Browsed by
Month: August 2013

It Should Happen to You (1954)

It Should Happen to You (1954)

“The whole reason I came to New York in the first place was to make a name for myself.”

Synopsis:
Hoping to “rise above the crowd” in New York, a young woman named Gladys Glover (Judy Holliday) rents a billboard for three months and places her name on it, much to the consternation of her new boyfriend (Jack Lemmon). When a businessman (Peter Lawford) hoping to rent the space himself offers Gladys six other billboards in exchange, a “Gladys Glover” phenomenon soon sweeps the city.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Advertising
  • Aspiring Stars
  • George Cukor Films
  • Jack Lemmon Films
  • Judy Holliday Films
  • Media Spectacle
  • Peter Lawford Films
  • Romantic Comedy

Review:
Judy Holliday’s third collaboration with director George Cukor and screenwriter Garson Kanin — after Born Yesterday (1950) and The Marrying Kind (1952) — was this modestly enjoyable satire about the follies of instant fame. The premise is years ahead of its time, and won’t feel foreign to a current generation of viewers raised on “reality T.V.”; yet Kanin’s script fails to exploit the situation to its full potential, with gullible public citizens depicted as far too naive, and Holliday’s publicist (Michael O’Shea) presented as simply a money-grubbing shyster. Another concern is that Holliday’s protagonist isn’t particularly likable: while her naive desire to “be somebody” is cute at first, we (like Lemmon) quickly grow weary of her inability to recognize the emptiness of her quest. Speaking of Lemmon, his infatuation with Holliday is equally suspect. Sure, this is a romantic comedy, and we shouldn’t spend too much time analyzing the logic of desire; but Lemmon’s initial inflammatory criticism of Holliday’s actions comes across so strong that we wonder why in the world he remains attracted and committed to her (despite her charms). Meanwhile, Lemmon’s occupation as a documentary filmmaker feels simply like a convenient plot device, one that brings him together with Holliday during their “meet cute” in Central Park, and nicely wraps things up at the end; but how he actually makes a living at this craft is left unexplained. On a more positive note, Cukor effectively utilizes authentic New York locations, and Holliday’s comedic performance is as stellar as always — making this a one-time must-see title.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Judy Holliday as Gladys Glover (nominated as one of the Best Actresses of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars)
  • Jack Lemmon (in his film debut) as Pete
  • Nice use of authentic New York settings
  • A clever premise

Must See?
Yes, simply for Holliday’s iconic performance. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Important Director
  • Noteworthy Performance(s)

Links:

Wuthering Heights (1954)

Wuthering Heights (1954)

“A minute after you left, you were already back with me for good.”

Synopsis:
When her childhood soulmate (Jorge Mistral) returns after many years away, Catalina (Irasema Dilian) — despite being married (to Ernesto Alonso) and expecting a child — acknowledges that she’s never stopped loving Alejandro (Mistral). Meanwhile, her husband’s sister (Lilia Prado) foolishly tries to seduce Mistral, and her alcoholic brother (Luis Aceves Castaneda) feels increasing resentment over Mistral’s newfound financial success.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Cecil Kellaway Films
  • Luis Bunuel Films
  • Star-Crossed Lovers

Review:
Made during his “Mexican period”, Luis Bunuel’s adaptation of Emily Bronte’s classic Gothic novel at first seems like a curious choice for the famed surrealist filmmaker — until one recognizes his fascination with the star-crossed couple’s l’amour fou. Unfortunately, Bunuel’s vision of Bronte’s story — which he sets in a barren Mexican desert landscape rather than wind-swept moors — isn’t entirely successful. His decision to eliminate all scenes from Catalina and Alejandro’s childhood, instead starting the story with Alejandro’s return as an adult, prevents us from understanding either the depth of their enduring passion for one another, or the rationale for Alejandro’s bitter resentment towards Catalina’s snobbish brother; also missing is narration by the family’s housekeeper, who (in the novel and in William Wyler’s highly regarded 1939 adaptation) provides a valuable perspective on affairs. The result is an overly melodramatic tale that lacks narrative depth, and at times comes across like merely a condensed telenovela.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Atmospheric cinematography

Must See?
No; this one is only must-see for Bunuel completists, or Bronte fans.

Links:

Bells Are Ringing (1960)

Bells Are Ringing (1960)

“What a perfect relationship: I can’t see him, he can’t see me!”

Synopsis:
A benevolent answering service operator (Judy Holliday) tries to help her clients succeed in their careers by passing along information she hears, but her do-gooding efforts are threatened by a detective (Dort Clark) who believes she and her colleagues are running a house of ill repute; meanwhile, she falls in love with a client (Dean Martin) who knows her only as an older woman he calls “Mom”.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Dean Martin Films
  • Judy Holliday Films
  • Mistaken or Hidden Identities
  • Musicals
  • Romantic Comedy
  • Vincente Minnelli Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary writes that Judy Holliday’s final movie — in which she “reprised her Broadway role as a Brooklyn answering-service operator who uses her knowledge of her clients’ difficulties to help them out, without divulging who she is and how she knows their problems”:

— is “overlong and not particularly smooth”; but he argues that “Holliday, even below her peak, is well worth watching”. He notes that “one interesting point is that Holliday’s ‘dumb blonde’ is much more stable than the men in the film — however, her support for them, including Martin, comes more out of her need to be a mother than a friend or lover”.

I’ll admit to finding this Vincente Minnelli-directed musical (with songs by Betty Comden, Adolph Green, and Jules Styne) one of the least compelling Holliday vehicles listed in Peary’s GFTFF; even Holliday’s naturally engaging presence can’t do much to elevate the storyline. The primary problem, as Peary hints, is that Martin and Holliday lack any real romantic tension: their “meet cute” (with Holliday crawling around Martin’s apartment after surreptitiously trying to wake him up for an important appointment) is poorly handled (why does he accept her presence so easily?), and Martin only seems to fall in love with Holliday because of her power as a muse. Meanwhile, the subplot involving thick-headed Clark’s pursuit of Holliday comes across as equally inane. This one is only must-see for diehard fans of Holliday and/or musicals.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Judy Holliday as Ella

Must See?
No, though naturally Hollidays fans will want to check it out at least once.

Links:

How Green Was My Valley (1941)

How Green Was My Valley (1941)

“There is no fence nor hedge around time that is gone. You can go back and have what you like of it, if you can remember.”

Synopsis:
The youngest child (Roddy McDowall) in a large Welsh family watches his father (Donald Crisp) and brothers (Patric Knowles, John Loder, Richard Fraser, Evan S. Evans, and James Monks) struggle to survive as coal miners, while his mother (Sara Allgood) attempts to provide a stable home, and his sister (Maureen O’Hara) falls in love with a penniless preacher (Walter Pidgeon).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Anna Lee Films
  • Barry Fitzgerald Films
  • Coming of Age
  • Donald Crisp Films
  • John Ford Films
  • Maureen O’Hara Films
  • Mining Towns
  • Roddy McDowell Films
  • Walter Pidgeon Films

Review:
Though Peary doesn’t review this John Ford adaptation of Richard Llewellyn’s 1939 novel in his GFTFF, he does briefly mention it in Alternate Oscars, where he refers to it as a “sensitive memory piece”, but then quickly moves on to designate Citizen Kane as the truly worthy Best Picture winner that year; indeed, HGWMV continues to suffer in many film fanatics’ eyes from what they consider the “injustice” of this decision. I read Llewellyn’s lengthy novel (supposedly autobiographical — though it actually wasn’t) many years ago, and recall being disappointed with how much of its meaty content was necessarily truncated from Philip Dunne’s screenplay; revisiting the film again recently, however, I’m impressed by the economy of Dunne’s script, and Ford’s ability to condense Llewellyn’s vision into a memorable 2-hour film. It’s been noted that HGWMV represents an initial attempt by Ford (eleven years before he made and released The Quiet Man) to evoke nostalgia for his own heritage — albeit in Wales rather than Ireland (and it’s also been duly noted how terrible most of the actors’ attempts at Welsh accents are). However, while The Quiet Man exists in the realm of escapist nostalgic fantasy, HGWMV doesn’t shy away from truly difficult issues — such as the Morgan family’s ongoing quest to earn a decent living as coal miners, despite increasing efforts by mine owners to lower wages.

As the film opens, the Morgans are represented in an idealized fashion: McDowall’s brothers are strapping, his sister gorgeous, his parents stern but loving, and coal mining is viewed as a beloved, honorable profession. However, it’s quickly revealed that life will present an unending series of challenges for this group of strong-minded individuals. Crisp and his sons don’t see eye-to-eye on issues of unionization; O’Hara is asked to set aside her love for Pidgeon in order to marry (unhappily) for money; and McDowall, while clearly gifted (and, as the youngest child, somewhat spoiled) suffers from a debilitating injury, and must ultimately make a difficult decision regarding his future livelihood. Indeed, for a nostalgic historical drama, HGWMV is filled with a surprising number of genuinely distressing scenes; it’s to Ford’s credit that HGWMV remains so lighthearted in overall spirit while simultaneously avoiding designation as a “feel good” film. It should also be noted that Ford mostly avoids his general tendency to incorporate comedic supporting actors for levity; the only instance of this is in the character of Dai Bando (Rhys Williams), McDowell’s boxing teacher, and his presence does indeed provide some welcome relief.

The production values for HGWMV — shot in the hills of Malibu, given wartime climate in Europe — are uniformly stellar. Arthur C. Miller’s b&w cinematography is consistently stunning, and Ford frames each scene with his characteristically considerate eye. Scene after scene has lasting visual impact, from the image of Welsh coal miners singing as they wend their way to and from work, to the strategically choreographed wedding scene between O’Hara and her wealthy suitor (Marten Lamont), to crippled McDowell’s attempts to walk to Pidgeon on the hillside. The performances are equally top-notch: Crisp and Allgood are perfectly cast as the heads of the Morgan clan; O’Hara is stunning in her breakthrough role; and it’s difficult to imagine anyone but McDowell in the lead role (though a different actor should perhaps have been considered to play his character in the final scenes of the film, given how many formative years have supposedly passed, and how youthful McDowall still looks). But this is a minor complaint about a film that remains surprisingly poignant all these years later, despite its enduringly bad rap as the film that “stole” Citizen Kane‘s award. (And yes, Citizen Kane — one of my top-five favorite films — DID ultimately deserve the award. But that’s beside the point.)

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Roddy McDowall as Huw
  • Maureen O’Hara as Angharad
  • Donald Crisp as Mr. Morgan
  • Sara Allgood as Mrs. Morgan
  • Arthur C. Miller’s cinematography

  • Impressive sets (built in the hills of Malibu)
  • Fine direction by Ford

Must See?
Yes, as an enduring Ford classic. Listed as a film with Historical Importance and a Personal Recommendation in the back of Peary’s book.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Important Director
  • Oscar Winner or Nominee

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Marrying Kind, The (1952)

Marrying Kind, The (1952)

“You don’t seem to remember anything — and when you do, you remember it all wrong.”

Synopsis:
A couple (Judy Holliday and Aldo Ray) on the brink of divorce relate the story of their rocky marriage to a sympathetic judge (Madge Kennedy).

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Aldo Ray Films
  • Divorce
  • Flashback Films
  • George Cukor Films
  • Judy Holliday Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Romantic Comedy

Response to Peary’s Review:
Peary accurately argues that this “captivating film” — directed by George Cukor, and scripted by Ruth Gordon and Garson Kanin — is “way ahead of its time” in its hard-hitting blend of “comedy and extreme tragedy”, telling the tale of a “lower-middle-class couple [who] experience a kind of therapy” while relating their story to a judge, “revealing feelings that they never expressed to each other”. He writes that while Holliday and Ray’s characters clearly “loved each other”, they “have ego problems which could be solved if they just expressed their true feelings for each other”. He notes that they “seemed to bring each other bad luck”, citing an instance he refers to as “one of the most painful scenes in movie history”, in which Holliday “has the opportunity to win a lot of money on a radio quiz by correctly naming a tune”, but instead “gives Ray’s guess instead of her own and they lose”.

I actually don’t find this scene particularly painful, given Holliday’s loving attempts to smooth the situation over: “Money you get that way doesn’t do you any good”, she reassures her depressed husband. It’s a later, tragic scene — one following on the heels of Holliday singing a delightful ditty (“Dolores”) while strumming a ukelele — that tears me up inside each time I think of it (though I won’t say more at risk of spoiling).

Indeed, Kanin and Gordon’s willingness to include truly hard-hitting scenes such as this one is part of what sets The Marrying Kind apart from other romantic comedies of its era. Equally innovative is their incorporation of voice-overs during flashback scenes, as we hear either Ray or Holliday telling their version of what happened while we simultaneously watch the “truth” unfold in front of us; it’s a remarkably effective strategy, shaking us out of our complacency as viewers.

Hunky newcomer Aldo Ray was an interesting choice to play Holliday’s postman-husband, Chet. While he suits the bill nicely in many ways (he’s believable as a blue collar worker, and seems invested in his role), his acting lacks nuance at times. More than making up for this, however, is Holliday, who gives a typically stellar performance as Florence (a.k.a. Florrie). In Alternate Oscars, Peary names Holliday Best Actress of the Year, noting that the role “was designed as a showcase for her, to prove that she had enough versatility to play in all kinds of films and that she could play a real character”. He writes that “like other Holliday characters, Florence is funny and endearing, and has a singular logic about life, which completely befuddles everyone else, including Chet… She seeks happiness along a rocky road, stubbornly refusing to compromise her way of doing things”. Yet he points out that “she can be extremely aggravating, insensitive, unsupportive, unforgiving, even selfish” — in other words, she’s an equal partner in the dissolution of her marriage. Holliday’s performance makes this film must-see viewing at least once, though the film itself is also a hidden gem.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Judy Holliday as Florrie (named Best Actress of the Year in Alternate Oscars)
  • Ruth Gordon and Garson Kanin’s creative, incisive script

Must See?
Yes, as an unsung classic, and for Holliday’s performance.

Categories

  • Good Show
  • Important Director

Links:

Quiet Man, The (1952)

Quiet Man, The (1952)

“I’m Sean Thornton and I was born in that little cottage. I’m home, and home I’m going to stay.”

Synopsis:
An Irish-American ex-boxer (John Wayne) returning to his birth town falls in love with a beautiful, red-headed lass named Mary Kate (Maureen O’Hara) — but their happiness is foiled when Mary Kate’s bullish brother Will (Victor McLaglen) refuses to relinquish her dowry, Mary Kate refuses to consummate their marriage without it, and Sean (Wayne) refuses to confront Will.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Barry Fitzgerald Films
  • Battle-of-the-Sexes
  • Ireland
  • John Ford Films
  • John Wayne Films
  • Marital Problems
  • Maureen O’Hara Films
  • Romantic Comedy
  • Victor McLaglen Films
  • Ward Bond Films

Response to Peary’s Review:
After noting that John Ford visited his parents’ birthplace of County Galway in Ireland to “make this classic”, Peary writes that “the rolling countryside is so green, the village of Innisfree is so quaint, and the people whom [Ford’s] stock company portrays are so charmingly eccentric that we understand his love for his native land”. In his more extensive review of the film for Cult Movies 3 (where he refers to The Quiet Man as “the cult movie of the American Irish who are nostalgic for their homeland”), he goes into detail about the film’s production history — including the many years it took Ford to get his dream project off the ground, and the fact that it was truly a “family affair”, with siblings and children of not only Ford but Wayne, O’Hara, Barry Fitzgerald, and McLaglen involved (!). Peary describes the movie as “leisurely paced, lovely-to-look-at, [and] spiritedly acted”, but wonders if Ford and DP Winton C. Hoch were “trying to capture the look of a fairy tale or one of Ford’s daydreams about Ireland”; he further argues that — just like in Ford’s westerns, which are filled with stereotypical stock characters — this film represents Ford’s vision of a “romanticized, ideal Ireland”, rather than a more “authentic” Ireland. [That latter vision — driven by Irish filmmakers themselves — would come right around the time Peary’s book was published, with movies such as Jim Sheridan’s My Left Foot (1987) and Neil Jordan’s The Crying Game (1992).]

In his GFTFF, Peary analyzes the film’s sexual politics, noting that Mary Kate’s refusal to “consummate [her] marriage if she doesn’t have the dowry” makes her like a “modern woman”, given that she “doesn’t want to enter a relationship unless it’s on equal terms”. He writes how refreshing it is that, despite their obvious challenges, Mary Kate and Sean ultimately both view each other with maturity, love, and respect. Mary Kate “decides to have sex with Sean although he has not come through for her”, given that she “senses that he has reasons for not challenging her brother, although she herself may not understand them”. Similarly, Sean “challenges Will for Mary Kate’s sake”, conceding “that her reasons for wanting the dowry are not trivial, although he doesn’t understand them”. Peary goes on to note that “there’s so much Irish humor in this film and so many quirky characters that one tends to overlook that just below the surface there is much seriousness, hurt, and guilt; both Sean and Mary Kate are tormented in real ways and we feel for them”.

Finally, Peary points out that while “Ford was never known for ‘love scenes’… the silent passage in which Sean and O’Hara hold hands, race for shelter from the sudden rain, and then stop, clutch (he drapes his sweater over her), and kiss as the rain soaks through their clothing is incredibly sexy”; I agree. Wayne and O’Hara are both in top form here, and are indeed — as Peary notes — “one of the screen’s most romantic couples”. In Alternate Oscars, Peary names Wayne Best Actor of the Year for The Quiet Man, and provides a detailed analysis of why this performance was one of Wayne’s best and “most relaxed”. He notes that Sean “is Wayne’s gentlest character”, that he’s “formidable” but without McLaglen’s “need to be a bully or braggart”. As Peary writes, “He has such confidence in his masculinity that he is polite, emotional, sentimental, and sweet enough to plant roses”, never “hid[ing] his love from Mary Kate, [and] never assum[ing] a paternal or authoritarian stance with her”. Indeed, it’s easy to see why O’Hara would fall in love with him — though naturally, she’s equally appealing, for her own reasons. This romantic couple is one we truly enjoy watching on screen.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Maureen O’Hara as feisty Mary Kate Danaher (nominated as one of the Best Actresses of the Year in Peary’s Alternate Oscars)
  • John Wayne as Sean Thornton (voted Best Actor of the Year in Alternate Oscars)
  • Barry Fitzgerald as Michaleen Oge Flynn
  • Plenty of romantic tension between Wayne and O’Hara
  • Excellent use of authentic Irish countryside
  • Oscar-winning cinematography by Winton C. Hoch

Must See?
Yes, as one of Ford’s finest films. Nominated as one of the Best Films of the Year in Alternate Oscars.

Categories

  • Genuine Classic
  • Important Director

(Listed in 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die)

Links:

Phffft (1954)

Phffft (1954)

“I’m no longer interested in beds.”

Synopsis:
A recently divorced husband (Jack Lemmon) and wife (Judy Holliday) navigate the tricky world of dating while gradually recognizing that they’re still in love with one another.

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Divorce
  • Flashback Films
  • Jack Carson Films
  • Jack Lemmon Films
  • Judy Holliday Films
  • Kim Novak Films
  • Mark Robson Films
  • Romantic Comedy

Review:
Judy Holliday and Jack Lemmon are perfectly paired in this sprightly romantic comedy (directed by Mark Robson, and scripted by George Axelrod) about a recently divorced couple who are clearly meant to end up right back in one another’s arms; with this understanding fully in mind, one watches the couple’s quibbling and travails with a sense of bemusement rather than discomfort. The film isn’t entirely successful, with some scenes working better than others: for instance, Holliday’s first post-divorce date — with the narcissistic star (Donald Curtis) of her hit radio show — is played much too broadly:

… but her scenes with the inimitable Jack Carson (as Lemmon’s playboy roommate) go in unexpected directions:

… and Lemmon’s dalliance with a sexy young student (Kim Novak, having fun channeling Marilyn Monroe):

… is an interesting foreshadowing of his scenes as traumatized Oscar Madison interacting with the Pigeon sisters in The Odd Couple (1968).

My favorite scenario, however, is a wordless one in which Holliday and Lemmon meet each other unexpectedly on the dance floor, flaunting their new moves (they’ve both taken dance lessons) while doing the mambo; one wonders how long it took them to coordinate their physical timing, and to learn to dance so perfectly awkwardly.

(All of this is made doubly impressive knowing that Holliday was sick as a dog throughout most of the shooting, and reported feeling like she was sleep-walking through many of her scenes.) Another fun scene has Lemmon — cautiously exercising his newly single muscles while driving a sporty car — attempting to flirt with a sexy woman on the sidewalk, only to have her turn around and reveal she’s Holliday.


Silly? Yes. Unrealistic? Sure. But Holliday and Lemmon are such gifted comedians that we can’t help enjoying their work together throughout this light-hearted romp. If only all divorces were so easily remedied.

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Judy Holliday as Nina
  • Jack Carson as Charlie
  • Lemmon and Holliday’s hilarious dancing scene

Must See?
No, though it’s definitely recommended simply for the performances.

Links:

Hold Back the Dawn (1941)

Hold Back the Dawn (1941)

“We are like two trains, halted for a moment at the same station, but we are going in different directions. We can’t change our course, any more than we can hold back the dawn.”

Synopsis:
A Romanian gigolo (Charles Boyer) living near the U.S./Mexico border hopes to gain entrance to the U.S. by marrying a naive young schoolteacher (Olivia de Havilland) — but will his jealous lover (Paulette Goddard) foil his plans?

Genres, Themes, Actors, and Directors:

  • Charles Boyer Films
  • Con-Artists
  • Immigrants and Immigration
  • Mitchell Leisen Films
  • Olivia de Havilland Films
  • Paulette Goddard Films
  • Romance

Review:
Mitchell Leisen directed this far-fetched but touching romance set in the “gritty” (albeit highly sanitized) world of immigration limbo. Much about the screenplay (written by Charles Brackett and Billy Wilder, based on a story by Ketti Frings) defies belief: would Boyer really be so instantly successful with the first woman he tries to woo? Would de Havilland really be so instantly swayed by his charms?

(And why in the world was beautiful de Havilland so consistently cast in “plain Jane” roles?) Regardless, Hold Back the Dawn is meant to function purely as Hollywood escapist fare, and to that end it works reasonably well. Despite knowing that de Havilland is being duped, we can’t help enjoying the blossoming of her romance with Boyer, given our conviction that Boyer will surely come to see the folly of his ways. The screenplay is nicely book-ended by Boyer’s character visiting a Hollywood studio and attempting to sell his story to a director (Leisen himself, in cameo); watch for fun cameos as well by Veronica Lake and Richard Webb, shown rehearsing a clip from Leisen’s I Wanted Wings (1941).

Redeeming Qualities and Moments:

  • Charles Boyer as George (nominated by Peary as one of the Best Actors of the Year in his Alternate Oscars)
  • Olivia de Havilland as Emmy (nominated by Peary as one of the Best Actresses of the Year in Alternate Oscars)

Must See?
No, though it’s certainly recommended.

Links: