly melodramatic.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Some beautiful piano music

Must See?
No; there’s no need to seek this one out. Listed as a Sleeper and a Cult Movie in the back of Peary’s book (though I can’t imagine it currently being one).

Links:

Janis (1974)

Janis (1974)

“They always hold up something more than they’re prepared to give.”

Synopsis:
Just before her death at the age of 27, Janis Joplin rehearses, performs, tours, visits her 10th high school reunion, and discusses her art with interviewers.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Biopics
  • Singers

Review:
This documentary about legendary rock star Janis Joplin — part of the infamous “27 Club” as one among too many artists who died at such a young age — is comprised exclusively of archival footage, without any additional narration or commentary (or, for that matter, any mention of her death). Though limited, it remains a poignant piece of collated cinema that may not answer many questions, but does give us a glimpse into the life of this traumatized young singer whose life was consumed by drugs. To that end, we’re able to clearly see how high and/or out-of-it Joplin was for much of her existence, while simultaneously giving powerhouse performances that — paraphrasing her own words — were what gave her energy and purpose in life. In this footage — as in her songs — she puts it all out there, being as consistently authentic as possible. While it will be of most interest — indeed, essential viewing — for Joplin fans, I think it’s worth a look by all film fanatics for its historical value.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Many memorable sequences and songs



Must See?
Yes, as an invaluable time capsule of Joplin’s short life.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links:

My Darling Clementine (1946)

My Darling Clementine (1946)

“What kind of town is this, anyway?”

Synopsis:
When his cattle are stolen and his youngest brother (Don Garner) is murdered by a clan of local outlaws led by Old Man Clanton (Walter Brennan), Wyatt Earp (Henry Fonda) and his two other brothers — Morgan (Ward Bond) and Virgil (Tim Holt) — decide to settle in the nearby town of Tombstone, where Fonda is quickly made marshal and Morgan and Virgil are deputized. Fonda befriends an alcoholic former dentist named “Doc” Holliday (Victor Mature) whose girlfriend (Linda Darnell) is jealous when a woman (Cathy Downs) from Mature’s past, named Clementine, comes to town; meanwhile, tensions continue to brew between the Earps and the Clantons.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Henry Fonda Films
  • Historical Drama
  • John Ford Films
  • John Ireland Films
  • Linda Darnell Films
  • Revenge
  • Sheriffs and Marshals
  • Victor Mature Films
  • Walter Brennan Films
  • Ward Bond Films
  • Westerns

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that “John Ford’s stirring, beautifully photographed
(by Joe MacDonald) but flagrantly fictional account” of how the Earp brothers “cleaned up Tombstone in the 1880s” is a “different kind of western”, noting that despite the many killings and “major theme” of “violent retribution”, “it has been described as ‘lovely’, ‘poignant’, ‘nostalgic’, ‘sentimental’, ‘tender’, ‘sweet’, and ‘poetic’.” He points out that what we remember most are “Wyatt playfully leaning back on his chair and balancing himself on the street post in front of him, with one foot and then the other; Wyatt proudly escorting pretty Clementine… to the town gathering; Wyatt and Clementine dancing; and… Wyatt walking alone down the middle of the road leading to the O.K. Corral with the enormous rocks of Monument Valley in the distance.” We also “remember Cyril Mockridge’s lyrical score, using harmonicas, fiddles, guitars, and a cowboy chorus.”

Naturally, this retelling of the infamous “gunfight at the O.K. Corral” — as with nearly every other adaptation — falls far short of the truth of the story; those interested in learning more can read any of TCM’s articles about the film, Wikipedia, or Peary’s lengthy article in his Cult Movies 2 book. As Peary writes in GFTFF, “The real Wyatt Earp was a cad (also he was no marshal), but Fonda plays him as a brave, virtuous, dignified man” who is “so steadfast in his moral beliefs that he’s too predictable”, thus leading to “the morally ambiguous Holliday” being “brought into play”. Peary describes Holliday as a “tragic figure who, unlike Wyatt, cannot accept the advent of civilization because he will be rejected by society when, by all rights, he should fit in — he’s more intellectual, educated, cultured, better dressed than Wyatt”, and “also blessed with the power to cure the sick — but makes no [apparent] attempt to rid himself of consumption”.

In Cult Movies 2, Peary elaborates on “the way people relate to each other in Ford’s west” — that is, “the director’s own version of ‘realism’.” As Peary writes:

“Foes speak to one another hesitantly, with clipped dialogue so they won’t betray themselves. They’re polite but we sense hostility. Pronouns are dropped… Characters rarely change their expressions or the levels of their voices, lest they reveal their innermost thoughts… Old Man Clanton (played by the incomparable Walter Brennan) refuses to show emotion, and even at his most demonstrative, barely curls his lips into a snarl or semi-smile, or moves his big eyes… Wyatt seemingly remains calm in the face of disaster; we never know if he’s scared… To change expressions is to show vulnerability, not the wise thing to do in this west, where bluffing is as important as a quick draw.”

Indeed, as fictionalized as all the proceedings are (and boy, they certainly are), My Darling Clementine nonetheless represents an iconic vision of the West — complete with racism (Mexicans and Indians are lower-class citizens) and rampant corruption (a massive set of crimes are committed by the Clantons within the first five minutes). Visually the film is stunning, and the performances are noteworthy as well — but the story-line itself also offers plenty to chew and reflect on as we consider how we have constructed our problematic, deeply complex history of the West.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Henry Fonda as Wyatt Earp (nominated as one of the Best Actors of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars)
  • Victor Mature as Doc Holliday
  • Walter Brennan as Old Man Clanton
  • Joseph MacDonald’s cinematography

  • Fine location shooting

Must See?
Yes, as an enduring classic.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Blood of a Poet, The/Sang D’Un Poete, Le (1930)

Blood of a Poet, The/Sang D’Un Poete, Le (1930)

“Is it not crazy to wake up statues?”

Synopsis:
A poet (Enrico Rivero) experiences increasingly surreal events in his studio and after travelling through a mirror into a hotel.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Experimental Films
  • French Films
  • Jean Cocteau Films
  • Silent Films
  • Surrealism

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary describes Jean Cocteau’s “first film” as “four segments, each expressing through a series of puzzling visuals (making use of various camera tricks) the difficulty a poet has in artistically confronting ‘reality’.” He notes that the “journey of [the] poet is [a] weird trip where visual metaphors and symbols are used to emphasize the artist’s break with traditional forms”, given that “statues come to life, people turn into statues, people pass through mirrors, a [girl] flies, [and] abstract images move about the frame”. He adds that while this “classic work has long been admired by Surrealists” and avant-garde filmmakers consider it “required viewing”, “others may have to fight boredom and confusion”. While I’m suitably impressed by some of the uniquely memorable imagery, I’ll admit I fall primarily into the latter category — though it’s short enough at just 50 minutes to not be a chore to get through. I ultimately agree with Peary that while it’s “not for all tastes” it’s “interesting considering who made it and how long ago it was made.”

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Many memorably surreal images




Must See?
No, but it’s certainly worth a one-time look for its historical significance.

Links:

Good Fight, The (1984)

Good Fight, The (1984)

“There was this enormous feeling of wanting to come to grips, and not being able to.”

Synopsis:
Veterans of an American Communist militia fighting on behalf of the Spanish Republic during the Spanish Civil War reflect back on their experiences and motivations for joining this cause.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Documentary
  • Soldiers
  • Spanish Civil War
  • Veterans

Review:
I’ll admit to knowing very little about the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) prior to watching this illuminating documentary, other than the fact that Hemingway was a vocal ally of the cause and wrote For Whom the Bell Tolls about this period of history. Thankfully, back in the early 1980s, filmmakers Noel Buckner, Mary Dore, and Sam Sills decided to fill in America’s collective knowledge gap with this much-needed overview of what led to the Spanish Civil War, why a significant number (~45,000) of Americans decided to voluntarily join, what it was like for them to fight on behalf of a nation other than their own, and how the entire affair was perceived back in the U.S.

This is all highly complex — made even more so given that the American militia members (men and women, black and white) were overtly joining forces with the USSR and the Mexican Communist Party, an association which led to ostracization and blackballing once they returned back to an increasingly anti-Communist mid-century America. As the film clearly shows, their experiences in Spain were harrowing: they were underfunded, underfed, under-armed, and unexperienced, yet stayed with their cause at any cost, demonstrating the power of convictions and a desire to make a difference in the world. Listening to this feisty group of marginalized Americans discuss their willingness to sacrifice their lives to fight global fascism makes for fascinating viewing.

Note: This film was originally much more ambitious in scope, at ~6 hours long. It ended up focusing exclusively on the American militia in its ultimate 98 minute running time, but it is made clear that this truly was an international effort of militias from many nations joining the cause.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Many invaluable historical and present-day clips about the American militia’s involvement in Spain


Must See?
Yes, as a powerful historical document.

Categories

  • Historically Relevant

Links:

Great Locomotive Chase, The (1956)

Great Locomotive Chase, The (1956)

“Won’t anything stop that train?”

Synopsis:
A Union soldier (John Lupton) receiving one of the first Congressional Medals of Honor reflects back on the leader (Fess Parker) who organized him and others as spies while boldly attempting to steal a Confederate train known as the General — a plot ultimately foiled due to the persistence of the General’s conductor, William A. Fuller (Jeffrey Hunter).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Civil War
  • Fess Parker Films
  • Flashback Films
  • Historical Drama
  • Jeffrey Hunter Films
  • Soldiers
  • Spies
  • Trains and Subways

Review:
Based on the same historical episode (known as “The Great Locomotive Chase”) which inspired Buster Keaton’s The General (1926), this Disney live-action film is distinct in hewing closer to the authentic details of the event and telling the story from “the other [winning] side”. Given that the ending of the episode is known, the excitement lies in seeing the attempted act carried out (and fought against by Fuller) with such skill and bravery. Attention to historical detail with the trains is impressive as well; see TCM’s article (or Wikipedia) for more information on how similar trains were found and rented. Unfortunately, Parker — best known for playing Davey Crockett in Disney’s TV mini-series — is as dull as can be in the lead role; it’s difficult to see how he might have grown his career, given the limited range and affect he displays here. Faring much better is Hunter as Fuller, though he’s on the hissing side.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Numerous exciting, well-filmed action sequences in realistic locations and with well-matched replicas of the trains

Must See?
No; you can skip this one unless you’re a fan of the topic and historical era.

Links:

Wagon Master (1950)

Wagon Master (1950)

“Ain’t likely any posse will look for us in a Mormon wagon train, now is it?”

Synopsis:
Two young horse traders (Harry Carey and Ben Johnson) are hired by the head of a Mormon wagon train (Ward Bond) to help guide them towards their promised land. They are soon joined by a travelling “medicine man” (Alan Mowbray) and his two female assistants (Ruth Clifford and Joanne Dru), who have been stranded without water on the desert for several days. Their journey becomes even more complicated when a murderous gang (led by Charles Kemper) holds them hostage in an attempt to escape detection from the law.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Hostages
  • Joanne Dru Films
  • John Ford Films
  • Outlaws
  • Settlers
  • Ward Bond Films
  • Westerns

Review:
John Ford purportedly had two personal favorite films among his vast oeuvre: The Sun Shines Bright (1953) and this unassuming little flick about a wagon train of misfits. The protagonists (Carey and Johnson) are perfectly content with their lives of horse trading, but willing to help out a persuasive group with a clear goal — especially given how pretty one of the young Mormons (Kathleen O’Malley) is. Prior to this, however, the film is kicked off by the murderous Clegg clan, shown in the creatively shot opening sequence robbing a bank before the title song and credits begin to roll — and their arrival at the wagon train provides all the tension necessary to bring the proceedings to a climactic denouement. However, it’s the unusual pacing of the film that catches one’s attention; as noted in TCM’s article:

The story often pauses to revel in the characters dancing, whittling or singing (the soundtrack is packed with old Western songs), and to show pastoral sequences of the wagons simply moving through the landscape or crossing a river. These scenes become the emotional core of the film, and they undoubtedly are what Ford was so satisfied to have achieved.

Apparently the film’s production was an enjoyable family affair, with Ford’s brother, daughter, and son all involved in some way. Ultimately, this western is a must-see for Ford fans or for those, as DVD Savant writes, “who like ‘pure’ westerns that showcase good horse riding and other cowboy skills”.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Excellent location shooting
  • An appropriately rugged depiction of wagon trains

Must See?
No, but it slowly grows on you and is worth a look.

Links:

Stranger on Horseback (1955)

Stranger on Horseback (1955)

“That’s the funny thing about the Bannermans: folks are always picking on ’em.”

Synopsis:
A circuit judge (Joel McCrea) rides into the town of Bannerman and learns that everything is controlled by patriarch Josiah Bannerman (John McIntire), whose son (Kevin McCarthy) has just killed an innocent man, and whose niece (Miroslava) is determined to protect her family at any cost. Can McCrea convince at least a few of the town’s inhabitants to give law and order a chance?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Jacques Tourneur Films
  • Joel McCrea Films
  • John Carradine Films
  • John McIntire Films
  • Judges
  • Kevin McCarthy Films
  • Westerns

Review:
Jacques Tourneur directed this nifty, economically scripted western about “law and order” — in the form of a circuit judge on horseback:

— arriving in a town which is bound and determined to retain the Mafia-like stronghold of its founding family. Through a series of interactions with the family’s skulking “lawyer” (John Carradine):

we’re quickly shown exactly how much of a stranglehold the Bannermans have on all aspects of life in the town — with the strong and automatic assumption that anyone daring to question the status quo will either be brought into the Bannermans’ fold or bullied out. The film’s omnipresent protagonist is Judge Thorne (stalwart McCrea):

… a man ready and willing to push back against this assumption at every turn. He may be temporarily seduced by beautiful Miroslava:

but quickly gets back on track with his investigation, fighting the forces of both irascible Bannerman Sr. (McIntire is a bully with a childishly petulant bent) and Bannerman Jr. (McCarthy is chillingly sociopathic).

Close attention is paid to detail throughout the film: a cat lounges on the sheriff’s desk in full view; McIntire sits cross-legged (he and his son are selfish children at heart) on a table outside his residence while preventing Miroslava’s would-be suitor (Robert Cornthwaite) from sitting down in a chair nearby.

The supporting roles are filled with great care, including a jumpy town drunk (Emmett Lynn) who literally can’t stay still, and a frightened neighbor (Walter Baldwin) who tries to convince his pretty daughter (Nancy Gates) that she has no realistic chance of breaking into the Bannerman clan through marriage.

Much of the film is shot on location in Sedona, Arizona and Placerita Canyon, California, and the natural sets are gorgeous — though the entire print needs a serious clean-up and restoration.

A couple of minor quibbles include the score (which doesn’t seem to quite jibe with the proceedings) and the oddly paced ending, which leaves several questions unanswered. But overall, this remains a fine and worthy film to seek out.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Excellent performances by the entire cast (including minor supporting roles)

  • A strong sense of direction and detail
  • Lovely (if badly-in-need-of-restoration) Ansco Color cinematograpy

Must See?
Yes, as a dandy little western.

Categories

  • Good Show

Links:

Intruder in the Dust (1949)

Intruder in the Dust (1949)

“I don’t want help — I pays my way.”

Synopsis:
A falsely accused black man (Juano Hernandez) in Mississippi seeks help from a white teenager (Claude Jarman, Jr.) and his lawyer-uncle (David Brian) in finding evidence that will exonerate him. Meanwhile, an angry white mob is demanding a lynching, yet unexpected help comes from a feisty and righteous older white woman (Elizabeth Patterson) who knows it’s her duty to step in.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • African-Americans
  • Clarence Brown Films
  • David Brian Films
  • Deep South
  • Falsely Accused
  • Juano Hernandez Films
  • Lawyers
  • Murder Mystery
  • Race Relations and Racism

Review:
This adaptation of William Faulkner’s 1948 Nobel Prize-winning novel — directed by Clarence Brown and scripted by Ben Maddow — remains a unique Hollywood film for its era, featuring a ground-breaking performance by Hernandez as a fiercely independent African-American man who refuses to accept racism or denigration on any level.

The film centers on a young man (Jarman) steeped in his town’s culture of white supremacy, forced to acknowledge and deal with the cognitive distortions that arise when his life is saved by Hernandez and Hernandez rejects payment of any kind. Jarman’s anger at Hernandez — including his desire for the “revenge” of paying Hernandez to complete their “transaction” — is a bold narrative choice, refusing to sugarcoat the intensely personal and challenging process of dismantling racism. Indeed, the entire film could be viewed as an exercise in revealing and exposing racism on every level — from the overtly murderous cries of the lynch-happy white mob, to Jarman’s internalized fury, to Brian’s initial conviction that nothing can ultimately save Hernandez, regardless of his guilt or innocence.

The storyline is atmospherically filmed (by Robert Surtees) throughout, with the very-real threat of white violence present around every corner, adding to the film’s authentic sense of danger — yet there are pleasant surprises as well, primarily the inclusion of a feisty old woman (Patterson) who accepts that it’s her responsibility to help out in whatever way she can.

Indeed, without Patterson’s seemingly random presence as Jarman is talking about the matter with Brian, the film wouldn’t progress as it does. The scene of Patterson and Elzie Emanuel (playing the teenage son of Jarman’s family servants) driving along in her rickety jalopy to the cemetery while Jarman rides a horse in front of them is a truly surreal one:

as is the entire scene that ensues. The gradual discovery of proof exonerating Hernandez is simultaneously miraculous and numbingly mundane — a vivid anecdote of how many black men in American have been killed on circumstantial “evidence” alone.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Juano Hernandez as Lucas Beauchamp
  • David Brian as John Stevens
  • Elizabeth Patterson as Miss Eunice
  • Claude Jarman, Jr. as Chick Mallison
  • Atmospheric cinematography

  • Ben Maddow’s fine script

Must See?
Yes, as an unusual and still-powerful tale of racial (in)justice.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Historically Relevant

Links: